| Front page | | Contents | | Previous
| | Next |
Substance Flow Analysis for Dioxin 2002
Reclamation of cable scrap in Denmark concerns reclamation of electrical cables with
lead sheath used for power supply or communication purposes buried in the ground or at the
sea bottom. The cables typically consist of solid copper conductors separated by
oil-saturated paper surrounded by a solid and impermeable lead sheath wrapped in
tar-impregnated textile and finally covered by a thin flexible ring of steel. One
reclamation plant for such cables has existed in Denmark until 2002. The company have from
2002 chosen to shot down the reclamation of cable scrap and will in the future only deal
with transformer waste. The annual emission in next section will therefore only be valid
for 2000-2001.
By the reclamation process the lead sheath is melted away at 500 - 600°C. The air stream that has a high content
of soot is afterwards treated in an afterburner at 875°C with a minimum of 6% O2 for 2 seconds. Via a heat
exchanger the air stream is finally led through a bag filter with an inside layer of lime.
The temperature around the bag filter is approx. 100°C.
The reclamation plant is also receiving and separating old transformers, which will be
the main future activity. The oil is tapped of and burned as fuel. However, this only
applies for oil with less than 50 ppm of PCB. In those cases - happens very seldom - in
which the oil contains 50 ppm of PCB or more, the transformers are directed to the central
Danish facility for hazardous waste (Kommunekemi - reference is made to section 5.2).
Danish cable scrap not treated at this plant is believed to be exported for reclamation
in India or the Far East. Illegal cable burning, if any, is believed to be insignificant.
However, a separate plant exists for reclamation of modern PEX-coated cables that is
separated by purely mechanical processes. Other cables may be treated as mixed metallic
waste for shredding (section 5.1.2) or as municipal solid waste directed to incineration
(section 5.3.1).
Plant activity
Based on information from the company, the activity of the plant in the periode 2000 -
2001 can be summarised as follows:
Total cable waste: |
approx. 2000 tonnes/year
|
Total transformer waste |
approx. 1800 tonnes/year
|
Filter dust |
approx. 1 kg/year
|
Air emission |
approx. 3.4 million Nm3/year |
Filter dust is sent to the central Danish facility for hazardous waste (Kommunekemi).
Dioxin formation and disposal
The dioxin emission to air has been measured once during reclamation of a mixture of
scrap and transformer waste. This measurement was undertaken in December 2000 and showed a
dioxin emission of 0.08 ng I-TEQ/Nm3. Taking the result of this measurement as
the level of dioxin emission from cable reclamation the total annual emission is estimated
to be within the range of 0.03 - 0.2 mg I-TEQ/year. This interval includes an uncertainty
of ± factor 3 (reference is made to section 1.5).
In SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ the total emission to air was estimated to be 0.005 - 5 g
I-TEQ/year based on international experience.
6 shredder plants for treatment of cars, white goods and mixed metallic scrap exist in
Denmark. In a shredder plant the waste is torn to pieces by large rotating steel hammers.
The temperature of the hammers and other parts of the shredder may rise to 600-800 C due
to friction, and part of the organic materials present (e.g. as paint and plastics) may
actually be burnt away. Air emission from shredders is typically cleaned by scrubbers.
Activity
Approx. 700.000 tonnes yearly of metal scrap was treated by the Danish shredders in the
middle of the nineties (H. Dalgaard, Danish EPA quoted by /Jensen 1997/). The figure is
believed still to be valid.
Dioxin formation and disposal
One of the Danish shredder plants has made measurements of the dioxin emission from the
production air flow in 2000 and 2001. The results of the two measurements show a total
dioxin emission within the range of 1 - 15.4 mg I-TEQ/year.
A measurement of dioxin air emission from a second Danish shredder was made in 1999.
The annual emission based on this measurement is approximately 0.5 - 4.3 mg I-TEQ/year,
assuming an uncertainty of ± factor 3 /Fyns Amt 2000/.
The measurements from the Danish shredder plants correspond to air emission factors in
the range of 0.01 - 0.09 µg I-TEQ/ton scrap manufactured. The European Dioxin Inventory
(section on Germany) states values for dioxin emission to air of 0.06 - 0.67 g I-TEQ/ton
scrap /Landesumweltamt Nordrhein-Westfalen 1997/.
Adopting the three Danish measurement as valid to all Danish plants the total emission
from shredder plants in Denmark the emission level can be estimated at approximately <1
- 79 mg I-TEQ/year, when a 90 % confidence level is used.
No data on the content of dioxin in scrubber sludge and other shredder residues are
available. These residues are normally directed to Kommunekemi.
In SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ the total dioxin emission from shredder plants was estimated
at 7 mg I-TEQ/year.
Kommunekemi that is the central facility for treatment of hazardous waste in Denmark,
has 3 kilns, of which 2 kilns (F3 and F4) are now equipped with dioxin abatement.
Hazardous waste is for the time being treated only in these two kilns. The third kiln, F1,
has been closed down due to reconstruction in the period 2000 - 2002. In connection with
the rebuilding this kiln has also been equipped with dioxin abatement.
Before the air stream enters the dioxin abatement, it is cleaned by a bag filter (one
kiln) or an electrostatic precipitator (the other kilns), and a wet flue gas facility. The
temperature in the bag filter and the electrostatic precipitator is around 195° C, whereas the temperature over the
dioxin abatement is around 145° C.
The experience of Kommunekemi confirms the general experience that the temperature through
the flue gas system is of the outmost significance to dioxin formation and should be below
200 C.
Besides Kommunekemi, another minor Danish plant has permission for incineration of
special types of hazardous waste. This plant also treats clinical hospital waste. Totally
the plant treats 4.700 tonnes waste/year of which 1.600 t is hazardous waste, and the rest
is clinical hospital waste (Danish EPA 1999c). This plant is covered by section 5.4 on
incineration of clinical hospital waste.
Furthermore a Danish company uses turpentine waste as fuel for a combustion plant,
which generates heat for the production.
Plant activity
The activity of Kommunekemi can be briefly summarised as follows:
Oil and hazardous waste burned |
approx. 90,000 tonnes/year
|
Oil and tar polluted soils burned |
approx. 20,000 tonnes/year
|
Air emission cleaned by dioxin abatement |
approx. 600 million Nm3/year
|
Air emission without dioxin abatement |
approx. 100 million Nm3/year
|
Fly ash deposited |
approx. 6,000 tonnes/year
|
Slag deposited |
approx. 11,000 tonnes/year
|
Gypsum |
approx. 1,150 tonnes/year
|
Filter cakes and other materials |
approx. 12,000 tonnes/year |
Dusts from the dioxin abatement is incinerated in the kilns, and the content of dioxins is
assumed to be destroyed. The fly ash collected by the bag filter and the electrostatic
filter is landfilled on Kommunekemi's own depot.
Kommunekemi has no knowledge of and is not analysing dioxin concentrations in waste
received for treatment and disposal.
Formation and disposal of dioxin
Kommunekemi has carried out several measurements of dioxin emission by air and water
and some earlier measurements have shown very high concentrations of dioxin. In order to
fulfil the present limit value of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3, Kommunekemi has redesigned
rotary kilns and flue gas cleaning systems, which means that F3 and F4 have complied with
the limit value since July 2000. Dioxin abatement has also been installed in order to
comply with the legal conditions for burning of waste.
Until June 2000 Kommunekemi had permission to carry out themal treatment of polluted
soil on F1. In 1999 Kommunekemi also used F1 for experiments on incineration of shredder
waste (ASR, Automotive Shredder Residue). For a short period Kommunekemi had also
permission to use it for treatment of liquid hazardous waste, because F3 and F4 were under
reconstruction. The use of F1 for other purposes than thermal treatment of soil gave high
emissions and was therefore stopped. /Kjærgaard, 2003/
The total operation time in 1999 was 3,109 hours /Danish EPA 2000b/.
From 1999 until today the following emission results for dioxin (I-TEQ) from F1 have
been obtained /Danish EPA 2000b/:
1999 June |
ASR |
2.7 |
ng/Nm3 |
1999 August |
Liquid waste |
36 |
ng/Nm3 |
1999 September |
Liquid waste/polluted soil |
200 |
ng/Nm3 |
1999 October |
Liquid waste |
3.5 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 January |
Polluted soil |
0.6 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 March |
Polluted soil |
0.5 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 April |
Polluted soil |
0.4 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 May |
Polluted soil |
0.2 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 May |
Polluted soil |
0.2 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 June |
Polluted soil |
0.2 |
ng/Nm3 |
The kiln F1 has been closed down due to reconstruction in the period from July 2000 -
2002, but has re-opened in December 2002. F1 has been closed down because the kiln no
longer will be used for treatment of polluted soil. It will instead be used for treatment
of hazardous waste like F3 and F4. This adjustment means that F1 has to comply with the
demands for combustion of waste and the kiln will therefore be equipped with dioxin
abatement, when it goes into operation again. /Kjærgaard, 2003/.
According to /Danish EPA 2000b/ Kommunekemi has estimated the total emission from F1
during 1999 to 2 2.5 g I-TEQ. This estimate will probably not correspond to the
dioxin emission, when kiln F1 is put into service again. The annual emission for kiln F1
is therefore not calculated.
For the two other incinerators F3 and F4 equipped with dioxin abatement the following
emission measurement results for dioxin (I-TEQ) have been obtained:
F 3
1999 April |
Normal Operation |
0.7 |
ng/Nm3 * |
1999 December |
Normal Operation |
0.04 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 March |
Normal Operation |
0.01 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 May |
Polluted Soil |
0.008 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 June |
Normal Operation |
0.007 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 August |
Normal Operation |
0.012 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 October |
Normal Operation |
0.034 |
ng/Nm3 |
2001 May |
Normal Operation |
0.02 |
ng/Nm3 |
2001 October |
Normal Operation |
0.01 |
ng/Nm3 |
2002 April |
Normal Operation |
0.007 |
ng/Nm3 |
2002 October |
Normal Operation |
0.006 |
ng/Nm3 |
*)Without dioxin abatement
F4
1999 April |
Corrosion Problems |
1.2 |
ng/Nm3 |
1999 April |
Corrosion Problems |
0.4 |
ng/Nm3 |
1999 June |
Corrosion Problems |
0.35 |
ng/Nm3 |
1999 August |
Corrosion Problems |
0.06 |
ng/Nm3 |
1999 December |
Normal Operation |
0.05 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 May |
Normal Operation |
0.003 |
ng/Nm3 |
2000 November |
Normal Operation |
0.053 |
ng/Nm3 |
2001 May |
Normal Operation |
0.100 |
ng/Nm3 |
2001 August |
Normal Operation |
0.006 |
ng/Nm3 |
2001 October |
Normal Operation |
0.100 |
ng/Nm3 |
2002 May |
Normal Operation |
0.009 |
ng/Nm3 |
2002 October |
Normal Operation |
0.01 |
ng/Nm3 |
The total dioxin emission for kiln F3 and F4 during the period 2000 - 2002 can be
calculated as follows:
F3: Average emission for 2000 - 2002 0.013 ng/Nm3 and 300 million Nm3/year.
Best estimate for total emission is 3.8 mg I-TEQ/year, ranging from 2.1 - 5.5 mg
I-TEQ/year using a 90% confidence level.
F4: Average emission 0.04 ng/Nm3 and 300 million Nm3/Year. Best
estimate for total emission is 12 mg I-TEQ /year, ranging from 2.3 - 21.8 mg I-TEQ/year.
In addition to F3 and F4 a CIS plant is used. This plant is a container-based rotary
kiln combustion system, which has a capacity of approximately 300 kg/hour and an operation
temperature at 1100ºC - 1200ºC. Contrary to F3 and F4 this kiln is a removable pilot
plant. It also has a very low capacity compared to these two kilns.
Three measurements of dioxin emission to air have so far been made on the CIS plant
during combustion of a combination of fluid and solid waste with low chlorine load:
2000 May |
0.04 ng I-TEQ/Nm3
|
2001 January |
0.001 ng I-TEQ/Nm3
|
2002 October |
0.01 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 |
The measurements correspond to an emission of approximately <0.01 - 0.7 mg I-TEQ/year,
when a 90% confidence level is used.
Assessed on the basis of the measurements during 2000 - 2002 from F3, F4 and the CIS
plant, the best estimate for the total dioxin emission from Kommunekemi is approximately
16 mg I-TEQ/year with an uncertainty interval ranging from 4.4 - 28 mg I-TEQ/year. The
estimate does not include a future emission from the F1 kiln, as F 1 will be equipped with
dioxin abatement, when it goes in operation again.
In SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ the total emission to air was calculated at 2.2 - 2.7 g
I-TEQ/year, of which F1 had an emission of approximately 2-2.5 g I-TEQ/year. This emission
from F1 must be expected to decrease significantly.
Regarding emission with wastewater from flue gas cleaning, Kommunekemi has estimated a
total emission of 0.003 mg I-TEQ/year for 2001 /Kommunekemi 2002/.
Regarding dioxin in fly ash and slag from the incineration processes, measurements from
March 2000 have given concentrations of 69 ng I-TEQ/kg and 39 ng I-TEQ/kg respectively
/Kommunekemi 2000/ equalling a total dioxin quantity of:
Fly ash |
approx. 0.4 g I-TEQ/year
|
Slag |
approx. 0.4 g I-TEQ/year |
The figures, at least the figure for fly ash, are likely to underestimate the amount of
dioxin collected during 1999, at least the amount collected from kiln F1. However,
measurements for fly ash and slag corresponding to measurements of air emissions are not
available. Measurements of dioxin content of gypsum, filter cakes and other materials
deposited are not available either.
The fly ash and slag are deposited on Kommunekemi's own landfill at Klintholm.
The dioxin emission in the flue gas from a Danish plant that combusts turpentine waste
was measured in 2001. The result shows a dioxin emission at 0.052 ng I-TEQ/Nm3,
which means an emission of approximately 0.2 - 1.6 mg I-TEQ/year. This interval is
assuming an uncertainty of ± factor 3. The emission factor of the combustion plant is
approximately 0.0018 mg I-TEQ/ton turpentine incinerated.
Emission of brominated dioxins
In autumn 2002 the National Environmental Research Institute has conducted four
measurements of the air emission of brominated dioxins on kiln 3 and kiln 4 respectively
/the National Environmental Research Institute, 2002/.
No official method is at the time being available for converting the measured values
into I-TEQ, but as earlier mentioned WHO suggests that the current toxicity equivalency
factors for chlorinated dioxins are also applied to brominated dioxins on an interim basis
/IPCS 1998/. This is done for the new measurements to get an estimate of the annual dioxin
emission of brominated dioxins from treatment of hazardous waste. The measurements do not
represent a complete investigation as it only has been possible to include congeners on
the tetra and penta level. Hexa-, hepta- and octa-congeners are thus not included in the
results presented. Furthermore many of the congeners cannot be identified specifically
from the measurements, and this means that it is not possible to use I-TEF for these
measured concentrations of brominated dioxins and thereby calculate a total emission in g
I-TEQ/year. The measurements have however identified some specific congeners, where I-TEF
will be used to estimate a total I-TEQ concentration for the specific congeners, compare
table 5.1:
Tabel 5.1
Measured specific congeners and I-TEF.
Measured specific congeners |
I-TEF |
1-Br-2378-Cl4-DD |
0.5 |
23-Br2-78-Cl2-DD |
1 |
2378-TeBDD |
1 |
12378-PeBDD |
0.5 |
3-Br-278-Cl3-DF |
0.1 |
1-Br-2378-Cl4-DF |
0.05 |
2378-TBDF |
0.1 |
12378-PeBDF |
0.05 |
23478-PeBDF |
0.5 |
On the basis of the measured values for the specific congeners and the I-TEF values from
table 5.1, the annual emission of brominated dioxins can be estimated to be approximately
<0.009 - 0.06 g I-TEQ/year with a best estimate of approximately <0.04 g I-TEQ/year
(90 % confidence level). This emission value represents with certainty an under estimate
of the reel emission, but any estimate of the reel emission value must be regarded as
highly uncertain. Based on an anlysis of the chromatographies for the congeners it is
estimated that the reel estimate can be up to approximately a factor 5 higher, but most
likely not a factor 100 /Vikelsøe, 2003a/.
Apart from the waste oil received and incinerated at the central Danish facility for
hazardous waste (reference is made to section 5.2.1), waste oil is also incinerated by
district heating plants. Before incineration at district heating plants the oil is
typically re-refined in order to reduce the content of heavy metals and other
contaminants. The focus on waste oil e.g. comes from the possibility that waste oil may
contain traces of PCB originating from transformers and condensers. The knowledge
available (reference is made to /Danish EPA1995/) is that PCBs are only registered in
unrefined waste oil and in concentrations below 1 mg/kg.
In year 2000 around 20,000 tons waste oil was incinerated at local district heating
plants /Danish EPA, 2001/. Measurements of the air emission of dioxins caused by
incineration of waste oil at district heating plants have been carried out in three plants
during spring/summer 2000 and at one plant in 1999.
One of the plants in question is equipped with an alkaline scrubber for cleaning of
off-gases. The fuel incinerated was unrefined waste oil. 4 measurements were conducted
each lasting for 4 hours. Air emission factors are ranging between 300 and 1,640 ng I-TEQ/
ton waste oil /Schleicher et al. 2001/.
The second district heating plant, which is firing with re-refined waste oil, shows an
emission factor of approximately 30 ng I-TEQ/ton waste oil. At the third plant, also
firing with re-refined waste, a similar result has shown, as the one sample taken under
normal operation shows an emission factor of 36 ng I-TEQ/ ton waste oil. At the same plant
a sample was taken under abnormal combustion conditions, and it shows an emission of 970
ng I-TEQ/ton waste oil. /Schleicher et al. 2001/.
In 1999 a measurement was made at a fourth Danish district heating plant, which is also
using re-refined waste oil. This measurement also showed an emission factor of
approximately 30 ng I-TEQ/ton waste oil.
In addition to the measurements from district heating plants measurements have been
carried out in 2002 at two waste-oil fuelled boilers generating heat for productions. The
emission factor is approximately 2.5 µg I-TEQ/ton waste oil for the one boiler and 600 ng
I-TEQ/ton waste oil for the other. An earlier measurement from 2001 showed an emission
factor of approximately 8 µg I-TEQ/ton waste oil, but this measurement was made while
using a too high concentration of salt in the scrubber-cleaning water. This concentration
was normalized in the measurements from 2002.
Using the emission factors from the Danish plants, the best estimate of the total
dioxin emission to air is 65.4 mg I-TEQ/year, with the uncertainty interval ranging from
<1 - 167.3 mg I-TEQ/year, using 90% confidence level. The total emission is most likely
not as high as the high interval limit, because most of the waste oil used is incinerated
in district heating plants and re-refined before incineration. Re-refined waste oil can
according to Schleicher (2003c) be compared to normal oil.
In SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ the annual emission is estimated at 45 mg I-TEQ/year.
No knowledge is available concerning residues from waste oil incineration at district
heating plants. Such residues will be directed to landfills.
Solid waste incineration is generally accepted as an important source of dioxin
formation and emission. A detailed discussion of the many investigations related to solid
waste incineration is outside the agenda for this report reference is made e.g. to
/Jensen 1995, Jensen 1997 and Dam-Johansen 1996 /. As a very brief summary it can be
concluded that dioxins will be present in waste materials directed to incineration.
Dioxins may furthermore be formed by the incineration process and afterwards during
treatment and cooling of flue gasses either from precursors or by "De Novo
synthesis".
As the temperatures in modern Danish incineration plants are typically around 1000° C, which should be appropriate for
degradation of dioxins present in the waste, it is assumed fair to believe that most
dioxins in the incoming waste (see table 5.2) are destroyed by the process (reference is
made to section 1.5).
However, as indicated by tables 5.2 and 5.3 a very significant emission of dioxins also
takes place. As the amount of dioxins emitted from waste incineration by flue gas and
incineration residues is significantly higher than the amount destroyed the figures
presented documents that municipal waste incineration also in Denmark should be regarded
as a very important source of dioxin formation and emission.
Table 5.2
Sources of dioxins in combustible waste assumed to be directed to municipal waste
incineration in Denmark
Source |
Estimated quantity g
I-TEQ/year |
Reference to section |
Chlorinated dioxins: |
|
|
Clay for decoration and educational
purposes |
0.004 - 5 |
2.2.1 |
PCP treated wood 1) |
5 - 240? |
2.6.1 |
PCP treated leather 1) |
0.5? |
2.6.2 |
PCP treated textles 1) |
0.3 |
2.6.3 |
Cork - bleached |
<0.01 |
2.7.2 |
Paper and cardboard |
1.5-3.3 |
2.7.2 |
Residues from wood stoves |
0.32 - 2.2? |
3.3.1 |
Residues from accidental fires 2) |
1 - 30 |
4.1.1 |
Residues from other fires 2) |
0.01 - 27.5? |
4.1.2 |
Lime filter dust as filter material |
<0.08 |
2.2.5 |
Other sources |
___?___ |
4.4 |
Total |
9 - 310 |
|
Brominated dioxins: |
|
|
Brominated flame retardants (in plastics) |
<(2 - 60) |
2.1.3 |
|
|
1. |
The figures indicate the quantity of dioxins assumed to
be present in wood, leather and textiles directed to waste incineration. The phrase
"PCP treated" should be regarded as a description indicating the reason for the
presence of dioxins. Some of the materials will besides dioxins also contain PCP. |
2. |
Only a part of these residues will be directed to
incineration. |
It should be noted that investigations on dioxin emission from incineration plants have
focused on chlorinated dioxins only, and no precise knowledge on brominated dioxins or
"mixed" dioxins containing bromine as well as chlorine exists. The following
discussion is therefore addressing chlorinated dioxins only.
Uncontrolled burning of waste in backyards etc. is not widespread in Denmark, but
cannot be excluded, particularly in rural areas. No statistics covering this practice are
available, and the amount of waste disposed of this way can only be estimated with a high
degree of uncertainty.
Plant activity
In Denmark 31 municipal waste incineration plants (MWI) are currently operating. By the
end of year 2002 2/3 of the Danish waste was incinerated at waste incineration plants
which are capable of complying with the new limit value for dioxin of 0,1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3/Danish
EPA 2002/. Most of the remaining waste incineration plants are planning to install dioxin
abatement before the end of year 2004. Two of the 31 incineration plants are however first
planning to finish the installation of filters in 2005 and three of the 31 incineration
plants have no intention of installing dioxin abatement, because they already have
measured low emissions that comply with the limit value 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3.
/Danish EPA 2003/. Dioxin filtration is done with charcoal/coal dust, and the filter
material with its content of dioxin is disposed of by being fed into the oven.
The total amount of municipal solid waste incinerated in Denmark comes up to approx.
2.9 million tonnes per year (2000-figure /Danish EPA 2001/). In table 5.3 is indicated the
knowledge available as per spring 2000 regarding installation of special dioxin abatement
and for plants without such abatement the type of flue gas cleaning process otherwise
employed.
Dioxin formation and disposal
The available knowledge regarding dioxin emissions from Danish waste incineration
plants is also indicated in table 5.3. To the best of knowledge none of the measurements
undertaken is based on a sampling time exceeding 6 hours. Continuous long term
measurements, lasting 2 - 6 weeks, is a new way of measuring the emission, but so far
Belgium is the only country that has implemented long term measurements on municipal waste
incineration plants. Long term measurements were implemented in Belgium after a number of
long term measurements detected emissions limits being exceeded massively, namely
exceedings and/or deviating process conditions that the random 6 hour sampling did not
detect. The annual expences to long term measurements constitute more than 2 - 3 time as
much as the annual expences to conventional biannual 6 hour sampling. /Schleicher, 2003b/.
As dioxin formation is extremely process dependent and the actual formation may differ
considerably from "normal" process conditions to "deviating" process
conditions, deviating process conditions may contribute significantly to the total dioxin
formation and emission. E.g. even if deviating process conditions only rules 5% of the
total operation time for a specific plant the dioxin formation during this time could
perhaps be 10-100 times higher than under normal process conditions. It is the impression
of the authors that most of the emission factors reported reflect normal process
conditions and thus do not include the consequences of deviating process conditions. Only
little factual knowledge is available on this issue, but the significance to the total
emission should not be overlooked.
The available Danish measurements from the periode 2000 - 2002 is summarised in table
5.3. Considering the uncertainty related to e.g. the importance of deviating operation
conditions, the choice is made to rely more on the assumed interval of uncertainty than on
the calculated best estimate.
Table 5.3
Dioxin emissions to air from municipal waste incineration in Denmark 2000 - 2002.
Flue gas cleaning process 1) |
Dioxin concentration
ng I-TEQ/Nm3 2) |
Waste incinerated
1000 tonnes3) |
Dioxin emission
g I-TEQ/year 4) |
Mean |
Min. |
Max. |
Samples |
Best estimate |
Assumed interval of uncertainty |
No dioxin abatement |
Wet |
2.3 |
0.9 |
4.0 |
39 |
1.029 |
14.1 |
5.9 - 24.8 |
Semidry |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
3 |
342 |
0.3 |
0.1 - 0.6 |
Dry |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
17 |
117 |
0.3 |
0.1 - 0.7 |
Dioxin abatement |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.1 |
33 |
1423 |
1 |
0.3 - 2.8 |
Sum |
2911 |
15.7 |
6.4 - 28.9 |
|
|
1. |
The figures presented are based on data from the
following Danish waste incineration plants: No dioxin abatement, wet::
I/S FASAN, Sønderborg Kraftvarmeværk, Haderslev Kraftvarmeværk, Kolding
Affaldskraftvarmeværk, Måbjergværket, Knudmoseværket, I/S RENO SYD, Hammel
Fjernvarmeværk, Affaldscenter Århus, I/S Fællesforbrænding, I/S Kraftvarmeværk
Thisted, Aars Varmeværk, Hadsund By Fjernvarme, AVV I/S, Skagen Kraftvarmeværk,
Frederikshavn Kraftvarmeværk.
No dioxin abatement, semi-dry: I/S KARA (line 3), I/S KAVO, Affaldscenter Århus,
I/S Reno-Nord.
No dioxin abatement, dry: VEGA, REFA, BOFA, Vestfyn.
Dioxin abatement: REFA, Fynsværket, Vestforbrænding, Nordforbrænding, KARA (line
4 and 5), Svendborg, Amagerforbrænding, Vejen Kraftvarmeværk, Horsens Kraftvarmeværk,
Grenå Kraftvarmeværk. |
2. |
Samples represent plants, as each plant is represented by
one figure. Average is used for plants with more than one measurement. Some plants have
two or more incinerators with different flue gas cleaning equipment. |
3. |
The amount of waste incinerated is in general reported
from the municipal waste incineration plants. If no information has been available, the
amount has been estimated from the amount used in the substance flow analysis from 2000. |
4. |
Assumed 6.5 Nm3/kg. The best estimate is
calculated based on the actual measurements (average figures) for the individual plants to
the extent measurements are available. For plants for which measurements have not been
available the calculation is based on the mean dioxin concentration for other plants with
the same flue gas cleaning process. The assumed interval of uncertainty is assessed by
statistically analysing the available data set from individual plants. On 2 data set
covering 4 measurements or more from the same plant a 90% confidence interval corresponded
to 37-131% of the mean value of the measurements for the plant. For other data sets of
only 2 measurements per set a 90% confidence interval corresponded to 30-580% of the mean
value of the measurements from the plant. Based on these data, the choice has been made to
assume an interval of uncertainty as ± factor 3 of the calculated best estimate, when
only two measurements are available. |
The total annual emission of dioxin from Danish municipal waste incineration plants can,
on the basis of the 92 measurements used in the investigation, be estimated at
approximately 15.7 g I-TEQ/year. The assumed interval of uncertainty for this value is 6.4
- 28.9 g I-TEQ/year. The annual value was estimated to be 21.1 g I-TEQ/year in SFA 2000
/Hansen, 2000/, within a range of 11 - 42 g I-TEQ/year (also 90% confidence).
The investigation from 2002 supports the theory that the type of flue gas cleaning
system to some extent determines the dioxin emission level. In the report from 2000 it was
found that dry processes are better than wet and semidry - the same picture can by and
large be seen in the investigation from 2002.
During the period from 1999 to 2001 the amount of waste that is dioxin-cleaned has
grown from 839,000 tons to 1,423,000 tons. This is the primary reason for the reduction of
the annual emission, since the amount of waste has moved from wet flue gas cleaning to
dioxin cleaning. It should be noted that the dioxin abatement systems are still in
commisioning fase on some of the plants. The full effect of the installed dioxin abatement
has perhaps not shown yet, as most of the abatement equipment has a running-in period
before it is getting the total efficiency.
With respect to uncontrolled burning of waste recent American investigations have
revealed that burning of domestic waste containing 0.0%, 0.2 %, 1% and 7.5 % PVC generated
14 ng I-TEQ/kg respectively 80, 200 and 4900 ng I-TEQ/kg waste /Gullett et al 1999/. The
tests with 0.2 % PVC were considered baseruns illustrating the normal content of PVC in
domestic waste.
As already stated the amount of waste burned uncontrolled in Denmark is not known, but
should be considered small. Assuming a figure of 2,700 tonnes of waste, corresponding to
0.1 % of the total waste quantity, and an emission factor of 80 ng I-TEQ/kg waste, the
total emission may be estimated at 0.2 g I-TEQ/year. It is noted that a figure of 2,700
tonnes of waste burned uncontrolled most likely should be regarded as an overestimate
rather than the opposite. Thus, uncontrolled burning cannot be expected to significantly
contribute to the total dioxin emission from waste incineration in Denmark.
Emission of brominated dioxins
The National Environmental Research institute has in autumn 2002 conducted an
investigation of the content of brominated dioxins in the flue gas from the municipal
waste incineration plant Vestforbrænding /the National Environmental Research Institute,
2002/. These measurements have been made according to the same method as the measurements
that have been carried out at Kommunekemi, compare section 5.4, and the same problem with
estimating I-TEQ emission is therefore present. As for Kommunekemi the measurements from
Vestforbrænding A/S only include tetra- and penta congeners.
Only five measurements from the same plant are available, but it is chosen to use these
measurements as an indication of the level of the annual emission of brominated dioxins.
This estimate is indeed very uncertain, because the 31 Danish plants have different
processes, waste and flue gas cleaning systems (Vestforbrænding has installed dioxin
abatement). Furthermore the calculation only includes the specific measured congeners with
an I-TEF value (compare section 5.2.1).
Using the measured values for the specific congeners and the I-TEF- values in table
5.1, the annual emission from Danish waste incineration plants can be estimated to be
approximately <0.001 - 0.03 g I-TEQ/year. This emission value represents with certainty
an under estimate of the reel emission, but any estimate of the reel emission value must
be regarded as highly uncertain. Based on an anlysis of the chromatographies for the
congeners it is estimated that the reel estimate can be up to approximately a factor 5
higher, but most likely not a factor 100 /Vikelsøe, 2003a/.
Residues
The available knowledge regarding dioxin content in residues from Danish waste
incineration plants is indicated in table 5.4 from SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/. More
measurements have been carried out in 2000 after finishing SFA 2000, but these
measurements are covered by the 90 % confidence interval stated in table 5.4. The waste
quantities have been updated, which means that the annual emission has changed. As shown
the total quantity may be estimated at 52 - 407 g I-TEQ/year. Of this quantity around 98 %
is collected with flue gas cleaning residues.
Table 5.4
Dioxin in residual products from waste incineration.
|
Waste quantity 1)
t/year |
Dioxin concentration
ng I-TEQ/kg dry matter 2) |
Number of samples |
Dioxin
90% confidence interval
g I-TEQ/year |
90% confidence interval around the mean 3) |
Min. 4) |
Max. 4) |
Clinker
Flue gas treatment residues |
494,000
68,000 |
8.8 ± 3.7
4.162 ± 3.236 |
5.1
135 |
17.8
35.566 |
6
21 |
2 - 5
50 - 402 |
Sum (rounded) |
|
|
|
|
|
52 - 407 |
|
|
1. |
/ Danish EPA, 2001/ - 2000 figures. The figures should be
expected to include a content of water of around 20% /COWI 2000/. |
2. |
Data on dioxin concentration in clinker originate from 5
different plants and are provided by /Ansaldo Vølund 1997/, whereas data on flue gas
treatment residues are provided by /Dansk RestproduktHåndtering 2000/. Flue gas treatment
residues cover flyash, filter dust and filter cakes. |
3. |
The "true" average is with a 90% certainty
within the interval. |
4. |
Min. and max. are the lowest and highest measurements
respectively. |
Three of the measurements of dioxin of "flue gas treatment residues" were on
filter cakes. These measurements constitute both the two highest and the lowest figure,
i.e. 35.566 and 22.176 ng I-TEQ/kg and 135 ng I-TEQ/kg respectively. The other 18
measurements show much lower difference. The highest and lowest figures are 380 and 6.476
ng I-TEQ/kg respectively with a 90% confidence interval around the mean of 1.037
2.243 ng I-TEQ/kg /Dansk RestproduktHåndtering 2000/.
Clinker will primarily be utilised for civil works (in this context also regarded as
landfilling) or secondly landfilled, whereas flue gas treatment residues will be directed
to landfilling only. In 2000 85,700 tonnes of flue gas treatment residues were exported
for landfilling. This number is higher than the actual amount of created flue gas
treatment residues, probably due to export of stored up flue gas cleaning products. It is
therefore assumed that the major part of the dioxin in the flue gas treatment residues is
exported.
The dominant part of healthcare risk waste generated in Denmark is incinerated together
with municipal solid waste in 7 of the ordinary municipal waste incineration plants, and
all small incineration plants previously operating at hospitals have been closed. Danish
investigations have concluded, that incineration of healthcare risk waste together with
ordinary solid waste do not seem to influence the dioxin emission to air from ordinary
waste incineration plants /Vikelsøe 2000; Vestforbrænding 2000/. The emission from
healthcare risk waste in that context is thus assumed to be included in the figures stated
for waste incineration (reference is made to section 5.3.1).
However, one small plant incinerating partly hazardous waste and partly healthcare risk
waste is in operation. This plant treats approx. 4,000 tons waste per year. The plant is
equipped with bag filter, but has no special dioxin abatement. 2 measurements from 1999
gave results of 1.4 and 5.8 ng N-TEQ/Nm3 respectively. Since then 10
measurements have been carried out, where the highest value is 31.4 ng I-TEQ/Nm3
and the lowest value is 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3. Assuming that the measurements are
normal distributed the average emission equals 3.9 ng I-TEQ/Nm3. The
measurement are within the range of <1 - 9,5 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 using a 90 %
confidence level. This interval results in annual emissions that range from approximately
<1 - 350 mg I-TEQ/year, using the annual air flow of approximately 37400000 Nm3/year.
In SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ the annual emission was estimated at 34 - 140 mg I-TEQ/year.
No measurements exist of filter dust and clinkers. The amount of dioxin collected with
these residues is assessed as insignificant compared with residues from municipal waste
incineration.
The total quantity of waste to be directed to landfills comes up to approx. 1.87
million tonnes/year (1998 figure /Teknologisk Institut 2000/). From 1 January 1997
it has not been permitted to landfill waste suitable for incineration.
Included in this quantity will be around 37 - 415 g I-TEQ/year of dioxins as detailed
in table 5.5.
The fate of dioxins in landfills is not well known, and no Danish investigations on
this issue have been undertaken. Based on the physical-chemical characteristics of dioxins
it should be expected that transport of dioxins out of landsfills is a very slow process.
Evaporation as well as leaching would have to be considered. Concerning leaching attention
should be paid to the risk that dioxins may be transported by leachate adsorbed to organic
matter.
Investigations on the content of dioxins in leachate have been carried out in Japan.
Dioxin concentrations of <0.001-50 pg I-TEQ/l raw leachate have been reported
/Yoshikawa et al 1999; Nishikawa et al 1999/. Assuming a leachate generation from Danish
landfills of around 5 million m3/year, the dioxin emission may be estimated at
< 0.05 g I-TEQ/year. This emission will primarily be directed to municipal wastewater
treatment plants.
Dioxin concentrations in leachate have been investigated from four Danish landfills
during 2002. These investigations have shown that leachate from normal Danish landfills
does not contain traceable amounts of dioxin. Leachate from special deposits containing
for example sludge, ash or other types of special waste will be investigated, but only one
result is so far available. One measurement has been taken from a deposit for hazardous
waste. The result showed a dioxin content of 0.02 pg I-TEQ/l when the dioxin content in
the blind test is deducted. /Vikelsøe, 2002/ and /the National Environmental Research
Institute, 2002/. The dioxin content in leachate from Danish municipal landfills is so far
maintained at the level of <0.05 g I-TEQ/year.
Tabel 5.5
Sources and quantities of dioxins assumed to be directed to landfills in Denmark
Source |
Quantity
g I-TEQ/year |
Reference to section |
Hot-dip galvanising |
<0.002 |
2.3.2 |
Steel reclamation |
<0.005 |
2.3.3 |
Aluminium reclamation |
1 - 3 |
2.3.4 |
Other industrial sources |
? |
2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.4, 2.8 |
Coal combustion |
0.27 - 31? |
3.1 |
Biomass combustion |
0.03 - 33? |
3.3.2 |
Residues from accidental fires 1) |
1 -30? |
2.1.1 |
Residues from landfill fires 2) |
0.4 - 17? |
5.5 (this section) |
Residues from other fires 1) |
0.01 - 27.5? |
4.1.2 |
Residues from shredder plants |
? |
5.1.2 |
Residues from incineration plants 3) |
35 - 275 |
5.3.1 |
Sewage sludge |
0.42 - 0.46 |
5.7.2 |
Other sources |
? |
|
Total (rounded) |
37 - 415 |
|
|
|
1. |
Only a part of these residues will be directed to
landfills |
2. |
Covers residues from fires in temporary depots for
combustible waste |
3. |
Of this quantity a little amount of dioxin will in
reality be included in clinkers used for road construction and other types of civil works.
|
Formation of dioxins may take place by landfill fires. However, the frequency and extent
of such events in Denmark is small, as it is standard procedure at Danish landfills to
cover the waste with soil. Thus landfill fires can hardly be expected to be a source of
any significance in Denmark, and in particular not after landfilling of combustible waste
has been banned.
For combustible waste temporarily stored on landfills or other depots awaiting adequate
incineration capacity to be established the situation is different. This procedure became
necessary as a consequence of the Danish ban on landfilling of waste suitable for
incineration. One major accident has occurred.
In July 2000 a temporary depot of 25,000 tons of waste was accidentally set on fire.
The fire continued most of a week until more than 75% of the waste had burned out. A
significant part of the waste consisted of wood and plastics. The wind direction changed
several times during the fire. Measurements of a few soot samples taken from the most
exposed areas in a neighbouring city were undertaken. 4 samples taken in distances of
380-3500m from the depot showed dioxin contents varying from 1-2 to 21 ng I-TEQ/m3.
The data available are however to a few to allow for a reliable quantification of the
dioxin formation and emissions occurred.
Available information indicates that a number of similar fires takes place every year
in Denmark. No exact recordings of the number of fires and the amount of waste burned are
made. Assuming that on average 5000 10,000 tonnes per year of waste are consumed by
such fires, and assuming the dioxin formation to be somewhat between 50 and 1000 ng
I-TEQ/kg waste (as for fires in general - reference is made to section 5.3.1 and 4.1.1
although typical PVC-products are not included in the waste, the waste should be
assumed still to contain small amounts of PVC), the air emission of dioxins may be roughly
estimated at 0.25 - 10 g I-TEQ/year. Assuming as for accidental fires that the amount
collected and landfilled with residues from the fires comes up to 170% of the amount
emitted to air, an amount of 0.4 17 g I-TEQ should be expected to be directed to
landfills.
It is emphasised that these calculations should be taken as rough estimates likely to
indicate the relevant order of magnitude of the flows in question. It is noted that the
amount of waste assumed to be consumed by fires in the calculations above may well be
underestimated /Hansen 2000a/.
In 2001 450,000 tons organic garden waste was brought to composting plants /Danish EPA,
2002/. Furthermore around 200,000 tonnes of food waste and other organic materials were
recycled /Teknologisk Institut, 2000/ mainly by composting and bio-fermentation processes.
Organic garden waste and food waste will contain dioxins due to e.g. atmospheric
deposition.
12 measurements on organic garden waste have been carried out in 2001.The measurements
come from 9 different locations. These measurements show an average dioxin content of 4.5
ng I-TEQ/kg dry matter with a minimum value of 0.5 ng I-TEQ/kg dry matter and a maximum of
15.9 ng I-TEQ/kg dry matter.
The amount of dioxin collected with organic garden waste equals 1.7 g I-TEQ/year, when
the average value is used, and using a 90% confidence level the uncertainty range
corresponds to 0.8 - 2.6 g I-TEQ/year.
Concerning food waste an estimate of 23 165 ng I-TEQ/ton waste can be developed
based on table 3.6 assuming that the content of dioxin in food waste corresponds to the
content of food products. Based on these assumptions the quantity of dioxins directed to
biological waste treatment in Denmark can be calculated to 0.8 2.6 g I-TEQ/year, as
the dioxin content in food waste is marginal compared to the content in the organic garden
waste.
The new information on organic garden waste has developed a higher estimate than the
one made in SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/, where the dioxin amount directed to biological waste
treatment was estimated at 0.01-0.07 g I-TEQ/year.
The fate of dioxins by biological waste treatment is not well investigated. Based on a
general understanding of the characteristics and behaviour of dioxins (reference is made
to section 2.2 and 2.4) and design of Danish plants for biological waste treatment, little
or no formation and degradation is assumed to take place. Consequently, the input of
dioxins to such processes will also be present in the products produced that dominantly
consist of compost and other residues used as soil improvement material and fertiliser in
farming, private and public gardens and parks.
5.7.1 Wastewater treatment
The total amount of wastewater discharged from Danish wastewater treatment plants sums
up to approximately 770 million m3 as an average for the years 2000 and 2001.
The storm water systems furthermore discharges an extra 190 million m3 in a
normal year and from separate industrial sources the average discharge has been
approximately 70 million m3 during 2000 and 2001./Danish EPA, 2002a / and
/Danish EPA, 2001a/.
In the SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ 3 samples from 1995 from a single Danish treatment plant
were reported which showed dioxin levels of 0.4-1.4 ng I-TEQ/m3 in the outlet
from the plant /Vikelsøe 2000/. More measurements from outlets of waste water treatment
plants have been made available from the period 2000 -2002 due to analytical work
undertaken by the National Environmental Research Institute on behalf on clients. However,
the origin of the samples is in most cases poorly described making data interpretation
difficult. In total 26 measurements are available, of which 3 originates from a semilarge
treatment plant (the one described above), 3 measurements originates from an industrial
textile processing plant and 3 from other industrial plants. The origin of the remaining
19 measurements is not stated and they must be assumed to represent a mix of municipal and
industrial waste water treatment plants.
Considering all measurements available from Denmark, they can be described as ranging
within 0 - 3 ng I TEQ/m3, and an average value of 0.5 ng I-TEQ/m3
with a 90% confidence level that ranges from 0.23 - 0.75 ng I-TEQ/m3
/Vikelsøe, 2002/. No measurements of dioxin in water from storm water drainage systems
have so far been carried out in Denmark.
Based on the data available the emission of dioxin with waste water and storm water to
Danish water recipients may roughly be estimated as follows:
Municipal waste water: 770 million m3 with 0.4-1.4 ng I-TEQ/m3
corresponds to 0.31-1.08 g I-TEQ yearly.
Industrial waste water: 70 million m3 with 0.23-0.75 ng I-TEQ/m3
corresponds to 0.02-0.05 g I-TEQ yearly.
Storm water- direct discharges: 190 million m3 with 0.4-1.4 ng I-TEQ/m3
corresponds to 0.08-0.27 g I-TEQ yearly.
Total emission: 0.4-1.4 g I-TEQ yearly.
This emission should be considered equal to the previous estimate for year 2000 of 0.3
- 1.4 g I-TEQ/year /Hansen, 2000/.
It is noted that the dioxin concentrations assumed for storm water should be regarded
as a best estimate only, as the concentration of dioxin in storm water could well be
higher than in municipal waste water, as storm water will be a carrier of dioxin
originating from atmospheric deposition which seemingly is the dominating source of dioxin
to the waste water and storm water system.
The sources of dioxin in wastewater and storm water may be outlined as indicated in
table 5.6.
Table 5.6
Sources and quantities of dioxins assumed to be directed to wastewater and
storm water drainage in Denmark
Source |
Quantity
g I-TEQ/year |
Reference to section |
Chlorine bleaching
PCP preserved textiles
Atmospheric deposition 1)
Leachate from landfills
Other sources |
<0.5
0.2
0.4 - 4?
<0.05
? |
2.7.1
2.6.3
6
5.5
|
Total (rounded) |
0.4- 4.8? |
|
|
|
1. |
The estimate is based on a total Danish area served by
sewage systems of 2,230 km² and a deposition rate of 0.3 - 3.6 ng I-TEQ/m2/year.
A collection rate of 50% is assumed. The collection rate reflects the amount storm water
directed to waste water treatment plants. The remainder will be directed directly to water
recipients. The estimate does not take into account the likely higher deposition in city
areas. On the other hand is part of the served areas without tight surface (garden areas
etc.), meaning that deposition in these situations are directed to soil and not to sewage
systems. |
The calculated total contribution of 0.4 - 4.8 g I-TEQ/year should be taken as comparable
to the estimated total content in discharged waste and storm water of 0.4 - 1.4 g
I-TEQ/year (see above) and the calculated total content in sewage sludge of 1.2 - 2.3 g
I-TEQ/year (reference is made to section 5.7.2) indicating that the contribution to waste
water treatment plants in Denmark is at least 1.6 - 3.7 g I-TEQ/year. These observations
indicate that the deposition level stated in chapter 6 is a realistic estimate.
It is, however, not possible based on the existing data to discuss the fate of dioxins
in wastewater treatment plants. /Vikelsøe, 2002/ points out that observed congener
profiles for dioxins in sewage sludge only partly are correlated to profiles for air
deposition. Some correlation to congener profiles for textiles may also be argued. Any
definite conclusions on sources for dioxins in wastewater and sewage sludge should so far
be considered premature. For a more detailed review of existing international experience
related to the fate of dioxins by wastewater treatment and sludge treatment and disposal
reference is made to /Jensen 1997/ and /Jones & Sewart 1997/.
It should be noted, that sewage systems as well as storm water systems contain a number
of sinks for dioxins e.g. sediment traps as well as the sewage hide inside the sewage
pipes. In sediment from sediment traps on storm water systems in the Copenhagen area has
e.g. been registered 1.2 - 1.9 ng N-TEQ/kg dry matter (2 samples, 1996 - /Kjølholt et al
1997/). Thus, it seems quite reasonable that the contribution from sources exceeds the
amount registered by analysis of wastewater samples and sewage sludge. The content of
sediment traps, when cleaned, should be expected to be directed to landfills. It is,
however, not possible to estimate the amount of dioxins directed this way.
5.7.2 Treatment and disposal of
sewage sludge
In 1999 the total production of sewage sludge from municipal wastewater treatment
plants was 1,442,930 t wet weight corresponding to 155,622 tonnes of dry matter /Danish
EPA 2001b/. The sludge is applied to farmland as well as to special sludge incineration
plants and landfills as detailed in table 5.7 below.
The content of dioxins in Danish sewage has been thoroughly investigated during the
recent years. 95 samples of sewage sludge covering city areas as well as rural districts
have been analysed during the years 1995 - 2002. The average content of dioxins has been
determined as 11.4 ng I-TEQ/kg dry matter with min./max. values of 0.7/201.3 ng I-TEQ/kg
dry matter/Vikelsøe 2002/. The measurements correspond to an average annual quantity of
dioxin collected with sewage sludge of approximately 1.8 g I-TEQ/year. The estimated
uncertainty is 1.2 - 2.3 g I-TEQ/year, when a 90% confidence level is used.
The distribution of this dioxin on the relevant disposal routes is also indicated in
table 5.6.
Table 5.7
Disposal of sewage sludge and dioxins contained in sewage sludge in Denmark
2000-2002.
Disposal |
Sewage sludge |
Dioxin
g I-TEQ/year |
Tonnes
dry matter |
% 1) |
Farmland etc. |
87852 |
56.5 |
0.68 - 1.3 |
Landfill 1) |
21007 |
13.5 |
0.16 - 0.31 |
Incineration |
32853 |
21.1 |
0.25 - 0.49 |
Other |
13909 |
8.9 |
0.11 - 0.20 |
Total |
155,621 |
100 |
1.2 - 2.3 |
|
|
1. |
Distribution figures originate from /Danish EPA 2001b/. |
In SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ the total amount of dioxin in sewage sludge was estimated at
2.1 g I-TEQ/year. The reduction is caused by slightly decreasing concentrations of dioxins
in sewage sludge, as the total amount of dry matter has increased by approximately 3%
compared to the figures from 1997, used in SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/.
Incineration of sewage sludge takes place at 5 plants in Denmark (reference is made to
table 5.8). Of these Lynetten and Spildevandscenter Avedøre are the two major plants. The
emission from Lynetten and Avedøre will be reduced in the coming years because of new
installations at the two plants. Avedøre has been equipped with dioxin abatement. As the
temperature in the incineration chamber exceeds 1000ºC, it seems justified to assume that
all or at least most of the dioxins present in sludge will be destroyed by the process.
Table 5.8
Dioxin emission to air in Denmark from incineration of sludge.
|
Sludge
tonnes
dry matter |
Emission
factor
µg/ton
dry weight |
Emission
mg I-TEQ/year |
Lynetten 1) |
19,000 |
0.07 |
1.3 |
Avedøre 2) |
6,279 |
0.025 |
0.2 |
Others 3) |
7,564 |
0.037 |
0.3 |
Total 4) |
32,843 |
|
1.8 |
|
|
1. |
Based on an air flow of 180 million Nm /year and dioxin
content of 0.007 ng I-TEQ/Nm (as found by measurement per November 1999 /Lynetten 2000/ |
2. |
Based on an air flow of 53 million Nm3/year
and dioxin content of 0.003 ng I-TEQ/Nm3(average of 2 measurements from 2001 of
0.004 and 0.002 ng I-TEQ/Nm3). 6279 tons was manufactured in 2001. |
3. |
Other minor sludge incineration plants include e.g.
Køge, Bjerringbro, Lundtofte and Brønderslev. The plant in Brønderslev has carried out
a measurement of dioxin emission to air in 2002. This measurement shows a dioxin emission
of 0.007 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 while the air flow was approx. 5 million Nm3.
/Nordjyllands Amt 2002/ The plant in Lundtofte has also made a measurement in 2001 with
0.005 ng I-TEQ/Nm3. This measurement is used as an indication of the level at
the minor incineration plants. The emission factor used for the minor plants is an average
of the emission factors from Brønderslev, Lundtofte, Lynetten and Avedøre, as it seems
there is no considerable difference between the emissions from large and minor plants. |
4. |
The total amount of sludge, dry matter, from /Hansen et
al. 2000/ has been maintained, as no new information is available. |
The new measurements at sludge incineration plants result in a reduction of the estimated
level of the dioxin emission from sludge incineration, compared to SFA 2000 /Hansen,
2000/.
The resulting ash from burning of sludge constitutes between 25-45% of the dry matter,
and 8,000-15,000 tonnes of ash yearly are currently being directed to landfills. As part
of the flue gas cleaning system at least at the major plants also a scrubber
system is employed. The scrubber water is normally directed to the wastewater treatment
plant and mixed with the raw wastewater. No recent measurements of the dioxin content in
ash and scrubber water from sludge incineration from Denmark are available. The only
available measurements date back to 1989, at which time measurements at Lynetten showed a
dioxin content of bottom ash of 6.3 ng N-TEQ/kg and of scrubber water of 0.28 ng N-TEQ/l
/Jensen 1997/.
Assuming the data for bottom ash still to be valid and relevant to all sludge
incineration plants in Denmark, and furthermore assuming N-TEQ to equal I-TEQ, the
quantity of dioxins collected by bottom ash and directed to landfills can be calculated as
0.05 0.09 g I-TEQ/year. Concerning scrubber water it may, based on data from
Lynetten /Lynetten 2000/ and assuming that all air emissions from sludge incineration in
Denmark is treated by scrubber, be estimated that the total amount of scrubber water comes
up to approx. 1.8 million m3/year. A content of 0.28 ng I-TEQ/l will correspond
to a total quantity of 0.5 g I-TEQ/year. The dioxin formation by sludge incineration
plants can thus be summed up to (0.0018 + 0.05 - 0.09 + 0.5 = 0.55 - 0.59) g I-TEQ/year.
The amount of dioxins collected by the scrubber water and redirected to wastewater
treatment will to some extent be included in the figure for discharges from wastewater
treatment plants (reference to section 5.7.1).
The assessments and estimates related to formation and turnover of dioxins by waste
treatment and disposal activities in Denmark by the end of the nineties and presented in
section 5.1 to 5.8 are summarised in table 5.9.
Table 5.9
Summary of formation and turnover of dioxins by waste treatment and disposal
activities in Denmark
Activity/product |
Formation |
Emissions/losses
(g I-TEQ/year) |
to air |
to water |
to soil |
to depots |
Export |
g I-TEQ/year |
Cable scrap |
0.00004 - 0.001 |
0.00004- 0.001 |
|
|
? |
|
Shredder plants |
<0.001 - 0.1 |
<0.001 - 0.1 |
|
|
? |
|
Hazardous waste incineration |
0.9 ? |
0.004 - 0.03 |
0.000003 |
|
0.9? |
|
Incineration of waste oil |
<0.001 - 0.2 |
<0.001 - 0.2 |
|
|
? |
|
Municipal waste incineration 1) |
58.4 436? |
6.4 29 |
|
|
2 - 5 |
50 - 402 |
Healthcare risk waste |
<0.001 0.4 |
<0.001 0.4 |
|
|
? |
|
Landfills 2) |
0.7 - 27? |
0.25-10? |
<0.05? |
|
0.4 - 17? |
|
Biological waste treatment |
|
|
|
0.01 0.1 |
|
|
Waste and storm water treatment/ discharges |
0.4 - 1.4 |
|
0.4 - 1.4 |
|
|
|
Sewage sludge disposal 3) |
1.0 - 1.9 |
0.002 |
|
0.7- 1.3 |
0.2 - 0.3 |
0.2 - 0.3 |
Total (rounded) |
61 468 |
6.7 - 39.7 |
0.4-1.4 |
0.7-1.3 |
4 23.2? |
50.2 - 402.3 |
|
|
? |
Figure cannot be estimated due to lack of data. The flow
in question should be overlooked. x? Figure or some of the subfigures referred to is
deemed highly uncertain. |
1. |
The quantity stated under "formation" is the
sum of the quantities estimated to be emitted to air or directed to depots and exported to
depots abroad. It may be so, that part of the dioxin contained in the in-coming waste is
not destroyed and is therefore included in the figures. |
2. |
Formation and transport of dioxins in landfills are in
general believed to be non-significant, although the factual knowledge is very limited.
However, fires in temporary depots of combustible waste occasionally take place. The
figures of formation, emission to air and to depots are related to such fires. Emission to
water represents leachate directed to wastewater treatment. |
3. |
The dioxin in sludge that is incinerated is not
mentioned, as it is assumed that the dioxin in the sludge is likely completely destructed
during the incineration process. The dioxin emission to air therefore is caused by the
dioxin generated later on in the flue gas cleaning system and the chimney.The
emission/losses to soil are the amount of dioxin in sludge directed to farmland, but there
is a possibility that some of the dioxin is emitted to water. The emission to depots
covers untreated sewage sludge and ash from sludge incineration. |
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous
| | Next | | Top
| |