Effects of the increase in the danish waste tax 5. Summary and recommendationsThe results of the evaluation may be summarised as follows:
Evaluations: Waste tax contributes to de-couple economic growth and waste generation It is remarkable that the steep increase in the waste tax rate as from 1st January 1997 did not lead to a decrease in taxable waste amounts, since the increase as a weighted average amounted to around 60 per cent of the previous waste tax rate. An important reason for the lack of reduction in waste generation seems to be the significant growth in production and consumption of around 7 per cent for the past two years, which is believed to have resulted in increasing waste generation in relation to the base year of 1996. Within private consumption especially the consumption of electronics and durable consumer goods has increased more than the average, and this type of consumption is believed to lead to a relatively larger waste generation (packaging etc.) Against this background, it must be concluded that the waste tax increase has contributed to ensuring that waste amounts did not increase correspondingly, and that waste generation and economic growth have been de-coupled. Another reason for the moderate waste reduction is that the differentiation in the tax means that considerable savings may be obtained by diverting waste from landfill to incineration. Waste tax not directly reflected in householders costs Despite substantial tax increases in both 1993 and 1997, the stagnation in taxable waste amounts from 1993 to 1998 indicates that the instrument has had certain problems of penetrating to the waste producers. The explanation given in the Working Report from The Danish Environmental Protection Agency no. xx 1997 was that the tax is not reflected in the waste collection fees paid by householders, as fees under collection schemes are typically calculated according to a fixed volume and not by weight. Thereby, there is no financial incentive for householders to increase recycling. The lack of transmission of the price signal of the waste tax in financial transactions in the waste sector, especially regarding households, is assessed to constitute one of the decisive barriers to a decrease in taxable waste amounts. Some local authorities have changed to weight-based fee systems for household waste, but as very few have done so, it does not have a decisive impact on total waste figures. Low cost burden for most enterprises Large enterprises are typically not comprised by collection schemes and have therefore the possibility of reacting to the price signal of the waste tax. However, as demonstrated by this study, not all enterprises pay attention to the costs of waste disposal. For most enterprises, the waste tax amounts to less than 1 per mille of the net turnover and will consequently range low in the hierarchy of attention. For a few very waste-intensive enterprises, however, the tax does put a significant stamp on the financial result, and this makes it difficult to implement new tax increases without showing regard to the competitive situation of certain enterprises and production processes. "Chimney-industries" are most advanced The analysis of enterprises waste management confirms the assumption put forward in Working Report no. Xx 1997 that waste-intensive enterprises typically are significantly further advanced in their waste management than enterprises that are waste-extensive. This may imply that the marginally cheapest waste reductions today are hardly found in traditional "chimney-industries", but rather at enterprises in the pharmaceutical, plastics, electronics and telecommunications industries, or within trade and offices that so far did not pay much attention to waste issues (as reflected in relatively low recycling rates). Increasing attention However, it is a positive sign that, according to the ISAG, taxable waste amounts from industry and commerce from 1996 to 1997 showed a decrease of 2 per cent. The study of enterprises indicates that attention to waste management increases in enterprises, and it is the first time for several years that a drop in enterprises waste amounts can be seen. Similarly, several enterprises have reacted by diverting their waste from landfill to incineration. Recommendations:
The statistical basis for estimating the development in industrial and commercial waste amounts should be improved so that waste can be stated both by sub-sectors and waste types. The market concentration in the manufacturing industry is relatively high (the average market share on the domestic market is estimated to be around 55 per cent just for the four largest enterprises in each sector cf. Konkurrencestyrelsen (1999: 26)). As a consequence it will be possible, on the basis of analyses of a limited number of enterprises, to design a database covering the most relevant sectors. This database could be based on, for example, a total of 50 to 80 enterprises and could be used with considerably larger certainty in future analyses in the waste area, and in environmental-economic modelling tools. Such a database could be similar to the LOOP (Landovervågningsoplande) designed by the Danish National Environmental Research Laboratory in the area of nutrients.
|