Cleaner Technology Projects in Denmark 1997

Examination of Beet Lifting and Beet Cleaning in an Armer Salmon and in a TIM Beet Digger

Undersøgelse af roeoptagningen og –rensning i en Armer Salmon og en TIM roeoptager
Arbejdsrapport nr. 46, 1997, Miljøstyrelsen

Danisco Sugar initiated in 1993 a project called "Rene Roer" (clean beets) which purpose was to ensure that the sugar beets were brought to the factories as clean as possible, and if possible so clean that further cleaning at the factory would be unnecessary. In this phase of the project there has been focused on the possibilities of improving the cleaning conditions in the beet diggers partly by lifting the beets with as little adjacent soil as possible, and partly by installing extra cleaning modules in the harvesters.

During the 1995 campaign two experimental beet harvesters from Armer Salmon (Ireland) and TIM (Denmark) were tested in 4 fields in East-Denmark under different harvesting conditions and with different additional cleaning equipment.

Armer lifts the beets by drawing in the top, and the beets are fixed between two belts and led to topping and mechanical cleaning in the harvester. The beets are oriented and positioned fixed between the belts for further cleaning with brushes and/or air, and these cleaning methods were tested in the harvester.

TIM lifts the beets by squeezing and pushing up the beets from the earth by means of the so-called oppel wheels. This method results in large amounts of soil being lifted into the harvester, and the demands on an effective cleaning will be heavy. Harvesting by oppel wheels and a subsequent cleaning in star wheels are standard practice in Denmark.

The comparison of the two harvesting principles with subsequent cleaning in the cleaning devices mounted by the supplier showed that under ideal/good harvesting conditions as well as under good/hard harvesting conditions the TIM harvester produced beets with less residual soil than the Armer harvester.

The cleaning modules (brushes and air nozzles) for the Armer harvester were constructed and mounted at the harvester under great consideration of the initial construction of the harvester, i.e. at the belts where space was left over. No greater changes of the construction of the harvester were made in order to make allowance for orientation and single beet cleaning.

Consequently, the effect of the mentioned additional cleaning modules was minimal. For brushes as well as for compressed air it means that the contact times of 0.4 sec. and 0.07 sec., respectively, should be essentially increased in order to have some effect, and the cleaning should be more oriented to the places of the beet where the soil is actually found.

Author/ institution

Franck B. Hansen, Flemming Hansen og Bjarne Fallesen, Danisco Sugar

This report is subsidised by the National Council for Recycling and Cleaner Technology

ISSN no. 0908-9195
ISBN no. 87-7810-812-8