| Front page | | Contents | | Previous |
Integrated Supply Chain Information
10. Annex
Annex 1
Establishing Eco-label criteria
Procedure
The procedure for establishing the eco-label criteria, including mapping and selection of the most important environmental aspects, comprise the following steps, schematically presented in figure 1.

Figure 1: Overview of the activities suggesting criteria for the EU Eco-label.
Feasibility and market investigations
Feasibility and market investigations map the various types of products within the product group in question on the common market, the amounts produced, imported and sold as well as the market structure
in the member states. Trade inside and outside the Union is also considered.
Consumer perceptions, functional differences between the product types and the need to establish sub-groups are mapped and evaluated.
Lifecycle evaluations
The most important environmental conditions for which criteria are to be prepared are defined using lifecycle evaluations. This work is carried out according to internationally recognized methods and
standards. Resource consumption, chemical consumption, packaging consumption, transport contribution as well as various removal and emission scenarios are all considered.
Improvement analysis
Improvement considerations primarily include the following aspects:
- The theoretical potential for environmental improvements compared with the possible changes in market structures. This is based on an improvement evaluation on the basis of the lifecycle
considerations.
- The technical, industrial and financial feasibility and market changes.
- Consumer behaviour, perceptions and preferences that can influence the efficiency of the eco-label.
Suggestions for eco-label criteria
The final suggestion for environmental criteria includes the relevant environmental conditions for the product group. Criteria to be included in the final criteria and to be omitted are a political decision. The
criteria agreed upon are prepared on the basis of lifecycle evaluations. The centralized organ has established which factors are so significantly potentially damaging to the environment that they are to be
included in the criteria.
The most essential environmental conditions are established by identifying the categories of environmental influences where the product investigated offers the biggest contribution seen from a lifecycle
perspective and among these conditions, those for which there is a substantial potential for improvements.
The result of this selection is a number of criteria clearly defining boundaries for the acceptable. These limit values are established as well-defined acceptance criteria to be met in order to obtain the EU
eco-label. The criteria are established by the authorities along with the different interest groups within the product type in question.
Click here to see the Figure 2.
The selection of criteria can be decided using various figures and tables. A normalization [1_1] of the various environmental impact categories can be used to compare the environmental impact potentials across
categories by means of which the categories with the greatest environmental impact potential can be identified. An example of such a graphic presentation for a lifecycle screening of paint is given in figure 2.
Criteria will be established for a number of different paints in order to create a reliable standard of comparison. Whenever possible, the paint types must come from a representative number of countries in the
Union.
The different categories can of course be divided further and categories with a big environmental impact can be identified.
The final step in the selection of environmental impact categories is to find those categories, which have the greatest potential for being lowered. The categories which make up the largest environmental
impact are listen in a form as shown below in table 1.
Flows/Effects |
Main Contribu-tion Stage |
Paints Comparison |
How to reduce environmental impact |
Consumptions |
|
|
|
Non renewable resource depletion |
Crude oil, Ti |
a>b,c>d |
Optimise TiO2 use, electricity reduction |
Renewable resour-ce consumption |
Wood |
b,c>a,d |
No possibility |
Water Discharge |
|
|
|
COD |
Ti emission |
. |
Optimise Ti use |
BOD |
|
. |
|
Euthrofication |
|
. |
|
Toxicity Potential |
|
. |
Decrease chemical discharge |
Air Emissions |
|
. |
|
VOC |
Paint Application |
. |
|
Global Warming |
TiO2 |
|
|
Particles |
|
|
|
Solid Waste |
|
|
|
Total Waste |
Paint application |
|
|
Table 1 Example of a segment of a scheme identifying categories of importance for eco labelling criteria.
The criteria, for which there is a possibility of reducing the environmental impact potential, are identified in the right column of the table above. If it is realistic to obtain the reduction potential without
overwhelming expenses, the category in question will be included in the criteria.
In practice, the criteria are worked out as a ban on specific ingredients, a limitation in the allowed content in the goods or a demand for declaration of certain ingredients.
The limits for the individual parameters must be reasonable and agreement must be reached about the values.
Thus, a number of environmental criteria are listed. The number of criteria listed varies greatly among the different product categories.
The purpose of the established criteria is that no more than 1/3 of the existing products on the market are able to meet the criteria [1_2] but that the criteria must be obtainable for the remaining products within
the category.
Other criteria
As mentioned previously, consumer products carrying the eco-label, must fulfil a number of environmental demands, which have been defined based on lifecycle evaluations.
In addition to the criteria, which are established based on the lifecycle analysis, the criteria include demands for health and for handling the product, i.e. manuals, noise, return declaration among others.
These criteria are included since the order dictates that the eco-label must contribute to consumer protection.
The aim has been to protect both the environment and the consumers' health when preparing the criteria for the various product types.
Health criteria
The criteria illustrated in figure 3 below include certain considerations relating directly to the health aspect.
Regulation EC No. 1980/2000 of 17 July 2000 (extract)
Article 2 section 4:
"The eco-label may not be awarded to substances or preparations classified as very toxic, toxic, dangerous to the environment, carcinogenic, toxic for reproduction, or mutagenic (...) nor to goods manufactured by processes which are likely to significantly harm man and/or the environment, or in their normal application could be harmful to the consumer."
Article 3, section. 2:
"(...) In evaluating the comparative improvements, consideration shall be given to (...) health and safety aspects (...)".
Figure 3 Health aspects in the order.
The health criteria are often indirectly included due to bans against substances with particular classifications (typically chronic effects such as cancer and reproduction toxicity), limitations in the allowed
amount of substances with less severe effects as well as declarations of ingredients for general consumer guidance.
Criteria concerning consumer behaviour
As the EU eco-label is based on lifecycle evaluations there is often, particularly for criteria for electronic products, a demand for a reuse declaration describing how dangerous parts and resource-scarce
components in a given apparatus may be safely disassembled or removed.
The chosen criteria will be submitted for hearing before a final approval can be made.
When the consumers buy a product labelled with the eco-label the product is environmentally sound compared to other products within the same category and that there is an agreement that these criteria are
generally acceptable.
Annex 2
Type III EPD systems
Sweden (EPD)
In Sweden, an official system for type III environmental product declarations called EPD (Environmental Product Declaration) [2_1] has been developed and established. The system is voluntary and can be
used worldwide by all interested companies and organizations. At the moment, interested parties from 7 other countries have joined the EPD system at various levels [2_2] . The Swedish EPD system is the
most developed type III product declaration type in the world.
In Sweden, EPDs have primarily been developed for energy-heavy products such as refrigerators, washing machines, pumps etc.
At the moment, environmental product declarations have been prepared for the following products and services:
Existing EPDs |
Freezers |
Refrigerators |
Washing machines |
Frequency converters |
Circuit breakers |
Transformers |
Waste collection services |
Landfills |
Production chemicals |
Ink |
Sink mixer taps |
District heating |
Galvanising processes |
Steel production |
Pumps |
Copy- and fax machines |
Hydro Power |
Nuclear Power |
Under preparation |
Packaging products (Tetra pak) |
Clay Bricks |
Print Toner |
Table 2 Overview of existing and scheduled EPDs
Other countries have developed type III product declarations as well. The systems used outside Sweden are typically used and developed within specific trades. One of the most extensively developed type
III declarations is the Canadian, which is briefly described below.
Canada (EPDS)
An environmental profile declaration similar to the Swedish EPD is used in the Canadian pulp and paper industry. The declaration is called EPDS, Environmental Profile Data Sheet [2_3], and is certified by
Terra Choice Environmental Services, inc. The EPDS is a standardized reporting form, which offers measurement data and explanatory comments related to a list of environmental attributes that cover the
lifecycle of pulp and paper products. It provides pulp and paper producers with a credible and cost-effective way of measuring and reporting on the environmental performance of individual products and the
mills that produce them. The data requirements of the EPDS are very similar to what is generally required in an EPD.
Japan (EcoLeaf)
The Japanese eco-label EcoLeaf [2_4] is designed to present comprehensive information in a quantitative form on lifetime environmental impact by the product or service, without making any judging statement
by any set criteria - it is entrusted to the reader. EcoLeaf is run by JEMAI (Japan Environmental Association for Industry).
By encouraging companies to participate, the EcoLeaf program aims at encouraging them to plan and then to develop eco-conscious products and services. This will give consumers a stronger awareness of
eco-conscious practices and allow them to choose and use environmentally friendly products. By facilitating communication of environmental information between producers and consumers, EcoLeaf aims at
creating a relationship of mutual trust, thereby contributing to the creation of a sustainable society.
The system is very similar to the Swedish EPD system with Product Specific Criteria (PSC) similar to PCR for each product type.
At the moment, PSC has been developed for the product categories listed in table 3.
Title |
Issued |
Electro-photographic Dry Process Photocopier |
6/13/2002 |
Insulation Material (polystyrene foam type) |
6/13/2002 |
Single-Use Camera |
6/13/2002 |
EP (Electro-photographic Printer) and IJ (Ink Jet) printer |
6/13/2002 |
Analogue Camera (with silver film) |
8/29/2002 |
Digital Printer-Duplicator |
8/29/2002 |
Data Projector |
8/29/2002 |
Thermal Transfer Card Printer |
8/29/2002 |
Facsimile |
11/14/2002 |
Water Meter Box |
11/14/2002 |
Communication Cable |
11/14/2002 |
Bidet Toilet Seat |
11/14/2002 |
Structural Aggregate |
1/22/2003 |
Porcelain products |
1/22/2003 |
Office Desk |
1/22/2003 |
Digital Camera |
3/26/2003 |
Notebook Computer |
3/26/2003 |
Grid Electricity |
5/2003 |
Drain Ditch Cover |
5/2003 |
Table 3 Present PSCs for the Japanese Eco-leaf system /10/
Norway (EPD)
NHO - Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry has initiated the EPD work in Norway [2_5]. The system is almost identical to the Swedish EPD-system. The Norwegian EPDs are prepared in
co-operation with The Federation of Norwegian Construction Industries, BNL. EPDs are prepared for cement, concrete and other building materials /13/. An overview of existing Norwegian EPD certified
product types are presented in table 4.
Product types with Norwegian EPD |
Sewage Pipes |
Concrete building materials |
Cement Materials |
Natural Gas |
Hydroelectric Power |
Chairs |
Plastic Jug |
Disabled sitting solution |
Cardboard Paper |
Table 4. Overview of existing Norwegian EPDs /13/
South Korea (EDP)
In 1998, the Korean Ministry of Environment and KELA (Korean Environmental Labelling Association) initiated the type III product declaration, EDP - Environmental Declaration of Products [2_6]. The
system is very similar to the Swedish and the Japanese systems regarding the development of PCR, the lifecycle perspectives etc. At the moment, EDP is mainly prepared for electronic appliances. One EDP
is developed for toilet paper as well. An overview of Korean EDPs is presented in table 5 below.
Product Category |
Product Model |
Manufacturer |
Refrigerator |
DIOS (87products) |
LG Electronics |
ZIPEL(SRS768CC) |
Samsung Electronics |
TFT-LCD Monitor |
SyncMaster(DV17AS) |
Samsung Electronics |
Glass for TV's and Monitor's |
17" Flat Type |
Samsung Corning |
Toilet Paper |
POPEE Plus |
Yuhan Kimberly |
PDP TV |
X-Canvas (MN-60PZ12) |
LG Electronics |
PAVV SPD-42P2S1 |
Samsung Electronics |
CD-Rom |
CD-RW Drive |
Samsung Electronics |
Microwave Range |
Toast MWO (MD-272-EJ) |
LG Electronics |
Air-conditioner |
Whisen LP-C080AD |
LG Electronics |
Whisen LP-C100AD |
LG Electronics |
Whisen LP-C150AD |
LG Electronics |
AP-W1240 |
Samsung Electronics |
Washing Machine (Drum Type) |
TROMM Washing Machines (WD-P070RD et al.) |
Samsung Electronics |
VCR (Video Cassette Recorder) |
VCR (SV-DVD630) |
Samsung Electronics |
Table 5 Existing Korean EPD /13/
Denmark (MVD)
In Denmark, a project has been initiated to establish a privately organised environmental declaration system [2_7]. The Danish system will be voluntary and internationally oriented so that if and when EU
guidelines and ISO standards are established, the Danish system is already coordinated with these efforts. The construction of the system will take place during the coming three years during which concrete
guidelines for the preparation of and control with environmental product declarations will be prepared. A template will also be prepared for the content and layout of an environmental product declaration. An
organization will be established along with a business plan for the future running and development of the system, including a suggestion for financing. Finally, the system and its guidelines will be tested by a
number of companies within some selected product groups. It has not yet been established which product groups the system will start up with, but the intention is that more and more products and services
will be covered by the system. Testing will last approximately one year ending in the fall of 2006. From the turn of the New Year 2006/2007, the system must be up and running and function without support
from the EPA. Companies and organizations will then immediately be able to prepare environmental product declarations according to the product specific guidelines developed during testing and begin the
development of product specific guidelines for other product groups.
