Buffer zones for biodiversity of plants and arthropods: is there a compromise on width?

Table 3.20. Correlations between species richness of various test taxa. The analyses were carried out on the July data.

Test combination Test results F(ndf,ddf)P¹ Estimate±S.E.
  Field² Treatment³ Species richness
relationship4
Species richness relationship(Treatment)5 Species richness
relationship
Heteroptera vs. dicots.7 - 44.18(1, 77)*** 1.35(1, 77)NS - -
           
Carabidae vs. dicots. - 0.36(1, 77)NS 1.58(1, 77)NS - -
           
Lepidoptera vs. dicots. - 1.04(1, 77)NS 3.67(1, 77)(0.059) - 0.111 ± 0.058
           
Herbivorous coleopterans vs. dicots8 - 9.51(1, 77)** 0.28(1, 77)NS - -
           
Heteroptera vs. Lepidoptera - 78.63(1, 77)*** 5.89(1, 77)* - 0.345 ± 0.142
           
Carabidae vs. Lepidoptera 12.89(3, 75)*** 1.211,74)NS 4.24(1, 74)* - 0.636 ± 0.309
           
Herbivorous coleopterans vs. Lepidoptera - - - 24.51(2, 77)*** Treated area:
0.390 ± 0.113
Buffer area:
-0.237 ± 0.160
Herbivorous coleopterans vs. Lepidoptera - 0.051,76)NS 0.62(2, 76)NS 4.50(1, 77)* Treated area:
0.353 ± 0.198
Buffer area:
NS

¹ NS not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. F is the F-value, ndf and ddf is the numerator and denominator degree of freedom used for testing the significance.

²Effect of field (four fields were included in the experiment).

²Effect of field (four fields were included in the experiment).

³Buffer zone or pesticide and fertilizer treated field.

4Effect of correlation between test taxa.

5Effect of correlation between test species within treatment.

6The estimated relationship between species richness of test taxa.

7Species richness of dicotyledonous plants.

8Complex of Chrysomelidae and Curculionidea.

 



Version 1.0 November 2009, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency