Valuation of Chemical related Health Impacts

9 Skin cancer

Skin cancer is defined as a malignant melanocytic tumor arising in the skin. Often skin cancer is divided into two main groups. (1) Non-melanoma and (2) melanoma skin cancer known as 'birthmark cancer'. Whereas no relation between chemicals and non-melanoma skin cancer exists, certain types of chemicals may induce non-melanoma skin cancer. Therefore the focus here will be on non-melanoma skin cancer17.

The two main cancer groups within non-melanoma skin cancer are basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. The latter also called spinocelluaire carcinoma. US data shows that Squamous cell carcinoma is responsible for 20% of the non-melanoma skin cancer cases, and basal cell carcinoma is responsible for approximately 75% of the cases (Chen et al. (2001)). The remaining 5% are other types of non-melanoma skin cancers. The incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer in Denmark is increasing (Sundhedsstyrelsen 2003a; 2003b).

Chemicals can induce squamous cell carcinoma. The available clinical data do not distinguish between the different types of non melanoma skin cancers (Sundhedsstyrelsen 2003a; 2003b). The reason for this is that registration of cancers is based on the ICD10. It is only registered whether the cancer is melanoma or non-melanoma and where it is located. This can be the reason why the international literature on costs of non-melanoma cancers is not segmented according to variety (e.g. Housman et al. (2003); Chen et al. (2001))). Furthermore, the literature on chemicals related to non-melanoma skin cancer is not segmented according to variety either (e.g. EU Commission (2003); Hansen et al. (1998)). Therefore, the costs estimations are made for the general group 'non-melanoma skin cancer'.

9.1 Definition

Non-melanoma skin cancer is defined as C44 (Non-melanoma skin cancer) ICD-10 classification of diseases.

It is assumed that all patients are treated within one year and that non-melanoma is not fatal. Even though a number of patients are likely to die from the non-melanoma skin cancer, Danish data on survival for non-melanoma skin cancer show a higher relative survival probability than the background population (Storm and Engholm (2002)). Therefore, fatality is not included in the analysis.

9.2 Chemicals associated with Skin Cancer

The far most important reason for skin cancer in general is UV radiation of the skin from the sun. In relation to chemicals, there is no clinical evidence showing a direct relation between skin cancer and chemicals. However, animal studies and observational human studies indicate that exposure to certain chemicals, such as coal tar pitch, mineral oil, and creosote increases the relative risk of skin cancer (Merck (1998); Andersen et al. (1994)).

9.3 Direct health care costs

Estimation of direct health care costs are based partly on the incidence based approach and partly on the prevalence based approach. Costs for hospital services are based on the prevalence approach where as costs for primary care services are based on the incidence approach.

According to Drzewiecki (2003), 30% of the patients are treated in the primary care sector only. 70% of the patients are visited in the primary care sector and referred to treatment in the secondary sector (hospital sector).

Costs for patients treated in the hospital sector

Costs of hospital services are estimated from the average number of discharges for inpatient and outpatient hospital services (Table 9-1).

Table 9-1 Total treatment costs for patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated in the hospital sector (DKK 2002 values)

Table 9-1 Total treatment costs for patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated in the hospital sector (DKK 2002 values)

Sources The first number refers to the source for the number of services or percentage. The second number refers to the source for the cost per service. See appendix 1 with list of sources for the calculations.

Before a patient is referred to a hospital, the patient will on average have one consultation at the GP and one at the MS.

Total costs of hospital services are approximately DKK 85 millions. The costs per person are found by dividing total hospital costs with the incidence for non-melanoma skin cancer. Hence, of the persons admitted to the hospitals, the costs per person are approximately DKK 15,000. Total expected costs are found by multiplying total costs with the percentage of patients referred to hospitals. Hence, total expected costs for persons treated at hospitals are 10,991 per person.

Costs of treating a person in the primary care sector are estimated using expert input as no data regarding use of these services are available (Table 9-2).

Table 9-2 Total direct costs for patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated in the primary care sector (DKK 2002 values)

Table 9-2 Total direct costs for patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated in the primary care sector (DKK 2002 values)

Sources The first number refers to source for the number of services. The second number refers to source for the costs per service. See appendix 1 with list of sources for the calculations.

15% of the patients treated in the primary care sector are treated at the GP whereas 85% are treated at the MS (Drzewiecki (2003)). In both cases, the patient will have 6 follow-up visits over the following 3 years. Using a discount rate of 3%, the costs of 6 follow-up visits are DKK 594 and 2,841 for GP and MS respectively. Furthermore, 1/6 of the patients will have recurrence of the non-melanoma skin cancer (Drzewiecki (2003)). Recurrence is assumed on average to take place in the second year following the diagnosis. Using a discount rate of 3%, costs of recurrence are estimated to be DKK 606 ((1/6 * 2,841)/1.032). Total costs for patients treated in the primary care sector are DKK 3,795. Hence, expected costs are DKK 1,179 when taking into account that this is only 30% of the patients.

Total direct costs are estimated by adding costs of primary and hospital services together (Table 9-3).