Annex 3
Eco-label criteria and EPD requirements for washing machines
An area, in which a direct comparison between the EU eco label and an environmental product declaration can be made, is washing machines. To compare the two sets of criteria, the EU eco label
requirements [3_1] are listed together with the product specific requirements for washing machines [3_2]. The main data requirements for the two environmental performance criteria are presented in table 6.
Table 6 Data inventory requirements for the EU eco label and PCR for washing machines.
Category |
EU eco-label |
EPD |
Manufacturer info |
Manufacturing Company |
Yes |
Yes |
Manufacturing Site |
Yes |
Yes |
Issuer and contact |
Yes |
Yes |
Guarantee statement |
Yes |
No |
Environmental performance
declaration |
Refinement |
No |
Yes |
Resource Consumption |
No |
Yes |
Electricity use |
No |
Yes |
Transportation |
Refinement Production |
No |
Yes |
Production Sale |
No |
Yes |
Sale Use |
No |
Yes |
Use Disposal |
No |
Yes |
Production |
Energy Consumption |
No |
Yes |
Use of Chemicals |
Yes, detailed |
Yes, detailed especially for use of heavy metals as well as halogenated and brominated flame
retardants |
Material List |
Yes, some specific materials, mainly chemicals. |
Yes, total list |
Emission Estimation to air and water |
Yes, name of components |
Yes |
Greenhouse Emissions |
No |
Yes |
Resource Consumption |
No |
Yes |
Use |
Energy Efficiency |
Yes [3_3] |
Yes |
Water Consumption |
Yes |
Yes |
Spin Drying Efficiency |
Yes |
Yes |
Noise |
Yes |
Yes |
Control of Detergent use |
Yes |
No (not mandatory) |
Criteria for users manual |
Yes |
No |
Washing Performance |
Yes |
Yes |
Estimated Lifetime |
No, but a two year guarantee |
Yes |
Disposal |
Recycling rate |
Yes, declaration has to be done |
Yes Specification has to be made |
Waste amounts |
No |
Yes |
Hazardous waste amounts |
Yes |
Yes |
Separable hazardous materials |
Yes, declaration has to be made |
No |
3: Information from the company and
certification body |
Data is sent to the Eco-label secretariat. The label is issued,
but the data is kept confidential. |
Specific data is kept confidential depending of the PCR, but the environmental key figures and
conclusion are to be stated in the EPD, which is public accessible. |
Annex 4
PCR for Chemical products
The PCR for chemical products [4_1] is defined for both substances and preparations. Preparations are mixtures or solutions consisting of two or more substances. The PCR is based of the entire lifecycle.
For some product areas within chemical products further clarification could be needed. Principally, it might come into question to make a complement for chemi-cal products with a specific application and
long manufacturing chains.
Prerequisites for the PCR:
Functional unit:
The functional unit is set to 1000 kg paint.
System boundaries:
Data to be included in the PCR
- Extraction of resources
- Transport of resources
- Refinement of resources
- Transport of refined resource
- Manufacturing of the chemical product
- Transport to costumer
- Use of the product
Manufacturing phase of the EPD is including the first 5 parts of the system boundaries.
Time limitations:
Inventory data must be given as annual mean values and be representative for the production. The period of time when the LCA is carried out must be stated in the environmental declaration.
Limitations within the lifecycle:
The following is not included:
- environmental impact from manufacture of capital goods as well as building of plants.
- Packages used at deliveries directly to or from the company.
Packages in previous stages can be excluded.
Boundaries towards other products life cycle:
Recovered material is presented as flows out of the system and flows in to the sy-stem respectively. On the contrary refinement and transport of recovered fuel to en-ergy transformation plants must be
included as well as environmental impact from combustion of the recovered fuel
within the studied life cycle.
Boundaries towards the nature:
Waste, by-products and waste energy generated within the manufacturing phase of chemical products is presented as outflows. An exception is when system expansi-on is used.
Waste management handled by the producer itself must not be included. Inflows not followed from the cradle must be presented. Waste handling in previous stages, not declared as outflows, must also be
presented.
Geographic boundaries:
Potential environmental impact from emissions from processes in different stages of the life cycle must be included, no matter geographic location.
Cut-off rule:
Processes/activities estimated to contribute to less than 1 % of the total environ-mental impact of the product, for any impact category, can be omitted.
Use phase:
All declarations must include a presentation of the environmental impact from the transport to costumer.
Most chemical products have many different fields of application and are often intermediate products used in other production processes. In the usage phase a short description of the main applications of the
chemical product is given. Branch specific information can be used.
When the chemical product has a predominant field of application, a quantitative description of environmental characteristics must be included, e.g. waste production, energy consumption etc. If the product
is commonly used as an inflow waste data does not need to be included.
Common environmental impact categories:
Use of resources [kg/FE],
Use of resources with energy content [MJ/FU]
All energy consumption must be presented in net values
Electricity Consumption [kWh/FU]
Toxic Substances emissions [g/FU]
Calculation of impact categories:
Greenhouse Gases: g CO2-eq/FU
Ozone depleting gases [g CFC11/FU]
Acidifying Gases [mole H+/FU]
Contribution to creation of ground water ozone [g ethane equivalents/FU]
Contribution to ozone depletion [O2-eq/FU]
Resource consumption [nPE/FU]
Eco-Toxic Substances [nPE/FU]
Humane-Toxic Substances [nPE/FU]
Additional environmental impacts:
Emission to air:
CO2 (fossil), SO2, CH4, NOx, NMVOC alternatively HC, particles
Emission to water:
N total, P total. COD alternatively BOD or TOC.
Emissions of toxic substance:
Selection of toxic substances must be motivated. If no toxic substances are selected, this action must be motivated as well. Toxic substances must be specified as far as possible
Declaration of contents:
To be included in EPD for all chemical products. Must include health- and environ-mentally dangerous substances, categories of danger, symbol letters and risk phrases.
The declaration of content must consist of a list of material nouns according to the SDS (item 2). Categories of danger, symbol letters and risk phrases must be given according to the information from item
15 in the SDS.
Annex 5
Eco-label criteria for paint/varnish and PCR for chemical products
Annex 4 contains a description of the PCR for chemical products. It is much harder to comprehend the inventory data of an EPD for chemical products than that of the criteria for the EU eco label
application form, but some of the routines regarding data requirements are identical.
The EU eco label focuses on chemicals in the finished product while the EPD requires data on the entire lifecycle. The EU eco label has data requirements that are very well defined whereas the PCR for
chemical products requires individual choices of limitations with thorough explanations for the decisions made.
To some extent, it is possible to share data (PCR and EU eco label) on the chemical contents of the products, since part of the inventory data requirements for EPDs are similar to corresponding
requirements for the EU eco label. Sharing of information is possible regarding identification of risk sentences, hazard identification, general company data, emission estimation, etc. Table 7 sums up
similarities and differences between the two varieties of environmental labelling.
The EU Eco-label Paint/Varnish [5_1]
|
The EPD/PCR Chemical Products
|
General Information |
Product group well-defined |
Product group not specific |
Based on finished product |
Based on functional unit of 1000 kg |
|
Definition of product, manufacturing process, manufacturing location etc is needed |
Labelling |
A declaration description (SDS or similar) for ingredients has to be handed in to the certification
body |
Labelling: Health and risk sentences, symbol letters have to be stated according to section 15 in the SDS |
Cut-off rule |
Certification has decided which information is required. |
The manufacturer can omit information concerning activities assessed to contribute to less than 1% of the
total environmental impact. The manufacturer has to explain the reason for omitting data. |
Extraction |
No information required. |
Detailed information on extraction and resource consumption, energy use and emission scenarios are
required. |
Production |
Requirements to emissions of SOx, sulphate waste and chloride waste from the production of
the titanium dioxide pigment used. |
Requirements for a detailed description of environmental impact potential in the produc-tion phase, keeping
the cut-off rule in mind. |
No information required. |
Emission information required. Emission to air (CO2, CH4, NOx, CO, VOC and particles)
Emission to water: N total, P total, COD.
Emission of toxic substances. Selection criteria shall be included
|
Product requirements |
Declaration of contents required. |
Declaration of contents required. |
Instruction manual required. |
1.1.1
|
Restrictions on the content of white pigment, VOC, VHS, heavy metals and dangerous
substances. |
General information on chemical content of a product is required. |
|
|
Ingredients criteria: Restrictions on content of compounds labelled as dangerous to the
environment”, the content of formaldehyde, and izothiazolinone compounds. |
General information on the chemical content of a product is required |
Any use of alkylphenoletoxylates and Diethylene glycol methyl ether is prohibited |
General information of chemical content of a product is required. |
Use |
Declarations on covering power, water resistance etc. |
Not mandatory. Description of application method needed. |
Safety instructions required |
No immediate requirements, but if the chemical product has a predominant field of application, a quantitative
assessment of environmental performance of this particular scenario should be presented. |
Transport |
No requirements |
Impact potentials from transport have to be estimated. |
Disposal |
Description of recommended disposal procedures has to be declared, if possible through
pictograms |
Recycling material, hazardous waste and other waste information is mandatory. An explicit recycling declaration is voluntary
|
Other |
|
Name of certification body and reference to homepage of EPD system needed. |
Table 7 Comparison of EU eco label criteria for paints and varnishes and the PCR for chemical products.
It would be preferable if a more specific PCR for different types of products were divided into more product-specific groups such as for the EU eco label. The EU Eco-label has its main focus on chemicals,
while the PCR requires data on energy, resources, transportation, electricity, recycling potential etc.
Based on the existing requirements, chemical products are not the most ideal “
product type”
for which to obtain an immediate synergy improvement by integrating the two types of regulations.
An interesting point regarding the PCR is that additional requirements are needed, if the chemical product has “
a predominant field of application”
. If this is the case, a quantitative description of the
environmental performance related to the specific use of the product is required. This will make the EPD for different chemical product groups more specific than for the general PCR guideline. However,
there is no requirement to the form of this additional information. This lack of criteria can make it difficult to make a direct comparison between two products in the same group.
The possibility of integrating the data collection when applying for the EU Eco-label and preparing an EPD can be beneficial to both tasks, if the planning is elaborated thoroughly. The additional data for the
EPD for a specific product type and the product-specific descriptions can be performed relatively easily if consulting the EU Eco-label certification body.
If the guidelines for elaborating an EPD for chemical products were described for a specific product type instead, information and data sharing between the EU Eco-label application and the EPD elaboration
activities will become less complicated. To achieve a significant synergy effect by gathering the two types of product declarations, it is preferable if the declarations are performed on well-defined specific
product types rather than vague definitions
Footnotes
[1_1]During normalization, the environmental impact potentials and resource consumption of a product is seen in relation to a common reference impact in order to evaluate which impacts are big and which are small. This makes it easier to compare the categories directly.
[1_2]Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the european parliament and of the council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme
[2_1]www.environdec.com
[2_2]Countries with existing EPD programs: Sweden, Belgium, Poland, Finland, Italy, Japan, Denmark and South Korea. In Norway, an EPD program is underway.
[2_3]http://www.terrachoice.com/Home/Certification/Environmental%20Choice%20Program
[2_4]http://www.jemai.or.jp/english/ecoleaf/outline.cfm
[2_5]http://www.epd-norge.no/
[2_6]http://www.koeco.or.kr/eng/index.asp
[2_7]The parties to solve the task are Erik K. Jørgensen AS (EKJ) (Project management), Instituttet for produktudvikling (IPU) Dansk Standard (DS), AB Svenska Miljostyrningsrådet and Valør & Tinge A/S. In addition, a number of trade organizations and companies participate in the work.
[3_1]Commission decision of 17. December 1999 establishing the ecological criteria for award of the Community eco-label to washing machines, (2000/45/EC)
[3_2]Product-Specific Requirements. Household washing machines and household dishwashers, PSR 2001:2. The Swedish Environmental Management Council, Version 1.0, 2001-11-21
[3_3]For the eco-label, only rigid statements are needed in order to fulfil the criteria. For EPDs, quantifiable data is required. Thus sharing of data is not possible if only rigid statements are received, only the other way around.
[4_1]Product-Specific Requirements. Chemical Products, PSR 2000:5, The Swedish Environmental Management Council Version 1.0 2000-12-28
[5_1]Commision decision of 3 September 2002 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Communityeco-label to indoor paints and varnishes and amending Decision 1999/10/EC
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | | Top |
Version 1.0 February 2006, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency
|