|
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next |
Scenarios and Model Describing Fate and Transport of Pesticides in Surface Water for Danish Conditions
Appendix B
1 Growth Curves
Winter wheat |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 25-sep |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 01-okt |
13 |
11 |
7 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
|
|
|
| 25-okt |
15 |
13 |
15 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
| 04-apr |
17 |
28 |
33 |
50 |
38.5 |
65.3 |
|
|
|
| 13-apr |
23 |
30 |
34 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
| 02-maj |
47 |
32 |
93 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
| 11-maj |
54 |
33 |
100 |
18.4 |
14.5 |
22.9 |
|
|
|
| 16-maj |
60 |
38 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
| 23-maj |
62 |
39 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
5 |
0.6 |
0.250 |
| 10-jun |
|
51 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
| 20-jun |
98 |
60 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
| 25-jun |
98 |
67 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
| 07-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 18-jul |
|
80 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
| 16-aug |
|
|
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
3 |
1.2 |
0.150 |
| 26-aug |
98 |
harvest |
100 |
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Winter rye |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 25-sep |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 01-okt |
13 |
11 |
7 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
|
|
|
| 25-okt |
15 |
13 |
15 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
| 04-apr |
17 |
28 |
33 |
50 |
38.5 |
65.3 |
|
|
|
| 13-apr |
23 |
30 |
34 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
| 02-maj |
47 |
32 |
93 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
| 11-maj |
54 |
33 |
100 |
18.4 |
14.5 |
22.9 |
|
|
|
| 16-maj |
60 |
38 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
| 18-maj |
|
39 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
5 |
0.6 |
0.250 |
| 10-jun |
98 |
51 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
| 20-jun |
|
60 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
| 25-jun |
|
67 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
| 07-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
1.2 |
0.300 |
| 15-jul |
|
80 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
| 06-aug |
|
|
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 16-aug |
98 |
harvest |
100 |
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Winter barley |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 25-sep |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 01-okt |
13 |
11 |
7 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
|
|
|
| 25-okt |
15 |
13 |
15 |
59.6 |
41.1 |
86.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
| 04-apr |
17 |
28 |
33 |
50 |
38.5 |
65.3 |
|
|
|
| 13-apr |
23 |
30 |
34 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.025 |
| 25-apr |
|
32 |
93 |
36.9 |
30.6 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
| 01-maj |
|
33 |
100 |
18.4 |
14.5 |
22.9 |
|
|
|
| 04-maj |
|
38 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
| 08-maj |
|
39 |
100 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
10.2 |
5 |
0.5 |
0.250 |
| 20-maj |
98 |
51 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
| 27-maj |
|
60 |
100 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
| 30-maj |
|
67 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
| 07-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 15-jun |
|
80 |
|
4.1 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
| 07-jul |
98 |
|
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
2 |
1.2 |
0.100 |
| 17-jul |
98 |
harvest |
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Spring cereal representing spring barley, spring wheat and oats |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 28-apr |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 05-maj |
11 |
13 |
14 |
65.1 |
53.7 |
79.8 |
|
|
|
| 11-maj |
14 |
23 |
40 |
49 |
41.7 |
57.5 |
|
|
|
| 18-maj |
17 |
32 |
59 |
38.9 |
34.2 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
| 22-maj |
24 |
33 |
67 |
23.8 |
19.7 |
28.8 |
|
|
|
| 28-maj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
0.4 |
0.100 |
| 31-maj |
33 |
35 |
76 |
23.8 |
19.7 |
28.8 |
|
|
|
| 10-jun |
55 |
50 |
80 |
15.8 |
13 |
19.5 |
|
|
|
| 20-jun |
62 |
51 |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25-jun |
|
60 |
|
17.3 |
14.1 |
21.3 |
|
|
|
| 27-jun |
65 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 30-jun |
|
69 |
|
17.3 |
14.1 |
21.3 |
|
|
|
| 07-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 20-jul |
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 06-aug |
|
87 |
|
20.4 |
16.6 |
24.9 |
4 |
1.2 |
0.200 |
| 21-aug |
65 |
87 |
|
20.4 |
16.6 |
24.9 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Sugar beets |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 02-maj |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 05-maj |
3 |
11 |
0.2 |
99.8 |
84.3 |
100 |
|
|
|
| 11-maj |
5 |
12 |
1.1 |
99.3 |
84.1 |
100 |
|
|
|
| 18-maj |
7 |
13 |
5.1 |
93.1 |
81.3 |
100 |
|
|
|
| 22-maj |
8 |
13 |
10 |
93.1 |
81.3 |
100 |
|
|
|
| 27-maj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
0.35 |
0.025 |
| 31-maj |
10 |
15 |
16 |
76.4 |
69.2 |
84.1 |
|
|
|
| 09-jun |
20 |
16 |
45 |
76.4 |
69.2 |
84.1 |
|
|
|
| 11-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.5 |
0.050 |
| 20-jun |
22 |
22 |
67 |
42.7 |
36.6 |
49.9 |
|
|
|
| 28-jun |
25 |
34 |
82 |
28.9 |
24.7 |
33.7 |
|
|
|
| 11-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1 |
0.250 |
| 27-jul |
38 |
39 |
94 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
8.9 |
|
|
|
| 09-aug |
38 |
39 |
100 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
8.9 |
|
|
|
| 12-nov |
38 |
harvest |
100 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
8.9 |
5 |
1 |
0.250 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Potatoes |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals* |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 21-maj |
|
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 05-jun |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
0.25 |
0.2 |
0.013 |
| 09-jun |
10 |
25 |
19 |
90.4 |
67.6 |
100 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
|
| 10-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20-jun |
20 |
32 |
39 |
74.6 |
56 |
99.5 |
|
|
|
| 28-jun |
28 |
35 |
58 |
48.5 |
40.3 |
58.4 |
|
|
|
| 10-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.75 |
0.250 |
| 26-jul |
55 |
69 |
95 |
6.4 |
5 |
8.2 |
|
|
|
| 09-aug |
55 |
79 |
96 |
6.4 |
5 |
8.2 |
|
|
|
| 19-aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.75 |
0.250 |
| 29-aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
0.75 |
0.200 |
| 18-sep |
harvest |
|
|
6.4 |
5 |
8.2 |
0 |
0.75 |
0.100 |
*Source: Jensen and Spliid (2003)
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations |
Peas |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 08-maj |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 07-jun |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.025 |
| 09-jun |
10 |
|
35 |
65 |
52 |
91 |
|
|
|
| 14-jun |
20 |
|
55 |
45 |
36 |
63 |
|
|
|
| 22-jun |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.7 |
0.250 |
| 26-jun |
50 |
|
85 |
15 |
12 |
21 |
|
|
|
| 07-jul |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.7 |
0.250 |
| 11-aug |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
0.7 |
0.125 |
| 15-aug |
50 |
|
85 |
15 |
12 |
21 |
|
|
|
| 26-aug |
0 |
|
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0.7 |
0.000 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Maize |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 15-maj |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 14-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.025 |
| 27-jun |
|
|
25 |
75 |
60 |
105 |
|
|
0.100 |
| 06-jul |
|
|
50 |
50 |
40 |
70 |
|
|
|
| 20-jul |
|
|
75 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
|
|
|
| 29-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 28-aug |
200 |
|
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
5 |
|
0.250 |
| 17-sep |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0.250 |
| 06-nov |
200 |
harvest |
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
3 |
1.2 |
0.150 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Spring rape |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 10-maj |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 30-maj |
|
|
40 |
60 |
48 |
84 |
1 |
0.25 |
0.050 |
| 09-jun |
|
|
80 |
20 |
16 |
28 |
|
|
|
| 29-jun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.7 |
0.250 |
| 14-jul |
|
|
|
20 |
16 |
28 |
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 09-aug |
80 |
|
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
|
|
|
| 18-aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 24-aug |
80 |
harvest |
|
10 |
8 |
14 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Winter rape |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 15-sep |
0 |
emergence |
0 |
100 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
| 25-okt |
|
|
25 |
75 |
60 |
105 |
1 |
0.2 |
0.050 |
| 13-apr |
|
|
25 |
75 |
60 |
105 |
1 |
0.2 |
0.050 |
| 24-apr |
|
|
40 |
60 |
48 |
84 |
|
|
|
| 06-maj |
|
|
80 |
20 |
16 |
28 |
|
|
|
| 18-maj |
|
|
80 |
20 |
16 |
28 |
5 |
0.5 |
0.250 |
| 13-jun |
100 |
|
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
5 |
1.2 |
0.250 |
| 13-jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1.2 |
0.100 |
| 28-jul |
100 |
|
90 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.000 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Grass - for grazing/hay |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 20-apr |
7 |
|
|
10 |
8 |
14 |
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 19-maj |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
| 20-maj |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 25-maj |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 23-jun |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
| 24-jun |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 25-jun |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 24-jul |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
1 |
0.125 |
| 25-jul |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 25-jul |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 23-aug |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
| 24-aug |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 25-aug |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 23-sep |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
| 24-sep |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 25-sep |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
| 24-okt |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
1 |
0.275 |
| 25-okt |
7 |
|
|
10 |
8 |
14 |
2.2 |
1 |
0.110 |
*Source: FOCUS –groundwater scenarios. # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on Plauborg and Olesen, (1991) and Daisy simulations, @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Apples |
| Date |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals@ |
Intercep- tion |
| Crop |
Growth stage* |
Crop |
Soil |
-95% |
95% |
LAI** |
Root depth** |
Storage** |
| height* |
|
cover* |
deposit* |
|
|
|
m |
mm |
| 01-jan |
300 |
|
20 |
50 |
40 |
70 |
0 |
-0.8 |
0.000 |
| 20-apr |
|
|
20 |
35 |
28 |
49 |
0 |
-0.8 |
0.000 |
| 01-maj |
leaf emergence |
50 |
30 |
24 |
42 |
0.5 |
-0.8 |
0.025 |
| 01-jul |
|
|
|
20 |
16 |
28 |
4 |
-0.8 |
0.200 |
| 20-okt |
|
|
50 |
20 |
16 |
28 |
4 |
-0.8 |
0.200 |
| 21-okt |
300 |
|
20 |
50 |
40 |
70 |
0 |
-0.8 |
0.000 |
*Source: FOCUS (2000). # the height of the crop is estimated (for colloid generation calculations).
**Source: Values used in the MIKE SHE model, based on FOCUS (2000), Olsen, B. and Vang-Petersen, O. (1982): Frugttræers rodsystem, Frugtavleren, Dansk erhvervsfrugtavl, Januar 1982, 11. årgang, 417-421. @ From comparison with the four measured crops, the deviation is estimated as –20 + 40 % (but maximum 100 %). |
Spruce |
| |
cm |
(BCCH) |
% |
% |
Deposition intervals |
| Age of |
Crop |
Growth stage |
Crop |
Soil |
-0.95 |
0.95 |
|
|
|
| culture |
height |
|
cover |
deposit |
|
|
LAI |
root depth |
Int Storage |
| 0 |
|
|
1-2 |
|
|
|
6 |
-0.5 |
0.300 |
| 1 |
70 |
|
2-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
5 |
95 |
76 |
100 |
herbicides |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
150 |
|
33 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
45 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
insecticides |
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
55 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
|
|
|
| 8 |
harvesting |
|
* |
|
|
|
6 |
-0.5 |
0.3 |
For herbicides:
For soil treatment, weed cover 0
For leaf-treatment, weed cover 95
Dosage: 0.8 ha/ha due to spray tracks left untreated.
*Source: Thomas Robov, SJVF, Flakkebjerg |
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next | | Top |
Version 1.0 Maj 2004, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency
|