[Front page] [Contents] [Previous]

Substitutes for Potent Greenhouse Gases

Appendix A: List over refrigerants and refrigerant mixtures

In the below table the most common refrigerants, consisting of single substances, are stated:

Substance
R-number
Chemical formula
ODP-value
GWP-value (100 yrs)
Halon-1301
R-13B1
CBrF3
10
5.600
CFC-11
R-11
CFCl3
1.0
4.000
CFC-12
R-12
CF2Cl2
1.0
8.500
CFC-115
R-115
CClF2CF3
0.6
9.300
HCFC-22
R-22
CHF2Cl
0.055
1.700
HCFC-124
R-124
CF3CHClF
0.03
480
HCFC-142b
R-142b
C2H3F2Cl
0.065
2.000
HFC-23
R-23
CHF3
0
11.700
HFC-32
R-32
CH2F2
0
650
HFC-125
R-125
C2HF5
0
2.800
HFC-134a
R-134a
CH2FCF3
0
1.300
HFC-143a
R-143a
CF3CH3
0
3.800
HFC-152a
R-152a
C2H4F2
0
140
HFC-227ea
R-227ea
C3HF7
0
2.900
PFC-14
R-14
CF4
0
6.500
PFC-116
R-116
C2F6
0
9.200
PFC-218
R-218
C3F8
0
7.000
Isobutane (HC-600a)
R-600a
CH(CH3)3
0
3
Propane (HC-290)
R-290
C3H8
0
3
Ethane (HC-170)
R-170
C2H6
0
3
Ethene (Ethylene)
R-1150
CH2CH2
0
3
Propylene (HC-1270)
R-1270
C3H6
0
3
Ammonia
R-717
NH3
0
0
Carbondioxide
R-744
CO2
0
1
Air
R-729
-
0
0
Water
R-718
H2O
0
0


From below mentioned table various refrigeration mixtures in the 400-serie (zeotropic mixtures) appear. Calculation of the ODP and GWP values is possible according to the values in the table for single substances, as the ratio of mixture according to single substances is weighted.

R-No.
Substances
GWP-value (100 yrs)
Concentration in weight-%
R-401A
HCFC-22/HFC-152a/HCFC-124
1082
53/13/34
R-402A
HCFC-22/HFC-125/HC-290
2326
38/60/2
R-403A
HCFC-22/PFC-218/HC-290
2675
75/20/5
R-403B
HCFC-22/PFC-218/HC-290
3682
56/39/5
R-404A
HFC-143a/HFC-125/HFC-134a
3260
52/44/4
R-406A
HCFC-22/HC-600a/HCFC-142b
1755
55/4/41
R-407C
HFC-32/HFC-125/HFC-134a
1526
23/25/52
R-408A
HCFC-22/HFC-143a/HFC-125
2743
47/46/7
R-409A
HCFC-22/HCFC-142b/HCFC-124
1440
60/15/25
R-410A
HFC-32/HFC-125
1725
50/50
R-412A
HCFC-22/HCFC-142b/PFC-218
2040
70/25/5
R-413A
HFC-134a/PFC-218/HC-600a
1774
88/9/3
R-414A
HCFC-22/HCFC-124/HCFC-142b/HC-600a
1329
51/28.8/16.5/4
R-415A
HCFC-22/HFC-23/HFC-152a
1966
80/5/15

Refrigeration mixtures in the 500 serie (azeotropic mixtures) appear from the following table:

R-No.
Substances
GWP-value (100 yrs)
Concentration in weight-%
R-502
CFC-115/HCFC-22
5576
51/49
R-507
HFC-143a/HFC-125
3300
50/50
R-508A
HFC-23/PFC-116
10175
39/61
R-508B
HFC-23/PFC-116
10350
46/54
R-509A
HCFC-22/PFC-218
4668
44/56

Appendix B: Commercial refrigeration systems

The commercial refrigeration systems installed in retail stores, supermarkets, restaurants, computer centres etc. account for the most important economic area within the refrigeration industry. In addition, the widest range of applications lies within this area. On this background various conditions like prices, energy consumption, refrigerant leakage and the TEWI value (Total Equivalent Warming Impact) will be elucidated in this appendix.

In chapter B.1 a price comparison between liquid chillers using R-404A, hydrocarbons and ammonia is made, whereas conditions like energy consumption, refrigerant leakage and the TEWI value for supermarkets systems are addressed in chapter B.2. In chapter B.3 detailed price differences between a traditional refrigeration system and a similar refrigeration system using hydrocarbon refrigerant are shown.

B1. Comparison of prices between ammonia, hydrocarbon and HFC refrigeration systems (liquid chillers)

The comparison will be based on liquid coolers (chillers) and on this background price differences and the reason for such will be analysed. An estimate of how prices are expected to develop in the future is given.

Today HFC and ammonia refrigeration systems are produced in large quantities. Basically, the HFC refrigeration systems use the same technology as CFC and HCFC refrigeration systems, and ammonia refrigeration systems have been produced for more than 100 years. Recently, ammonia has been replaced by artificial refrigerants, however application of ammonia is rapidly in progress within the field of large liquid coolers, air conditioning etc.

Compared to this, the use of hydrocarbons is relatively new within the area of commercial refrigeration systems. Some of these are produced in Sweden and Germany, where quite a number of refrigeration systems operating on propane or propene has been installed. These systems are produced in small quantities and compared to HFC refrigeration systems prices continue to be relatively high. A rapid improvement of competitiveness could be possible.

Haukås
A report for SFT, Norway (Report 97:32, SFT) has been prepared by Hans T. Haukås. This report includes prices on various types of refrigeration systems.

According to Haukås the following prices for systems over 10 kW are to be taken into consideration:

- a 12.5% price increase for refrigeration systems using HFC-134a compared to systems using R-404 or R-507

- a 10-40% price increase for liquid cooling aggregates using ammonia or hydrocarbons compared to systems using R-404A or R-507

- application of ammonia or hydrocarbon requires a certain extra charge for machine room safety

According to Haukås, the figures should be regarded as guides and some examples deviate on both sides of the scale. As far as large refrigeration systems are concerned, application of ammonia will be directly competitive. No investigation has been carried out as far as application of hydrocarbons is concerned.

Grødem
In the trade magazine ScanRef (Scandinavian Refrigeration 3/98) Bjørn Grødem, also from Norway, states that the above price differences are somewhat lower. Grødem=s statement is based on German investigations of refrigeration systems for supermarkets, where comparisons between indirect cooling with R-404A, ammonia and hydrocarbons have been made. Prices have been compared with a direct R-404A refrigeration system as well.

Table B.1: Price comparison between different types of supermarket systems. According to Grødem, ScanRef 3/98. Index 100 is the value for direct cooling with R-404A.

  Direct system using R404a
Indirect system using R-404A
Indirect system using ammonia
Indirect system using propane/
propene
Pipe system
15%
25-30%
25-30%
25-30%
Refrigeration cabinets and air coolers
45%
45%
45%
45%
Refrigeration system
20%
25%
34-40%
23-28%
Refrigerant, oil and brine
2%
2%
2%
2%
Control and electrical installation
15%
15%
16%
(extra for safety)
17%
(extra for safety)
Planning
3%
3%
3%
3%
Price
100%
115-120%
125-135%
115-125%

As can be seen in table B.1, direct refrigeration systems are the most competitive. In addition, only a limited price difference between the indirect systems appears. In particular, only a small price difference (a minor percentage of the total costs of system) appears when comparing the R-404A and the hydrocarbon system.

Estimation of prices for hydrocarbon refrigeration systems
In co-operation with Alexander C. Pachai, AirCon A/S, Denmark, DTI Energy has made an analysis of future prices for hydrocarbon systems compared with a similar HFC refrigeration system.

The analysis assumes a large-scale production of the hydrocarbons systems similar to the present production of HFC refrigeration systems, thus achieving large-scale production benefits. The analysis also assumes that authorities have issued explicit guidelines on the building of hydrocarbon systems and that fitters have been properly trained in handling hydrocarbons. These requirements prevail in Sweden, where the company Bonus Energy AB builds hydrocarbon refrigeration systems, but not in other Nordic countries.

Components
Most of the components used in a hydrocarbon system are similar to the ones used in an HFC refrigeration system, and thus the price level will be identical. However, a certain price difference prevails for automatic controls. Application of explosion-safe components like differential pressure controllers, thermostats, terminal boxes, relays and ventilators, registered in the IP 44 safety category, is demanded. In Denmark the IP 23 safety category is normally used for commercial refrigeration systems, but this category is not sufficient for use of hydrocarbons. An example of a 14 kW refrigeration system is shown in chapter B.3, where the prices of component are shown as well. From this example a 4.3% price difference occurs, however this difference will be reduced for large systems.

Assembling
In hydrocarbon systems all joints and connections must be soldered. HFC refrigeration systems may be connected either by means of soldering or by use of screw fittings. Although the soldering process will require more working hours, this is expected to be equalised by decreased material consumption (i.e. screw fittings). Additional costs are expected in the range of 0 - 1%. The time used for leak detection is similar to that used for an HFC refrigeration system.

Safety
In the case of indoor machine room installation of the refrigeration system, the presence of a gas alarm at ground level is required. In case of outdoor or semi-roof installation, this precaution may not be necessary. The same requirements are valid for an HFC refrigeration system, which ought also to include a refrigerant leakage detector. The price for a gas alarm and the associated ventilator amounts to approximately DKK 6000 (list price).

Education
To secure that fitters are duly skilled for proper handling of hydrocarbons, establishment of a training system is required. Until now this is only the case in Sweden.

Equipment
For proper hydrocarbon handling, the assembling company needs suitable equipment.
The price of a hydrocarbon leak detector is almost similar to the one required for artificial refrigerants, e.g. HFC, which is also the case with a hydrocarbon charging aggregate. In addition, an explosion-safe vacuum pump is required, the price of which will be approximately 50% higher than the price of a traditional pump (list price is approximately DKK 7150).

For some time, the Danish transport requirements for pressure bottles containing hydrocarbon refrigerant have been the cause of confusion. According to previous advice issued by the Danish Society for Gas Technology, gas bottles should be placed in safety rooms in the service cars. Consequently, the requirements will differ from those of other gas bottles, e.g. acetylene for welding and soldering processes. At the moment, DTI Energy is investigating these requirements.

Conclusion
It has been concluded that the price of hydrocarbon systems is somewhat higher than that of similar HFC refrigeration systems. The price difference ranges between 10-40%, however, nothing will prevent a significant decrease of this in the future. Compared to a HFC refrigeration system, components for a 14 kW output hydrocarbon system are about 5% more expensive. In addition, due to the assembling process a 1% price increase will appear, including a possible additional charge for detector installation. However, use of detector is also recommended for HFC refrigeration systems.

Supermarket hydrocarbon refrigeration must be carried out by means of indirect cooling. Thus, the difference from an HFC refrigeration with direct system systems becomes more significant.

Estimation of future prices for ammonia refrigeration systems
Today ammonia refrigeration systems are competitive when taking systems larger than 100 kW into consideration. However, this is not yet the case with small and medium sized refrigeration systems, a fact, which can be changed. Not until recently has the use of ammonia in small and medium sized refrigeration systems been in focus and the number of available compressors is increasing.

However, the price level of these continues to be higher compared to prices of similar compressors for HFC refrigerants, but it is likely to believe that price equalisation will be generated by means of production of larger quantities. Furthermore, as far as pipe systems are concerned, new assembling methods are being developed to obtain lockring or fittings as an alternative to soldering.

B.2 Energy consumption and TEWI for commercial refrigeration systems based on supermarket refrigeration systems

From January 1994 the assembling of new commercial refrigeration systems using CFC refrigerant (CFC-12, R-502 etc.) was prohibited in Denmark. In new refrigeration systems the use of HCFC will be prohibited from January 2000. From January 2002 this will include application of new HCFC for service purposes as well.

Hence, HFC based refrigerants including HFC-134a, R-404A or possibly R-407 are used in most of the new supermarket cooling cabinets and other commercial refrigeration systems.

Direct cooling is used in supermarkets in Denmark and Norway, whereas the use of indirect cooling is becoming more frequent in Sweden, Germany and other countries. In Sweden new supermarket refrigeration systems must be provided with indirect cooling. According to the Swedish Refrigeration Standard, a partly indirect refrigeration system is required for filling charges between 10 and 30 kg. Traditionally, an indirect system will be used for cooling and a direct system will be used for freezing.

Filling charges over 30 kg require a completely indirect system, i.e. indirect systems for both cooling and freezing.

For direct supermarket cooling, liquid refrigerant will flow in long pipe systems to the cooling places, e.g. cooling or freezing storage, milk cooling cabinets, cold stores etc. Afterwards the evaporated refrigerant is led back in other pipe systems. In a medium sized supermarket, with cooling required at 30-40 different locations, there are often kilometres of refrigerant pipes and hundreds of pipe connections.
A certain amount of leakage is almost impossible to avoid in these pipe systems. Leakage will often occur in valve gaskets and connections, or by direct accident caused by broken pipes. Previously, the assumed leakage rate of these systems amounted to 20-30% of the annual filling charge.

Great efforts have been made within the trade to improve the quality of new systems, and hence a considerable reduction of the leakage rate is assumed. IPCC's guidelines from 1996 state an annual average leakage rate of 17%. However, a 100% tightness of the systems is not technically possible. The exact figures are not known, however an annual 10% leakage rate for supermarket systems with direct cooling is assumed.

It is less expensive to produce a refrigeration system with direct cooling than a similar system using indirect cooling. According to Haukås the price is 20% higher, whereas Grødem mentions a 15-20% price increase of the indirect system.

This price difference is due to the slightly higher prices for pipe systems. Investment in circulation pumps for the secondary refrigerant is necessary. In addition, investment in additional heat exchangers between the primary and secondary system is required.

On the other hand a considerably smaller amount of refrigerant is required (often 15-20% depending on the amount in a direct system) and the leakage rate will be much less, often only 5%.

Energy consumption
The precise energy consumption in the various systems is hard to predict, as it depends on the retrofitting rate of the individual systems. However, Bjørn Grødem has tried to estimate some figures in ScanRef 3/98, which are as follows:

Table B.2: Energy consumption for different supermarket refrigeration systems. The source is similar to that used in table B.1. However, it should be emphasised that this example is not necessarily valid for all systems.


  Direct system using R404A
Indirect system using R404A
Indirect system using propane/
propene
Indirect system using NH3 (ammonia)
Estimated energy consumption
100%
110%
108%
105%

The energy consumption is slightly higher for the indirect systems due to the thermodynamic loss from temperature differences in the heat exchanger between the primary and secondary refrigeration system and the pumps' energy consumption. This will to some extent be balanced by improved efficiency of the hydrocarbon and the ammonia refrigeration system.

It is estimated that the design of hydrocarbon refrigeration systems soon will result in energy consumption for indirect systems, which does not exceed the consumption for direct systems. Use of components (compressors), which have been optimised according to the refrigerant, is required. Previously, R-22 components for propane or propene have been used. Through this optimisation the difference between direct HFC systems and indirect hydrocarbon systems will be significantly less.

New secondary refrigerants will be available on the market in the future, including ice slurry for refrigeration purposes and CO2 for freezing purposes. Hence, in comparison with direct HFC systems an improvement of the energy consumption used for indirect systems using ammonia or hydrocarbons is expected.



Contribution to the green house effect, TEWI
Refrigeration systems contribute both directly and indirectly to the green house effect. Direct contribution is caused by leak of refrigerant, e.g. R-404A, which has a GWP (Global Warming Potential) of 3260, compared to CO2, which has a GWP of 1.

The indirect contribution derives from electricity consumption. If electricity is generated at coal fired power plants, as is the case in Denmark, the CO2 emission from the power plant's stack corresponds to 0.8 kg of CO2 per kWh of electricity.

The TEWI value (Total Equivalent Warming Impact) combines both direct and indirect contributions, i.e.:

TEWI = GWP * M + ALFA * E

where

GWP is the GWP factor of the refrigerant;
M is the amount of refrigerant, leaking from the refrigeration system;
ALFA is the amount of CO2, which is generated during electricity production (kg of CO2 per kWh);
E is the electricity consumption of the refrigeration system.

Example
An example of a typical supermarket refrigeration system is given below. The example, which is typical for countries with direct cooling as standard, comprises a medium sized supermarket (e.g. Danish supermarket such as >Kvickly=, >Føtex=) with a sales area of 1000-1500 m2.
The total refrigeration efficiency is 100 kW and the system is provided with direct cooling. The refrigerant charge is 300 kg of R-404A.

The annual energy consumption of the refrigeration system is 170,000 kWh, whereas the leakage rate is 10% of the annual charge, i.e. 30 kg.

TEWI calculation stating yearly operation of the refrigeration system:
Direct yearly contribution to the green house effect:
M * GWP = 30 kg of R-404A * 3260 (kg of CO2/kg of R-404A) = 97800 kg of CO2 = 97.8 tonnes of CO2.

Indirect contribution to the green house effect: ALFA * E = ALFA * 170,000 kWh.

Table B.3: Contribution to the green house effect for the refrigeration system stated in the example. This example is for direct cooling with R-404A.


  ALFA
(kg of CO2/kWh)
Indirect contribution to the green house effect (kg of CO2)
Direct contribution to the green house effect (kg of CO2)
TEWI for one year (kg of CO2)
Coal-firing
0.8
136.000
97.800
233.800
100% hydro-
electric power (or nuclear power)
0
0
97.800
97.800
50% coal power + 50% hydroelectric power
0.4
68.000
97.800
165.800

According to the example the 100% coal-fired power station accounts for the direct contribution to the green house effect (approximately 42% of the total TEWI contribution).

In the example with 50% coal and 50% hydroelectric power supply the share accounts for 59%. According to the example the share of hydroelectric power supply accounts for 100%. It should be mentioned that other environmentally related problems occur in connection with hydroelectric and nuclear power. In this example only the green house effect is included.

It has often been said that the refrigerant share of the TEWI value is very limited. However, this does not seem to be the case with supermarket refrigeration systems using R-404A and direct cooling. The refrigerant accounts for a considerable share of the total impact of the green house effect.

When using a hydrocarbon or an ammonia refrigeration system in the same supermarket, a considerably lower green house impact will be achieved, despite the small increase of energy consumption shown in the following table.

Table B.4: The TEWI value for a supermarket refrigeration system using propane and indirect cooling, c.f. table B.3. It should be mentioned that calculations are only related to the contribution to the green house effect. This example may not necessarily be representative for other commercial refrigeration systems.

  ALFA (kg of CO2/kWh)
Indirect contribution to the green house effect
(kg of CO2)
Direct contribution to the green house effect
(kg of CO2)
TEWI
(kg of CO2)
TEWI (R290) /
TEWI (R-404A)
Coal-firing
0.8
146.880
0
146.880
0.63
100% hydroelectric
0
0
0
0
0
50% coal-
firing 2 50% hydroelectric
0.4
73.440
0
73.440
0.44

According to the values shown in table B.4 the total impact of the green house effect is far lower for a hydrocarbon or ammonia refrigeration system using indirect cooling than for an R-404 refrigeration system using direct cooling. The result is independent of electricity production methods.

B.3 Differences in traditional and in hydrocarbon refrigeration systems

In this chapter the price differences between components for HFC and hydrocarbons systems are described.

Components in a traditional refrigeration system
The design of a traditional refrigeration system is often very simple. In many cases a thermostat equipped with an on/off signal is used. If the system is provided with an air-cooled condenser, application of a differential pressure controller to obtain suitable condensing pressure during cold intervals is frequently used.

Most of the components that can ignite a spark are categorised under the protection classification IP 23 or the like, which also implies fans. In many cases the terminal box of the compressor, which contains the starting relay or other relays than can cause a spark, are included as well. In Denmark no rules concerning the application of twin diaphragm differential pressure control for chemical refrigerants prevail. As a consequence, these are not commonly used, although their application may reduce emission of potent green house gases. This is also the explanation of their extent of use in Germany.

Price differences between IP 23 and IP 44 or above
In connection with hydrocarbon refrigeration systems it is required as a minimum that equipment is categorised under the safety classification of at least IP 44 or even above. IP 54 and IP 55 are becoming a standard, wherefore products of this class are normally easily obtained.

The definition of safety classification requires some knowledge about the relevant nomenclature. Briefly, on a scale from 0 to 6 the first number indicates dust-proofness. The second number indicates water-proofness also on a scale from 0 to 6. Thus, an apparatus categorised under IP 23 is not quite dustproof and will only tolerate water spray, whereas an apparatus under IP 66 remains tight when exposed to water through a certain period and depth. Further details concerning this matter is described in an European standard.

Considering the system mentioned in the example, prices are indicated in the following table for a system provided with a suitable casing and improved level of safety.
Table B.5: Comparison between components for a traditional HFC refrigeration systems and similar hydrocarbon systems. The refrigeration performance is app. 14 kW.

Component
List price
Alternative
List price
KP 15 Flare (pressure controller)
DKK 483.00
KP 17 W Soldered
DKK 700.00
KP 5 Flare (pressure controller)
DKK 261.00
KP 7 W Soldered
DKK 474.00
KP 73 (2 pcs.)
(thermostat)
DKK 742.00
RT 2 (2 pcs.)
DKK 1,640.00
Compressor aggregate
UAK 500
DKK 24,992.00
Same
DKK 24,992.00
TAU plate heat exchanger
DKK 4,330.00
Same
DKK 4,330.00
Total price
DKK 30,808.00
Total price
DKK 32.136.00

According to the example, a slight price difference appears for the entire system.

Whereas the price of some components in the high protection class is more than twice as much as the others, the most expensive components in the system are not more expensive, thus eliminating to some degree the price difference. The same type of components is used despite the size of system. Should the price of compressor, condenser and evaporator be more than doubled, the additional price for the subcomponents will be insignificant compared to the total price. According to the example, only a 5% price difference for the components alone is registered.

However, it should be emphasised that apart from Sweden the end-users in the Nordic countries may choose between an HFC refrigeration system with direct cooling and a hydrocarbon using indirect cooling. In this case the price difference will be higher, see table B.1.

As Swedish systems traditionally use indirect cooling. a lower price difference will be registered in this case.

Appendix C: Sabroe Chillers with NH3 refrigerant, installed in Denmark 1990-1998

  Installed Refrigeration capacity
Lego A/S,Billund 1990 2.000 kW
Grindsted Products,Grindsted 1990 470 kW
Statens Seruminstitut,Copenhagen 1990 125 kW
The Copenhagen Mail Centre,Copenhagen 1992 800 kW
Novo Nordisk,Kalundborg + 5 other chillers 1992 2.800 kW
MD Foods, Troldhede Dairy,Troldhede 1993 55 kW
MD Foods,HOCO,Holstebro 1993 2.000 kW
SAS Data,Kastrup 1993 2 x 155 kW
Panum Institute,Copenhagen University 1993 920 kW
National Hospital of Denmark,Copenhagen 1993 1.000 kW
Toyota,Middelfart 1993 360 kW
Scandinavian Center,Århus 1993 1.000 + 800 kW
SAS Data,Copenhagen 1994 155 kW
Danaklon,Varde 1994 520 kW
Dandy,Vejle 1994 3 x 1.000 kW
EAC,Head Office,Copenhagen 1994 1.100 kW
Copenhagen Pectin,Lille Stensved 1994 230 kW
Novo Nordisk,Kalundborg 1994 340 kW
SAS Data,Kastrup 1994 2 x 155 kW
Rødovre Skating Rink,Rødovre 1994 500 kW
SDC of 1993 A/S, Ballerup 1994 1.600 kW
Dandy,Vejle 1995 800 kW
Danish National Television,Head Office,Cph. 1995 850 kW
Copenhagen Airport,Copenhagen 1995 1.066 kW
Magasin (Dept. Store),Aalborg 1995 528 kW
Schou-Epa (Dept. Store),Roskilde 1995 175 kW
Lundbech A/S,Lumsås 1995 500 kW
Løvens Kemiske Fabrik,Ballerup 1995 174 kW
Faxe Kalk,Fakse 1995 686 kW
PBS Finans A/S,Ballerup 1995 + 1997 640 kW
Schouw Packing A/S,Lystrup 1995 397 kW
Pharmacia,Køge 1995 76 kW
NKT Project Center,Kalundborg 1995 340 kW
Aalborg Storcenter (Dept. Store),Aalborg 1995 2.530 kW
Nordisk Wawin A/S,Hammel 1996 200 kW
Novo Nordisk,Gentofte 1996 100 kW
Kastrup Stationsterminal,Kastrup 1996 804 kW
Novo Nordisk,Gentofte 1996 1.096 kW
J & B Enterprise A/S,SID Building 1996 162,4 kW
Novo Nordisk (building 3A-Ba),Bagsværd 1996 370 kW
Novo Nordisk (building AE-KA),Bagsværd 1996 200 kW
Danisco Foods A/S,Odense 1996 220 kW
SDC of 1993 A/S, Ballerup 1996 1.588 kW
Copenhagen Airports,Copenhagen 1996 185 kW
Risø National Laboratory,Roskilde 1996 1.820 kW
Codan Gummi A/S,Køge 1996 175 kW
Magasin du Nord (Dept. Store),Copenhagen 1996 528 kW
Glent Novenco,Åbyhøj 1996 50 kW
Superfos Packing A/S,Hårby 1996 495 kW
Dandy,Vejle 1996 3.560 kW
Palsgård Industri A/S,Juelsminde 1996 25 kW
Aarhus Oliefabrik A/S,Aarhus 1996 406 kW
Danisco A/S,Copenhagen 1996 270 kW
H. C Ørsted Institute,Copenhagen University 1996 254 kW
Eberhart A/S,Engesvang 1996 261 kW
Danisco Ingredients,Copenhagen 1996 45 kW
Kastrup Skating Rink,Kastrup 1996 583 kW
Lundbech A/S,Valby 1997 500 kW
Hvidovre Hospital,Hvidovre 1997 2 x 2.543 kW
Nordisk Wavin,Hammel 1997 202 kW
H.C. Ørsted Institute,Copenhagen University 1997 254 kW
Novo Nordisk,Bagsværd 1997 200 kW
Copenhagen Airports (Finger B),Copenhagen 1997 2 x 804 kW
Copenhagen Airports (Finger Vest),Copenhagen 1997 900 kW
Novo Nordisk,Hillerød 1997 3.840 kW
Delta A/S,Hørsholm 1997 130 kW
Ishøj Bycenter,Ishøj 1997 1.030 kW
Unibank,Christianshavn 1997 538 kW
Copenhagen Pectin A/S,Lille Stensved 1997 530 kW
Illum A/S (Dept. Store),Copenhagen 1997 1.022 kW
Scandic Hotel Copenhagen,Copenhagen 1997 359 kW
Tholstrup Gjesing A/S,Skanderborg 1997 395 kW + 53 kW
Tjæreborg Champinon,Tjæreborg 1997 1.146 kW
MD Foods,Troldhede Dairy, Rødkærsbro 1997 240 kW
Eghøj Champinon A/S,Veflinge 1997 500 kW
Danisco Distillers,Aalborg 1997 9 kW
FeF Chemicals A/S,Køge 1997 68 kW
Novo Nordisk - Building 3BM-Ba,Bagsværd 1997 129 kW
Phønix Contractors A/S,Vejen 1997 575 kW
SDC af 1993 A/S, Ballerup 1997 505 kW
Hørsholm Skating Rink,Hørsholm 1998 370 kW
Novo Nordisk A/S, Gentofte 1998 1.670 kW
Søndagsavisen,Copenhagen 1998 80 kW
Løvens Kemiske Fabrik,Ballerup 1998 300 kW
Nordisk Wawin,Hammel 1998 220 kW
Schulstad,Holstebro 1998 290 kW
Løvens Kemiske Fabrik,Ballerup 1998 320 + 120 kW
Birch & Krogboe A/S,Virum 1998 390 + 50 kW
MD Foods,Bislev,Bislev 1998 1.500 kW
Albani,Odense 1998 270 kW
Mejeriernes Produktionsselskab,Esbjerg 1998 400 kW
Hvide Sande Fiskeriforening,Hvide Sande 1998 100 kW
Løvens Kemiske Fabrik,Ballerup 1998 2 x 214 kW
Copenhagen Airports,Copenhagen 1998 660 kW
Novo Nordisk A/S,Kalundborg 1998 100 kW + 2 x 400 kW
Tulip,Århus 1998 70 kW
Scandinavian Air Lines,Copenhagen 1998 160 kW
Ørbæk Most,Ørbæk 1998 120 kW
Danexport,Hobro 1998 650 kW
Marine Biologisk Institut 1998 2 x 30 kW


Appendix D: Gram Chillers (York International) with NH3 refrigerant, installed in Denmark 1992-1998

  Prodution
Refrigeration capacity
Force Institutes
Brøndby
Containerised water chiller for process chilling of welding machines
200 kW
Esbjerg Thermoplast
Esbjerg
Water chillers for process chilling of plastic moulding plant
2 x 187 kW
Sun Chemical
Køge
Water chillers for process chilling in chemical industry
235 kW
Magasin Department Store
Copenhagen
Water chiller for A/C
2 x 907 kW
Vellev Dairy
Vellev
Brine (glycol) chiller for process chilling (ice water)
225 kW
Chr. Hansens Lab.
Roskilde
Walter chiller for process chilling of pharmaceutical laboratories
407 kW
Tele Danmark
Odense
Water chiller for A/C of main telephone central
3 x 232 kW
Danish State Hospital
Copenhagen
Brine (glycol) chiller for refrigeration & freezing of central kitchen facilities
52 kW
Magasin Department Store
Aarhus
Water chiller for A/C
1.449 kW
Esbjerg City Hall
Esbjerg
Water chiller for A/C
540 kW
County Data
Odense
Water chillers for A/C
2 x 195 kW
Frederiksberg Hospital
Copenhagen
Water chiller for A/C
322 kW
Esbjerg Hospital
Esbjerg
Water chiller for A/C
2 x 554 kW
Esbjerg Hospital
Esbjerg
Water chiller for A/C
868 kW
Panther Plast
Vordingborg
Water chillers for process chilling of plastic moulding plant
2 x 602 kW


Printca
Aalborg


Water chillers for process chilling in pharmaceutical industry


322 kW
ATP House
Hillerød
Water chiller for EDP cooling and ventilation
180 kW
Berlingske Newspaper- Production
Avedøre
Water chillers for A/C
2 x 919 kW
H. Lundbeck
Pharmaceutical
Valby
Water chiller for process chilling in pharmaceutical industry
994 kW
ATP House
Hillerød
Water chiller for EDP cooling and ventilation
564 kW
Copenhagen Airport
Kastrup
Water chiller for ventilation in luggage sorting
350 kW
Grundfos
Bjerringbro

Containerised liquid chiller for test plant
25 kW
NeuroSerch A/S
Ballerup
Water chiller for process chilling in pharmaceutical industry
400 kW
Technos Schou A/S
Vamdrup
Brine chiller for process chilling at painting production
175 kW
Jyske Avistryk A/S
Kolding
Water chiller for process chiller for printing machines
450 kW
P-Industri
Bjæverskov
Water chiller for plastics industry
240 kW
Sophus Berendsen
Søborg
Water chillers for ventilation
284 kW

Appendix E: Bonus Chillers with Hydrocarbon-refrigerant, installed in Sweden 1996-1998

  Installed
Refrigeration capacity
Bäckhammars Bruk, Kristinehamn
1996
19 kW
Vasakronan Real estate, Norrköping
1996
2 x 260 kW
AG's Favör, Lund
1996
3 x 192 kW
AG's Favör, Lund
1996
2 x 50 kW
AG's Favör, Landskrona
1996
2 x 128 kW
AG's Favör, Landskrona
1996
25 kW
Ronneby Real Estate, Bräkne-Hoby
1996
2 x 250 kW
TA Hydronics, Göteborg
1996
66 kW
ABB Real Estate, Enköping
1996
60 kW
Pharmacia & Upjohn, Uppsala
1996
40 kW
The Birgitta Gymnasium, Örebro
1996
10 kW
Hållstugan Daycare center, Örebro
1996
38 kW
Melkers meat processing, Falun
1996
76 kW
Ljungby Hospital, Ljungby
1996
2 x 298 kW
Calor Gas, GB
1996
2 x 600 kW
NWT - Newspaper, Karlstad
1996
2 x 298 kW
SEAB Gävle, Gävle
1996
20 kW
Areng Spa, Italien
1996
3 kW
Binsell, Uppsala
1996
46 kW
AG's Favör, Helsingborg
1997
4 x 120 kW
AG's Favör, Helsingborg
1997
3 x 228 kW
Domus (COOP), Visby
1997
2 x 40 kW
Domus (COOP), Visby
1997
2 x 126 kW
ASSI Domän, Frövi
1997
95 kW
ASSI Domän, Frövi
1997
28 kW
Edbergs, Örebro
1997
38 kW
University of Luleå, Luleå
1997
82 kW
Akzo-Nobel, Ömsköldsvik
1997
91 kW
Volvo, Köping
1997
6 x 336 kW
Hällstugan Daycare center, Örebro
1997
38 kW
ASSI Domän, Frövi
1997
95 kW
ASSI Domän, Falum
1997
82 kW
ABB Atom, Västerås
1997
164 kW
Pastejköket, Tranås
1997
3 x 216 kW
SKV, Svängsta
1997
10 kW
County of Karlstad, Karlstad
1997
2 x 260 kW
Katedral gymnasium, Skara
1997
111 kW
IUC-Gymnasium,Katrineholm
1997
20 kW
Saluhallen, Uppsala
1997
82 kW
Saluhallen, Uppsala
1997
54 kW
ICA HQ, Västerås
1997
190 kW
Volvo Aero, Arboga
1997
48 kW
Volvo Aero, Arboga
1997
95 kW
Hospital of Skellefteå, Skellefteå
1997
2 x 260 kW
Hospital of Skellefteå, Skellefteå
1997
2 x 56 kW
Hospital of Skellefteå, Skellefteå
1997
8 kW
Swedish Road Adm., Borlänge
1997
2 x 56 kW
ASSI Domän, Frövi
1997
41 kW
Ericsson, Ursviken
1997
2 x 190 kW
Swedish Army, Visby
1997
111 kW
County of Gävle, Bollnäs
1997
4 x 520 kW
County of Gävle, Bollnäs
1997
34 kW
TA Hydronics, Göteborg
1997
69 kW
Real Estate Company, Umeå
1997
2 x 96 kW
ASSI Domäm, Frövi
1997
20 kW
Hospital of Lindesberg, Lindesberg
1997
20 kW
Hospital of Söderhamn, Söderhanm
1997
20 kW
Swedish Road Adm, Örebro
1997
170 kW
Electrolux, Holland
1997
5 kW
University of Umeå, Umeå
1997
10 kW
Swedish Coast Artillery, Stockholm
1997
2 x 56 kW
Vombverket, Veberöd
1998
2 x 160 kW
Hospital of Linköping, Linköping
1998
2 x 86 kW
Swedish Radio, Luleå
1998
122 kW
Hospital of Sandviken, Sandviken
1998
34 kW
Country of Karlstad, Karlstad
1998
122 kW
Country of Karlstad, Karlstad
1998
90 kW
Umeå gymnasium, Umeå
1998
2 x 138 kW
ABB Atom, Västerås
1998
21 kW
House of Wasa, Örebro
1998
2 x 180 kW
Nestlé, Malmö
1998
78 kW
Unikum in Örebro, Örebro
1998
2 x 244 kW
Kv Sjövik, Stockholm
1998
122 kW
Country of Karlstad, Karlstad
1998
60 kW
ABB Atom, Västerås
1998
180 kW
Sparebanken, Köping
1998
2 x 206 kW
Kv Harren, Luleå
1998
122 kW
Expolaris, Skellefteå
1998
38 kW
University of Karlstad, Karlstad
1998
34 kW
University of Karlstad, Karlstad
1998
147 kW
Hospital of Ljungby, Ljungby
1998
147 kW
Vasakronan Real estate, Norrköping
1998
122 kW
TÜV-approval, Tyskland
1998
90 kW
Fire Brigade, Luleå
1998
33 kW
Sabroe + Søby, Danmark
1998
90 kW


[Front page] [Contents] [Previous] [Top]