| Front page | | Contents | | Previous
    | | Next | 
    Cleaner Technology Projects in Denmark 1997 
    Examination of Beet Lifting and Beet Cleaning in an Armer
    Salmon and in a TIM Beet Digger 
    Undersøgelse af roeoptagningen og rensning i en Armer
    Salmon og en TIM roeoptager 
    Arbejdsrapport nr. 46, 1997, Miljøstyrelsen
    Danisco Sugar initiated in 1993 a project called "Rene Roer" (clean beets)
    which purpose was to ensure that the sugar beets were brought to the
    factories as clean as possible, and if possible so clean that further cleaning at the
    factory would be unnecessary. In this phase of the project there has been focused on the
    possibilities of improving the cleaning conditions in the beet diggers
    partly by lifting the beets with as little adjacent soil as possible, and partly by
    installing extra cleaning modules in the harvesters. 
    During the 1995 campaign two experimental beet harvesters from Armer Salmon
    (Ireland) and TIM (Denmark) were tested in 4 fields in East-Denmark under different
    harvesting conditions and with different additional cleaning equipment. 
    Armer lifts the beets by drawing in the top, and the beets are fixed between two belts
    and led to topping and mechanical cleaning in the harvester. The beets are oriented and
    positioned fixed between the belts for further cleaning with brushes and/or air, and these
    cleaning methods were tested in the harvester. 
    TIM lifts the beets by squeezing and pushing up the beets from the earth by means of
    the so-called oppel wheels. This method results in large amounts of soil being lifted into
    the harvester, and the demands on an effective cleaning will be heavy. Harvesting by oppel
    wheels and a subsequent cleaning in star wheels are standard
    practice in Denmark. 
    The comparison of the two harvesting principles with subsequent cleaning in the
    cleaning devices mounted by the supplier showed that under ideal/good harvesting
    conditions as well as under good/hard harvesting conditions the TIM harvester produced
    beets with less residual soil than the Armer harvester.  
    The cleaning modules (brushes and air nozzles) for the Armer harvester were constructed
    and mounted at the harvester under great consideration of the initial construction of the
    harvester, i.e. at the belts where space was left over. No greater changes of the
    construction of the harvester were made in order to make allowance for orientation and
    single beet cleaning. 
    Consequently, the effect of the mentioned additional cleaning modules was minimal. For
    brushes as well as for compressed air it means that the contact times of 0.4 sec. and 0.07
    sec., respectively, should be essentially increased in order to have some effect, and the
    cleaning should be more oriented to the places of the beet where the soil is actually
    found. 
    Author/ institution 
    Franck B. Hansen, Flemming Hansen og Bjarne Fallesen, Danisco Sugar 
    This report is subsidised by the National Council for Recycling and Cleaner Technology 
    ISSN no. 0908-9195 
    ISBN no. 87-7810-812-8 
      
    | Front page | | Contents | | Previous
    | | Next | | Top |  |