Udvikling af metode til testning af udvaskning af organiske stoffer fra jord og restprodukter

Executive Summary

Summary

As part of a comprehensive legislative effort in the area of soil protection and soil remediation, a new statutory order on the utilisation of soil and certain inorganic waste materials for building and construction purposes has been issued (Miljøstyrelsen, 2000). In previous regulation, requirements on soil and waste materials to be utilised only concerned total or partial contents of regulated substances, determined by chemical analysis of the solid materials. The new statutory order also prescribes testing of the leaching of trace elements and salts under specified conditions and sets leaching limit values, which must be met by soil and inorganic waste materials in order to allow their use in certain applications.

Practical experiences with testing of the leaching of organics from contaminated soil and (largely) inorganic waste materials are limited, and very few well-established test procedures exist for the examination of the leaching behaviour of organic contaminants. In order to improve this situation a study has been carried out with the objective to evaluate primarily the technical feasibility of using leaching tests for the characterisation and classification of the leaching of organic components from contaminated soil and inorganic waste materials.

The project has benefited from previous work on the behaviour of organic components in soil and groundwater carried out under the auspices of the Danish Environmental Protection Agency (DEPA). A state-of-the-art overview of the processes and factors controlling the leaching/desorption of organic compounds from soil and waste materials has been established. Based on this information and experience from experimental work, the preconditions and limitations of various test methods and test principles related to leaching of organic compounds from soil and (largely) inorganic waste materials have been evaluated.

By grouping the relevant organic compounds according to their physical/chemical properties in relation to their distribution in a combined air-water-soil system, they have been classified in relation to the feasibility and relevance of testing their leaching from soul and waste materials.

Based on the collected information and the classification of the organic compounds, some of the leaching procedures have been tested experimentally on 5 selected samples of contaminated soil. Some of the results have been compared to results of fugacity/total analysis based distribution calculations performed on the same samples.

Finally, an overall evaluation of the compiled information has been performed, and a number of recommendations concerning the development of methods for the determination of the leaching of certain organic compounds from contaminated soil is given. A first preliminary draft version of a test protocol is presented.

Conclusions and recommendations

Through the collection and compilation of experience and data from literature, a number of factors of importance to further developments of test procedures for examination of the leaching of organic compounds from soil and waste materials have been identified:
When organic compounds are present in contaminated soil and waste materials as free phases, the leachability of these organic compounds will be controlled by their water solubility. If no free phase of an organic compound is present, or the free phase is totally dissolved, the leaching will be controlled by desorption from the solid particles of the soil/waste material.
Dissolution from free and residual phases of organic compounds in soil is a relative fast process (minutes to hours). The course of the release of organic compounds from a free phase may be predicted if the composition of the free phase is known. This would, however, require additional information on the properties of the compounds and the soil. Such information is often difficult to procure.
Desorption of organic compounds from soil is often a slow process (days to weeks). Desorption rates are difficult to predict, probably because they depend both on the organic compounds and the soils in question. Slow desorption rates are seen in particular for hydrophobic compounds. There are indications that "young" soil types in general are characterised by exhibiting relatively fast desorption rates and small hysteresis effects, whereas the opposite is true for geologically older soil types. Except for determinations of the O/C ratio, which increases with the age of the soil, no easy or well-established methods for the determination of the age of soils exist. It should be noted that top -soils in some cases may consist of or contain geologically old materials.
A general impression of the expected sorption capacity of a soil may be based on a determination of its content of natural organic carbon. Furthermore, the above mentioned ratio between oxygen and carbon (O/C) is considered an indicator of the age of the solid organic carbon present in the soil. Low values of O/C indicate that the organic material is old and that low desorption rates may consequently be expected.
In relation to testing of the leaching of organic compounds it is of key importance that their release from soils in many cases will be controlled by desorption kinetics. This has an impact on the required contact time between the soil and the leaching agent in the test. Considerations should be given to the determination of realistic contact times under field conditions for relevant physical scenarios. It seems obvious to attempt to develop test systems, which ensure that equilibrium-like conditions between the organic compounds in the solid phase and the leaching agent, respectively, are achieved. In those cases where long time periods are required to achieve equilibrium-like conditions, this would not necessarily be a suitable criterion for establishing the contact time. The reason for this is partly the impracticability of long contact times, partly the fact that equilibrium-like conditions are not always attained in the field.
Most of the above mentioned factors, which influence and are of importance to the leaching of organic compounds from soil/contaminated soil, may be expected to be of similar importance to the leaching of organic compounds from (largely) inorganic waste materials. However, for many such waste materials the organic contaminants constitute a more or less integral part of the materials themselves, whereas for soils they normally are associated only with the surface or the pores of the particles. In contrast to soil, a number of waste materials may react chemically with water when they are moistened or percolated, which e.g. may give rise to more extreme pH values in the water phase than usually seen for soils.

Based on the in formation collected on test methodology and the experimental work conducted in this study, a number of factors of importance to the development of a batch leaching test for organic compounds have been identified:
A certain minimum of pre-treatment of a soil or waste sample is necessary to ensure sufficient homogenisation of the sample. Such pretreatment procedures should be gentle and should in many cases be carried out within a closed system to minimise loss by evaporation of volatile organic components. This means either that sieving and crushing of the sample is not possible, or that a certain loss by evaporation must be accepted.
The liquid to solid ratio (L/S) is of key importance to the performance of a leaching test and the interpretation of the results. The leaching experiments performed in this study were carried out at L/S = 2 l/kg, which in many cases approaches the lowest practicable L/S ratio at which a batch leaching test can be executed. The practical difficulties with suspended particles in the system combined with the need for relatively large volumes of eluate for chemical analysis have meant that the use of the low L/S value has not been optimal from all perspectives. During the performance of the batch tests, the headspace (the volume of air) in the test bottles has been minimised in order to reduce the loss of volatile organic compounds and to reduce the amount of oxygen in the test systems
The separation of the eluate from the solid phase has turned out to a very critical part of the leaching test procedure. Compared to the application of a similar procedure to the testing of the leaching of trace elements and inorganic salts, the separation procedure for organic components is made much more difficult by the fact that organic compounds are far more prone to evaporation and to sorption to filter materials etc. than trace elements and salts. In addition, there is a general requirement for larger volumes of eluate for chemical analysis of organic compounds than for analysis of trace elements and salts.
In order to minimise the losses (or gains) of the organic compounds being studied, equipment primarily made of glass and stainless steel, and to a lesser extent teflon, has been used in the leaching experiments carried out in this study. Filter materials made of glass resulted in losses, but apart from this, the test system performed as intended. The composition of the leaching agent, the temperature and the mode of agitation appear to have be non-critical in the leaching tests carried out on the selected leaching tests.

For some of the relevant groups of organic compounds a reasonable amount of background information exists on which further development of procedures for the testing of the leaching properties may be based. This is true for oil components, chlorinated solvents and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), whereas less information is available on components such as MTBE and DEHP. The potential problems associated with small particles in soil samples and the eluate resulting from the leaching test has been (and is being) examined in relation to the leaching of PAHs. Due to the high affinity of PAHs for solid particles, the presence of small particles/colloids in the test system is expected to be potentially important primarily to the leaching of PAHs. However, once the final particle cut-off has been decided, it should be examined whether the presence of particles influences the test results for other organic compounds of high priority. For practical reasons, i.e. to save time and reduce the difficulties involved in the handling of larger volumes of eluate, particle cut-offs corresponding e.g. to 0,7 m m have been used in this study instead of the 0,45 m m cut-off, which is most commonly used for trace elements and inorganic salts.

Based on simplified calculations of the distribution between the phases in a combined air/water/soil system it is proposes to classify those organic compounds for which ecotoxicological criteria in soil and water exist according to the feasibility and relevance of testing their leaching from soil and waste materials. It is proposed that they should be divided into three groups:
The first group consists of consists of non-volatile compounds which sorb strongly on soil and have low solubilities in water. Most PAHs and diesel oil components belong to this group. It seems obvious that a methodology for determination of the leaching of organic compounds from soil and waste materials should include these compounds, which on the one hand will be present in and move with the soil and on the other hand to a certain extent will be leachable. The most critical factors that may influence the leaching procedure and results and need consideration are likely to be the separation of the eluate from the solid phase, including the material which may be sorbed on colloids, and the contact time. A preliminary proposal for a protocol for testing of the leaching of non-volatile organic compounds from contaminated soil has been produced. The proposed protocol does not specify a definite contact time (1 to 5 days are suggested) and it does not address the question of colloidal transport.
The second group includes volatile compounds with relatively high water solubilities. The chlorinated solvents and BTEX are among the compounds in this group. Many of these compounds have low criteria values in groundwater and it would therefore be advantageous to be able to test their leachabilities. Some of them have far higher diffusion coefficients in air than in water and will therefore migrate faster through air that through water. In the context of utilisation of soil and waste materials for building and construction purposes, these compounds are not likely to cause a general (indoor) air problem, since covering is required and may be assumed hinder any substantial transport by air. In relation to testing of the leaching of these compounds, the potential loss of material through volatilisation is likely to pose the major problem. By minimising the headspace in the test system this may be taken care of in a batch test since only a minor part of the total amount be present as a gas, but the volatility will be difficult to control when handling the solid sample and the eluate before and after the test itself. Especially the separation of the solid phase and the eluate will be critical in relation to loss of material and hence the feasibility of the test.
The third group consists of compounds, which have very high water solubilities or are water miscible, and which do not sorb very strongly on soil. This group includes e.g. MTBE. The phenols have high water solubilities and also belong to this group, although they sorb stronger on soil than e.g. MTBE. Other compounds in this group will only to a very limited extent be associated with the solid phases, and it will therefore in general be difficult or irrelevant to attempt to use leaching tests to describe their behaviour. To the extent it seems relevant, the leachability of compounds belonging to this third group may also be tested by the method mentioned above. Colloids are not likely to play any significant role in the transport of these compounds due to their weak sorbing properties.

It will be necessary to develop appropriate methodologies for testing the leaching properties of all the organic priority compounds. This includes further develop the proposed test protocol. A number of the critical factors identified in this study and their influence on the test results must be coped with and accounted for. High priority should be given to the development or adjustment of methods for chemical analysis of the organic compounds with detection limits comparable to those applicable to analysis of groundwater. Application of most of the existing analytical methods leads to requirements for relatively large volumes of eluate, which again leads to a need for inconveniently large test systems (or multiple systems) causing the separation of the eluate and the solid phase to become difficult and time consuming.

From a practical perspective, it will probably be most useful to continue the development of a batch leaching test for organic compounds. The choice of test conditions and the interpretation of the results do present some problems and a comparison of the results of batch test results with the results of column leaching tests would be appropriate. Further discussion of the exact objective and expected use of the result may help. One of the most important technical issues is, as already mentioned, the separation of the eluate from the solid phase. The importance of the particle cut-off is probably negligible for some of the less hydrophobic compounds, whereas it may be more significant for the more hydrophobic compounds. Based on the experiences from the experimental part of this project it is recommended to use leaching procedures, which do not require filtration. Centrifugation is recommended as an alternative to filtration. Such procedures should be developed and evaluated in parallel with the development and evaluation of the above mentioned analytical techniques which do not require large volumes of eluate. It will probably be too optimistic to attempt to design the test systems to be applicable to all the potentially interesting groups of organic compounds, since this would lead to inappropriately complicated procedures. The test system should be able to accommodate the most frequently occurring multiple compound contaminations (e.g. contaminations with BTEX and heavier oil components), whereas soil contaminated with combinations of organic compounds which occur less frequently, e.g. chlorinated solvents and gasoline components, could, if necessary, be subjected to two (different) parallel test procedures. The feasibility of testing at a higher L/S ratio than 2 l/kg, e.g. 5 or 10 l/kg, could also be examined. All other things equal, this would increase the volume of eluate produced and possibly reduce the problems involved in the separation of the eluate from the solid phase. Among the disadvantages of using higher L/S values would be the fact that the test conditions would move further away from simulating the L/S ratio corresponding to the pore volume of the soil, which in many cases is of primary interest to the investigator. Another disadvantage is that the concentration of the organic compounds in the eluate in general will be lower than it would be at L/S = 2 l/kg, thus possibly requiring a lower analytical detection level anyway. A deviation from the currently chosen L/S ratio would also require a re-evaluation of preconditions and assumptions upon which that choice has been based. Another alternative would be to apply the same L/S (= 2 l/kg) but use larger test bottles. The handling of larger volumes of eluate may, however, as already mentioned be both troublesome and time consuming.

The mode and degree of agitation may possibly have a significant influence on the performance and results of a batch leaching test because they have a physical impact on the soil particles. Agglomerates and surfaces may be destroyed in such a way that the sorption capacity of the soil changes. If the physical influence on the soil e.g. results in an increased availability of solid organic material, the test may underestimate the desorption of organic contaminants. In contrast, the release of colloids may result in an overestimation of sorbed contaminants. The latter has been shown experimentally, where particles in the 0,45 to 10 m m range were observed in the eluate after the agitation, and substantial amounts of PAH were shown to be associated with those particles. Eluate from corresponding column leaching tests, which may be assumed to simulate field conditions better than batch leaching tests, did not contain significant amounts of particles.

The previously discussed differences in the contact times needed to achieve equilibrium-like conditions for different types of organic compounds should be further examined and evaluated for specific test systems and materials. A possible test straetegy that would enable the kinetics of the leaching process in question to be taken into account, would be to run a number of identical batch leaching tests in parallel and analyse the eluates at various time intervals. The first two batch tests could be terminated e.g. after 1 and 3 hours, respectively, and if no significant differences between the concentrations of the organic contaminants are observed, the testing stops here. If a significant difference is observed, additional batch leaching tests are continued and eluates are analysed e.g. after 24 hours and 5 days, respectively. In this case, the results could be fed into a model that is able to account for the field conditions, particularly with respect to contact time and equilibrium conditions.

The temperature has no significant influence on sorption and desorption processes, but it does, of course, influence the volatility and biodegradability of certain compounds. In general, it is recommended to perform leaching tests for organic contaminants at room temperature, provided the volatility and biodegradability of the organic compounds in question is under control. Minimising the oxygen concentration in the test system may reduce the biodegradation.

It is reasonable to assume that test procedures for examining the leaching of organic compounds from granular, mineral waste products to a large extent may be based upon the same principles and considerations as test procedures for examining the leaching of organic compounds from soil. However, some specific measures will in many cases be necessary for waste products as regards pre-treatment of the samples to be tested (e.g. drying and crushing), and the potential reactivity of some waste materials with water as well as the changes in pH and redox conditions of the eluate these reactions may cause must be taken into consideration. An evaluation should be made of the results obtained when dissolved organic carbon (DOC ), as is often the case, is determined from analysis of eluates from leaching tests for examination of the leaching of inorganic components from waste products.

The study described in this report has provided a foundation which allows the presentation of a first draft proposal for a test procedure for the examination of the leaching of certain organic compounds from soil. A number of factors and issues which are essential to the development of leaching tests for soil contaminated with organic compounds have been identified, discussed and in some cases subjected to experimental investigations. A classification of the most important organic contaminants has been established and may used to focus further developments. It is, however, quite clear that the precise knowledge on the organic compounds, particularly as regards properties and factors which are critical in relation to the development of a more comprehensive test protocol for leaching procedures for organic compounds, is incomplete and insufficient. This means that even though some specific information was produced in this study from experimental work on selected soil types and selected organic compounds or groups of compounds, it will be necessary to further clarify and examine (experimentally) a number of important issues, before a more comprehensive protocol for testing of the leaching of organic compounds from soil and waste products in Denmark can be elaborated.

A preliminary draft protocol describing a single batch leaching test for the examination of the leaching of non-volatile organic compounds such as oil products (not gasoline) and PAH’s at L/S = 2 l/kg is presented presented. To simulate natural soil water and facilitate the separation of the eluate from the soil phase, the proposed leaching agent is 0.001 M CaCl2 solution in demineralised water. Centrifugation rather than filtration is recommended for the separation of the eluate from the soil. In some cases and with great caution, the results of the leaching test may be used to estimate the composition of the pore water in the soil just below a layer of contaminated soil that is being percolated by infiltrating rain. An example of such an estimation is presented.