Environmental management in product chains Summary and conclusions
This report analyses 25 cases of environmental initiatives in product chains involving companies and discusses the conditions for further diffusion of these types of environmental management in product chains. 0.1 Eight types of environmental management initiatives in product chainsThe 25 cases, which are the empirical basis of the analyses in the report, have been described by four Danish consultancy companies and involve all at least one Danish company. In some of the cases, suppliers and/or customers are based in other countries. Based on the case descriptions eight types of environmental management initiatives have been identified. These types of environmental initiatives have been analysed with respect to the background of the initiative, the shaping of the initiative, the organisational and environmental impacts and the conditions for further diffusion of this kind of environmental management in product chains. The different types of initiatives and the main company in each case are shown in the table.
0.2 Environmental improvements from the initiativesNot all the cases make it possible to conclude whether environmental improvements actually were obtained. The cases show a focus on a number of different environmental impacts, which the initiatives aim at reducing. These impacts include:
The cases have different types of focus on reduction of environmental impacts. It is not so that they all have focus on the reduction on all environmental impacts in a certain product chain. Rather, the product chain is an arena for the shaping and embedding of the management of some environmental impacts in the product. The cases show these different kinds of focus on environmental impacts:
The focus in a case may be on the reduction in one part of the chain, like the product use, but a substitution of a chemical will also give a reduced impact during the manufacturing of the product. The cases show how the reduction of impacts in a certain part of a product chain may imply changes in another part, like when the reduction of environmental impacts from a paint in the use phase imply that changes take place during the manufacturing of the paint. 0.3 Interaction between environmental initiatives in product chainsThe characteristics of the eight different initiatives show that environmental management in product chains is more than exchange of environmental information between supplier and customer. Several of the initiatives involve joint development projects and some of them strategic co-operation. Several companies have been involved in more than one of the eight initiatives. Some of the combinations are:
These combinations of initiatives shows that some companies have environmental-oriented relations as well upstream the product chain (to suppliers) as down stream the product chain (to customers). 0.4 Organisational aspects of the initiativesThe cases do not show a certain order of implementation of the different types of initiatives. For example, it is not so that all companies had implemented ISO 14001, before they initiated a change. Most of the cases show integration of an environmental initiative into some of the existing business relations. This shows that integration of environmental concern and interaction is possible within existing business relations. Companies do not necessarily need to find new suppliers to get a change implemented. However, it seems like the mutual importance of supplier and customer has impact on the way the change process is organised. Changes seem to be organised as a mutual development process if the customer and the supplier are of equal strategic importance to each other, although the customer usually initiates the change. If the customer is not of strategic importance to the supplier, it may be more difficult to get a change implemented. Maybe the costumer have to choose a strategy that demand less of the supplier, like when one of the companies could not carry out a life cycle assessment, because the supplier was not willing to use the necessary resources to develop the data. The customer considered then to shift to go for a eco-labelling license instead because that would be less demanding of the supplier to answer questions about the ability of their product to fulfil some specific eco-labelling criteria. Some cases show development of new organisational structures between the involved companies. One type of new structure is not directly part of the business relations (a centre for resource-saving concrete constructions). Although not directly mentioned in the case material also the so-called product panels, which involve different actors within a product or activity area (for example within textile, construction and freight transportation), have played a direct or indirect role in some of the cases. The panels can be characterised as a kind of policy networks and involves typically manufacturers, users, and knowledge-based institutions like consultants, research institutions and NGO’s. Other new structures are directly part of the business relations. An example is a printing company, which gets a sales office at a graphic designer company as part of their strategic co-operation. Change in existing structures in seen, where the relationship between a detergent supplier and its customer (a cleaning service company) changes from a relation involving only sales and purchase persons to involving detergent chemists and cleaning technicians. This change was necessary in order to enable a change to less hazardous chemicals, which at the same ensured the quality of the cleaning service. These experiences from the cleaning service case show the importance in greening of product development of a focus on the practice, which the product is supposed to support or become part of – and not only on the product or product component itself. In the cleaning service case, the important dialogue as part of developing guidelines for the practice with the new and greener detergent between the detergent chemists and the cleaning technicians focused on the roles of and interaction among the cleaning detergent, the equipment, the expected level of cleanliness and the expected level of costs. Several cases show that environmental initiatives are embedded in an organisation through changes in different elements of the organisation, like
0.5 Product and branch aspectsSome conclusions concerning the role of the type of products and branches, which are in focus in the cases, are:
A comparative analyses of cases within three resource areas: furniture and clothing, construction and housing, and information and communication show more similarities than differences in the type of environmental initiatives. This implies that the type of product or service and the way the product chain is organised does not seem to decide the type of environmental management initiative, which is possible. The following characteristics across the product areas were found:
These characteristics show the need to analyse which conditions and regulatory measure, which can support further diffusion of the environmental initiatives. 0.6 Conditions and regulatory measures for the diffusion of environmental management in product chainsThis paragraph summarises the conditions for each of the eight environmental initiatives and suggests regulatory measures, which could support the further diffusion and implementation of the environmental initiatives. 0.6.1 The conditions for implementation of the different types of environmental initiativesThe table shows the conditions, which are necessary for the support of each type of environmental initiative, and some proposals for regulatory measures, which can support the further diffusion of the different environmental initiatives in product chains.
The overview of the conditions for the application of the different types of environmental initiatives show that some of the initiatives may be easier to introduce for bigger companies with many resources and potentially bigger influence on their suppliers and customers than for smaller companies. 0.6.2 The role of environmental management systemsSeveral companies had implemented a formalised environmental management system, typically ISO 14001, before they initiated changes in product chain, while other companies have implemented ISO 14001 later on and some have not implemented an environmental management system. In a few cases, companies were planning to implement ISO 14001 after having been involved in one of the initiatives in a product chain. It looks like other companies’ strategies inspire companies in some of the cases while they are co-operating with them. Although formalised environmental management systems play a role in some of the cases, the cases clearly show that companies do not initiate environmental management in product chains as self-regulation, but often based on external demands. These demands might come from private or public customers, like through public green procurement, or inspired by regulatory measures aiming at substitution of chemicals and materials (like lists of unwanted chemicals and taxes on certain materials). Sometimes a regulatory measure, which a customer experiences, is raised as a demand to a supplier, whereby the product chain becomes an arena for mediation of regulatory demands among different geographical contexts. These observations show the importance of governmental regulation as guidance for corporate environmental management systems and thereby for environmental initiatives in product chains. One of the reasons for the need for external guidance for companies with environmental management systems (and for companies without environmental management systems) is the large degree of interpretative flexibility in the ISO 14001 standard. This implies that the standard not automatically guarantees a certain scope of the environmental management - for example a focus on environmental impact in the product chains, which the company is part of. The flexible elements in the ISO 14001 standard include (Jørgensen et al 2007):
0.6.3 The role of transnational environmental managementA few cases describe relations between Danish companies and either suppliers or customers from other countries. Some of these cases also show differences in the level of environmental protection or least different levels of environmental performance among companies in different countries, which are part of the same product chain. The examples include:
These cases show the importance for many companies of a policy, action plan and practice around transnational environmental management. The strategy need to include considerations about the level of environmental protection compared to the level of protection in Denmark and the present level of protection among suppliers and customers in these other countries. It is important that the companies do not assume that the environmental infrastructure, which they know from Denmark is available in other countries. This implies that it is necessary to get information about the environmental infrastructure, legislation and public debates and discourses around environmental issues in the other countries. The concept of script can used to consider what assumptions the company makes about the roles of the product, the user, the infrastructure, and the governmental authorities in those other countries, where present or potential suppliers and/or customers are located. 0.6.4 The role of governmental regulationThe cases have shown how a number of different types of regulatory measures have been important as occasions and driving forces for the development and implementation of environmental initiatives in product chains:
Public green procurement is a driver for eco-labelling and product development in several cases. However, the anticipated market for the greener products does not materialise, in some cases, in an actual public demand (furniture and cleaning service). This shows the need for support for further implementation of public green procurement policies into actual public green procurement practice. The role of the public green procurement is bigger in relation to printed goods. However, the restricted budgets among the public institutions is also here a limiting factor, which implies that the public institutions want the eco-labelled product quality, but they do not want to pay the fee for the eco-labelled product, so they ask for not having the products eco-labelled. Differences in municipal regulation have been a barrier to environmental initiatives. Two initiatives for development of national waste recovery schemes have only developed to a limited extent, because collection of waste materials and products as part of waste management needs approval from each of the municipalities. This practice has made a more widespread use of the schemes very time-consuming. 0.6.5 Regulatory support to environmental management in product chains though coherent policy regimes and policy patternsThe cases show the need for a careful development of the policy regimes, which are supposed to support the development of a new type of practice among companies, which means a focus not only on a law or a circular but also on the necessary policy instruments and competences among the civil servants that is needed. Furthermore, the experiences show the need for consistent policy patterns, which means that the different policy measures need to support each other. This implies that if the implementation of a certain measure, like public green procurement, is seen not to develop as expected and the demand for greener products do not develop, the background has to be found and changes in the policy measures developed. An important restriction to the development of public green procurement is the restricted budgets of the governmental institutions. It is important to analyse when and why these higher prices on eco-labelled products develop. Is it for example because better and therefore more expensive materials, components etc. are used or is it because the supplier expect that the users of greener products are willing to pay more for the product. In relation to printed products, the price difference between the labelled and the not-labelled product is sometimes only the eco-label fee, because the products are of the same quality. If the customer wants the products labelled, the printing companies want the public customer to pay the eco-label fee, but due to their restricted budgets governmental institution seem often to decide not to get the products labelled. The lack of diffusion of the environmental initiatives into more widespread practice in several of the case studies show the need for the governmental regulation to be more differentiated and have a focus on the different types of companies. There needs to be policy instruments, which encourage front-runners, but there need also to be instruments, which focus on the more reactive companies and also on the back laggards. The role of multi-stakeholder forums in some of the cases as a way of developing a successful strategy shows the need for support for this kind of initiatives. Examples are the product panels, the co-operation around development of waste management schemes and quality criteria in the use of recycled plasterboard in new plasterboard and the co-operation around a centre for resource-saving concrete constructions. Such multi-stakeholder forums can in some cases solve the dilemma whether the focus should be on developing the demand for or the supply of more environmental friendly solutions or products first, like eco-labelled products or products made from recycled materials. The need for these forums shows that also markets for more environmental friendly solutions and products need to be developed through a combination of policy instruments. This combination should include command-and-control regulation of for example chemicals, economic instruments like taxes and innovation supporting programs. It is necessary to develop these stakeholder forums with a broad selection of stakeholders in order to develop a broad legitimacy of the way the environmental problems and the solutions are framed. An important prerequisite of the diffusion of the environmental initiatives is sufficient staff in the Environmental Protection Agency with competences about the dynamic interactions between environmental policy and product chain dynamics and innovation dynamics. These competences include competences about the different roles of governmental regulation in innovation processes, like the support for development of product standards, quality criteria, prototypes, experiments etc. in the development of demand and supply of more environmental friendly solutions. Consultancy companies may be important in supporting companies in some parts of an environmentally focused innovation process and consultancy companies are good at making relations to companies, if it is a demand for public funding in an innovation programme. However, several of the initiatives in the case studies have had problems being embedded, when the public funding to the consultancy companies ends. Some of these initiatives, like the role of eco-labelling in the textile sector and the role of public green procurement within furniture and cleaning services could probably have been embedded, if there had been enough resources in the Environmental Protection Agency to monitor the market development for more environmental friendly products and services. This monitoring should include analyses of the driving forces that seem to support or hinder the market development. This kind of analyses and organisational support is not supposed to be a kind of governmentally supported “picking the winners” in terms of what products to develop, but a critical support and monitoring of the complex dynamics in the different phases of innovation processes in market development. This role of the Environmental Protection Agency need to be part of a stronger innovation focus in the environmental policy with focus on the need for different instruments in research, innovation and diffusion at the market. Some elements in such a regulatory strategy should be:
0.7 Theoretical perspectives for analysis of the shaping and embedding of environmental management in product chainsThe analyses of the 25 case studies have shown the value of theoretical perspectives in analyses of the shaping, embedding and diffusion of environmental initiatives in product chains. The following theoretical perspectives have shown to be of value and are recommended as focus in future capacity development as part of governmental strategies, which aim at supporting emergence and stabilisation of environmental concerns as part of product chain dynamics:
|