| Bottom | | Front page |
Survey of chemical substances in consumer products, 66
Emission and evaluation of chemical substances from selected electrical and electronic products - part 2
Contents
Summary
1 Description of the project
2 Emission tests
3 Assessment of potential health impacts
Appendix 1: Outline of brominated flame retardants, organic tin compounds etc. included in the analyses
Appendix 2: Substance list with classification according to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guidelines, including any unwanted substances
Appendix 3: Outline of calculated chamber concentration and risk factors for the tested products
Appendix 4: Outline of applied limit values with reference specification
Summary
The purpose the present study is to carry out measurements for emission of chemical substances from electric and electronical products in use and to assess the potential health risks when the tested products
are applied in the household. The study is planned to perform tests of new instruments and instruments that have been used for a shorter period in a simulated use situation.
The following electric and electronical products were selected for testing in co-operation with the Danish Environmental Protection:
- Printer
- Computer (PC)
- Television
- Electrical heater
- Rechargeable batteries
- Household oven
- Hair drier
- Mobile phone with or without charger
- Iron
- Decorative lamp
- Electric panel (multi electric outlet)
All appliances were tested for emission of chemical substances under controlled laboratory conditions. Thermostat-controlled climatic chambers of polished stainless steel were applied for the tests. The
measurements included VOCs, aldehydes, isocyanates, and breakdown products hereof, brominated flame retardants and organic tin compounds.
Emission from 73 different substances were determined and the mixture of substances from the tested electrical products. All tested products emit substances in major or minor degree when in use.
The total amount of identified substances is spread over a large number of substance groups (aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, ketones, acrylates, acetates, organic acids, phthalates,
siloxanes, and others).
Emission of one or more aldehydes was determined from nearly all tested products. The amounts vary and especially formaldehyde is emitted from a number of products in amounts that are regarded
hazardous.
One product emits aliphatic isocyanates (methylisocyanate and isocyanic acid). The emission is transitory and hardly presents a threat of health like consideration.
A product emits brominated flame retardants by way of nona- and decaBDE. The emitted amounts are small. However, please note that both substances are prohibited as of 1st June 2006 in accordance to
the EU RoHS directive.
Organic tin compounds were not determined from either of the tested products.
When comparing emissions after 7 hours and after 9 days use there is a significant reduction in substance types as well as amounts of emitted substances from the products after 9 days for 10 of 12 products.
When the emitted substances form the products are compared with the official lists of substances with long-term effect and the Danish Environmental Protection Agency's list of unwanted substances it is
ascertained that:
- 15 of 73 substances have documented long-term effects
- 5 of 73 substances are on the list of unwanted substances
Based on the measured source strengths a calculation of the indoor climate concentrations has been performed in a model room and an assessment of health risks at comparison with limit values cf.
Environmental project no 32, 2003.
It turns out that the two apparatures (decorative lamp and household oven) entail such emission of formaldehyde that the theoretical risk factor (fs) of 1 is significantly exceeded. Formaldehyde is the cause of
8 of the 12 highest calculated risk factors in this project. The remaining 4 cases relate to emission of methylisocyanate, phenol, isocyanic acid, or benzene.
The household oven turned out to emit an unidentified fluorine compound in large amount. It has not been possible to identify the compound within the project's economic frames, thus a health assessment has
not been carried out.
1 Description of the project
Electric and electronic products surround us in our every day life. Many of these become overheated – at least some single parts. Especially polymer materials (plastic, rubber, glue, and lacquer etc.) can emit
organic fumes at heating. Emission is expected to be highest at the beginning of the product's period of use.
The primary exposure flow for this type of emission is via inhalation. Former tests have indicated that electrical products can emit substances that pose a risk for e.g. allergy, irritation of respiratory organs,
hormone-disrupting impact etc.
Electrical and electronic products are so complex and contain many sub-components from hundreds of suppliers that a test of the finished products would be the only safe test method.
In order to provide more knowledge as to the problem's scope the Danish Environmental Protection Agency initiated a project in 2002, where selected products were tested for emission of different
chemical substances (Survey no 32, 2003: "Emission and evaluation of chemical substances from selected electrical and electronic products, Survey no. 32 – 2003”. Present survey is a continuation of
Survey no 32. In order to pass on the experiences from survey no 32 the Danish Environmental Protection Agency has requested that identical test methodologies and assessment criteria are used in the
project at hand.
Based on the literature examination survey no 32 conclude that aldehydes and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) basically posed potential problematic emission from electronic products. Thus
measurements for these substances were performed in the practical emission test.
The present survey has extended the measurement scope to include isocyanates, amines, aminoisocyanates, brominated flame retardants, and organic tin compounds as literature specifies these substances as
potential emission from this type of product, which is supported by the project group's experience.
1.1 Purpose
It is the project's primary goal to extend the available knowledge on different product types' contribution to indoor climate pollution.
The survey will primarily document emission of health hazardous substances from selected electric and electronic products. If possible the emission must be quantified in order to assess the actual health risks.
Furthermore, the difference in new and used (over a short period of 9 nine days) products will be tested.
1.2 Project phases
The project is divided into two phases. Phase 1 contains selection of products, selection of relevant substances, and completion of emission test. Phase 2 contains an assessment of possible health impacts.
2 Emission tests
2.1 Selection of product types and products
2.1.1 Criteria for product selection
A number of products have been selected for emission testing in co-operation with the Danish Environmental Protection Agency.
The criteria for product selection have been e.g.:
- Heat generation under normal operation
- Usage pattern
- Danish consumer usage
- Whether the products are used by particularly exposed groups (children, elderly, etc.)
- The potential heath risk from the emitted substances
A total of 11 product types have been selected for emission testing. The following section provides a detailed account for the single product type.
Within each product type one or more products have been purchased for emission testing.
The products were purchased in Danish retailing. Purchase has been aimed at products that constitute a dominant or significant part of the sales within the product type in question.
It is stressed that it is about spot tests selected randomly in Danish stores. The results are thus not representative for all apparatuses of the type in question in the Danish market.
2.1.2 Outline of tested products
The following product types are selected for emission testing based in the above-mentioned criteria.
Table 2.1. Outline of tested product types
Product type |
Description |
Printer |
Inkjet colour printer; table model |
Household oven |
Ceramic cooker with forced convection oven with catalytic purifying glaze |
Hair drier |
2000 W effect |
Mobile phone |
Mobile phone with camera |
Iron |
Steam iron, 2000 W |
Decorative lamp |
Lamp with halogen light source, rotating colour change and separate disco globe |
Computer (PC) |
PC with standard monitor and keyboard |
Tv-set |
28” 16:9 sized television |
Electric-panel (multi-plug box) |
5-plug box without earth connection |
Power heating unit |
500 W power heating unit for wall suspension |
Rechargeable batteries |
3 types of rechargeable batteries including charger, all types NiMH C 1,2 V |
The test of the mobile phone has been performed partly with the phone separately partly with the phone and the charger placed in the test chamber.
Prior to the test of the rechargeable batteries three types of batteries with charger were purchased. The batteries' surface temperature during charging was measured in preparatory test. The battery with the
highest surface temperature was applied at the continued emission tests.
2.2 Description of performed measurements
2.2.1 Sample scope
The table on the following page demonstrates an outline of the sample scope i.e. measurements contra products. The selection of the sample scope has been performed based on knowledge and experiences
on potential emissions form the single products.
Table 2.2: Outline of sample scope
Product type |
Aldehydes |
VOC’s |
Isocyanates
and amines |
Brominated
flame retardants |
Organic tin
compounds |
Printers |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
Household ovens |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Hair driers |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
Mobile phone |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
Mobile phone with charges |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
Iron |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
Decorative lamps |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
Computers (PCs) |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Tv-setes |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Electric panels (multi-plug boxes) |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
Power heating unit |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Rechargeable batteries |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
2.2.2 Sample preparation
The products are all tested under conditions that represent a normal utility model in any way possible. Products that consist of more parts (e.g. lamp with ancillary motor and transformer) are tested as they
are used. Lamp, motor, and transformer are thus tested as one.
The emissions are documented partly shortly after commissioning (7 hours) and after a longer period of use (9 days). Before the first emission test the products have been simulated used for 24 hours. The
product in question has been simulated used for 9 days in a relevant utility model between first and second emission test.
The table on the next page shows the simulated application situation that the apparatuses have been exposed to before, during, and in between the emission tests.
Table 2.3: Outline of application of products before and during test
Apparatus type |
Before 1 measurement session |
During emission measurement |
Between 1 and 2 measurement session |
Printer |
On for 7 hours without printing |
On for the entire period. Printed 30 colour copies during the measurement
period. |
On for 7 hours every day. Each day print 15 colour copies.
Between 1. and 2. emission measurement printing was change
from black/white to colour. |
Household oven |
On for 7 hours at 200°C |
On the entire measurement period at 200°C |
On for 1 hours every day at 200°C |
Hair drier |
On at maximum effect for 7 periods
of 15 minutes. |
On and off for periods of 15 minutes.
When operational on at maximum effect. |
On for 10 minutes every day at maximum effect. |
Mobile phone 1 (excl.
charger) |
Charging for 7 hours. Subsequently
discharge. |
Charger outside chamber. |
On the entire period of 9 days. Charged according to need
(twice during the period). |
Mobile phone 2 (with
charger) |
Charging for 7 hours. Subsequently
discharge. |
Charger in chamber. |
On the entire period of 9 days. Charged according to need
(twice during the period). |
Iron |
On with maximum effect for 7 hours |
Maximum effect during the measurement period |
20-30 minutes on maximum effect every day |
Decorative lamp |
On for 2 hours |
Lamp + motor on the entire period. |
Lamp and motor on for 2 hours every day |
Computer (PC) |
On for 7 hours (computer and
monitor) |
Computer and monitor on the entire period running software
demo-programme. |
Computer and monitor on for 2 hours every day |
Tv-set |
On for 7 hours |
On the entire period with screensaver |
On every day for 4.5 hours |
Electric panels (multi-plug
boxes) |
Used for hair drier and phone
charger for 7 hours |
Subjected with approximately 2,500 W during the measurement period |
Used for hair drier and phone charger for 5-7 hours every
day |
Power heating unit |
On with maximum effect for 7 hours |
On with maximum effect during the entire period. Effect consumption 0.59
kWh during the measurement period. |
On for 23 hours per day during the period |
Rechargeable batteries |
Charged and discharged once |
Charging of discharged batteries |
Discharge and recharge three times in 9 days. |
2.2.3 Description of applied chamber types
The product is placed in a climate controlled test chamber that is purged with a known amount of clean air. The air supply occurs from a central installation equipped with filtration for particles and gasses.
Stainless steel chamber were applied. Present survey used chambers of 0.11 m³, 0.25 m³, and 3.2 m³ respectively depending of the size of the product.
The test chambers are built and operated in accordance with ENV 13419-1. The emission tests are carried out according to identical procedures as are specified at accredited technical testing according to
the conditions set forth in Eurofins Danmark's accreditation number 168 (DANAK).
Test conditions during the performed tests were as follows:
Temperature: |
23 ± 2° C |
Humidity: |
50 ± 5% RH |
Air change: |
0.5 ± 0.05 times pr. hour. |
Due to heat emission the tested products influenced the climatic conditions in the chambers in some cases resulting in higher temperatures. The highest temperature rise was observed when testing the
household oven (Climate chamber temperature 38°C at the test stop).
2.2.4 Description of applied methods
Measurement for content of contaminations in the outlet air from the chambers was performed by collection of adsorbents or in collection fluids. A calibrated electronic flow meter types Sierra was used for
determination of the collected air amounts.
Before each emission test the chambers' background content of relevant substances (blank values) was determined. If relevant the measurement result has been corrected for blind value before calculation of
source strength from the instruments.
The single collection and analytical methods are stated below. Appendix I contain a detailed outline of the substances that are included of measurement for aldehydes, organic tin compounds, brominated
flame retardants, and isocyanates.
Aldehydes in air
Principle: |
Aldehydes (C1-C6) collected on 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine coatet silicagel tubes, eluted with acetonitril. Analysis by HPLC/UV. |
References: |
ISO/DIS 16000-3
VDI 3862-3. |
Limit of detection: |
0.1-0.5 µg |
Volatile organic compounds (VOC/SVOC) in air
Principle: |
Volatile organic compounds collected on ATD-combi tubes with Tenax TA/Chromosorb 106. The components are desorbed thermally from the tubes and analysed at gas chromatography with mass specific detector (ATD/GC/MS). A number of components are quantified relative to toluene (toluene equivalents). These components are marked with a star (*) in the table of results. |
References: |
ISO/CD 16017-1
MHDS 72 |
Limit of detection: |
5 ng |
Isocyanates and amines in air
Principle: |
Isocyanates/amines are collected in impinger bottles containing dibutylamine in toluene. Amines are derived accordingly with ethylchloroformiate. The derivates are analysed by use of
high-performance liquid chromatography with mass selective detection (HPLC/MS).
The method identifies and quantifies diisocyanate, monoisocyanate, isocyanic acid, aminoisocyanates, and amines. |
References: |
Analyst, 121 (1996) p. 1101-1106. |
Limit of detection: |
0.02 µg (butylisocyanate however 0.1 µg total). |
Organic tin compounds
Principle: |
The substances are collected on XADII adsorbent by absorbing a known airflow through the adsorbents. The components are extracted from the adsorption material with 10% acetic acid in methanol. The extract is transferred to water phase and derived with sodium tetraethylborate. The derivates are extracted accordingly with pentane and analysed following evaporation at GC-MS. Tripropyltin is used as internal standard. |
Limit of detection: |
0.02 µg |
Brominated flame retardants
Principle: |
Polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDE), polybrominated biphenyles (PBB), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), and tetrabrombisphenol A (TBBPA) are collected on adsorption tubes containing
XADII. The samples are soxhlet extracted with toluene, added 13C-labelled internal standards, and analysed at gas chormatography with mass selective detection in the laboratorlabelled internal standards,
and analysed at gas chormatography with mass selective detection in the laboratory. |
References: |
Environment International 29 (2003) 663-664
ISO draft method 22023 |
Limit of detection: |
0.2 – 5 ng |
2.3 Results
The results of the performed emission measurements are given on the following pages. A number of the applied methods are screening methods that measure a very large amount of substances. For clarity
only the substances that evaporate in amounts larger than 1 µg/unit/hour. This limit of detection corresponds to the limit of detection applied at survey no 32.
The substances' labelling according to the following lists is given in the tables of results:
- The list of hazardous substances, Order no 439 of June 2002
- The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guidelines to self classification of hazardous substances, (2001)
- List of unwanted substances, (2004)
Appendix I contain a complete list of the substances that the measurements for aldehydes, isocyanates, aminoisocyanates, amines, organic tin compounds, and brominated flame retardants have included.
2.3.1 Printer
Table 2.4: Emissions from printer
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Acetic acid |
64-19-7 |
34 |
<2 |
R10 C;R35 |
Limonen* |
5989-27-5 |
27 |
<2 |
R10 Xi;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
Siloxanes* |
- |
22 |
<2 |
|
3-Caren |
13466-78-9 |
5.4 |
<2 |
|
2-Ethylhexylacrylate* |
103-11-7 |
4.0 |
5.4 |
Xi;R37/38 R43 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
3.5 |
7.8 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Hexanal |
66-25-1 |
2.2 |
<2 |
|
2-Pyrrolidinone |
616-45-5 |
<2 |
61 |
Xn;R22 |
1,2-Hexandiol* |
6920-22-5 |
<2 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unidentified |
- |
12 |
12 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
Note: Toner change from black to colour between 1. and 2. measurement round
2.4 Household oven
Table 2.5: Emissions from household oven
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Siloxanes* |
- |
1100 |
290 |
|
2-butanon |
78-93-3 |
990 |
400 |
F;R11 Xi;R36 R66 R67 |
Unidentified fluorine compounds* |
- |
450 |
7.2 |
|
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
160 |
210 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Hydrocarbons C10-C18 |
- |
57 |
4.2 |
|
3-Caren |
13466-78-9 |
42 |
<5 |
N;R51/53 |
Nonanal |
124-19-6 |
30 |
<5 |
N; R50 |
Butyraldehyde |
123-72-8 |
27 |
27 |
F; R11 |
Limonen |
138-86-3 |
26 |
<5 |
R10 Xi;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
Benzene |
71-43-2 |
18 |
<5 |
T;R48/23/24/25 |
Octanal |
124-13-0 |
18 |
<5 |
R10 Xi;R36/38 |
Ethylhexanol |
104-76-7 |
18 |
<5 |
|
Benzoic acid* |
65-86-0 |
13 |
6.7 |
|
Phenol |
108-95-2 |
13 |
<5 |
T;R24/25; C;R 34List of unwanted substances |
Nonanic acid* |
112-05-0 |
11 |
<5 |
C;R34 |
alfa-Pinen |
80-56-8 |
10 |
7.8 |
N;R50/53 |
C10-aromates |
- |
10 |
<5 |
|
Decanal* |
112-31-2 |
9.8 |
<5 |
|
Diethylphthalate |
84-66-2 |
8.0 |
<5 |
|
Styrene |
100-42-5 |
7.8 |
<5 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
2-Ethyl hexanic acid |
149-57-5 |
6.1 |
<5 |
Rep3;R63 |
Benzaldehyde |
100-52-7 |
5.6 |
4.2 |
Xn;R22 |
C9-aromates |
- |
5.1 |
<5 |
|
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
5.0 |
<5 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Methylisocyanate |
624-83-9 |
0.75 |
<5 |
Fx ;R12 T;R23/24/25 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Isocyanic acid |
75-13-8 |
0.67 |
<5 |
|
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
<3 |
120 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Pentanal |
110-62-3 |
<3 |
40 |
|
Propionaldehyde |
123-38-6 |
<3 |
22 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unidentified |
- |
160 |
<10 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.4.1 Hårtørrer
Table 2.6: Emissions from hair dryer
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Hydrocarbons C12-C16* |
- |
130 |
120 |
|
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
11 |
15 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Butylacetate |
123-86-4 |
10 |
<3 |
R10 R66 R67 |
Dibutylphthalate |
84-74-2 |
9.0 |
<3 |
Rep2;R61 Rep3;R62 N;R50 |
Ethylbenzene |
100-41-4 |
7.7 |
11 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 suspected carcinogenic |
Butanol* |
110-82-7 |
5.6 |
14 |
F;R11 Xi; R38 Xn; R65 R67 N; 50/53 |
Limonen* |
5989-27-5 |
5.3 |
<3 |
R10 Xi; R38 R43 N;50/53 |
Tetrahydrofurane* |
109-99-9 |
4.6 |
<3 |
F; R11 R19 Xi;R36/37 |
Benzothiazol* |
95-16-9 |
4.5 |
6.7 |
Xn; R22 R43 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
4.2 |
5.8 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Ethylglycolacetate* |
111-15-9 |
4.0 |
6.4 |
Rep2;R60-61 Xn;R20/21/22 |
Ethylhexanol |
104-76-7 |
4.0 |
<3 |
|
Butyraldehyde |
123-72-8 |
3.8 |
<5 |
F;R11 |
3-Caren |
13466-78-9 |
2.4 |
<3 |
N;R51/53 |
Phenyl-1-butene |
824-90-8 |
<2 |
2.2 |
|
Styrene |
100-42-5 |
<2 |
1.8 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
C10 aromates |
- |
<2 |
1.8 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.5 Iron
Table 2.7: Emissions from iron
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Hydrocarbons* C6-C18 |
- |
230 |
16 |
|
Siloxaners* |
- |
100 |
25 |
|
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
29 |
0.06 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Toluene |
108-88-3 |
25 |
0.64 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
18 |
<1 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Trimethylsilanol* |
1066-40-6 |
16 |
<1 |
|
Butanol* |
110-82-7 |
24 |
0.91 |
F;R11 Xi; R38 Xn; R65 R67 N; 50/53 |
Phenol |
108-95-2 |
12 |
1.5 |
T;R24/25; C;R34List of unwanted substances |
Tetrahydrofurane* |
109-99-6 |
9.6 |
<1 |
F;R11 R19 Xi;R36/37 |
Hexanal |
66-25-1 |
5.3 |
<0.3 |
|
1,1-Phenylen-bis-ethanon* |
1009-61-6 |
5.0 |
3.8 |
|
Methoxy-phenyl oxime* |
1000222-86-6 |
4.5 |
1.2 |
|
N-methylpyrrolidon |
872-50-4 |
4.4 |
<1 |
Xi; R36/38 |
C9-aromatee |
- |
2.5 |
<1 |
|
Butyrolacton* |
96-48-0 |
2.1 |
<1 |
|
Benzaldehyde |
100-52-7 |
1.5 |
<0.3 |
Xn;R22 |
Butyraldehyde |
123-72-8 |
1.3 |
<0.3 |
F;R11 |
Acetophenon |
98-86-2 |
0.89 |
<0.5 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unidentified |
- |
91 |
6,6 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
Emission of nonaBDE and decaBDE (brominated flame retardants) was determined from the product. The source strenght is less than 0.05 µg/unit per hour for both substances.
2.5.1 Decorative lamp
Table 2.8: Emissions from decorative lamp
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Hydrocarbons C9-C17 |
- |
390 |
120 |
|
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
200 |
41 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Ethylbenzene |
100-41-4 |
180 |
28 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 suspected carcinogenic |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
170 |
43 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Butanol |
110-82-7 |
260 |
88 |
F;R11 Xi; R38 Xn; R65 R67 N; 50/53 |
Hexanal |
66-25-1 |
79 |
14 |
|
Toluene |
108-88-3 |
58 |
8.6 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
C9-aromates |
- |
38 |
<2 |
|
Pentanal |
110-62-3 |
25 |
7.9 |
|
Butyraldehyde |
100-52-7 |
24 |
4.6 |
F ;R11 |
C10-aromates |
- |
21 |
<2 |
|
Acetophenon |
98-86-2 |
12 |
<2 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
10 |
2 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Methyl formal |
109-87-5 |
6.4 |
<2 |
|
Propionaldehyde |
123-38-6 |
5.8 |
1.1 |
F;R11 Xi;R26/37/38 |
Butyl formate* |
592-84-7 |
5.0 |
1.4 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37 |
Styrene |
100-42-5 |
2.6 |
<2 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
2-Ethylfurane |
3208-16-0 |
0.56 |
<2 |
Xn ;R22 |
Ethylhexanol |
104-76-7 |
<2 |
6.3 |
|
Benzaldehyde |
100-52-7 |
9,4 |
<2 |
Xn;R22 |
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.5.2 Mobile phone 1 (without charger)
Table 2.9: Emissions from mobile phone excl. charger
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Toluene |
108-88-3 |
29 |
<1 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
Siloxanes* |
- |
1.6 |
<1 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.5.3 Mobile phone 2 (incl. charger)
Table 2.10: Emissions from mobile phone incl. charger
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Toluene |
108-88-3 |
17 |
<1 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
Siloxanes* |
- |
2.1 |
<1 |
|
Butylated
Hydroxytoluene |
128-37-0 |
1.3 |
<1 |
Xn,R22 N;R50/53List of unwanted substances |
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
1.1 |
<1 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Hexanal |
66-25-1 |
0.21 |
<0.4 |
|
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
0.061 |
<0.4 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
0.017 |
<0.2 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.5.4 Computer (PC)
Table 2.11: Emissions from computer (PC)
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Hydrocarbons* C8-C15 |
- |
480 |
260 |
|
Phenol |
108-95-2 |
140 |
140 |
T;R24/25; C;R 34List of unwanted substances |
C10-aromates* |
- |
130 |
46 |
|
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
91 |
75 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Butanol |
110-82-7 |
66 |
88 |
F;R11 Xi; R38 Xn; R65 R67 N; 50/53 |
Ethylbenzens* |
100-41-4 |
66 |
51 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 suspected carcinogenic |
C9-aromates |
- |
42 |
22 |
|
Ethylhexanol |
104-76-7 |
37 |
30 |
|
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
29 |
32 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Acetophenon |
96-86-7 |
27 |
18 |
Xn :R22 Xi ;R36 |
Ethylhexylacrylate* |
103-11-7 |
27 |
30 |
Xi;R37/38 R43 |
Siloxanes |
- |
26 |
40 |
|
Styrene |
100-42-5 |
22 |
16 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
2-Ethylhexanic acid |
149-57-5 |
15 |
<2 |
Rep3;R63 |
Butyldiglycol* |
112-34-5 |
14 |
2.8 |
Xi;R36 |
Tetrahydrofurane* |
109-99-9 |
14 |
24 |
F;R11 R19 Xi;R36/37 |
2-Butoxyethanol |
111-76-2 |
13 |
<2 |
Xn; R20/21/22 Xi; R36/38 |
2,3-Dihydro-4-methyl-1H-Inden* |
824-22-6 |
13 |
4.5 |
|
Naphtalene |
91-20-3 |
11 |
5.8 |
Xn;R22 N;R50/53List of unwanted substances |
alfa-Pinen |
108-95-2 |
11 |
12 |
N;R50/53 |
p-Cresol* |
106-44-5 |
10 |
8.3 |
T;R24/25 C;R34 |
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
7.5 |
8.8 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Butylated hydroxytoluene |
475-20-7 |
7.4 |
8.3 |
Xn,R22 N;R50/53List of unwanted substances |
Longifolen |
103-11-7 |
6.6 |
2.6 |
Xi;R37/38 R43 |
Hexanal |
66-25-1 |
6.2 |
<2 |
|
1,6-dichlorocyclooctadien* |
29480-42-0 |
5.9 |
<2 |
|
Hydroxyethylmethacrylate* |
868-77-9 |
5.6 |
3.5 |
Xi;R36/38 R43 |
Methylnapthalene* |
90-12-0 |
5.1 |
<2 |
|
Propionaldehyde |
123-38-6 |
5.0 |
<2 |
F ;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Kodaflex |
6846-50-0 |
4.0 |
<2 |
R43 |
2-Methylcyclopentanon* |
1120-72-5 |
2.6 |
<2 |
Xn;R22 |
Decahydronaphtalene* |
493-02-7 |
2.1 |
<2 |
|
Ethylacetate |
141-78-6 |
<2 |
12 |
F;R11 Xi;R36 R66 R67 |
Butylglycol |
111-76-2 |
<2 |
6.6 |
Xn;R20/21/22 Xi;R36/38 |
Benzaldehyde |
100-52-7 |
<2 |
4.1 |
Xn;R22 |
3-Caren |
13466-78-9 |
<2 |
2.7 |
N;R51/53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unidentified |
- |
78 |
<10 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.5.5 TV-set
Table 2.12: Emissions from TV-set
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Acetic acid |
64-19-7 |
56 |
38 |
R10 C;R35 |
2-(2-ethoxyethoxyethanol)* |
111-90-0 |
51 |
40 |
|
Phenol |
108-95-2 |
30 |
<2 |
T;R24/25; C;R 34List of unwanted substances |
2-Butoxyethanol |
111-76-2 |
24 |
16 |
Xn;R20/21/22 Xi;R36/38 |
Hydrocarbons C9-C16 |
- |
20 |
9.4 |
|
Styrene |
100-42-5 |
13 |
7.7 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
13 |
<1 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
10 |
<2 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Limonen |
5989-27-5 |
10 |
<2 |
R10 Xi;R38 R43 N;50/53 |
Methylmethacrylate |
80-62-6 |
6.9 |
<2 |
F;R11 Xi;R37/38 R43 List of unwanted substances |
alfa-Pinen |
108-95-2 |
5.8 |
<2 |
N;R50/53 |
Hexanic acid |
142-62-1 |
5.8 |
6.7 |
|
C9-aromates |
- |
5.6 |
<2 |
|
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
5.4 |
<2 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol |
104-76-7 |
5.3 |
<2 |
|
Benzaldehyde |
100-52-7 |
5 |
<2 |
Xn;R22 |
3-Caren |
13466-78-9 |
4.3 |
<2 |
N;R51/53 |
Butyraldehyde |
123-72-8 |
4.0 |
<2 |
F;R11 |
1-Ethenyl-4-ethyl benzene* |
3454-07-7 |
3.7 |
<2 |
|
Ethylbenzene |
100-41-4 |
3.2 |
<2 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 suspected carcinogenic |
Texanol* |
25265-77-4 |
3.2 |
2.6 |
|
Phthalic acid anhydride* |
85-44-9 |
3.0 |
<2 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R37/38-41R42/43List of unwanted substances |
Naphtalene |
91-20-3 |
1.9 |
<2 |
Xn;R22 N;R50/53List of unwanted substances |
Diethylphthalate |
84-66-2 |
1.9 |
<2 |
|
2-methyl-1-propyl benzene |
768-49-0 |
1.7 |
<2 |
N;R50/53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unidentified |
- |
38 |
23 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.5.6 Electric panel (multi plug box)
Table 2.13: Emissions from electric panel (multi plug box)
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
2-Ethylhexanol |
104-76-7 |
5 |
2.3 |
|
Hydrocarbons C11-C14 |
- |
0.5 |
<1 |
|
alfa-Pinen |
108-95 |
0.42 |
<1 |
N;R50/53 |
Longifolen* |
103-11-7 |
0.26 |
<1 |
Xi;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
0.06 |
0.50 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
0.06 |
<0.1 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.5.7 Power heating unit
Table 2.14: Emissions from power heating unit
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Hydrocarbons C6-C11 |
- |
14 |
<2 |
|
Acetophenon |
98-86-2 |
14 |
13 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
Propionaldehyde |
123-38-6 |
9.1 |
<2 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Siloxanes* |
- |
9.0 |
<2 |
|
Acetic acid |
64-19-7 |
7.4 |
<2 |
R10 C;R35 |
Hexane |
110-54-3 |
7.2 |
<2 |
F;R11 Xi;R38 Xn;R48/20-65Rep3R62 R67 N,R51/53 |
Butylacetate |
123-86-4 |
4.8 |
<2 |
R10 R66 R67 |
Hexanic acid |
142-62-1 |
4.8 |
<2 |
|
Heptanic acid* |
111-14-8 |
4.8 |
<2 |
C;R34 |
Nonanic acid |
112-05-0 |
4.3 |
<2 |
C;R34 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
3.7 |
<2 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Octanic acid |
124-07-2 |
2.6 |
<2 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
2.5.8 Rechargeable batteries
Table 2.15: Emissions from rechargeable batteries
|
CAS no |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
|
(µg/unit/hour) |
(µg/unit/hour) |
|
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
170 |
46 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Ethylbenzene |
100-41-4 |
140 |
34 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 mistænkt kræftfr. |
C9-aromates |
- |
83 |
24 |
|
Toluene |
108-88-3 |
77 |
9.4 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
C10-aromates |
- |
13 |
1.2 |
|
Hydrocarbons C8-C14 |
- |
8.3 |
<1 |
|
Styrene |
100-42-5 |
7.2 |
1.4 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
Acetophenon |
98-86-2 |
1.8 |
<1 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
Benzaldehyds |
100-52-7 |
0.94 |
<1 |
Xn;R22 |
Hexanal |
66-25-1 |
0.83 |
<0.1 |
|
Limonen* |
5989-27-5 |
0.77 |
<1 |
R10 Xi;R38 Rr43 N;R50/53 |
Propionaldehyde |
123-38-6 |
0.37 |
2.3 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
0.22 |
0.28 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
0.16 |
<0.1 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unidentified |
- |
4.3 |
<2 |
|
*: Quantified as toluene equivalents
3 Assessment of potential health impacts
An assessment of potential health risks has been prepared based on the substances that have been determined in the test of the electronic products.
The assessment was prepared according to the same guidelines as was applied in survey no 32, 2003 (Emission and evaluation of chemical substances from selected electrical and electronic products). The
measured concentrations have been assessed in a model room.
There has been a minor change in the reporting of potential health hazardous impacts in the identified substances compared to survey no 32, as the present report is focused on official lists published by the
Danish Environmental Protection Agency. The following lists have been applied:
- List of hazardous substances; Order no 439 of June 2002
- The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list to self classification of hazardous substances, 2001
- List of unwanted substances, 2004
3.1 Identified substances
Emission of 73 different substances and compounds from the tested electric products in this survey has been determined. All the tested products emit substances in major or minor amount at use.
The total amount of determined substances is spread over a wide amount of compounds (aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, ketones, acrylates, acetates, organic acids, phthalates,
siloxanes etc.). The major emission of single component was identified for siloxanes and 2-butanon with 1100 µg/hour and 990 µg/hour respectively
Emission from one or more aldehydes from practically all the tested products was determined. E.g. formaldehyde was emitting in amounts from 0.02 to 210 µg/hour.
One product emits aliphatic isocyanates (methylisocyanate and isocyanic acid). Source strength is 0.75 µg/hour for methylisocyanate as the dominant component.
One product emits brominated flame retardants in the form of nona- and decaBDE. The source strength is less than 0.05 µg/unit per hour for both substances.
Organic tin compounds were not identified from any of the tested products.
When the emitted substances from the products are compared with the Danish Environmental Protection Agency's list of hazardous substances, the guiding list to self-classification of hazardous substances,
and the list of unwanted substances it may be assertained that:
- 15 of 73 substances have documented long-time effects
- 5 of 73 substances are included on the list of unwanted substances.
The identified emissions are calculated to potential indoor climate concentrations and any potential health effects are assessed in the following sections.
3.2 Calculation of indoor climate concentrations and risk factors
The performed test has not only carried out an identification of the determined compounds. A determination of the source strength was also carried out for the single relevant substances. The source strength
is given in tables in section 2.
The measured source strengths are calculated to potential indoor climate concentrations. When calculating it is assumed that the tested electronic products are used in a room with cubic content of 17.4 m³
and an air change of 0.5 times per hour. This corresponds to a typical child's room in a well-insulated single-family house.
The calculated indoor climate concentrations (cR) are given in the table in appendix 3.
In survey no 32 the risk attached to the calculated indoor climate concentration risk is assessed by calculation of a risk factor (fs). This factor appears by dividing the calculated indoor climate concentration
with he Danish Working Environment Service's limit value (LV) for the substance in question multiplied with a safety factor. The safety factor is set with the aim to consider particular vulnerable groups (e.g.
children and expectant mothers), durability of exposure, and potential synergies. Please see survey no 32 for more detailed description. Survey no 32 uses a safety factor of 100. This corresponds to
multiplying the limit value with 0.01 when the risk factor is calculated as stated in survey no 32.
The expression for calculation of the risk factor fs is as follows:
fs = CR / (GV x s), as s is set to 0.01
A risk factor of 1 or more represents a situation that may supposedly include a health risk if the electric instrument in question is used under the described conditions (volume and air change).
A number of the determined substances have no defined limit value or a tentative limit value from the Danish Working Environment Service. Suggestions for limit values have been search for in survey no 32
and for any limit values for the substance in question in other countries (Norway, Sweden, and United Kingdom).
Based in the Danish Working Environment Service's list, survey no 32, and other countries' official limit values is has been possible to outline limit values to this survey for a total of 46 of the determined 73
substances (65%). The used limit values and their source are given in appendix 4.
It is beyond the limits of this project to set limit values for substances without limit values. Instead a separate assessment of substances that occur in the calculated indoor climate concentrations of 0.01
mg/m³ or more has been performed. 0.01 mg/m³ is used as a lower threshold limit as the concentrations below this limit are not assessed to pose a risk for the actual substances.
3.3 Substances with limit value
The calculated risk factors are given in the following tables (table 3.1 – 3.12) for the test instruments. The results are briefly commented for each instrument.
3.3.1 Printer
Table 3.1: Emissions from printer
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
fs |
fs |
|
Acetic acid |
25 |
0.02 |
<0.01 |
R10 C;R35 |
Limonen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xi;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
3-Caren |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R51/53 |
2-Ethylhexylacrylate |
38 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xi;R37/38 R43 |
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
0.10 |
0.22 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Hexanal |
300 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Risk factor above 1 has not been identified for either of the determined substances. In accordance with the applied assessment criteria the risks seem to be limited when applying this type of printer under the
described conditions.
The cause of the difference between the two test rounds is attributed to change of toner from black to colour between round 1 and 2.
3.3.2 Household oven
Table 3.2: Emissions from household oven
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
2-butanon |
145 |
0,08 |
0,03 |
F;R11 Xi;R36 R66 R67 |
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
4.6 |
6.0 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Hydrocarbons C10-C18 |
180 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
3-Caren |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R51/53 |
Limonen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xi;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
Benzene |
1.6 |
0.13 |
<0.01 |
T;R48/23/24/25 |
Ethylhexanol |
500 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Phenol |
4 |
0.04 |
<0.01 |
T;R24/25; C;R 34Listen over uønskede stoffer |
alfa-Pinen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R50/53 |
C10-aromates |
137 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Decanal |
300 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Diethylphthalate |
3 |
0.03 |
<0.01 |
|
Styrene |
105 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
2-Ethyl hexanic acid |
100 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Rep3;R63 |
C9-aromates |
50 |
0.00 |
<0.01 |
|
Xylene |
109 |
0.00 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Methylisocyanate |
0.02 |
0.43 |
<0.01 |
Fx ;R12 T;R23/24/25 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Isocyanic acid |
0.02 |
0.39 |
<0.01 |
|
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
0.03 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Pentanal |
175 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Propionaldehyde |
100 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
The emission of formaldehyde from the oven results in a risk factor of more than 1 or both test runs. It is thus assessed that there is a potential health problem caused by emission of formaldehyde from a
household oven when put into use. As indicated by the measurement the emission seems to continue for some time, as there is actually an increase in the emission after 9 days. The performed test does not
provide possibility for assessment of the continued progress after 9 days.
There is also considerable emission of methylisocyanate, isocyanic acid, and benzene without these emissions causing risk factors above 1.
3.3.3 Hair drier
Table 3.3: Emissions from hair drier
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Hydrocarbons C12-C16 |
180 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
Xylene |
109 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Butylacetate |
710 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 R66 R67 |
Dibutylphthalate |
3 |
0.03 |
<0.01 |
Rep2;R61 Rep3;R62 N;R50 |
Ethylbenzene |
217 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 mistænkt kræftfr. |
Butanol |
150 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi; R38 Xn; R65 R67 N; 50/53 |
Limonen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xi;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
Tetrahydrofuran |
148 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F; R11 R19 Xi;R36/37 |
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
0.12 |
0.17 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Ethylglycolacetate |
27 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Rep2;R60-61 Xn;R20/21/22 |
Ethylhexanol |
500 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
3-Caren |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R51/53 |
Styrene |
105 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
C10 aromates |
137 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
There is no identified emission from the hair drier that involves risk factors above 1. Thus the instrument hardly comprises a health risk at use. There is a slight increase in the emission of formaldehyde from 7
hours to 9 days, however, without attaching significant importance.
3.3.4 Iron
Table 3.4: Emissions from iron
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Hydrocarbons C6-C18 |
180 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
0.83 |
<0.01 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Toluene |
94 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Butanol |
150 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi; R38 Xn; R65 R67 N; 50/53 |
Phenol |
4 |
0.03 |
<0.01 |
T;R24/25; C;R 34List of unwanted substances |
Tetrahydrofuran |
148 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F; R11 R19 Xi;R36/37 |
Hexanal |
300 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
N-methylpyrrolidon |
20 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xi; R36/38 |
C9-aromates |
50 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Butyrolacton |
176 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Acetophenon |
49 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
Immediately after utilization emission of formaldehyde was detected, however, without exceeding the risk factor of 1. The total emission from iron is very limited after 9 days.
Emission of nonaBDE and decaBDE (brominated flame retardants) was detected from the product. The source strength is less than 0.05 µg/unit per hour for both substances and hardly comprise any health
problem. However, it should be noted that sale of irons with content of polybrominated diphenylethers per 01.06.2006 will be forbidden according to EU’s RoHS-directive.
3.3.5 Decorative lamp
Table 3.5: Emissions from decorative lamp
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Xylene |
109 |
0.02 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Ethylbenzene |
217 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 suspected carcinogenic. |
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
4.89 |
1.2 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Butanol |
150 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
F;R11 Xi; R38 Xn; R65 R67 N; 50/53 |
Hexanal |
300 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Toluene |
94 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
C9-aromates |
50 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Pentanal |
175 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
C10-aromates |
137 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Acetophenon |
49 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Propionaldehyde |
100 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Styrene |
105 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
Ethylhexanol |
500 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
The lamp shows considerable emission of formaldehyde as based on the applied assessment criteria must be considered health hazardous.
The emission is reduced during 8 days with approximately 75%, however, this do not bring the risk factor below 1. A period of one to more weeks after installation of this lamp negative health effects must
be expected.
3.3.6 Mobile phone 1 (without charger)
Table 3.6: Emissions from mobile phone excl. charger
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Toluene |
94 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
3.3.7 Mobile phone 2 (with charger)
Table 3.7: Emissions from mobile phone incl. charger
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Toluene |
94 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
Butylated Hydroxytoluene |
10 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn,R22 N;R50/53List of unwated substances |
Xylene |
109 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Hexanal |
300 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Neither with nor without charger a mobile phone of the tested types seems to pose any risk of negative health impacts when used in the indoor climate.
3.3.8 Computer (PC)
Table 3.8: Emissions from computer (PC)
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Hydrocarbons C8-C15 |
180 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
|
Phenol |
4 |
0.40 |
0.40 |
T;R24/25; C;R 34List of unwated substances |
C10-aromates |
137 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Xylene |
109 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Butanol |
150 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
F;R11 Xi; R38 Xn; R65 R67 N; 50/53 |
Ethylbenzene |
217 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 suspected carcinogenic |
C9-aromates |
50 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
Ethylhexanol |
500 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
0.83 |
0.92 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Acetophenon |
49 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
Ethylhexylacrylate |
38 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
Xi;R37/38 R43 |
Styrene |
105 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
Butyldiglycol |
100 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xi;R36 |
Tetrahydrofuran |
148 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F; R11 R19 Xi;R36/37 |
2-Butoxyethanol |
98 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn; R20/21/22 Xi; R36/38 |
Naphtalene |
50 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn;R22 N;R50/53List of unwated substances |
alfa-Pinen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R50/53 |
p-Cresol |
175 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
T;R24/25 C;R34 |
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Butylated hydroxytoluene |
10 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
Xn,R22 N;R50/53List of unwated substances |
Longifolen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xi;R37/38 R43 |
Hexanal |
300 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Hydroxyethylmethacrylate |
147 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xi;R36/38 R43 |
Propionaldehyde |
100 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Decahydronaphtalene |
134 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Ethylacetate |
540 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi;R36 R66 R67 |
Butylglycol |
98 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn;R20/21/22 Xi;R36/38 |
3-Caren |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R51/53 |
The test of the PC indicates emission of a wide range of different compounds of which most are of limited concentrations.
Formaldehyde and phenol seem to pose the most health significant emissions. After 7 hours as well as after 9 days the emission is close to exceeding the risk factor of 1. Although this factor is not exceeded
it cannot be dismissed that there may be a health problem for some particularly sensitive persons.
If more PCs are places together in e.g. one computer room this will obviously enhanced the total emission and thus the potential negative health effects.
3.3.9 TV
Table 3.9: Emissions from TV
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Phenol |
4 |
0,09 |
<0,01 |
T;R24/25; C;R 34List of unwanted substances |
2-Butoxyethanol |
98 |
<0,01 |
<0,01 |
Xn; R20/21/22 Xi; R36/38 |
Hydrocarbons C9-C16 |
180 |
<0,01 |
<0,01 |
|
Styrene |
105 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
0.37 |
<0.01 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Xylene |
109 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Limonen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xi;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
Methylmethacrylate |
102 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi;R37/38 R43 List of unwanted substances |
alfa-Pinen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R50/53 |
C9-aromates |
50 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol |
500 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
3-Caren |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R51/53 |
Ethylbenzene |
217 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 suspected carcinogenic. |
Phthalic acid anhydride |
1 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R37/38-41R42/43List of unwanted substances |
Naphtalene |
50 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn;R22 N;R50/53List of unwanted substances |
Diethylphthalate |
3 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
2-methyl-1-propyl benzene |
135 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R50/53 |
The TV shows emission of a wide range of compounds as appears from the table above. For most compounds the emission is expressed with low risk factor.
The largest risk factor is due to formaldehyde after 7 days where the emission corresponds to a risk factor of 0.37.
Thus there seems not to be significant risk of negative health effects caused by emission of chemical compounds from the TV.
3.3.10 Electric panel (multi plug box)
Table 3.10: Emissions from electric panel (multi plug box)
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
2-Ethylhexanol |
89 |
<0.01 |
0.01 |
|
Hydrocarbons C11-C14 |
180 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
alfa-Pinen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
N;R50/53 |
Longifolen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xi;R37/38 R43 |
Formaldehyd |
0.4 |
<0.01 |
0.10 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
The emission of chemical compounds from the multi plug boxes is generally very limited in number of substances as well as amounts.
For certain there is no risk of health effects when using the multi plug boxes of the tested type.
3.3.11 Power heating unit
Table 3.11: Emission from power heating unit
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Hydrocarbons C6-C11 |
180 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Acetophenon |
49 |
<0.01 |
0.01 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
Propionaldehyde |
100 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Acetic acid |
25 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 C;R35 |
Hexane |
700 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xi;R38 Xn;R48/20-65Rep3R62 R67 N,R51/53 |
Butylacetate |
710 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 R66 R67 |
Formaldehyde |
0,4 |
0.11 |
0.01 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
As is the case with a number of the other instruments the power heating unit also shows emission of a number of compounds in relatively low concentrations with formaldehyde with the highest emission
measured compared to the substances' limit value.
The power heating unit is not give cause to any negative health impacts resulting from chemical compounds.
3.3.12 Rechargeable batteries
Table 3.12: Emissions from rechargeable batteries
|
GV |
After 7 hours |
After 9 days |
Labelling |
Substance |
mg/m³ |
Fs |
Fs |
|
Xylene |
109 |
0.02 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
Ethylbenzene |
217 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 suspected carcinogenic. |
C9-aromates |
50 |
0.02 |
<0.01 |
|
Toluene |
94 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
C10-aromates |
137 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Hydrocarbons C8-C14 |
180 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Styrene |
105 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
Acetophenon |
49 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
Hexanal |
300 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
|
Limonen |
140 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
R10 Xi;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
Propionaldehyde |
100 |
<0.01 |
0.07 |
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Formaldehyde |
0.4 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
T; R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Acetaldehyde |
45 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
The batteries indicate emission from a number of compounds of which some must likely originate from the applied lacquers.
The emitted amounts are generally low and the batteries including charges will not cause any health hazardous problematic concentrations of chemical substances in the indoor climate if used under conditions
similar to those in this report.
3.4 Substances without limit value
The iron and the household oven emit substances in concentrations above the selected lower threshold limit of 0.01 mg/m³ and without limit valued.
The detected substances and related indoor climate concentrations are given in table 3.13.
Table 3.13. Substances without limit value in concentrations above 0.01 mg/m³.
Instrument |
Substance |
Calculated indoor climate
concentration CR |
|
|
|
Iron |
Siloxan-compound |
0.012 |
Household oven |
Siloxan-compound |
0.13 |
Household oven |
Unidentified fluorine compound |
0.052 |
The analysis of the siloxan compound from both household oven and iron shows that it is a mixture with a number of components that is dominated of hexamethylcyclotrisiloxan (CAS no 541-05-9),
octamethylcyclotetrasiloxan (CAS no 556-67-2), and decamethylcyclopentasiloxan (CAS no 541-02-6).
These are substances with low acute toxicity. There is only scanty information available of the substances in question. There is, however, reason to believe that the calculated indoor climate concentrations
hardly pose a health risk.
Still it should be noted that octamethylcyclotetrasiloxan is included in the Danish Environmental Protection Agency's list of unwanted substances (2004) and is classified as Rep3;R62 R53.
The household oven demonstrated emission of a fluorine-containing compound. This is probable due to emission from the coating on the oven's inside. It has not been possible to identify the compound within
the frames of this project and a health assessment can thus not be carried out.
3.5 The emission's process in terms of time
The tables in appendix 3 show the emission of substances after 7 hours and after 9 days' use of the electric products.
There is practically everywhere notable decrease in emission of substances over a short period of use of 9 days. However, the household oven and the decorative lamp still display risk factors larger than 1
for formaldehyde after 9 days' use.
3.6 Final comments
The measurements have shown that a number of substances with well-documented long-time effects can be found among the substances that emit from the electronical products.
This corresponds to survey no 32 where partly the literature study partly the completed test of a limited amount of products indicated a number of the same substances that have been determined in this
survey.
When the emitted amount are recalculated to potential indoor climate concentrations and the substances' toxicity is included by way of limit values for the substances in question, there seem to be a risk of
health hazardous impacts especially from the tested decorative lamp and the household oven. In both cases the reason is emission of formaldehyde.
Based on the model that has been applied in a similar survey of electric products (Survey no 32, 2003), none of the other products seem to emit substances that comprise a health risk.
A single product emits brominated flame retardants typed polybrominated diphenylethers. The emitted amounts are small and do not comprise an acute health risk. It should be noted that the identified
substances as per 01.06.2006 will be prohibited according to EU’s RoHS-directive.
Appendix 1
List of compounds included in methods for measurement of aldehydes, organic tin compounds, brominated flame
retardants and isocyanates/amino isocyanates
Substance group |
Substance included by the method |
Aldehyder |
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Propionaldehyde
Butyraldehyde
Pentanal
Hexanal |
Organic tin compounds |
MonobutyltinDibutyltin
Tributyltin
Triphenyltin
Monoctyltin
Tetrabutyltin
Dioctyltin
Tricyclohexyltin |
Brominated flame retardants |
Tribromodiphenylether (TriBDE)
Tetrabromodiphenylether (TetraBDE)
Pentabromodiphenylether (PentaBDE)Hexabromodiphenylether (HexaBDE)Heptabromodiphenylether (HeptaBDE)
Octabromodiphenylether (OctaBDE)
Nonabromodiphenylether (NonaBDE)
Decabromodiphenylether (DecaBDE)
Hexabromocyclododecan (HBCD)
Tetrabrombisphenol A (TBBPA)
Tetrabromophenyl (TetraBB)
Pentabromophenyl (PentaBB)
Hexabromophenyl (HexaBB)
Heptabromophenyl (HeptaBB)
Octabromophenyl (OctaBB)
Nonabromophenyl (NonaBB)
Decabromophenyl (DecaBB) |
Isocyanates/amino isocyanates/amines |
Isocyanic acid
Methylisocyanate
Ethylisocyanate
Propylisocyanate
Butylisocyanate
Phenylisocyanate
Hexamethylendiisocyanate
2,6-toluendiisocyanate
2,4-toluendiisocyanate
Diphenylmethane-diisocyanat
2,6-toluendiamin
2,4-toluendiamin
Diphenylmethan-diamin
Toluenaminoisocyanate
Diphenylmethan-aminoisocyanate
Toluendiisocyanat diurea
3-ring diphenylmethan-diisocyanate |
Appendix 2
Substance list with classification according to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guidelines, including any
unwanted substances
Substance |
CAS nr. |
C |
T |
M |
S |
|
1,1-Phenylen-bis-ethanon |
1009-61-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,2-Hexandiol |
6920-22-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,6-dichlorocyclooctadien |
29480-42-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1-Ethenyl-4-ethyl benzene |
03454-07-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2-(2-ethoxyethoxyethanol) |
111-90-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,3-Dihydro-4-methyl-1H-Inden |
824-22-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
2-butanon |
78-93-3 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 Xi;R36 R66 R67 |
2-Butoxyethanol |
111-76-2 |
|
|
|
|
Xn; R20/21/22 Xi; R36/38 |
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol |
104-76-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2-Ethylfuran |
3208-16-0 |
|
|
|
|
Xn; R22 (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
2-Ethylhexanic acid |
149-57-5 |
|
x |
|
|
Rep3;R63 |
2-Ethylhexylacrylate |
103-11-7 |
|
|
|
x |
Xi;R37/38 R43 |
2-methyl-1-propyl benzene |
768-49-0 |
|
|
|
|
N; R50/53 (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
2-Methylcyclopentanon |
1120-72-5 |
|
|
|
|
Xn; R22 (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
2-Pyrrolidinon |
616-45-5 |
|
|
|
|
Xn; R22 (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
3-Caren |
13466-78-9 |
|
|
|
|
N; R51/53 (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
x |
|
|
|
Fx;R12 Xi;R36/37 Carc3;R40 |
Acetophenon |
98-86-2 |
|
|
|
|
Xn;R22 Xi;R36 |
alfa-Pinen |
80-56-8 |
|
|
|
|
N;R50/53 (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
Benzaldehyde |
100-52-7 |
|
|
|
|
Xn;R22 |
Benzene |
71-43-2 |
x |
|
|
|
Carc3;R45 F;R11 T;R48/23/24/25 |
Benzoic acid |
65-86-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Benzothiazol |
95-16-9 |
|
|
|
x |
Xn;R22 R43(The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
Butanol |
110-82-7 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 Xi;R38 Xn;R65 R67 N;R50/53 |
Butyl format |
592-84-7 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 Xi;R36/37 |
Butylacetat |
123-86-4 |
|
|
|
|
R10 R66 R67 |
Butyldiglycol |
112-34-5 |
|
|
|
|
Xi;R36 |
Butyleret Hydroxytoluene |
128-37-0 |
|
|
|
|
Xn;R22 N;R50/53 List of unwanted substances and the Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list |
Butyraldehyde |
123-72-8 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 |
Butyrolacton |
96-48-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
C10 aromates |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
C9-aromates |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Decahydronaphtalene |
493-02-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decanal |
112-31-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dibutylphthalate |
84-74-2 |
|
x |
|
|
Rep2;R61 Rep3;R62 N;R50 |
Acetic acid |
64-19-7 |
|
|
|
|
R10 C;R35 |
Ethylacetate |
141-78-6 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 Xi;R36 R66 R67 |
Ethylbenzene |
100-41-4 |
x |
|
|
|
F;R11 Xn;R20, suspected carcinogenic |
Ethylglycolacetate |
111-15-9 |
|
x |
|
|
Rep2;R60-61 Xn;R20/21/22 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
x |
|
|
x |
T;R23/24/25 C;R34 Carc3;R40 R43 |
Heptanic acid |
111-14-8 |
|
|
|
|
C;R34 |
Hexane |
110-54-3 |
|
x |
|
|
F;R11 Xi;R38 Xn;R48/20-65 Rep3;R62 R67 N;R51/53 |
Hexanal |
66-25-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hexanic acid |
142-62-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroxyethylmethacrylate |
868-77-9 |
|
|
|
x |
Xi;R36/38 R43 |
Isocyanic acid |
75-13-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kodaflex |
6846-50-0 |
|
|
|
x |
R43 (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
Hydrocarbons C10-C18 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Limonen |
138-86-3 |
|
|
|
|
R10 X;;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
Longifolen |
103-11-7 |
|
|
|
x |
X;;R37/38 R43 |
Methoxy-phenyl oxime |
1000222-86-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Methyl formal |
109-87-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Methylisocyanate |
624-83-9 |
|
|
|
x |
Fx;R12 T;R23/24/25 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Methylmethacrylate |
80-62-6 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 Xi;R37/38 R43 (List of unwanted substances) |
Methylnapthalene |
90-12-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Naphtalene |
91-20-3 |
|
|
|
|
Xn;R22 N;R50/53 (List of unwanted substances) |
N-methylpyrrolidon |
872-50-4 |
|
|
|
|
Xi;R36/38 |
Nonanal |
124-19-6 |
|
|
|
|
N;R50 (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency's guiding list) |
Nonanic acid |
112-05-0 |
|
|
|
|
C;R34 |
Octanal |
124-13-0 |
|
|
|
|
R10 Xi;R36/38 |
Octanic acid |
124-07-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
p-Cresol* |
106-44-5 |
|
|
|
|
T;R24/25 C;R34 |
Pentanal |
110-62-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phenol |
108-95-2 |
|
|
|
|
T;R24/25 C;R34 (List of unwanted substances) |
Phenyl-1-buten |
824-90-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phthalic acid anhydride |
85-44-9 |
|
|
|
x |
Xn;R22 Xi;R37/38-41 R42/43 (List of unwanted substances) |
Propionaldehyde |
123-38-6 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 Xi;R36/37/38 |
Siloxanes |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Styrene |
100-42-5 |
|
|
|
|
R10 Xn;R20 Xi;R36/38 |
Tetrahydrofuran |
109-99-9 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 R19 Xi;R36/37 |
Texanol |
25265-77-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Toluene |
108-88-3 |
|
|
|
|
F;R11 Xn;R20 |
Trimethylsilanol |
1066-40-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
|
|
|
|
R10 Xn;R20/21 Xi;R38 |
C: carcinogenic
T: teratogenic
M: mutagenic
S: sensitizing
Appendix 3
Outline of calculated room concentrations and risk factors for the tested products
Click here to see tables
Appendix 4
Outline of applied limit values with specification of sources
Substance |
CAS no |
GV |
Source |
1,1-Phenylen-bis-ethanon |
1009-61-6 |
|
|
1,2-Hexandiol |
6920-22-5 |
|
|
1,6-dichlorocyclooctadien |
29480-42-0 |
|
|
1-Ethenyl-4-ethyl benzene |
03454-07-7 |
|
|
2-(2-ethoxyethoxyethanol) |
111-90-0 |
11 |
2 |
2,3-Dihydro-4-methyl-1H-Inden |
824-22-6 |
|
|
2-butanon |
78-93-3 |
145 |
1 |
2-Butoxyethanol |
111-76-2 |
98 |
1 |
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol |
104-76-7 |
500 |
2 |
2-Ethylfurane |
3208-16-0 |
|
|
2-Ethylhexanic acid |
149-57-5 |
100 |
2 |
2-Ethylhexylacrylate |
103-11-7 |
38 |
1a |
2-methyl-1-propyl benzene |
768-49-0 |
135 |
1a |
2-Methylcyclopentanon |
1120-72-5 |
|
|
2-Pyrrolidinon |
616-45-5 |
|
|
3-Caren |
13466-78-9 |
140 |
1 |
Acetaldehyde |
75-07-0 |
45 |
1 |
Acetophenon |
98-86-2 |
49 |
1 |
alfa-Pinen |
80-56-8 |
140 |
1 |
Benzaldehyde |
100-52-7 |
|
|
Benzene |
71-43-2 |
1,6 |
1 |
Benzoic acid |
65-86-0 |
|
|
Benzothiazol |
95-16-9 |
|
|
Butanol |
110-82-7 |
150 |
1 |
Butyl formate |
592-84-7 |
|
|
Butylacetate |
123-86-4 |
710 |
1 |
Butyldiglycol |
112-34-5 |
100 |
1 |
Butyleret Hydroxytoluene |
128-37-0 |
10 |
2 |
Butyraldehyde |
123-72-8 |
|
|
Butyrolactone |
96-48-0 |
176 |
1a |
C10 aromates |
- |
137 |
1a |
C9-aromates |
- |
50 |
1a |
Decahydronaphtalene |
493-02-7 |
134 |
1a |
Decanal |
112-31-2 |
300 |
2 |
Dibutylphthalate |
84-74-2 |
3 |
1 |
Acetic acid |
64-19-7 |
25 |
1 |
Ethylacetate |
141-78-6 |
540 |
1 |
Ethylbenzene |
100-41-4 |
217 |
1 |
Ethylglycolacetate |
111-15-9 |
27 |
1 |
Formaldehyde |
50-00-0 |
0,4 |
1 |
Heptanic acid |
111-14-8 |
|
|
Hexane |
110-54-3 |
700 |
1 |
Hexanal |
66-25-1 |
300 |
2 |
Hexanic acid |
142-62-1 |
|
|
Hydroxyethylmethacrylate |
868-77-9 |
|
|
Isocyanic acid |
75-13-8 |
0,02 |
3 |
Kodaflex |
6846-50-0 |
|
|
Hydrocarbons C10-C18 |
- |
180 |
1 |
Limonen |
138-86-3 |
140 |
1 |
Longifolen |
103-11-7 |
140 |
1 |
Methoxy-phenyl oxime |
0 |
|
|
Methyl formal |
109-87-5 |
|
|
Methylisocyanate |
624-83-9 |
0,02 |
3 |
Methylmethacrylate |
80-62-6 |
102 |
1 |
Methylnapthalene |
90-12-0 |
|
|
Naphtalene |
91-20-3 |
50 |
1 |
N-methylpyrrolidon |
872-50-4 |
20 |
1 |
Nonanal |
124-19-6 |
|
|
Nonanic acid |
112-05-0 |
|
|
Octanal |
124-13-0 |
|
|
Octanic acid |
124-07-2 |
|
|
p-Cresol |
106-44-5 |
22 |
1 |
Pentanal |
110-62-3 |
175 |
1 |
Phenol |
108-95-2 |
4 |
1 |
Phenyl-1-buten |
824-90-8 |
|
|
Phthalic aicd anhydride |
85-44-9 |
1 |
1 |
Propionaldehyde |
123-38-6 |
100 |
2 |
Siloxanes |
- |
|
|
Styrene |
100-42-5 |
105 |
1 |
Tetrahydrofuran |
109-99-9 |
148 |
1 |
Texanol |
25265-77-4 |
|
|
Toluene |
108-88-3 |
94 |
1 |
Trimethylsilanol |
1066-40-6 |
|
|
Xylene |
106-42-3 |
109 |
1 |
1: At-Guideline C.0.1 (October 2002)
1a: Tentative list; At-guideline C.0.1 (October 2002)
2: Mapping no 32, Miljøstyrelsen 2003
3: Occupational Exposure Limits 2002, EH40/2002 (HSE)
| Top | | Front page |
Version 1.0 March 2006, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency
|