| Front page | | Contents | | Previous
| | Next |
Clean air - Danish efforts
In 1976 the Nordic environment ministers proposed a European convention on
transboundary air pollution, especially with sulphur compounds. After negotiations in ECE,
34 countries and the EC Commission signed the Geneva Convention in 1979. The convention
came into force in 1983, and has now been ratified by 47 countries on the European
continent plus the US and Canada.
The convention is a framework convention that is supplemented with more specific
protocols. So far 8 such protocols have been worked out and signed. Five of them are in
force.
Air pollution can be transported across national borders, and it is therefore not
always possible for individual countries to regulate the air quality and the deposition of
harmful compounds by national regulation. An effective abatement of air pollution requires
international collaboration. The Geneva Convention forms the framework of the only forum
on the European continent where the common problems in relation to air pollution can be
addressed.
The first protocol deals with financing of the technical scientific basis. Within this
framework data have been collected, air and precipitation quality have been measured, and
model calculations of the atmospheric dispersion have been carried out since 1985. By
means of emission prognoses and model calculations it is further possible to evaluate the
future pollution and the results of planned regulation. This has played a key role in
later negotiations on protocols that aim at regulating emissions of sulphur dioxide,
nitrogen oxide, hydrocarbons, heavy metals and POP.
The culmination of this work is the Gothenburg Protocol, which was signed in 1999. It
is both a "multi-pollutant" and a "multi-effect" protocol aiming at
reducing acidification, eutrophication and damages from tropospheric ozone. The strategy
is a comprehensive effort against transboundary pollution with sulphur dioxide, nitrogen
oxide, hydrocarbons and ammonia.
Danish emissions and targets for the four compounds in the Gothenburg Protocol
The diagram shows Danish emissions in the reference year 1990 and in 2000. Further are
shown the emission ceilings that Denmark is committed to as signatory to the Gothenburg
Protocol and the adoption of the EU directive on national emission ceilings.
Both within the UN Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) and at EU level, work is done to
control transboundary air pollution. For Denmark the results are identical.
(Source: Danish Environmental Protection Agency)
The objectives of the Gothenburg Protocol
The protocol has been negotiated on the basis of model calculations founded in national
mapping of critical loads and the costs of reducing emissions. And it puts ceilings for
emissions of the four mentioned compounds for each country in 2010.
The protocol operates with fixed targets for improvement of the state of the
environment in all the areas comprised. The emission reductions, however, are carried out
where it is most cost-effective, i.e. where the benefits to the affected areas are
largest, and where actions have so far been taken at least towards emission control and
further efforts therefore will be relatively cheap.
When the protocol is fully implemented in 2010 Europe's emissions of sulphur must be
reduced by at least 63%, NOx emissions by 41%, VOC emissions by 40% and emissions of
ammonia by 17% - all relative to emissions in 1990.
The protocol also sets out strict limit values for emissions from specific sources,
e.g. incineration plants, power plants, chemical treatment plants plus cars and lorries.
It is required that the best available technology is used in order to keep emissions down.
VOC emissions from products like paints and aerosols must also be reduced. Finally,
farmers must take specific measures in order to control emissions of ammonia. Guidelines
decided in connection with the protocol suggest a series of abatement technologies and
economic instruments for the emission reductions in the relevant sectors, including
transport.
It is estimated that when the protocol is implemented, European areas suffering from
too high acidification levels will be reduced from 93 mill ha in 1990 to 15 mill ha in
2010. Areas suffering from too high a degree of acidification will have fallen from 165
mill ha in 1990 to 108 mill ha.
The number of days with too high ozone levels will be halved. That means that the
number of life years lost as a consequence of chronic effects of ozone loads will be about
2.3 mill. lower in 2010 than in 1990. And there will be about 47,500 fewer premature
deaths as a result of ozone and particles in the atmosphere. The amount of vegetation that
is exposed to too high ozone levels will be reduced by 44% compared to 1990.
The EU directive on national emissions
In parallel with ECE also the EU has taken action to reduce long-range transport of air
pollution. The principal objective is the same: a cost-effective comprehensive reduction
of impacts of acidifying, eutrophying and ozone forming compounds (SO2, NOx, VOC and NH3).
The EU Commission has calculated proposed emission ceilings for each of the 15 EU
countries - the socalled NEC (National Emission Ceiling) directive, which was adopted in
October 2001.
In spite of a common basis for calculations the results are different, primarily
because no account is taken of areas that are sensitive to acidification in Norway, which
is not a member of the EU. For Denmark the ceilings for the four compounds are identical.
Consequences for Denmark
Danish emissions of SO2, NOx, VOC and NH3 are already
so strictly regulated that the required reductions will be achieved if current legislation
and existing environmental goals are fulfilled. For nitrogen oxide, however, the
fulfilment will to some extent depend upon electricity export and Denmark's implementation
of the Kyoto Protocol.
It is also worth noting that even full compliance with the Gothenburg Protocol can only
be considered a preliminary goal. It will not be sufficient to fully protect Danish nature
and environment.
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous
| | Next | | Top | |