[Front page] [Contents] [Previous] [Next]

Development of a Bunker Norm for Ships

5. Purchasing Bunkers

When a shipowner is about to order bunkers for a ship, obviously it is not enough to agree on the price, the quantity, and the time and place of delivery.

The basis for the order is, first and foremost, to find out what type of fuel oil the engine manufacturer is specifying for the relevant type of engine, and to ensure that the requisite oil treatment facilities onboard are consistent with these. Roughly, machinery can be divided into two groups: those designed for distillates of one grade or the other, and those designed for combustion of residual oil of one class or the other within this range.

For reasons of competition the engine manufacturers generally specify the "poorest" type of oil – and thereby also the most inexpensive type – on which the machinery can run. Because the costs of bunker oil represent a very large part of the operating expenses, the price obviously has great influence on the choice of oil type. This does not necessarily imply, however, that the shipowner will then consistently choose the cheaper and poorer type. In addition to price, the type of engine and oil treatment gear, the choice also depends on the operating experience and reliability achieved by the relevant shipping company over the years – as well as the assurance of supply and quality.

So that the ship and the shipowner can satisfy themselves that they are actually getting the specific bunker oil they have ordered, it is very common for the ship to draw a representative bunker oil sample from the bunker pipe – a so-called drop test, where the oil drips into a test vial throughout the bunkering process. The sample is then sealed by the ship’s crew in the presence of the bunker supplier, and the oil sample is sent to an independent laboratory for analysis.

When the analysis has been performed, the shipping company and the ship will be notified by telex or fax of the result, i.e., the content of co-substances as well as other details about the oil and its treatment for purification as well as any operational difficulties. It is a very common rule not to use the new bunker oil until the result of the analysis is to hand. It is also quite usual to refrain from mixing fuel oils of different origin, as this can lead to unfortunate operational consequences. Of course, sooner or later one may have to mix the oils, but before they are mixed, one must be certain that the oil types are mixable.

Despite the fact that diesel oil or heavy fuel oil as per ISO 8217 or with the shipping company’s extra specification requirements is ordered, one cannot be certain that the relevant oil in fact meets the standard or the specification, because – as already mentioned – the quality of bunker oil may vary within the same grade. This is one of the reasons why many shipowners have registered with the fuel oil analysis scheme, at least if they bunker worldwide.

This has been known for many years, and it is still a problem with heavy fuel qualities around the world. But it is perhaps even more surprising that the quality of so-called "finer" oil types such as distillates or diesel oils varies considerably within the same grade. An investigation made of the three distillates DMA, DMB and DMC according to the ISO standard shows the following deviations:Marine

Diesel Oil samples submitted in the period of 01/01/95 – 30/6/95

Samples breakdown:

Total Samples for this period:3212
Samples with Grade DMA:771
Samples with Grade DMB:949
Samples with Grade DMC:1487

Table 5.1
Number of samples per grade exceeding the specified limit

For DMA, DMB and DMC the following results can be derived from the above diesel oil analysis:

DMA
15% of all analyses failed to reach the lower limit for pour point. 3% had more than 0.3% MCR (coke residue). In the case of 2.6% the flash point was below 600C. A total of 25.2% of the DMA analyses showed at least one point where the relevant oil failed to meet the standard.

DMB
18.1% of the analyses had more than 0.3% MCR (coke residue). A total of 27.7% of the DMB analyses showed at least one point where the relevant oil failed to meet the standard.

DMC
5.7% of the analyses exceeded the specified limit for "Total sediment". A total of 15.8% of the DMC analyses showed at least one point where the relevant oil failed to meet the standard.

