| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next |
Scenarios and Model Describing Fate and Transport of Pesticides in Surface Water for Danish Conditions
Appendix B
1 Growth Curves
Winter wheat |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
25-sep |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
01-okt |
13 |
11 |
7 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
|
|
|
25-okt |
15 |
13 |
15 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
04-apr |
17 |
28 |
33 |
50 |
38.5 |
65.3 |
|
|
|
13-apr |
23 |
30 |
34 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
02-maj |
47 |
32 |
93 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
11-maj |
54 |
33 |
100 |
18.4 |
14.5 |
22.9 |
|
|
|
16-maj |
60 |
38 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
23-maj |
62 |
39 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
5 |
0.6 |
0.250 |
10-jun |
|
51 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
20-jun |
98 |
60 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
25-jun |
98 |
67 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
07-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
18-jul |
|
80 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
16-aug |
|
|
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
3 |
1.2 |
0.150 |
26-aug |
98 |
harvest |
100 |
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Winter rye |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
25-sep |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
01-okt |
13 |
11 |
7 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
|
|
|
25-okt |
15 |
13 |
15 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
04-apr |
17 |
28 |
33 |
50 |
38.5 |
65.3 |
|
|
|
13-apr |
23 |
30 |
34 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
02-maj |
47 |
32 |
93 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
11-maj |
54 |
33 |
100 |
18.4 |
14.5 |
22.9 |
|
|
|
16-maj |
60 |
38 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
18-maj |
|
39 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
5 |
0.6 |
0.250 |
10-jun |
98 |
51 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
20-jun |
|
60 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
25-jun |
|
67 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
07-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
1.2 |
0.300 |
15-jul |
|
80 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
06-aug |
|
|
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
16-aug |
98 |
harvest |
100 |
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Winter barley |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
25-sep |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
01-okt |
13 |
11 |
7 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
|
|
|
25-okt |
15 |
13 |
15 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
04-apr |
17 |
28 |
33 |
50 |
38.5 |
65.3 |
|
|
|
13-apr |
23 |
30 |
34 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
25-apr |
|
32 |
93 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
01-maj |
|
33 |
100 |
18.4 |
14.5 |
22.9 |
|
|
|
04-maj |
|
38 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
08-maj |
|
39 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
5 |
0.5 |
0.250 |
20-maj |
98 |
51 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
27-maj |
|
60 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
30-maj |
|
67 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
07-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
15-jun |
|
80 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
07-jul |
98 |
|
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
2 |
1.2 |
0.100 |
17-jul |
98 |
harvest |
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Spring cereal representing spring barley, spring wheat and oats |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
28-apr |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
05-maj |
11 |
13 |
14 |
65.1 |
53.7 |
79.8 |
|
|
|
11-maj |
14 |
23 |
40 |
49 |
41.7 |
57.5 |
|
|
|
18-maj |
17 |
32 |
59 |
38.9 |
34.2 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
22-maj |
24 |
33 |
67 |
23.8 |
19.7 |
28.8 |
|
|
|
28-maj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
0.4 |
0.100 |
31-maj |
33 |
35 |
76 |
23.8 |
19.7 |
28.8 |
|
|
|
10-jun |
55 |
50 |
80 |
15.8 |
13 |
19.5 |
|
|
|
20-jun |
62 |
51 |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25-jun |
|
60 |
|
17.3 |
14.1 |
21.3 |
|
|
|
27-jun |
65 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
30-jun |
|
69 |
|
17.3 |
14.1 |
21.3 |
|
|
|
07-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
20-jul |
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-aug |
|
87 |
|
20.4 |
16.6 |
24.9 |
4 |
1.2 |
0.200 |
21-aug |
65 |
87 |
|
20.4 |
16.6 |
24.9 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Sugar beets |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
02-maj |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
05-maj |
3 |
11 |
0.2 |
99.8 |
84.3 |
100 |
|
|
|
11-maj |
5 |
12 |
1.1 |
99.3 |
84.1 |
100 |
|
|
|
18-maj |
7 |
13 |
5.1 |
93.1 |
81.3 |
100 |
|
|
|
22-maj |
8 |
13 |
10 |
93.1 |
81.3 |
100 |
|
|
|
27-maj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
0.35 |
0.025 |
31-maj |
10 |
15 |
16 |
76.4 |
69.2 |
84.1 |
|
|
|
09-jun |
20 |
16 |
45 |
76.4 |
69.2 |
84.1 |
|
|
|
11-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.5 |
0.050 |
20-jun |
22 |
22 |
67 |
42.7 |
36.6 |
49.9 |
|
|
|
28-jun |
25 |
34 |
82 |
28.9 |
24.7 |
33.7 |
|
|
|
11-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1 |
0.250 |
27-jul |
38 |
39 |
94 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
8.9 |
|
|
|
09-aug |
38 |
39 |
100 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
8.9 |
|
|
|
12-nov |
38 |
harvest |
100 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
8.9 |
5 |
1 |
0.250 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Potatoes |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
21-maj |
|
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
05-jun |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
0.25 |
0.2 |
0.013 |
09-jun |
10 |
25 |
19 |
90.4 |
67.6 |
100 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
|
10-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-jun |
20 |
32 |
39 |
74.6 |
56 |
99.5 |
|
|
|
28-jun |
28 |
35 |
58 |
48.5 |
40.3 |
58.4 |
|
|
|
10-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.75 |
0.250 |
26-jul |
55 |
69 |
95 |
6.4 |
5 |
8.2 |
|
|
|
09-aug |
55 |
79 |
96 |
6.4 |
5 |
8.2 |
|
|
|
19-aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.75 |
0.250 |
29-aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
0.75 |
0.200 |
18-sep |
harvest |
|
|
6.4 |
5 |
8.2 |
0 |
0.75 |
0.100 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Peas |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
08-maj |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
07-jun |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.025 |
09-jun |
10 |
|
35 |
65 |
52 |
91 |
|
|
|
14-jun |
20 |
|
55 |
45 |
36 |
63 |
|
|
|
22-jun |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.7 |
0.250 |
26-jun |
50 |
|
85 |
15 |
12 |
21 |
|
|
|
07-jul |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.7 |
0.250 |
11-aug |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
0.7 |
0.125 |
15-aug |
50 |
|
85 |
15 |
12 |
21 |
|
|
|
26-aug |
0 |
|
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0.7 |
0.000 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Maize |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
15-maj |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
14-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.025 |
27-jun |
|
|
25 |
75 |
60 |
105 |
|
|
0.100 |
06-jul |
|
|
50 |
50 |
40 |
70 |
|
|
|
20-jul |
|
|
75 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
|
|
|
29-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
28-aug |
200 |
|
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
5 |
|
0.250 |
17-sep |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0.250 |
06-nov |
200 |
harvest |
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
3 |
1.2 |
0.150 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Spring rape |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
10-maj |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
30-maj |
|
|
40 |
60 |
48 |
84 |
1 |
0.25 |
0.050 |
09-jun |
|
|
80 |
20 |
16 |
28 |
|
|
|
29-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.7 |
0.250 |
14-jul |
|
|
|
20 |
16 |
28 |
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
09-aug |
80 |
|
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
|
|
|
18-aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
24-aug |
80 |
harvest |
|
10 |
8 |
14 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Winter rape |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
15-sep |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
25-okt |
|
|
25 |
75 |
60 |
105 |
1 |
0.2 |
0.050 |
13-apr |
|
|
25 |
75 |
60 |
105 |
1 |
0.2 |
0.050 |
24-apr |
|
|
40 |
60 |
48 |
84 |
|
|
|
06-maj |
|
|
80 |
20 |
16 |
28 |
|
|
|
18-maj |
|
|
80 |
20 |
16 |
28 |
5 |
0.5 |
0.250 |
13-jun |
100 |
|
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
13-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1.2 |
0.100 |
28-jul |
100 |
|
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Grass - for grazing/hay |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
20-apr |
7 |
|
|
10 |
8 |
14 |
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
19-maj |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
20-maj |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
25-maj |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
23-jun |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
24-jun |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
25-jun |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
24-jul |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
1 |
0.125 |
25-jul |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
25-jul |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
23-aug |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
24-aug |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
25-aug |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
23-sep |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
24-sep |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
25-sep |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
24-okt |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
25-okt |
7 |
|
|
10 |
8 |
14 |
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Apples |
Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
01-jan |
300 |
|
20 |
50 |
40 |
70 |
0 |
-0.8 |
0.000 |
20-apr |
|
|
20 |
35 |
28 |
49 |
0 |
-0.8 |
0.000 |
01-maj |
leaf emergence |
50 |
30 |
24 |
42 |
0.5 |
-0.8 |
0.025 |
01-jul |
|
|
|
20 |
16 |
28 |
4 |
-0.8 |
0.200 |
20-okt |
|
|
50 |
20 |
16 |
28 |
4 |
-0.8 |
0.200 |
21-okt |
300 |
|
20 |
50 |
40 |
70 |
0 |
-0.8 |
0.000 |
*Source: FOCUS (2000). # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on FOCUS (2000), Olsen, B. and Vang-Petersen, O. (1982): Frugttræers rodsystem, Frugtavleren, Dansk erhvervsfrugtavl, Januar 1982, 11. årgang, 417-421. @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Spruce |
|
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals |
Age of |
Crop |
Growth stage |
Crop |
Soil |
-0.95 |
0.95 |
|
|
|
culture |
height |
|
cover |
deposit |
|
|
LAI |
root depth |
Int Storage |
0 |
|
|
1-2 |
|
|
|
6 |
-0.5 |
0.300 |
1 |
70 |
|
2-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
95 |
76 |
100 |
herbicides |
|
|
3 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
150 |
|
33 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
45 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
insecticides |
|
|
7 |
|
|
55 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
|
|
|
8 |
harvesting |
|
* |
|
|
|
6 |
-0.5 |
0.3 |
For herbicides:
For soil treatment, weed cover 0
For leaf-treatment, weed cover 95
Dosage: 0.8 ha/ha due to spray tracks left untreated.
*Source: Thomas Robov, SJVF, Flakkebjerg |
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next | | Top |
Version 1.0 Maj 2004, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency
|