Table 9-3 Total direct costs per person with non-melanoma skin cancer (DKK 2002 values)

Table 9-3 Total direct costs per person with non-melanoma skin cancer (DKK 2002 values)

Total expected costs per person are estimated to be approximately DKK 12,000.

9.4 Individual welfare loss

Compared to other types of cancer many cases of non-fatal skin cancer are relatively easily cured without to much pain and suffering for the patient. Furthermore the average duration of the disease course is relatively short (less than one year).

One of the elements to be included in the individual welfare loss of skin cancer is the risk of permanent scars. According to Drzewiecki (2003) app. 70% of all inpatient treatments results in permanent scars. It is estimated that 70-75% of the cases appear in the face/neck and following this, scars will be difficult to cover.

Only very few studies on the WTP to avoid skin cancer are available. This include following as best options for benefit transfer:

  • Murdoch and Thayer (1990) estimate WTP for skin cancer by estimating the private benefits from savings in defensive expenditures for sun protection products from initiatives protecting the ozone layer.

    First, they forecast the expected ozone depletion during the period 2000-2050 as well as the expected increase in number of skin cancers. Then they estimate the need for sun protection products in order to neutralise the negative effect on human health from the ozone depletion. Based on information on the price on sun protection products this result in the total expenditures needed to offset the negative effect of the ozone depletion.

    The additional expenditures on sun protection products amounts USD 87.7 billion over the entire time horizon (undiscounted), which is expected to save 2.96 m. cases of non-melanoma skin cancer. This results in a value of app. USD 30,000 per skin cancer case (1985 prices).

    Converted into DKK 2002-prices, this amounts DKK 301,655 and corrected for differences in income and purchasing power between Denmark and US it results in a value of app. DKK 230,000.

    There are several reasons why benefit transfer from this study is critical. First, benefit transfer from an American study into a Danish context may be critical, along with the fact that the study is rather old. Secondly crucial elements of the study may be questioned, such as number of skin cancers following ozone layer depletion and the degree of protection from sun lotion.
  • According to Pearce (2000) An Australian contingent valuation study from 1992 showed that WTP of avoiding skin cancer would lie in the range DKK 56,000 - 1,200,000 (2002-prices), which is a rather large interval, however. Furthermore, it is unclear how these values have been derived.
  • Extern E provides estimates for welfare loss of non-fatal cancer in general. This estimate is around DKK 3.6 million and is probably not suitable for skin cancer, where the welfare loss must be expected to be somehow lower in perspective of the normally rather short and light disease course. Furthermore it is not very well documented how the estimate has been provided, and therefore what it covers.

    As seen from the descriptions above, the few existing studies of the individual welfare loss of skin cancer do not seem to be very suitable for benefit transfer for the present purpose. Our best suggestion is to use the value from Murdoch and Thayer estimate, being aware of its clear weakness. It may also be chosen to use the cost estimate without the individual welfare loss in a quantitative form.

9.5 Production loss

No statistics on the degree of absence due to skin cancer is available. Based on data on the number of various treatments combined with expert judgement (Drzewiecki (2003)), the number of days of sickness following Skin cancer has been estimated as seen in Table 9-4 below.

Table 9-4: number of days lost per skin cancer patient

Table 9-4: number of days lost per skin cancer patient

The number on lost days of production is a result of following data and assumptions:

Each inpatient hospital service of 4.5 days in average, and the incidence of hospitalization in connection with skin cancer is 23.7%. In addition to this it is assumed that each hospitalization is followed by a period of illness of 14 days in average ((Drzewiecki (2003)). It is further assumed that all days of illness may fall on working days as well as non-working days, except for one day of hositalization, namely the day of operation, which will always fall on a working day.

Each patient receives outpatient hospital services 3.9 times in average. In average, one of these times is assumed to include operation. Each outpatient operation is assumed to result in additional 4 days of illness at home ((Drzewiecki (2003)). Each time of outpatient hospital service is assumed to result in a day absence from work. The 4 additional days may fall on working as well as non-working days.

Each patient has 9 visits at the GP in average. It is here assumed to result in 3 days of absence from work.

With a production loss value of DKK 533 per day the average production loss value is DKK 6,625 per skin cancer patient.

9.6 Unit cost estimate

The total unit cost estimate is seen in Table 9-5 below. The total unit cost of skin cancer is DKK249,424. Again, the welfare loss is seen to be the far most important cost element contributing with 92% of the total costs. However, as described above, the estimation of the individual welfare loss is very uncertain, which makes the total unit cost estimate very uncertain as well.

Table 9-5: Unit cost estimate, non-melanoma skin cancer, DKK, 2002-prices

Table 9-5: Unit cost estimate, non-melanoma skin cancer, DKK, 2002-prices

Primary care sector are costs for those patients only treated in the primary sector
Primary and secondary sector are costs for those patients treated in both the primary and secondary sector


Footnotes

17 Indirectly, chemicals reducing the ozone layer may cause both types of skin cancer through increased UV radiation of the skin.

 



Version 1.0 June 2004, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency