Orientering fra Miljøstyrelsen, 2/2001 Waste Statistics 1998Contents1. IntroductionIn 1993, the ISAG (Information System for Waste and Recycling) was used for the first time. The 1998 reports are the sixth consecutive reports. Reports to the ISAG for 1998 cover 420 plants distributed on 313 enterprises. In 1997, reports covered 424 plants distributed on 307 enterprises. The results of the 1998 reports are presented in this publication, which is laid out as in previous years. Chapter 2 describes general developments in generation and treatment of waste. In Chapter 3, recycling of waste is presented. Chapter 4 deals with generation and treatment of hazardous waste, and in Chapter 5 developments in imports and exports are described, both for ordinary waste and for waste subject to mandatory notification. In Chapter 6, a detailed description of developments in waste amounts and treatment of waste from different sources is given. Furthermore, figures are compared to targets for treatment in year 2004 in the Danish Governments Waste Management Plan 1998 - 2004, Waste 21. Finally, Chapter 7 gives an outline of Danish incineration plants and landfills. The general picture for 1998 shows that:
2. Waste Generation
2.1 GenerationTotal Danish waste generation in 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 distributed on sources is shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Table 1 Look here! Sources: ISAG-reports for 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998, Danisco, Association of Danish Recycling Industries and other large scrap dealers, Elsam, Elkraft, and reports to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency on sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants applied to farmland etc. (for 1998, figures from 1997 have been used. Sludge in long-term storage has been included in amounts of sludge applied to farmland etc.), and incineration in sludge incineration plants (for 1998, figures from 1997 have been used). Figures for sludge are stated in wet weight. Figures have been adjusted for imports of waste. The generation of waste in relation to the ISAG reports has been found by stating the quantity of waste delivered to waste treatment plants from primary sources. For this purpose, "primary sources" means waste generators that are not waste treatment plants (reprocessing facilities, incineration plants, composting and biogas plants, and landfills). Waste such as slag, fly ash, and flue gas cleaning products from waste incineration plants is therefore not included in the statement as it would otherwise be counted twice. Furthermore, waste from the source "recycling centres/transfer stations" is distributed on other primary sources. The principles for distribution are given in Annex 2. The following changes in waste generation from 1997 to 1998 may be pointed out:
Waste generation at coal-fired power plants decreased by 17 per cent, from 1,775,000 tonnes in 1997 to 1,469,000 tonnes in 1998. Figure 1 Look here! The decrease in total waste generation is mainly due to a relatively large decrease in waste amounts from building and construction activities and coal-fired power plants. The decrease in construction and demolition waste amounts may be attributed to the recession in the building and construction sector in 1998. The decrease in waste amounts from coal-fired power plants is due to modest power exports to Norway and Sweden and to increasing use of natural gas and sustainable energy sources instead of coal in energy generation. Waste generation at coal-fired power plants not only depends on Danish consumption, but also on weather conditions in Sweden and Norway. It is therefore reasonable to keep amounts of slag and fly ash apart from overall statistics. In that case, total waste amounts decreased by 3 per cent. If also construction and demolition waste is kept apart, waste amounts increased by 2 per cent. 2.2 Treatment of waste in 1998Developments in treatment of total waste amounts are shown below. Treatment is furthermore related to targets for treatment in the Danish Governments Waste Management Plan 1998 - 2004, Waste 21. Table 2 Look here! Table 2 shows that 7,542,000 tonnes or 62 per cent of total waste amounts were recycled in 1998, corresponding to a decrease of 1 percentage point compared to 1997. Waste incinerated in 1998 amounted to 2,740,000 tonnes or 22 per cent, corresponding to an increase of 2 percentage points compared to 1997. In 1998, waste amounts going to landfill decreased compared to 1997: 1,868,000 tonnes corresponding to 15 per cent. According to Waste 21, targets for stabilising developments in waste amounts shall be supplemented by a number of qualitative elements, such as better utilisation of resources in waste, quality in treatment and mitigation of problems relating to environmental contaminants in waste. In general, the new targets for sectors and fractions mean that recycling will increase, more waste will be incinerated, and landfill capacity needs will decrease. Therefore, Waste 21 draws up a number of general targets for waste treatment that are different from targets in the previous waste management plan, The Governments Plan of Action for Waste and Recycling 1993-97. Waste 21 targets for waste management in year 2004 are: 64 per cent recycling, 24 per cent incineration and a maximum of 12 per cent landfilling. Figure 2 Look here! Figure 2 shows that amounts of waste for landfilling decreased in 1998, but there is still some way to go before the targets of Waste 21 have been met. It is assessed that the decrease in amounts of waste going to landfill is mainly due to the ban on landfilling of waste suitable for incineration. Furthermore, amounts of residues from coal-fired power plants have decreased, and they are furthermore recycled to a higher extent than in previous years where they were mainly landfilled. 2.2.1 Without slag, fly ash and construction/demolition wasteAs mentioned above, the decrease in total waste amounts is mainly due to the decrease in waste amounts from coal-fired power plants and the building and construction sector. Therefore, it is interesting to keep waste from building and construction activities and residues from power plants apart from statistics and take a closer look at treatment of remaining waste fractions. If residues from coal-fired power plants are kept apart, 58 per cent of remaining waste was recycled in 1998. This is a decrease of 3 percentage points compared to 1997. The proportion of remaining waste incinerated increased slightly from 24 per cent in 1997 to 26 per cent in 1998, whereas the proportion landfilled in 1998 remained unchanged from 1997. In absolute figures this means that without slag and fly ash, 10,764,000 tonnes of waste were generated in 1998. Of this, 6,283,000 tonnes were recycled, 2,740,000 tonnes were incinerated, 1,658,000 tonnes were landfilled, and 84,000 tonnes were subjected to special treatment. If also construction and demolition waste is kept apart from statistics, it is seen that no significant changes have taken place in the distribution among treatment options compared to 1997: 46 per cent of waste was recycled, whereas 35 per cent was incinerated and 18 per cent landfilled, cf. figure 3. Residues from coal-fired power plants and construction and demolition waste are thereby seen to have a large impact on fulfilment of targets for treatment of waste. Figure 3 Look here! 2.3 Treatment by sources and waste typesFigure 4 shows total waste generation in Denmark in 1998, distributed on sources and mode of treatment. Figure 5 shows waste generation distributed on waste type and mode of treatment. Tables with detailed figures are given in Annex 1. Figure 4 Look here! It is seen from Figure 4 that the rate of recycling is particularly high when it comes to waste from building and construction activities, wastewater treatment plants and coal-fired power plants. Targets for recycling in Waste 21 are met regarding waste from building and construction activities and sewage sludge, whereas there is still a little way to go before targets are met for residues from coal-fired power plants. Waste from manufacturing industries also has a relatively high rate of recycling: 56 per cent. But still there is some way to go before the Waste 21 target of 65 per cent is met. The reason is that too much industrial waste is landfilled: 27 per cent. The target for year 2004 is 15 per cent. Similarly, the rate of recycling of waste from institutions, trade and offices is not high enough in relation to the targets in Waste 21. In 1998, only 35 per cent of this waste was recycled, and the target for year 2004 is 50 per cent. While the target for incineration of waste from this source has almost been met, there is still a long way to the target of a maximum of 5 per cent landfilling. Figure 5 also shows that treatment of household waste does not meet the targets of Waste 21. With a rate of recycling of, for example, domestic waste of 17 per cent in 1998 there is still a long way to the target of 30 per cent recycling in year 2004. Figure 5 Look here! 3. Recycling
3.1 Recycling distributed on fractionsTable 3 shows waste fractions that are recycled, either by reprocessing, composting or biogasification. The table is not an outline of output from these fractions. Sources: ISAG-reports for 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998, (1) Association of Danish Recycling Industries and other large scrap dealers, (2) Elsam and Elkraft, (3) Reports to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency on sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants applied to farmland etc. (for 1998, figures from 1997 have been used. Sludge in long-term storage has been included in amounts of sludge applied to farmland etc.), (4) Correction for ferrous metals removed from waste incineration plants has been made to avoid double counting. Some of the collective terms such as "Other recyclables", "Other construction and demolition waste" and "Soil and stone" may contribute after separation has been completed to additional quantities of items such as tiles, wood etc. The most significant amounts are found for waste fractions relating to industry (ferrous metals), building and construction activities (for example concrete and asphalt), coal-fired power plants (fly ash, gypsum and slag) and wastewater treatment plants (sludge). Waste fractions such as paper and cardboard, branches, leaves, grass etc. and glass also account for large amounts. A large proportion of this waste is generated in households. In absolute figures, recycling of paper and cardboard, bottles and glass as well as plastic increased from 1997 to 1998, whereas recycling of, for example, ferrous metals and waste from the building and construction sector decreased. Also recycling of fly ash and slag from coal-fired power plants decreased in absolute figures from 1997 to 1998. This is due to lower generation of such residues, as the rate of recycling actually increased by 14 percentage points. 3.2 Paper and cardboardConsumption of virgin paper, paper collected for recycling, and exports of waste paper are shown in Table 4.
Sources: (1) Material stream analysis of waste paper from the Danish Waste Management Information Centre and Statistics Denmark. (2) ISAG reports for 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998. (3) Statistics Denmark. The discrepancy between waste paper collected, and Danish waste paper sent to Danish paper mills + net exports, may be due to stock enlargement, and it may be a consequence of applying different statistical sources and statement methods. From 1997 to 1998, a decrease in the consumption of virgin paper took place. At the same time, there has been an increase in waste paper collected, which means that the collection rate for waste paper reached 48 per cent in 1998. Consumption of virgin paper per capita decreased slightly in 1998 compared to 1997: 250 kg in 1998 against 259 kg in 1997. Furthermore, 120 kg/capita paper and cardboard were collected in 1998 against 112 kg in 1997. In 1998, net exports of waste paper amounted to 242,000 tonnes, which covers imports of waste paper of some 98,000 tonnes and exports of just above 339,000 tonnes. Sources of waste paper collected are stated in Table 5. Collection of waste paper increased from 583,000 tonnes in 1997 to 623,000 tonnes in 1998, corresponding to an increase of just above 7 per cent. This increase may be attributed to an increase in amounts collected from households and institutions, trade and offices, whereas amounts collected from manufacturing industries decreased. Amounts collected from households and institutions, trade and offices increased by 14 per cent for both sources, whereas amounts collected from manufacturing industries decreased by 5 per cent.
Source: ISAG reports for 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998. 3.3 GlassAccording to ISAG reports, recycling of bottles and glass from primary sources amounted to 104,000 tonnes in 1998. This is an increase of 15,000 tonnes compared to 1997. By only including waste from primary sources, however, a complete picture of total material streams is not obtained. Of special importance is recycling of glass during which several collection and treatment steps have been passed. As a consequence, the following description of total recycling of glass is based on the material stream analysis for glass in 1997 made by the Danish Waste Management Information Centre. Apart from a minor decrease in 1996, consumption of glass packaging has been increasing throughout the 1990s. In 1997, 190,000 tonnes of glass packaging were used, which is 6.5 per cent more than in 1996. Also collection and recycling of glass packaging have been increasing throughout the 1990s. However, amounts of collected glass decreased from 126,100 tonnes in 1996 to 115,200 tonnes in 1997. This means that the rate of collection in relation to total consumption decreased from 71 per cent in 1996 to 61 per cent in 1997. The reason for this decrease is not evident. Correspondingly, there has been a minor decrease in amounts of recycled glass packaging. The rate of recycling in relation to total consumption reached 57 per cent in 1997 against 61 per cent in 1996. Bottles for beer and soft drinks manufactured for reuse are not included in this statement. Refillable glass bottles, on average, make 35 trips. If these bottles were manufactured as single-use bottles, it would give an increase in waste glass of around 350,000 tonnes. Figure 6 Look here! 3.4 Ferrous metalsTable 6 shows amounts of collected ferrous scrap, distributed on consignees. It is seen that in 1998, 971,000 tonnes of ferrous scrap were recycled, and this is 41,000 tonnes less than in 1997. Total potential of ferrous scrap is not known precisely. Recycling industries normally estimate a recycling rate in excess of 90 per cent for ferrous scrap. According to ISAG reports, the Danish Steel Works and other Danish foundries imported 216,000 tonnes of ferrous scrap in 1998, whereas scrap dealers imported 26,000 tonnes. Total imports in 1998 thereby amounted to 242,000 tonnes of ferrous scrap, which is 46,000 tonnes less than in 1997.
Sources: (1) ISAG reports 1996, 1997 and 1998, (2) information from the Association of Danish Recycling industries and other large scrap dealers. The statement used in table 6 is slightly different from the statement in table 3. For example, the correction for ferrous scrap removed from waste incineration plants ( 1996: 15,100, 1997: 19,774 and 1998: 12,226) has not been made, as this table shows the total balance for ferrous metals. 3.5 Organic waste for composting, wood chipping and biogasificationOrganic waste amounts delivered to composting, wood chipping and biogasification are shown in Table 7. There has been an increase of almost 10 per cent in amounts of organic waste for composting, wood chipping or biogasification from 1997 to 1998. This increase is mainly due to an increase in amounts of garden waste (branches, leaves, grass etc.) for composting, and sewage sludge for composting or biogasification. Likewise, organic domestic waste for biogasification increased in 1998, and amounts are now at the 1996-level. By contrast, amounts of organic domestic waste for composting decreased slightly. This may be due to the fact that more and more local councils launch home composting schemes, and thereby amounts are not registered in the ISAG. Amounts of other organic waste for biogasification were around 30 per cent lower in 1998 than in 1997, whereas amounts of other organic waste for composting remained stable. Quantities of bark/wood chips and compost removed from the plants do not reflect the quantities generated. This quantity should be considered as reflecting the quantity sold or delivered free. The table shows that quantities of both compost and bark/wood chips removed from the plants were considerably smaller in 1998 than in 1997. Source: ISAG reports do not include information on the quantity of biogas generated. The table is designed on the basis of calculations and estimates based on ISAG reports for 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998. 3.6 TyresIn 1995, the Minister for Environment and Energy entered an agreement with a number of organisations, on a take-back scheme for used tyres from cars, vans, and motorcycles. The purpose of the agreement is to ensure collection and recovery of used tyres in Denmark. Landfilling is avoided and resource recovery ensured, whereby material recovery is prioritised to energy recovery. The scheme started 1st April 1995 and is financed by a fee on tyres comprised by the agreement and marketed in Denmark. The fee amounts to DKK 8 per new or old tyre, and DKK 4 per retreaded tyre. According to the agreement, the target was a take-back rate of 60 per cent in 1995, whereas the target for 1996 onwards is 80 per cent. The table shows that the rate of collection amounted to 87.3 per cent in 1998, which is 6.5 percentage points less than in 1997. However, also in 1998 the target for collection has been met by a good margin.
4. Hazardous wasteTable 9 on hazardous waste amounts includes waste from primary and secondary sources distributed on treatment options. Waste from secondary sources, such as waste from incineration plants, is not included in total waste generation, cf. Table 1. However, it is reasonable when assessing the total generation of hazardous waste to include waste from both primary and secondary sources. Table 9 shows that total generation of hazardous waste in 1998 amounted to some 280,000 tonnes, which means that from 1997 to 1998 there was an increase of just above 30,000 tonnes in the generation of hazardous waste. This increase is mainly due to an increase in amounts of hazardous waste from secondary sources. In 1998, Kommunekemi received around 73,000 tonnes of hazardous waste for special treatment. This is almost similar to the amounts received in 1997. Table 9 Look here! 5. Imports and exports of waste
5.1 ImportsTable 10 shows imported amounts of waste for 1997 and 1998 distributed on waste fractions and treatment options. Amounts of imported waste decreased by 6 per cent from 1997 to 1998 and account for just above 4 per cent of waste generated in Denmark. Table 10 Look here! 91 per cent of imported waste is categorised as green waste for recovery according to the EU Regulation on shipments of waste, and it covers glass, paper and cardboard, plastic, ferrous metals, as well as organic waste. Waste imported is destined for recycling or incineration with energy recovery. The remaining 9 per cent of waste imported is listed on the OECD amber and red lists and is subject to mandatory notification under the EU Regulation on shipments of waste, cf. Table 12. Waste of this type is destined for disposal (landfilling and incineration without energy recovery) or recovery (recycling and incineration with energy recovery). 5.2 ExportsTable 11 shows amounts of waste exported in 1997 and 1998. It is seen that amounts exported account for some 10 per cent of total waste generation in Denmark. In 1998, exports of waste were some 60,000 tonnes below the 1997 level. This decrease is mainly due to a decrease in exports of ferrous metals, whereas there was an increase in exports of, for example, fly ash and slag from coal-fired power plants and flue gas cleaning products from waste incineration plants. Just above 93 per cent of amounts exported is classified as green waste destined for recovery, and it covers primarily the fractions paper and cardboard and ferrous metals, which alone account for 73 per cent of exports. Sources: (1) Statistics Denmark, (2) Association of Danish Recycling Industries and
other large scrap dealers, Exports of waste destined for disposal and waste destined for recovery, which are listed on the OECD red and amber waste lists, are subject to mandatory notification in accordance with the EU Regulation of shipments of waste. These exports amounted to some 137,000 tonnes in 1998, cf. table 12, which is 23,000 tonnes more than in 1997. 5.3 Imports and exports of waste subject to mandatory notificationTable 12 shows countries of export and import of waste subject to mandatory notification. It is seen that Denmark did not import much waste for disposal in 1998: only just above 9,000 tonnes. Most waste was imported from Norway. By contrast, some 36,000 tonnes of waste were imported with a view to recovery in 1998, which is 12,000 tonnes less than in 1997. Of these amounts, the large majority of waste came from Germany, consisting of fractions such as waste oil and sewage sludge. Countries receiving most waste for recovery from Denmark in 1998 were Spain, Sweden and Germany, whereas waste for disposal was exported to Norway and Germany. Waste exported from Denmark for recovery or disposal abroad is typically household hazardous waste, lead batteries and residues from incineration of household waste. In 1998, 38,000 tonnes of waste were exported for disposal, which is 10,000 tonnes more than in 1997. Just above 99,000 tonnes were exported for recovery. This is 13,500 tonnes more than in 1997.
Sources: Danish Environmental Protection Agency, database of shipments. The registration is made on the background of completed consignment notes under EU Regulation 259/93 on shipments of waste. The consignee must send a copy of the filled-in consignment note to the competent authorities within three working days after receipt of the waste. OECD-codes are defined in Commission Decision of 21st October 1994 (no. L 288/36, Official Journal of the European Communities of 9th November 1994). 5.4 OECD codes
6. Waste fractions and status compared to targets for year 20046.1 Residues from waste incineration plantsResidues from waste incineration plants have not been included in statements of total waste generation presented so far, as waste would otherwise be counted twice. Figure 7 shows amounts of residues (slag, fly ash, and flue gas cleaning products) from waste incineration in 1998, stated in tonnes, as well as treatment option. Figure 7 Look here! As Figure 7 shows, by far the largest proportion of residues is recycled. However, residues cannot be recycled if heavy metal contents are too high in that case they will be led to landfill. According to Waste 21, environmental contaminants such as PVC, impregnated wood and waste electrical and electronic equipment may no longer be assigned to incineration. This means that heavy metal contents in slag will drop significantly. However, at the same time requirements for recycling will become more stringent in consideration of groundwater, and therefore targets from the previous plan of action are maintained in Waste 21, which means a target recycling rate of 70 per cent.
Source: Calculations based on ISAG reports for 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998, and registrations according to the EU regulation on shipments of waste. Remark that Table 13 and Figure 7 cannot be compared directly, as exports are not included in Figure 7. In Table 13, amounts of residues removed from waste incineration plants are detailed further. Amounts of residues from waste incineration naturally depend on amounts of waste incinerated. Slag and flue gas cleaning products account for 20 per cent and 3 per cent respectively of waste feed. The table shows that amounts removed from waste incineration plants in 1998 are almost similar to amounts in 1997 there has only been a minor decrease of 4,000 tonnes. Of amounts removed - 551,000 tonnes - 147,600 tonnes were landfilled, which is 2,600 tonnes less than in 1997. Recycling of residues from waste incineration accounted in 1998 for 392,000 tonnes, which is some 15,000 tonnes less than in 1997. By contrast, it is estimated that just above 11,000 tonnes were sent to storage in 1998 with a view to future recycling. 6.2 Waste from building and construction activitiesIn 1998, waste from the building and construction sector amounted to 2,962,000 tonnes, which is 14 per cent or 465,000 tonnes less than in 1997. The reason for this decrease is believed to be the recession in the sector in 1998. As it can be seen from Figure 8, by far the largest proportion of waste from the building and construction sector was recycled only 1 per cent of waste was incinerated in 1998, whereas 9 per cent was landfilled. The recycling rate reached 90 per cent in 1998, which is 2 percentage points less than the previous year, but still sufficient for meeting the targets for year 2004. However, there is still scope for improving waste treatment within the building and construction sector, and future efforts will focus on separating and treating the types of construction waste that are most harmful to the environment, such as PVC and impregnated wood. Furthermore, we must become better at making "cradle-to-grave" assessments and applying environmentally correct design in new building projects. There are several reasons for the high recycling rate for construction and demolition waste. Firstly, recycled waste is exempt from the waste tax, contrary to waste landfilled or incinerated. Secondly, a circular1 on municipal regulations regarding separation of construction and demolition waste with a view to recycling came into effect in 1995. And finally, the Ministry of Environment and Energy has entered an agreement with the Danish Demolition Association on selective demolition of building materials. Figure 8 Look here! Figure 9 shows construction and demolition waste distributed on fractions. The most important fractions are concrete, asphalt, soil and stone. A large proportion of construction and demolition waste is reprocessed in mobile crushing plants moved around the country for various assignments. In some cases, both the owner of the crushing plant and his client report to the ISAG. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency is aware of this possible source of double counting, and great efforts are made in co-operation with enterprises reporting to subject data to quality assurance in order to avoid double counting. Figure 9 Look here! 6.3 Waste from householdsWaste from households covers primarily the waste types domestic waste, bulky waste, and garden waste, which again can be divided into waste fractions such as paper and cardboard, bottles and glass, and food waste/other organic waste. See also Table 14 where fractions are stated, in so far as it has been possible to register them separately. Table 14 shows that total waste generation in households in 1998 amounted to around 2,796,000 tonnes, which is a minor increase of some 20,000 tonnes compared to 1997. This increase is exclusively due to an increase in domestic waste amounts. Actually, bulky waste and garden waste amounts show a decrease. Amounts of the fractions "various burnable" and "various non-burnable" from households decreased for the fourth consecutive year. At the same time, amounts of separately collected fractions like "paper and cardboard", "bottles and glass", "food waste/other organic", "oil and chemical waste" and "ferrous metals" have increased. This may indicate that waste from households is separated to a still higher extent, ensuring that a larger proportion of household waste may be recycled instead of going to incineration or landfill.
Source: ISAG reports 1996, 1997 and 1998. (1) Ferrous metals were included in the figure "Other" in 1996. The decrease in burnable and non-burnable household waste amounts cannot outweigh the increase that has taken place in amounts of separately collected fractions there has been an actual increase in the generation of these fractions. Amounts of branches, leaves, grass etc. from households decreased for the first time in the years when Danish waste statistics have been based on the ISAG. This may be attributed to the increasing number of home composting schemes launched in municipalities. Under these schemes, waste is no longer treated at a waste treatment facility and thereby not registered in the ISAG. Developments and treatment of different waste types are detailed below. 6.3.1 Domestic wasteDomestic waste from households covers waste that results from normal consumption in private households, i.e. paper, bottles and glass, organic food waste, and residual waste, collected at the household at regular intervals, normally weekly or every second week. As Table 1 shows, domestic waste amounts from households increased from 1,620,800 tonnes in 1997 to 1,702,400 tonnes in 1998, corresponding to an increase of 5 per cent. Also recycling of domestic waste increased in 1998: 17 per cent was recycled against 15 per cent in 1997. Domestic waste led to incineration decreased from 1997 to 1998: 78 per cent against 80 per cent, cf. Figure 10. By contrast, amounts of landfilled domestic waste increased slightly and accounted for 6 per cent in 1998 against 5 per cent in 1997. This trend is in conflict with the general ban on landfilling of waste suitable for incineration, including domestic waste. It seems that temporary storage of a small amount of domestic waste takes place, which is in contradiction to current regulation. Figure 10 Look here! The proportion of domestic waste led to incineration decreased in 1998, but still too large amounts of domestic waste are incinerated or landfilled. And as it is seen in Figure 10, there is still some way to go before the target for year 2004 of a rate of recycling of 30 per cent has been met. To meet the target for recycling in year 2004 a number of initiatives will be launched in the coming years. For example, separate collection for recycling of glass, paper, and cardboard and plastic packaging will be extended. Furthermore, initiatives will be launched with a view to recycling of a larger proportion of organic domestic waste. Today, only around 4 per cent is recovered in biogas plants. The target is a recycling rate of 7 per cent of organic domestic waste in year 2004. 6.3.2 Bulky wasteIn 1998, 572,400 tonnes of bulky waste were generated in Danish households, which is 3 per cent less than in 1997, cf. Table 1. Amounts of bulky waste doubled from 1985 to 1996. This is due to a real increase in bulky waste amounts, but for a major part also to the introduction of collection schemes and bring schemes at recycling centres. However, bulky waste amounts decreased both in 1997 and 1998. From 1996 to 1998 there has been a decrease of 10 per cent. It can be seen from Figure 11 that the distribution of bulky waste among the three treatment options of recycling, incineration and landfilling has been relatively stable since 1995. Figure 11 Look here! Therefore, efforts are called for in the coming years if the target for year 2004 of at least 25 per cent recycling and a maximum of 37.5 per cent incineration and landfilling shall be met. This may be achieved, for example, by separate collection of more bulky waste fractions such as cardboard, waste electric and electronic equipment, impregnated wood and PVC-containing waste. 6.3.3 Garden wasteGarden waste collected from Danish households in 1998 amounted to 438,300 tonnes, which is slightly less than in 1997, cf. Table 1. Treatment of garden waste is shown in Figure 12. It is seen that 94 per cent of garden waste was recycled in 1998, which is 3 percentage points less than in 1997 and also less than the target for year 2004. The proportion of garden waste incinerated is unchanged compared to previous years and also below the target for year 2004. Incineration of garden waste is only allowed at approved plants. 5 per cent of garden waste was landfilled in 1998, which is 4 percentage points more than in 1997 and also more than the target for year 2004. As Figure 12 shows, it is planned that all garden waste shall be either recycled or incinerated in year 2004. It is estimated to be impossible to increase recycling of garden waste further. Therefore, future efforts with respect to garden waste will concentrate on maintaining the present situation. Figure 12 Look here! 6.3.4 Household waste per capitaTable 15 states the generation of household waste per capita and per household in 1997 and 1998. The table covers both waste type and waste fraction. As the table shows, total waste generation in households stated per capita and per household has shown a modest increase: 2 kg and 1 kg respectively. Of this, amounts of domestic waste per capita and per household increased by 6 kg and 9 kg respectively, whereas bulky waste and garden waste amounts decreased. The table also shows that a good half of total waste amounts from households is collected in separate collection schemes for paper/cardboard, bottles/glass, food waste/other organic, hazardous waste, bulky waste and garden waste. Of this, however, only just above one fifth of domestic waste is collected in separate collection schemes.
6.4 Waste from manufacturing industriesWaste from manufacturing industries, distributed on waste fractions, is presented in Figure 13. It can be seen that ferrous metals, various burnable, various non-burnable and beet soil account for the largest waste fractions from industry. In 1998, waste generation from manufacturing industries amounted to 2,783,000 tonnes, which is 50,000 tonnes more than in 1997. In 1998, beet soil amounted to 288,000 tonnes, which is 75,000 tonnes more than in 1997, but 25,000 tonnes less than in 1996. Beet soil generation depends on weather conditions during harvesting of sugar beets. The sector continues to seek solutions to reduce amounts of soil sticking to beets during harvesting, but weather conditions were not as good in 1998 as in 1997. Figure 13 Look here! Figure 14 shows treatment of industrial waste. It is seen that 56 per cent of waste was recycled in 1998, which is 2 percentage points or 26,000 tonnes less than in 1997. Amounts for incineration and landfilling also increased in 1998: by 36,000 tonnes and 39,000 tonnes respectively. This means that 15 per cent of waste was incinerated and 27 per cent was landfilled in 1998. There is still some way to go before the target for treatment in year 2004 has been met. Figure 14 Look here! Amounts and composition of waste from manufacturing industries depend on the sector generating the waste, as well as size and number of enterprises. Possibilities of preventing or recycling waste will therefore differ from one waste fraction and sector to another. In order to meet targets in Waste 21, the Danish Environmental Protection Agency has selected a number of waste types from industry to come into focus. One such waste type is shredder waste. New treatment technologies shall contribute to diverting shredder waste from landfilling to recycling. Another waste type in focus is hazardous waste, for which collection schemes shall be established with a view to separation and recycling. 6.5 Waste from institutions, trade and officesWaste from institutions, trade and offices, distributed on waste fractions, is shown in Figure 15. It is seen that the major proportion of waste 73 per cent falls within the fractions various burnable and paper and cardboard. Figure 15 Look here! Waste from institutions, trade and offices amounted in 1998 to 955,000 tonnes, which is 94,000 tonnes or 11 per cent more than in 1997. Almost exclusively, this increase is attributable to the two fractions that make up the major proportion of waste from this sector: various burnable and paper and cardboard. These fractions increased by 110,000 tonnes and 25,000 tonnes respectively. By contrast, the fraction various non-burnable, which is mainly landfilled, decreased by 25,000 tonnes. These changes in the composition of waste from institutions, trade and offices are also reflected in the distribution on treatment options, cf. Figure 16. Landfilling decreased in 1998 by 3 percentage points compared to 1997, which means that 17 per cent of waste from institutions, trade and offices was landfilled in 1998, whereas 46 per cent was incinerated against 41 per cent in 1997. The rate of recycling was lower in 1998 than in 1997, whereas absolute figures show a slight increase of 14,000 tonnes. Figure 16 also shows that recycling in this sector is too modest and landfilling too high compared to the targets of Waste 21 of at least 50 per cent recycling and a maximum of 5 per cent landfilling in year 2004. If targets are to be met, separation and collection of waste must be improved so that a larger proportion of recyclable material can be recycled and environmental contaminants separated and treated separately. Figure 16 Look here! 6.6 Residues from coal-fired power plantsAmounts of residues from coal-fired power plants vary over the years due to variations in Danish power exports to Sweden and Norway. For example, generation of residues was especially high in 1996 due to large exports of power. Since then, power exports have decreased. Under the terms of the Governments Energy Action Plan 1996, "Energy 21", natural gas and renewable energy sources, including bio-fuel, shall substitute coal in the long-term perspective. It is reflected in energy statistics2 that an increasing part of electricity generation is based on natural gas and renewable energy sources. Also in future, Energy 21 will result in a decrease in residues from coal-based energy generation, whereas there will be an increase in fly ash and bottom ash from bio-fuels. Recycling of bioashes will be given top priority in future. Generation of residues from power plants amounted in 1998 to 1,469,000 tonnes, which is 17 per cent less than in 1997. As it is seen in Figure 17, by far the major proportion of residues is recycled. In 1998, 86 per cent was recycled, which is an increase of 9 percentage points compared to 1997. In absolute figures, however, recycled amounts are similar to 1997. The decrease in total amounts of residues is reflected in less landfilling of residues, as only 14 per cent was landfilled in 1998, against 27 per cent in 1997. Figure 17 Look here! Table 16 states recycling options for residues from coal-fired power plants.
Source: Reports from Elsam and Elkraft. Just above 82 per cent of recycled residues in 1998 was used as secondary raw materials in industrial manufacture of, for example, cement, concrete and plaster board. Just above 17 per cent was recycled either under the terms of Statutory Order no. 586 of December 6 1983 from the Ministry of Environment and Energy, or as backfilling with special approval under the Danish Environmental Protection Act. In other words, these residues are either used in building and construction works as backfilling below buildings, roads and squares, backfilling in cable conduits and trenches, for noise barriers, or as backfilling in land reclamation works or harbour fillings. 6.7 Sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plantsFigure 18 shows treatment of sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants. The statement only includes sludge, excluding sand and screenings. Sludge amounts are stated in wet weight, and amounted in 1998 to 1,213,000 tonnes, which is almost similar to 1997. Figure 18 Look here! Treatment of sludge in 1998 is distributed on 72 per cent recycling, 20 per cent incineration and 7 per cent landfilling, which is similar to 1997. Sewage sludge is recovered as fertiliser on farmland. In future, more stringent requirements for the contents of certain organic and chemical substances will be made in relation to application to farmland. In the short-term perspective, the rate of recycling is therefore expected to decrease. However, in future, the quality of sludge is expected to improve due to the general policy of phasing-out of xenobiotic substances. __________________________ 1Circular No. 94 of June 21, 1995 2Energy Statistics 1998, is found on the homepage of the Danish Energy Agency www.ens.dk 7. Incineration plants and landfills
7.1 Incineration plantsIn 1996, total waste incineration capacity was 2,474,000 tonnes, distributed on 31 plants, cf. Table 17. In the beginning of the nineties, an extensive conversion of waste incineration plants from heating generation to combined power and heating generation took place. In this connection, capacity adjustments were effected in relation to expected waste amounts for incineration in future. As a result of the ban on landfilling of waste suitable for incineration that took effect on 1st January 1997, increased pressure on incineration capacity is expected. Amounts of non-recyclable waste suitable for incineration will be surveyed regularly in order to ensure necessary incineration capacity.
Sources: Rambøll & Hannemann 1990: Analysis of data for energy plants based on waste, for the Danish Environmental Protection Agency and the Danish Energy Agency. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency and the Danish Energy Agency 1994: Waste resources for waste incineration 1993 and year 2000. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency and the Danish Energy Agency 1997: Waste amounts for incineration year 2000. Figures for 1989 and 1995 are calculated on the basis of nominal capacity at 7,000 hours/year. Figures for 1996 are based on actual hours of operation of plants. District heating capacity (DH) may be subject to restrictions under the Act on heating supply. CPH = combined power and heating. 7.2 LandfillsTotal remaining capacity at landfills in 1994 amounted to 24.7 million tonnes distributed on 64 sites. Remaining capacity at landfills for inert waste in 1994 was 6.4 million tonnes distributed on 49 sites. Remaining capacity at separately located mono-landfills amounted to 6.2 million tonnes in 1994, distributed on 63 sites. A landfill is defined as a site receiving waste that, immediately or over time, presents a risk of pollution of groundwater, surface water and/or air. A landfill for inert waste is a site receiving waste that does not, or only to a very limited extent presents a risk of pollution of groundwater, surface water and/or air. A mono-landfill is a site receiving only one or a limited range of waste types with known composition. As a consequence of the above-mentioned ban on landfilling of waste suitable for incineration, in combination with an increased and further differentiated waste tax, a drop in landfill capacity needs is expected. Thus, at the national level, it is not expected that there will be a need for large extensions of landfill capacity in future.
Sources: Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Working report no. 54, Landfill capacity 1992, Danish Environmental Protection Agency 1997: Working report no. 33, Landfill sites in Denmark, and internal calculations. Annex 2. Principles for distribution of waste received at recycling centres and transfer stations.Recycling centres/transfer stations The ISAG covers a commercial source "recycling centres/transfer stations". This means that waste, for example from households, delivered via transfer stations is not recorded as waste from "households". The source "recycling centres/transfer stations" is therefore distributed on the original sources. This distribution is obviously based on estimates.
Bulky waste
Ferrous metals
|