Buffer zones for biodiversity of plants and arthropods: is there a compromise on width?

Table 3.14. Schematic summary of the statistical analyses on abundance of pitfall-caught epigaeic arthropods.

Class/order Family Subfamily/ Genus Period² Test results F(ndf,ddf)P¹
        Field³ Distance4 Buffer5 Buffer × distance6
Araneae     1 6.02(3, 15)** 3.94(4, 12)* 1.80(4, 13)NS 2.68(16, 49)**
      2 4.78(3, 15)* 10.91(4, 16)*** 20.96(4, 14)*** 7.72(16, 47)***
      3 6.85(3, 13)** 39.70(4, 40)*** 42.94(4, 17)*** 25.24(16, 48)***
  Linyphiidae   1 0.48(3, 63.47)NS 10.96(4, 85.19)*** 1.38(4, 14)NS 0.76(16, 48)NS
      2 3.60(3, 11)* 13.01(4, 12)*** 17.30(4, 14)*** 7.53(16, 49)***
      3 6.41(3, 16)** 34.37(4, 19)*** 38.67(4, 18)*** 21.28(16, 46)***
  Lycosidae   1 4.30(3, 15)* 2.06(4, 13)NS 0.56(4, 14)NS 2.28(16, 49)*
Coleoptara Carabidae   1 5.863, 16)** 1.29(4, 12)NS 0.47(4, 12)NS 1.70(16, 49)NS
      2 4.94(3, 18)* 6.73(4, 13)** 4.20(4, 13)* 4.03(16, 50)***
      3 11.47(3, 14)*** 3.03(4, 12)NS 5.59(4, 12)** 3.31(16, 49)***
    Agonum 3 1.75(3, 12)NS 2.14(4, 13)NS 0.55(4, 14)NS 1.13(16, 48)NS
    Bembidion 1 4.39(3, 12)* 10.63(4, 9)** 1.21(4, 17)NS 1.76(16, 44)NS
      2 3.83(3, 14)* 20.72(4, 25)*** 7.02(4, 21)*** 4.96(16, 54)***
      3 7.41(3, 11)** 5.18(4, 12)* 2.22(4, 10)NS 2.28(16, 47)*
    Harpalus 1 17.78(3, 13)*** 3.08(4, 9)NS 0.42(4, 12)NS 1.52(16, 53)NS
      2 5.04(3, 17)* 1.41(4, 12)NS 0.38(4, 11)NS 1.99(16, 49)*
      3 8.08(3, 12)** 4.43(4, 10)* 3.74(4, 10)* 3.09(16, 46)**
    Nebria 1 2.00(3, 12)NS 7.36(4, 11)** 0.95(4, 24)NS 1.46(16, 48)NS
    Pterostichus 1 7.60(3, 10)** 9.60(4, 12)*** 0.44(4, 10)NS 1.34(16, 47)NS
      2 2.95(3, 12)NS 1.37(4, 9)NS 1.70(4, 11)NS 2.01(16, 44)*
      3 26.89(3, 16)*** 0.58(4, 12)NS 0.87(4, 10)NS 1.56(16, 53)NS
  Staphylinidae   1 4.67(3, 17)* 5.56(4, 13)** 0.29(4, 12)NS 0.68(16, 49)NS
      2 0.45(3, 17)NS 0.41(4, 12)NS 0.20(4, 12)NS 3.53(16, 48)***
      3 2.56(3, 15)NS 1.10(4, 12)NS 0.22(4, 12)NS 2.54(16, 48)**
    Aleocharinae 1 1.57(3, 14)NS 2.06(4, 13)NS 0.39(4, 11)NS 0.77(16, 48)NS
      2 0.19(3, 14)NS 4.93(4, 15)NS 1.18(4, 12)NS 1.86(16, 51)*
      3 0.76(3, 18)NS 0.87(4, 13)NS 0.20(4, 12)NS 2.67(16, 50)**
    Oxytelinae 1 4.45(3, 11)* 5.45(4, 9)* 0.15(4, 11)NS 2.22(16, 42)*
      2 1.73(3, 14)NS 1.33(4, 12)NS 0.42(4, 12)NS 3.37(16, 46)***
      3 7.33(3, 16)** 4.23(4, 13)* 2.88(4, 15)NS 2.37(16, 53)**
    Tachyporus 2 4.92(3, 10)* 23.66(4, 58)*** 0.53(4, 15)NS 2.17(16, 58)*

¹ NS Not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. F is the F-value, ndf and ddf is the numerator and denominator degree of freedom used for testing the significance.

² Three sampling periods: 1. After herbicide application (May), 2. After first insecticide application (June), 3. After second insecticide application (July).

³ Effect of field (four fields were included in the experiment).

4 Effect of distance from field edge (sampling was carried out 0, 2, 5, 9 and 18 m from the field edge).

5 Effect of buffer width (0, 4, 6, 12 and 24 m).

6 Effect of the combination of distance and buffer width (in total there were 5 × 5 = 25 combinations).

 



Version 1.0 November 2009, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency