Substance Flow Analysis for Dioxin 2002

7 Total picture for Denmark

7.1 Formation and consumption
7.2 Emissions to the environment
7.3 Substance flow balance for Denmark

7.1 Formation and consumption

The dioxin brought into circulation in the Danish society and emitted to the environment in Denmark partly originates from processes taking place in Denmark and partly from raw materials extracted and manufactured in Denmark or imported.

Table 7.1 summarises the available estimates regarding formation of chlorinated dioxins in Denmark and the extent to which these estimates are based on Danish investigations or literature values.

The calculation of formation of dioxins by each activity or process takes into account the amount emitted to air and water as well as the amount collected and disposed of with waste products including waste products being exported. Formation does in principle also include the amount created in the products manufactured, but no information has been available to allow estimates of these quantities that to the best of knowledge regarding chlorinated dioxins are also insignificant in Denmark, but could well be important to brominated dioxins in plastics containing brominated flame retardants.

The total formation of chlorinated dioxins in Denmark in 2000 - 2002 is estimated at 72-689 g I-TEQ/year. The most important activity is waste treatment and disposal activities of which municipal waste incineration is the dominant source for dioxin generation. Several other activities are, however, also adding significantly to the total formation. These activities include private wood stoves and other smaller biomass combustion plants, as well as fires, both accidental fires and other fires like the dominant Danish bonfire event - sankthansaften (midsummer day).

The formation of dioxins is widespread in the society, as it e.g. is connected to all types of combustion processes. It is noted that for several activities the formation cannot be quantified due to lack of data. It is, however, believed that the results presented in this report cover all major activities relevant in this context.

The large intervals given for most activities in table 7.1 reflect the uncertainty of the estimates. These uncertainties are partly related to the absence of reliable Danish data making it necessary in many cases to rely on international literature data. As dioxin formation is extremely process specific, this calls for a very critical attitude to all available data and in particular to whether the data available are representative to the process in question. However, the uncertainties also reflect the fact that for several important activities, e.g. fires, the knowledge available is actually inadequate, and the estimates presented may in reality only be justified by the need for obtaining an impression of the significance of such activities. It would be fair to conclude that dealing with dioxins is a matter of dealing with a host of uncertainties.

To make the picture complete, it is also necessary to consider the amount of dioxins brought into circulation by raw materials extracted and manufactured in Denmark or imported to Denmark. In table 7.2 the available estimates on this topic are summarised.

As stated in table 7.2 around 10 -1110 g I-TEQ/year should be expected to be in circulation of chlorinated dioxins alone. To this figure may be added brominated dioxins that are primarily brought into circulation by the use of brominated flame retardants in plastics.

Table 7.1
Formation of chlorinated dioxins by activities/processes in Denmark 2000 - 2002

Activity/process

Danish investigations
1)

Formation

g I-TEQ/year

% 2)

Manufacturing activities

- Chemicals 3)

Some-none

?

?

- Cement

Some

0.2 - 1.4?

0.2

- Lime

Some-None

0.001 – 0.005

<0.1

- Other high-temperature materials 4)

Some

0.02 – 0.3

<0.1

- Steel reclamation

Good

5.1 – 12.9

1.9

- Aluminium reclamation

Good

1 – 3.8

0.6

- Other metal manufacturing 5)

Some

0.02 – 0.4

<0.1

- Feedstuff 6 )

Some

0.004 – 0.07?

<0.1

- Use of chlorine for bleaching and disinfecting

None

<0.5

<0.1

- Other industrial processes 7)

Some-none

<0.04?

<0.1?

Manufacturing activities - subtotal

 

6.3 – 19

2.8

Energy production activities

 

 

 

- Coal power plants

Some

0.3 – 43?

6.2

- Other fossil fuels

None

0.4 – 1.3

0.2

- Biomass

Some

0.7 – 43.8

6.4

Energy production activities – subtotal

 

1.4 – 88

12.8

Miscellaneous human and natural activities

- Fires

None

1.6 – 112

16.5

- Traffic

None

1.3 – 1.7

0.2

- Crematories

Good

0.01 - 0.1

<0.1

- Other miscellaneous activities 8)

Some

0.09 - 0.22?

<0.1?

Miscellaneous human and natural activities – subtotal

3 – 114

16.5

Waste treatment and disposal activities

- Reclamation of cable scrap

Some-none

0.00004 – 0.001

<0.1

- Shredder plants

Some

<0.001 - 0.1

<0.1

- Hazardous waste

Good

0.9?

0.1

- Incineration of waste oil

 

<0.001 - 0.2

<0.1

- Municipal solid waste

Good

58.4– 436

63.3

- Healtcare risk waste

Some

<0.001 - 0.4

<0.1

- Municipals landfills 9)

None

0.7 – 27?

3.9?

- Wastewater and storm water treatment/discharges

 

0.4 - 1.4

0.2

Sewage sludge disposal

Good – some

1 - 1.9

0.3

Waste treatment and disposal activities – subtotal

61 - 468

67.9

Brominated dioxin from waste treatment (not included in total)

<0.01-0.1?

 

Total (rounded)

 

72 - 689

100

     
? Figure cannot be estimated due to lack of data. The flow in question should be overlooked. x? Figure or some of the subfigures referred to is deemed highly uncertain.
1. This column gives a brief assessment of the existing Danish investigations with the purpose of indicating on which subjects improved efforts may be relevant and to what extent others may benefit from Danish experience. The assessment is mainly related to air emission measurements, as measurements of solid waste or water discharges are scarce. The assessment uses the following terminology:
- Good: Reliable Danish investigations - estimates based solely on these investigations.
- Some: Some Danish figures are available - typically combined with literature values if available.
- None: No Danish experience al all - estimates rely completely on literature values.
2. Calculated based on the average value from each activity/process. Should be considered an uncertain rough impression of the significance of each source.
3. Covers manufacturing of pesticides and pharmaceuticals.
4. Covers manufacturing of insulation materials, tiles and bricks, glass and similar products.
5. Covers metal casting and hot-dip galvanising
6. Covers feedstuff production including fish oil/meal, meat and bone meal and green feed drying.
7. Covers asphalt preparation/recycling and several other processes only partly possible to quantify.
8. Covers a number of activities as fireworks, garden grills, cooking, and miscellaneous smallscale heating/burning operations, which can only partly be quantified
9. Formation and transport of dioxins in landfills are in general believed to be nonsignificant, although the factual knowledge is very limited. However, fires in temporary depots of combustible waste occasionally take place. The figure for formation is related to such fires.


Table 7.2
Presence of dioxins in products brought into circulation in the Danish society 2000 - 2002

Activity/process

Consumption by products

 

g I-TEQ/year

Clay-like raw materials

4 – 1050

Pesticides

<1?

Feedstuff products

1.5 – 11

Food products

0.06 – 0.44

PCP treated wood

0.11 – 42?

PCP treated leather

0.5

PCP treated textiles

0.5

Bleaching/disinfection agents

<0.001

Bleached cork

<0.01

Bleached paper/cardboard

3.0 – 6.6

Other chemical products

?

Total – Chlorinated dioxins

10 – 1110?

Brominated flame retardants

2 – 60?

Total – brominated dioxins

2 – 60?

Total (rounded)

12 – 1200?

    
? Figure cannot be estimated due to lack of data. The flow in question should be overlooked.
x? Figure or some of the subfigures referred to are deemed highly uncertain.


The dominant part of the quantity stated in table 7.2 will most likely be destroyed by heating or incineration processes, thus never being emitted to the environment. This is the case for dioxins in clay that are dominantly used for tiles, bricks and insulation materials manufactured of hightemperature processes. This is also the case for the dominant part of brominated dioxins, as they should be expected as plastics to be directed to municipal waste incineration.

However, this fate is certainly not the case for all types of products. Dioxins in feedstuff will partly be re-circulated to farmland by manure, dioxins in paper and cardboard will likely continue to be re-circulated for paper/cardboard manufacturing and preserved wood and leather may to some extent remain in the society, and slowly release dioxins to air by evaporation. A new measurement of air emission from a Danish edible fish industry has shown a dioxin level of 0.001 ng I-TEQ/Nm3. The source to the measured dioxin is difficult to explain as no combustion processes take place. The air emission can however indicate that some of the dioxin in the fish might be measured in the air emission.

The assessment of the consumption of dioxins by products should for many reasons be regarded as premature. An important reason is that so far insignificant efforts internationally have been devoted to products, and measurements are generally few and old and in no way systematic. The recognition of the presence of dioxins in natural clay is mainly due to a larger investigation reported recently. The question naturally arises whether dioxins might not be present in other sedimentary materials like e.g. lime or chalk. Despite these uncertainties, it is deemed relevant to bring forward these estimates in order to illustrate the magnitude of the dioxin flows in question.

7.2 Emissions to the environment

Table 7.3 summarises the estimates made with respect to emissions to the environment and quantities directed to depots in Denmark.

7.2.1.1 Emissions to air

Concerning emission to air the total emission is estimated at 11 - 163 g ITEQ/ year or as a best estimate, assuming uncertainties compensate each other, at around 87 g I-TEQ/year. The dominant sources include:
Municipal waste incineration
Biomass combustion (in particular combustion in wood stoves and farm boilers)
Evaporation from PCP-preserved wood
Fires

In SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ steel and aluminium reclamation was also regarded dominant sources. Since then both the steel reclamation plant and the aluminium reclamation plant have done an effort to minimize the dioxin emission and the toal air emission from these plants is today reduced to approximately 0.1 - 3.2 g I-TEQ/year. It is noted that at time of preparation of SFA 2000 no measurements were available for the aluminium plant. The first measurement for the plant from autumn 2000 showed an alarming emission of 183 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 corresponding to 60 g I-TEQ/year. The estimate made in SFA 2000 (1.3 - 5.6 g I-TEQ/year) was thus too low, and the case shows that unexpected emissions might appear.

In 1999 incineration of hazardous waste was a significant source as well, but the contribution from this source has been heavily reduced since 2000 due to redesign of ovens and installation of dioxin abatement. Other sources for emission that could be significant include cable scrap reclamation, lime and cement manufacturing, traffic, and landfills that in this context cover fires in temporary depots for combustible waste.

Concerning municipal waste incineration more plants are in the process of installing special dioxin abatement and the dioxin emission to air must thus be expected to decrease in the years to come. All municipal waste incineration plants must comply with the limit value of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 before 2005. By the end of year 2002 2/3 of the Danish waste was incinerated at waste incineration plants which are capable of complying with the new limit value for dioxin of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3/Danish EPA 2002/. Most of the remaining waste incineration plants are planning to install dioxin abatement before the end of year 2004.

Biomass combustion in small units without flue gas cleaning like wood stoves, farm boilers and stoker boilers is deemed an important source although the estimates are subject to significant uncertainty. For wood stoves it is known that burning of pure wood only is hardly a serious problem. However, adding other materials like paper, milk cartons, plastics or treated wood into the stove should be believed to promote dioxin formation e.g. due to the use of copper pigments in such materials. Considering that around 370,000 wood stoves are being used in Denmark by households, one should be prepared to accept a high level of variation with respect to the materials burned. With respect to the use of treated wood attention should e.g. be paid to the fact that very few people - if any - are able, without measurements, to determine whether the disposable pallet cut to pieces to be used as firewood has actually been treated with PCP or not. One may also discuss how many Danes actually have knowledge enough to care.

The Danish Environmental Protection Agency has in 2001 introduced an information campaign on private wood stoves and dioxin. The effect of this campaign can however not be evaluated as measurements on flue gas from private wood stoves is not present on a larger scale. The focus on dioxins from combustion of biomass has also led to several new measurements on residues from larger biomass combustion plants have been made in 2002 by the National Environmental Research Institute, and these results decrease the interval for residues from 0.04 - 36 g I-TEQ/year to <0.001 - 0.04 g ITEQ/ year.

Concerning farm boilers existing measurements have shown high variation of dioxin emission, and there is certainly a need for a better understanding of the factors causing this variation. As for wood stoves, one should be prepared to accept that also farm boilers are used for a number of other materials besides pure straw.

The contribution from other larger biomass combustion plants equipped with flue gas cleaning seems to be small compared to wood stoves, farm boilers and stoker boilers. In this context the larger plants should be expected to benefit from considerably better control of the materials burned and of operations in general. However, the number of other types of measurements carried out so far is still small and may not necessarily be representative to the total number of plants in operation.

Concerning evaporation from PCP-preserved wood the dominant part of the emission is due to old construction wood (from before 1980) in houses etc. all over Denmark. This emission will continue, until the wood in question has been naturally replaced. This should be expected to take place within the next 20 years, in which period the emission will gradually decrease. However, emission from PCP-preserved materials will continue taking place, as long as PCP is produced and used in the world. Dioxins are a natural contaminant in PCP and the increasing globalisation ensures that chemical substances used for industrial production in other regions of the world to some extent also will end up in Denmark.

Table 7.3
Estimated emissions/losses to the environment and depots in Denmark 2000 - 2002

Activity

Emissions/losses (g I-TEQ/year)

 

to air

to water

to soil

to depots

export

Manufacturing processes

Chemicals 1)

0.001 - 0.007?

<0.001

<1?

 

 

Cement and lime

0.2 - 1.4

?

 

 

<0.001

Other high temperature materials 2)

0.02 - 0.3

 

?

?

 

Steel and aluminium reclamation

0.1 - 3.2

 

 

1 - 3

5.0 - 10.5

Other metal manufac. 3)

0.02 - 0.5

 

?

<0.002?

 

Other manufacturing processes 4)

0.04 - 0.1?

<0.01

 

 

0.004 - 0.4

Energy generation

Coal combustion

0.1 –3.2?

 

 

0.2 – 40?

 

Other fossil fuels

0.4 – 1.3

 

 

0?

 

Biomass combustion, private wood stoves

0.4 – 22

 

(<0.001 - 2.2?)

0.001 – 2.2?

 

Biomass combustion, other smaller plants 5)

0.3 - 15.0

 

0.0003 - 0.09

<0.001 - 0.01

 

Biomass combustion, larger plants 6)

0.03 - 4.4

 

 

<0.001 - 0.03

 

Use of products

PCP-treated wood

0.5 – 26?

 

 

 

 

Other PCP-treated materials

< 0.05

0.2 7)

 

 

 

Bleached processes and bleaching agents

 

<0.5 7)

 

 

 

Feedstuff products

 

?

<10?

?

?

Miscellaneous other human and natural activities

Fires – accidental

0.5 – 20?

 

?

1 - 30

 

Fires – others

0.03 – 6.5

 

0.01 – 27.5?

0.01 - 27.5

 

Traffic

1.3 – 1.7

 

 

 

 

Cremation

0.01-0.1

 

?

 

 

Other activities 8)

0.1 - 0.2?

?

?

?

 

Waste treatment and disposal

Cable scrap reclamation

<0.001

 

 

?

 

Hazardous waste inc. 9)

0.004-0.03

<0.001

 

0.9?

 

Municipal waste inc. 10)

6.4 - 29

 

 

2 - 5

50 - 402

Landfills 11)

0.25 - 10?

<0.05?

 

0.4 - 17?

 

Waste and storm water

 

0.4 - 1.4

 

 

 

Sewage sludge disposal

0.002

 

0.7 - 1.3

0.2 - 0.3

0.1 - 0.2

Other activities 12)

<0.003 - 0.6

 

0.01 - 0.1

?

 

Emission of brominated dioxins (not included in total)13)

<0.01-0.1?

 

 

?

 

Total (rounded)

11 – 163

0.4 - 1.4

0.7 – 42

5 - 126

55 - 413

     
? ? Figure cannot be estimated due to lack of data. The flow in question should be overlooked.
x? Figure or some of the subfigures included is deemed highly uncertain.
1. Covers manufacturing of pesticides and pharmaceuticals
2. Covers manufacturing of insulation materials, tiles and bricks, glass and similar products.
3. Cover metal casting and hot-dip galvanising
4. Covers feedstuff production including fish oil/meal, meat and bone meal and green feed drying as well as asphalt preparation/recycling and several other processes not possible to quantify.
5. Other smaller biomass combustion plants are smaller stoker boilers and farm boilers.
6. Other larger biomass combustion plants are District heating plants, Industrial CHP plants and de-central and central CHP plants
7. Covers emission to waste water. Emission from waste water treatment plants is specified in the category "waste and storm water".
8. Covers a number of activities like fireworks, garden grills, cooking and miscellaneous smallscale heating/burning operations that can only be partly quantified.
9. The figure stated is only valid to the period 2000-2002. When the emission limit value of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 is fulfilled for all kilns the total maximum emission will be 0.09 g ITEQ/year.
10. When the emission limit value of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 is fulfilled for all-waste incineration plants the total emission will be approximately 2 g ITEQ/year.
11. Emission to air and depots relates to fires in temporary depots of combustible waste.
12. Cover shredder plants, healthcare risk waste, waste oil and biological waste treatment.
13. The emission of brominated dioxin derives from treatment of hazardous waste and municipal waste incineration. The interval is made on the basis of the estimated lowest and highest value, but does not include all measured congener groups.


Accidental fires etc. are a source recognised, but not quantified in most dioxin inventories, as the factual knowledge available is small and all estimates thus are highly uncertain. The basic problem is that it is difficult to undertake realistic experiments or to undertake actual measurements of the emission to air. Still the significance of fires for dioxin formation and emission should not be underestimated. It should be noted, that fires cover accidental fires in building, vehicles etc. for which a mixture of many different materials containing all the elements needed for dioxin formation are present, as well as bonfires, garden fires etc. dominantly based on pure wood but occasionally involving other materials, too.

Steel and aluminium reclamation together with incineration of hazardous waste and perhaps also cable scrap reclamation, cement and lime manufacturing are examples of single plant sources that should be considered significant at least in the perspective that one is dealing with the emission from a single plant. It should be noted that emissions from these companies can always be debated, based on the fact that spot measurements - even based on a standard procedure of 6-hours sampling - will normally not represent the total emission from such plants, and little experience exist to allow the importance of deviating process conditions to be assessed. This issue is further elaborated below. Concerning the estimated emission from steel reclamation in Denmark, the choice has been made to rely mainly on the company's own measurements.

A special source developed in Denmark in the last years is fires in temporary depots of combustible awaiting adequate incineration capacity to be established. This source is in table 7.3 included under "landfills". The comments relevant to this source correspond by and large to the comments given above on accidental fires etc.

The sometimes very large ranges given for most emissions reflect to the best judgement of the authors of this report the uncertainty actually related to the estimates presented. An issue, however, not necessarily fully covered by the ranges presented, is the consequences of deviating process conditions. As dioxin formation is extremely process dependent and the actual formation may differ considerably from "normal" process conditions to "deviating" process conditions, deviating process conditions may contribute significantly to the total dioxin formation and emission. E.g. even if deviating process conditions only rules 5% of the total operation time for a specific plant the dioxin formation during this time could perhaps be 10-100 times higher than under normal process conditions. It is the impression of the authors that most of the emission factors reported reflect normal process conditions and thus do not include the consequences of deviating process conditions. In this report the consequences of deviating process condition have been considered in relation to steel reclamation and to one municipal waste incineration plant. Only little factual knowledge is available on this issue, but the significance to the total emission should not be overlooked.

On the basis of the measurements on brominated dioxins in flue gas from Kommunekemi and Vestforbrænding the annual emission of brominated dioxins is estimated to be approximately <0.01 - 0.1 g I-TEQ/year. This estimate is very uncertain because of the few measurements and the variable processes used for waste incineration and cleaning of flue gasses. Furthermore there is no official method for calculating an I-TEQ-value, and the estimate does not include all measured congener groups, as it has only been possible to calculate I-TEQ-value for the specific congeners. The non specific congener groups are therefore not included in the interval of 0.01 - 0.1 g ITEQ/year. This emission value represents with certainty an under estimate of the reel emission, but any estimate of the reel emission value must be regarded as highly uncertain. Based on an anlysis of the chromatographies for the congeners it is estimated that the reel estimate can be up to approximately a factor 5 higher, but most likely not a factor 100 /Vikelsøe, 2003a/. This value is not a part of the total emission to air and figure 7.1 because of the uncertainty of the estimate.

Emissions to water

The total emission to water environment is estimated at 0.4 - 1.4 g ITEQ/ year. The estimate should be regarded as uncertain, as only few measurements are available.

Based on the available knowledge the most important source for dioxins in Danish waste and storm water seems to be atmospheric deposition (reference is made to table 5.5), but observed congener profiles for dioxins in sewage sludge only partly correlate to profiles for atmospheric deposition. Some correlation to congener profiles for textiles may also be argued. A definite conclusion on sources for dioxins in wastewater and sewage sludge should however so far be considered premature.

Emissions to soil

The total direct emission of dioxins to the soil environment is estimated at 0.7 - 42 g I-TEQ/year. The dominant sources are residues from miscellaneous fires and manure from domestic animals applied to farmland.

Other minor sources seem to be the use of pesticides and sewage sludge. It is, however, strongly emphasised that all estimates apart from sewage sludge are highly uncertain, as they are generally based on very few data of which most originates from foreign investigations. One must be prepared to accept that further and more detailed investigations could change the picture considerably. E.g. knowledge of the content of dioxins in pesticides should be regarded as almost non-existing, and more detailed investigations could perhaps identify pesticides as a significant source.

The focus on ash from wood stoves relates to that ash may frequently be directed to garden composts or directly spread on the soil in gardens. Similar behaviour should be expected for farmers operating farm boilers.

Residues from fires deal with ash etc. from other fires than accidental fires - e.g. garden fires and bonfires - not removed from the place of the fire and in time mixed into the soil.

Manure from domestic animals is generally applied to farmland and will contain dioxins originating from the feedstuff. As detailed investigations of the turnover of dioxins in the Danish agricultural sector are not available, the estimated supply should be regarded as a rough first estimate indicating the relevant order of magnitude.

Losses to depots

The total quantity of dioxins directed to landfills and other types of depots in Denmark is estimated at 5 - 126 g I-TEQ/year. Municipal waste incineration is no longer the dominant source because the flue gas treatment residues are exported. The major sources are dioxin residues in PCP-treated wood and residues from coal combustion however neither residues from steel and aluminium reclamation, biomass combustion nor fires should be overlooked. The significant quantities of dioxins ending on landfills naturally call for more knowledge of what is actually happening to dioxins within landfills.

Export

The data in the category "export" cover products and residues which have been exported from Denmark. The total amount of exported dioxin in the Danish society equals approximately 55 - 413 g I-TEQ/year. This amount has grown because of the export of flue gas treatment residues from the Danish waste incineration plants.

Uncertain estimates

Some of the estimates in table 7.3 are made on a very weak basis of experience due to lack of precise data. Because of the uncertianty connected to these estimates, some of the intervals stated have a high maximum value that influences the interval of the total emission considerably. It is therefore chosen to show a second edition of table 7.3, where these high, uncertain estimates are excluded. By doing this it is tried to distinguish between sources for which relative precise information is available and sources which can only be quantified with high level of uncertainty. The following categories are left out of the second edition of table 7.3 (table 7.4):
Biomass combustion - private wood stoves and other smaller plants
PCP-treated wood
Fires - accidental
Fires - others
Landfills
(Brominated dioxins - were not included in the total in table 7.3)

Table 7.4
Estimated emissions/losses to the environment and depots in Denmark 2000 - 2002, well determined sources only.

Activity

Emissions/losses (g I-TEQ/year)

 

to air

to water

to soil

to depots

export

Manufacturing processes

Chemicals 1)

0.001 - 0.007?

<0.001

<1?

 

 

Cement and lime

0.2 - 1.4

?

 

 

<0.001

Other high temperature materials 2)

0.02 - 0.3

 

?

?

 

Steel and aluminium reclamation

0.1 - 2.4

 

 

1 - 3

5.0 - 10.5

Other metal manufac. 3)

0.02 - 0.5

 

?

<0.002?

 

Other manufacturing processes 4)

0.04 - 0.1?

<0.01

 

 

0.004 - 0.35

Energy generation

Coal combustion

0.1 – 3.2?

 

 

0.2 – 40?

 

Other fossil fuels

0.4 – 1.3

 

 

0?

 

Biomass combustion, other larger plants 5)

0.03 - 4.4

 

 

<0.001 - 0.03

 

Use of products

Other PCP-treated materials

< 0.05

0.2 6)

 

 

 

Bleached processes and bleaching agents

 

<0.5 6)

 

 

 

Feedstuff products

 

?

<10

?

 

Miscellaneous other human and natural activities

Traffic

1.3 – 1.7

 

 

 

 

Cremation

0.006-0.1

 

?

 

 

Other activities 7

0.1 - 0.2?

?

?

?

 

Waste treatment and disposal

Cable scrap reclamation

<0.001

 

 

?

 

Hazardous waste inc. 8

0.004 - 0.03

<0.001

 

0.9?

 

Municipal waste inc. 9

6.4 - 29

 

 

2 - 5

50 - 402

Waste and storm water

 

0.4 - 1.4

 

 

 

Sewage sludge disposal

0.002

 

0.7 - 1.3

0.2 - 0.3

0.1 - 0.2

Other activities 10)

<0.003 - 0.6

 

0.01 - 0.07

?

 

Total (rounded)

9 – 45

0.4 - 1.4

0.7 – 12

3 - 49

55 - 413

    
? Figure cannot be estimated due to lack of data. The flow in question should be overlooked. x? Figure or some of the subfigures included is deemed highly uncertain.
1. Covers manufacturing of pesticides and pharmaceuticals
2. Covers manufacturing of insulation materials, tiles and bricks, glass and similar products.
3. Cover metal casting and hot-dip galvanising
4. Covers feedstuff production including fish oil/meal, meat and bone meal and green feed drying as well as asphalt preparation/recycling and several other processes not possible to quantify.
5. Other larger biomass combustion plants are District heating plants, Industrial CHP plants and de-central and central CHP plants
6. Covers emission to waste water. Emission from waste water treatment plants is specified in the category "Waste and Storm water".
7. Covers a number of activities like fireworks, garden grills, cooking and miscellaneous smallscale heating/burning operations that can only be partly quantified.
8. The figure stated is only valid to the period 2000-2002. When the emission limit value of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 is fulfilled for all kilns the total maximum emission will be 0.09 g ITEQ/year.
9. When the emission limit value of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 is fulfilled for all-waste incineration plants, the total emission will be approximately 2 g ITEQ/year.
10. Cover shredder plants, healthcare risk waste, waste oil and biological waste treatment.


Comparing table 7.3 and 7.4 it is clear that it is the emission to air and depots that is considerably influenced by the uncertainty from the abovementioned categories.

2000 - 2002 emission compared with 1998-1999 emission

Table 7.5 shows the estimated annual dioxin emission in the period 1998 1999. /Hansen, 2000/. Comparing the results from SFA 2000 with the results in table 7.3 it is clear that the data quality has been improved, especially for industry and waste treatment processes. However it is primarily dioxin emission to air that has been investigated during the past two years, and this means that the estimates of emissions to soil and water have not been improved.

Looking at the total dioxin emission to air there has been a reduction in the best estimate from 95 g I-TEQ/Nm3 in 1998 - 1999 to 87 g I-TEQ/Nm3 in the period 2000 - 2002. This reduction is caused by lower emission levels primarily for steel and aluminium reclamation, cable scrap reclamation, hazardous waste and municipal waste. Especially the dioxin emission from the municipal waste incineration companies has decreased. The main reason behind the decreased emission is improved dioxin cleaning caused by installation of dioxin abatement.

The categories Municipal waste, Steel- and aluminium reclamation, Fires, Evaporation from PCP-preserved wood and Biomass combustion were in 1999 considered to cause considerable dioxin emission. Out of these five categories new measurements have only been available for Municipal waste and Steel and aluminium reclamation. The new data from Steel and aluminium reclamation have resulted in the fact that this category no longer can be seen as a dominant source because of the reduction of the emission level.

Table 7.5:
Estimated emissions/losses to the environment and depots in Denmark 1998-1999.

Activity

Emissions/losses (g I-TEQ/year)

to air

to water

to soil

to depots

Manufacturing processes

Chemicals 1)

?

 

<1?

 

Cement and lime

0.045 - 3.5

?

 

 

Other high temperature materials 2)

0.006 - 0.46

 

?

?

Steel and aluminium reclamation

1.3 - 5.6

 

<0.005

0.26 - 1.5

Other metal manufac. 3)

0.06 - 0.5

 

?

<0.002?

Other manufacturing processes 4)

0.004 - 0.08?

<0.01

 

 

Energy generation

Coal combustion

0.4 – 2.3

 

 

0.23 – 31?

Other fossil fuels

0.14 – 0.46

 

 

0?

Biomass combustion

0.73 – 41

 

< 15.2

0.04 – 36?

Use of products

PCP-treated wood

0.5 – 26?

 

 

 

Other PCP-treated

materials< 0.05

0.2 10)

 

 

Bleached processes and bleaching agents

 

<0.5 10)

 

 

Feedstuff products

 

?

<10

?

Miscellaneous other human and natural activities

Fires – accidental

0.5 – 20?

 

?

1-30

Fires – others

0.03 – 6.5

 

0.01 – 27.5?

0.01 - 27.5

Traffic

1.3 – 1.7

 

 

 

Cremation

0.01

 

?

 

Other activities 5)

0.09 - 0.22?

?

?

?

Waste treatment and disposal

Cable scrap reclamation

0.005 - 5

 

 

?

Hazardous waste inc. 6)

2.2 - 2.7

0.000001

 

0.9?

Municipal waste inc.

11 - 42

 

 

35 - 275

Landfills 7)

0.25 - 10?

<0.05?

 

0.4 - 17?

Waste and storm water

 

0.3 - 1.4?

 

 

Sewage sludge disposal

0.07 - 0.15

 

1.3

0.42 - 0.46

Other activities 8)

0.08 - 0.2

 

0.01-0.07

?

Total (rounded)

19 – 170

0.3 -1.4?

1.3 – 54

38-420

   
Figure cannot be estimated due to lack of data. The flow in question should be reviewed.
x? Figure or some of the subfigures included is deemed highly uncertain.
1. Covers manufacturing of pesticides and pharmaceuticals.
2. Covers manufacturing of insulation materials, tiles and bricks, glass and similar products.
3. Cover metal casting and hot-dip galvanising.
4. Covers feedstuff production including fish oil/meal, meat and bone meal and green feed drying as well as asphalt preparation/recycling and several other processes not possible to quantify.
5. Covers a number of activities like fireworks, garden grills, cooking and miscellaneous smallscale heating/burning operations that can only be partly quantified.
6. When the emission limit value of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm3 is fulfilled for all kilns, the total maximum emission will be 0.09 g ITEQ/year.
7, Emission to air and depots relates to fires in temporary depots of combustible waste.
8. Cover shredder plants, healthcare risk waste, waste oil and biological waste treatment.


1998-1999 emission compared with 1995 emission

In SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ a comparison between the results from 1998- 1999 and 1995 emissions was made. This comparison is maintained in the update of the substance flow analysis for dioxins to show the development in emission sources and emission level.

The figures presented in table 7.5 may be compared to previous estimates of dioxin emissions in Denmark presented in table 7.6. The main differences between the previous estimates and the present are due to the following:
That the previous estimates have generally been expressed as "best estimates" giving relatively little consideration to the significant uncertainties connected to the estimates.
That the present estimates have included a number of sources previously not quantified, e.g. fires and PCP-treated wood
That the present estimates benefit from the significant knowledge developed internationally and in Denmark in the recent years and e.g. has included all measurements known to be available from Denmark.

Other differences may be due to different interpretation of the available data. It should e.g. be noted, how the estimates of biomass consumption and in particular wood stoves fluctuate.

The benefit of including uncertainties in the estimates and operating with intervals instead of "best estimates" becomes clear, when comparing to the atmospheric deposition. A significant difference between estimated total emissions to air and estimated total atmospheric deposition has for long been recognised internationally (reference is e.g. made to /Brzuzy & Hites 1996 and Landesumweltamt Nordrhein-Westfalen 1997/) and is also illustrated in the figures given in table 7.5. On the contrary the balance for Denmark presented in SFA 2000 /Hansen, 2000/ indicates that Danish emissions are reasonably balanced with atmospheric deposition on the Danish land area (Air emission equals 19 - 170 g I-TEQ/year and atmospheric deposition 16 - 160 g ITEQ/ year). This could be taken as an indication of the fact that dioxin inventories are generally underestimating emissions and that giving proper attention to the significant uncertainties related to emission estimates may provide at least a part of the explanation of the difference generally noted between emissions and deposition.

Table 7.6
Estimated annual emissions of dioxins in Denmark in 1995 (1990 figures as N-TEQ in brackets - /Jensen 1997/).

Activity/process

Emission to (all figures as g I TEQ/year)

Air

Water

Soil

Waste/ residue

Total

Manufacturing

Chemical industry

-

-

-

-

-

Paper and pulp industry

-

-

-

-

-

Asphalt-mixing industry

0.1

-

-

-

-

Steel reclamation

7.5 (12)

-

-

34 (29)

42 (41)

Cement industry

0.08-1.5

-

-

-

0.08 – 1.5

Energy generation

 

 

 

 

 

Pit coal

2

-

-

40 (53)

42 (53)

Gas oil – heating of houses

0.02

-

-

-

0.02

Wood stoves

1.1 (10-50)

-

-

-

1.1 (10-50)

Wood burning – other

0.25

-

-

-

0.25

Straw burning

0.07-

-

-

-

0.07-

 

6.6(0.05)

 

 

 

6.6(0.05)

Miscellaneous activities and use of products

Fires (building, landfill, vehicles)

?

-

-

-

?

Traffic

0.2 (1.0)

-

-

-

0.2 (1.0)

Cremation

0.16

-

-

-

0.16

Textile products

-

0.08

-

-

0.08

Waste treatment

Cable scrap reclamation

0.13

-

-

-

0.13

Shredders

?

-

-

?

?

Municipal waste incineration

20 (34)

-

-

100 (250)

120 (284)

Inc. of hospital/health care risk waste

5 (14)

-

-

-

5 (14)

Hazardous waste inc. (KK)

0.23 (1.7)

-

-

1.0

1.23 (1.7)

Inc. of waste oil (district heating)

0.038 (0.01)

-

-

-

0.038 (0.01)

Sewage sludge

0.072 (1.5)

0.108

1.1

0.226

1.51 (1.5)

Compost

-

-

1-5

-

1-5

Total

38-46

0.12

2.1 - 6.1

175

215-226

Air deposition

 

 

120

 

 


Apart from steel reclamation and waste incineration, no specific trend in dioxin emissions should be noted. The Danish steel reclamation plant has based on the company's own estimate for dioxin emission seemingly succeeded in reducing emissions considerable whereas Danish waste incineration plants are in the process of speeding up installations of special dioxin abatement. For other plants and activities the focus on dioxin emissions in Denmark has so far been limited.

7.3 Substance flow balance for Denmark

The available knowledge and assessments on the flow of chlorinated dioxins in Denmark in 2000 - 2002 have been compiled and illustrated in figure 7.1.

Figure 7.1
Balance for chlorinated dioxins Denmark 2000-2002 (all figures in g I-TEQ/year)

Input to the Danish society

The Danish society receives dioxin by products imported to Denmark and by raw materials extracted from nature. The products in question are mainly materials like wood, leather and textiles preserved by pentachlorophenol, but also clay, paper/cardboard and feedstuff. The raw materials extracted are clay and clay-like materials that are mainly used for manufacturing purposes besides fish, grass and animals that mainly are turned into feedstuff and food products.

Export from the Danish Society

From Denmark is exported a number of items containing dioxins, mainly residues from waste and coal combustion, but also residues from manufacturing processes, like filter dust from steel reclamation. To this can be added small amounts of dioxin in exported feedstuff, clay and paper/cardboard etc.

Formation and destruction

Significant formation and destruction of dioxins is believed to take place in the Danish society. Formation is related to manufacturing, energy production, and waste treatment and miscellaneous other processes as elaborated in the previous sections. Destruction is related to high-temperature manufacturing of products based on clay, besides that thermal waste treatment like incineration of municipal waste and sewage sludge is believed to destroy - more or less - the dioxins present in the waste materials treated. Attention should be paid to the possibility that recycling of materials like coal fly ash and paper sludge for cement manufacturing also should imply destruction of the dioxins present in the recycled materials. To this may be added the unknown amount of dioxins in special dioxin abatement assumed to be destructed by incineration in the plants own ovens/kilns. Whereas the destruction capacity of such thermal processes should be recognised, it should, however, not be forgotten that at the same time many of the processes - in particular municipal waste incineration - belong to the dominant sources for dioxin formation.

It should be noted that destruction for the time being might well be larger than formation, as the stock of dioxins in use in products in the Danish society should be expected to be decreasing (reference is made to the section on stock building below).

Recycling

Recycling of dioxins present in paper and cardboard will take place.

Emissions to the environment

From the Danish society emissions will take place both to air, soil and water as elaborated in the previous sections.

Stock building

A stock of dioxins in the Danish society exists in the form of dioxins in PCPtreated wood. The size of this stock per 1999 is roughly estimated at 100 - 5,000 g I-TEQ. The stock should be assumed slowly to decrease due to replacement of the wood in question as well as evaporation of dioxins from the wood corresponding to the fact that the use of PCP in Denmark is now banned.

Balance for air

Whereas Denmark emits dioxins to the air, Denmark also receives dioxin from the air by atmospheric deposition. The deposition on the Danish land area is on the basis of measurements from The National Environmental Research Institute estimated at 13 - 130 g I-TEQ/year assuming a total land area of 44,000 km2 (reference is made to chapter 6). The given interval does not include:
The uncertainty coming from the fact that the measurements originate from only two locations and in addition that the measurements encompasses only one single year. This uncertainty is at the time being very difficult to assess.
Uncertainty coming from the fact that no measurements so far have been carried out in urban areas and in the vicinity of point sources.

The calculated total contribution from dioxin sources to waste water is approximately of 0.4 - 4.8 g I-TEQ/year of which atmospheric deposition from the Danish land area served by sewage systems, equals 0.4 - 4 g ITEQ/ year. The interval for dioxin sources should be taken as comparable to the estimated total content in discharged waste and storm water of 0.4 - 1.4 g I-TEQ/year and the calculated total content in sewage sludge of 1.2 - 2.3 g I-TEQ/year (reference is made to section 5.7.2). These observations indicate that the contribution to waste water treatment plants in Denmark is at least 1.6 - 3.7 g I-TEQ/year and it also indicates that the stated deposition level is a realistic estimate.

It is emphasised that the estimate of atmospheric deposition on the Danish land area is based on measurements that are higher than international measurements and results from the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme, EMEP.

The Danish marine internal waters are assumed to cover 38,000 km2 and will certainly also receive deposition that has however not been estimated due to lack of data. As an immediate conclusion it can be judged that a reasonable balance between the estimated emission and the calculated deposition seems to exist, assuming that the deposition on Danish internal waters is small compared to the deposition on the Danish land area.

Content in soil

The National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark has in 2001 made an investigation of the dioxin content in soil in Denmark. Furthermore six measurements have been made in 1996. The concentration of dioxin has been measured at 33 different places all over the country, in different types of soil from both field, garden and park and near and far from expected sources to huge atmospherically emissions. The measurements were carried out in a depth of 0-10 cm, because a depth profile has shown that by far the most dioxin is situated in the top soil.

There is a general tendency to higher dioxin concentrations in urban areas than in rural areas. In the rural areas the dioxin concentration is approximately 0.5 - 0.66 ng I-TEQ/kg dry matter and in urban area the concentration is approximately 3.6 - 19 ng I-TEQ/kg dry matter. Both intervals are based on 90 % confidence level. Soil samples taken near waste incineration plants, power plants and bigger industrial districts do not have higher dioxin content than samples from other areas in the same category. / The National Environmental Research Institute, 2002/ The density of top soil (the upper 10 cm) is assumed to be approximately 1.5 tonnes/m3 (dry matter) and the total land area is 44,000 km2. Approximately 8% of the Danish land area is urban areas and the remaining area is rural areas. /Ministry of Environment, 1999/ This means that the total dioxin content in soil from rural area is equal to 3 - 4 kg I-TEQ and in urban areas the content equals 2 - 10 kg ITEQ.

The total content of dioxin in the Danish soil is therefore estimated to be in the range of 5 - 14 kg I-TEQ, assuming that dioxin is only present in the top soil (0 - 10 cm). This interval is based on a 90 % confidence level. According to the results of the Danish measurements approximatey 2/3 of this amount of dioxin will be found in urban areas.

Water

Two measurements on seawater have been conducted in 2002, but it has not been possible to identify dioxin in the samples /Vikelsøe, 2002/.