Cleaner Technology Projects in Denmark 1997 Examination of the Connection Between Varieties of Beets and the Amount of CleaningUndersøgelse af sammenhængen mellem roesorter og jordvedhæng
|
![]() | Measurement of leaf attachment diameter. |
![]() | Cleaning of the beets individually (with variations; but always with cleaning in modules with brushes as the main cleaning) |
![]() | Final cleaning by compressed air pistol |
![]() | Cutting off crowns and measurements of crown diameter and beet. |
![]() | The cleaning results are expressed as the percentage of residue soil in clean beets without crowns. |
The results were:
![]() | Of the 11 varieties investigated, the "football" beet and especially the "cylinder" beet differ markedly from the others as regards to shape and location in the ground. The cylinder beet has a "soil-repellent" form due to a high location in the ground, an outward arched shape from top to tail, small root grooves and root hairs mainly attached to the tail. |
![]() | Also, as regards cleanability, the cylinder beet differs positively from the others, because its shape gives good conditions for a low content of adherent soil, and it facilitates the cleaning conditions. |
![]() | Generally, the commercial varieties do not differ much as regards cleanability in the range of 0-200% starting soil. Final soil is generally proportional to starting soil. |
![]() | Differences between clean-ability for fresh beets and beets stored for 1-2 days could not be detected. |
![]() | The method used to measure cleanability, where beets are cleaned with brushes, is not yet optimised for all conditions (high/low soil tare and wet/dry soil), and the method must be further developed. |
The conclusions were:
![]() | Of the 11 varieties investigated, the cylinder beet has the most optimal shape as regards cleaning. |
![]() | The optimal method for evaluation of the cleanability has not been found. The applied method with brushes gives a rough estimate of the importance of the shape of the beet, but the method is influenced by soil - and harvesting conditions. |
![]() | The rough method should be supplemented with a method, which expresses the cleanability in the low range of soil tare (0-5% initial soil and < 1 % residual soil after cleaning). Cleaning by compressed air on a single-beet level in a newly developed pilot plant would be a possible method (to be investigated in 1997). |
Author/ institution
Bjarne Fallesen, Flemming Hansen og Franck B. Hansen, Danisco Sugar
This report is subsidised by the National Council for Recycling and Cleaner Technology
ISSN no. 0908-9195
ISBN no. 87-7810-796-2