Evaluation of in vitro assays for determination of estrogenic activity in the environment

TABLE 2. Comparison of detection limits, limits of quantification for
the whole method, EC50 values and assay time for the various in vitro
assays
Assay
Cell
Detection
limita)
(ng E2/l)
LOQb) for the
whole method
(ng EEQ/l)
EC50
(ng E2/l)
Assay
time
(days)
References
ER binding
272
3162
953 or 17,705
1
2
Murk et al., 2002
Gutendorf and Westendorf, 2001
ER-CALUX
T47D
0.1
0.001c)
1.6
3
Murk et al., 2002
Vethaak et al., 2002
MVLN assay
MVLN
1
4
Gutendorf and Westendorf, 2001
Chimeric receptor/
reporter gene assay
MCF-7
HeLa
HGELN
5
5
5.4
~10
11
3
3
4
Zacharewski et al ., 1995
Balaguer et al., 1996
Gutendorf and Westendorf, 2001
YES
Yeast
2.7
~2.75
£ 1
3
~2
0.03d)
27
~100
57
60
212
54
57
54 or 218
54
2 or 3
3-4
4-5
10
2
3
2
3
3
3 or 4
Murk et al., 2002
Witters et al ., 2001
Hugget et al., 2003
Kirk et al., 2002
Arijs et al., 2002 + pers. comm.
Folmar et al., 2002
Beresford et al., 2000
Segner et al., 2003
Miller et al., 2001
Tyler et al., 2000
Andersen et al ., 1999
Arnold et al., 1996
E-screen
MCF-7
0.27
0.07-0.14
1.3-2.2
0.3-2.7
1
8.7
0.03-1.9
1.7
6
6
8
6
6
5-6
Körner et al., 1998, 1999, 2000
Körner et al., 2001
Gutendorf and Westendorf, 2001
Folmar et al., 2002
Andersen et al ., 1999
Behnisch et al ., 2001
a) Detection limit not including concentration factors (see section 5.3.1).
|