An examination of the sulphur content problems shows that it must be said to comply quite reasonably with the requirements in the standard – as shown by the following extract from the analysis:

Parameter: Sulphur
Unit: %mm
Limit DMA: >=1.6
No. exceeding: 3
% exceeding: 0.4
Limit DMB: >=2.1
No. exceeding: 5
% exceeding: 0.5
Limit DMC: >=2.1
No. exceeding: 7
% exceeding: 0.5

A typical bunker specification used for bunker purchases by a major Danish shipping company sailing worldwide may look as follows:

Quality – Bunker Specifications

Quality
method
Description Class Test
IBF 380 cSt: According to ISO 8217:1987 RMG 35  
IBF 180 cSt: According to ISO 8217:1987

Both qualities of fuel must be fit for use in the vessels' engines, with the following additions:

- Aluminium, MG/KG
max. 30

- Silicon, MG/KG
max. 30

- Water, V/V
max. 0.5

- Pour Point, deg.C
max. 10

- Sodium content to be max. 30 % of the vanadium content.

The fuel must not include chemical waste, waste lubricants or any other contaminants which would impair the efficiency of the purification or engine system.

RME 25

 

 

(IP 377)


(IP 377)


(IP 74)


(IP 15)


(IP 377)

Dist. Marine

Diesel:

According to ISO 8217:1987 with the following addition:

- CFPP, deg.C
max. 0

- Pour Point, deg.C
max. 0

DMB


(IP 309)


(IP 15)

Marine Gas Oil: According to ISO 8217:1987 with the following addition:

- CFPP, deg.C
max. 0

DMA  

 

(IP 309)

As will appear from the above specification, oil is ordered according to ISO 8217, but with the noted limitations and additions to the specification based on the shipping company’s experience – so as to achieve reliable and safe operations on the relevant type of oil.

A typical bunker specification used when purchasing bunkers for a major Danish ferry line sailing in Danish waters looks as follows:

Typical specification SMD

Test Method Result
Density at 150C, g/cm3 ASTM D 4052 0.8755
Ash, mass % ASTM D 482 < 0.01
Conradson Carbon Residue, mass % ASTM D 189 0.03
Flash Point, deg.C ASTM D 93 74
Pour Point, deg.C ASTM D 97 +6
Sediment by extraction, mass % ASTM D 473 < 0.01
Sulphur, mass % ASTM D 4294 1.08
Viscosity at 500C, cSt ASTM D 445 4.688
Water by distillation, vol % ASTM D 95 < 0.1
Cetane Index ASTM D 976 42-43

Typical specification LMD

Test Method Result
Density at 150C, g/cm3 ASTM D 1298 0.877
Ash content, mass % ASTM D 482 < 0.01
Cetane Index ASTM D 976 46.6
Colour ASTM ASTM D 1500 < 3.0
Flash Point, deg.C ASTM D 93 +71
Pour Point, deg.C ASTM D 97 -9
Sediment by extraction, mass % ASTM D 473 < 0.01
Sulphur content, mass % ASTM D 4294 0.99
Vanadium content, mg/kg IP 288 < 2
Viscosity at 500C, cSt ASTM D 445 2.597
Water by distillation, vol % ASTM D 95 < 0.1
Distillation
IBP, deg.C
10%, deg.C
50%, deg.C
90%, deg.C
ASTM D 86
182.5
218.0
285.5
353.5

If these two types of diesel oil – SMD and LMD – are to be referred to the ISO standard, the nearest group will be DMB. The SMD oil is for summertime use and may have a slight tinge. The LMD oil is clear and for wintertime use.

A typical bunker specification used for the purchase of diesel LS classified as gas oil (MGO) for a major Danish ferry line navigating Danish waters looks as follows:

Typical specification for diesel LS (MGO)

  Min Max
Spec. density at 150C, kg/ m3 820 880
Viscosity cSt at 400C 2.8 6.0
Flash point, deg. C (P.M.) 61  
Cloud Point, deg. C   +2
C.F.P.P., deg. C   -12
Water content   500 ppm
Distillation, 95%   3850C
Ash content %   0.01
Conradson Carbon %   0.25
Cetane Index 45  
Sulphur content %   0.10

[Front page] [Contents] [Previous] [Next] [Top]