Mapping and release of chemical substances from products made of chloroprene

5 Migration investigations

5.1 Chloroprene products selected for the migration investigation

According to agreement with the National Agency of Environmental Protection, the following products were selected for further migration investigation:

Figure 5.1 Selected products

Product designation Sample number
Knee bandage 1
Dive hood 4
Premium neoprene waders 6
Dive gloves 7
Dive suit, semi-wet 8

The chlorine content of the sample nos. 1, 4 and 8 was as expected when compared to published chloroprene formularies. The chlorine content of sample 6 was quite low in relation to standard formularies and sample 7 had, as previously mentioned, a chlorine content at trace level even though these dive gloves are marketed as neoprene and thus chloroprene-based gloves.

5.2 Method descriptions for the migration investigations

5.2.1 Initial test to determine the final test plan

It was decided to select two of the products for the initial tests since, based on the screening analyses, the concentrations of organic substances to be determined by short-term exposures were expected to be very low. Sample no. 1 (knee bandage) and sample no. 6 (waders) were selected. The knee bandage was selected because it represents a typical chloroprene product and because the temperature is expected to be relatively high when the user is engaged in sport activities. For sample 6, the headspace analysis had identified a relatively high content of toluene in relation to the other samples, and waders represented a product with low chlorine content.

The following exposure conditions were selected for the two products:

Figure 5.2 Exposure conditions

Product Sample
number
Exposure
time, hours
Exposure
temperature °C
Contact
medium
Knee bandage 1 2 37 Artificial sweat
Waders 6 6 37 Artificial sweat

The GC/MS analysis conditions used on the chromatograph were the same as those used for the screening analysis of extracts. The artificial sweat was produced as prescribed by literature (DS/EN 1811).

The exposure conditions and sample preparation were as follows:

A piece of the product was cut and weighed (approx. 1.5g) for the analysis. The sample was placed in a 250ml glass with a teflon-covered screw cap and was in contact with 50ml artificial sweat. The rubber was held down by means of metal mesh wire.

The cap was placed on the glass which was then placed in a ultrasonic bath at the exposure temperature for the time specified. Concentration was carried out by Solid Phase Micro Extraction (SPME) in the headspace which was desorbed at the analysis. The rubber was then removed from the contact medium after it had been exposed to a physical, pumping load ("massaging"). The purpose of this load was to pump the contact medium out of the rubber before the analysis. When the rubber was removed, the contact medium was extracted using dichloromethane. A direct GC/MS analysis of the extract was performed.

The results of the analysis work showed that no additional information is obtained from SPME and it was therefore decided to continue the analysis work by analysing the dichloromethane extract alone.

Results of the initial tests:

Method A: SPME-GC/MS

Sample 6 (waders) was found to contain toluene. The content was quantisised against toluene-d8 and found to be 3.1µg/g. No significant content of volatile organic components could be measured in sample 1 (knee bandage).

Method B: GC/MS of the dichloromethane extracts

Two different substances were identified in the migration liquids studied. The results of the analysis are indicated in Table 5.3.

Table 5.3 Analysis results from method B [10]

Component CAS no. No. 1 (knee bandage) No. 6 (waders)
[µg/g] [µg/g]
Dibutylformamide 761-65-9 4.5 -
N-Butylbenzene sulphonamide 3622-84-2 0.52 0.68
Rt:11.04 - - 1.1
Rt:11.36 - 0.39 -
Rt:11.50 - 0.83 1.1
Rt:12.24 - 0.68 -
Rt:12.44 - - 5.2

Identification was carried out by searching in the NIST MS library.

5.2.2 Final migration tests

The actual migration analyses were initiated on the basis of the initial migration tests. According to agreement with the National Agency of Environmental Protection, the tests were carried out under different contact conditions. First, the test involved an analysis of migrating substances to the simulant either in the form of artificial sweat or artificial sea water. The artificial sea water was produced according to a recipe provided in literature (Standard Methods).

Subsequently, the samples were analysed quantitatively for content of the migrants after extraction using dichloromethane.

The gas chromatographic conditions are identical to those previously listed under the method description i 5.2.2.

The results of tests and analyses are indicated in Table 5.4.

Table 5.4 Analysis results

Chemical compound CAS no. No. 1
Knee bandage
No. 4
Dive hood
No. 6
Waders
No. 7
Dive gloves
No. 8
Dive suit,
semi-wet
µg/g µg/cm² µg/g µg/cm² µg/g µg/cm² µg/g µg/cm² µg/g µg/cm²
Alde-
hydes and ketones
                     
3,5,5-Tri-
methyl-
2-cyclo-
hexen
-1-one (isopho-
rone)
78-59-1                 0.15 0.011
Aromatic hydro-
carbons
                     
Toluene 108-88-3         0.12 0.0046        
Aromatic amines and phenols                      
Phenol 108-95-2             0.90 0.062    
Form-
amide
deriva-
tives
                     
N,N-Dibutyl formamide 761-65-9 4.9 0.22 0.48 0.031         0.27 0.020
Urea derivatives                      
N,N`-diethyl-
thiourea
105-55-5         1.8 0.074        
Other                      
N-Butyl-
benzene
sulpho-
namide
3622-84-2 0.50 0.023     0.64 0.026        

The following exposure conditions were used in the tests:

No. 1 Knee bandage: 37°C, 2 hours, artificial sweat.
No. 6 Waders 37°C, 6 hours, artificial sweat.
No. 4 Dive hood, 28°C, 1½ hours, artificial sea water.
No. 7 Dive gloves: 28°C, 1½ hours, artificial sea water.
No. 8 Dive suit, semi-wet, 28°C, 1½ hours, artificial sea water.

In the table, the results are indicated as migrated amount per gram of sample and as migrated amount per exposed area. The results are indicated as the mean value of two determinations. Raw data are listed in Annex C.

The table shows that the following substances migrated:

  • Isophorone from the dive suit
  • Toluene from waders
  • Phenol from dive gloves
  • N,N-Dimethyl formamide from knee bandage, dive hood and dive suit
  • N-Butylbenzene sulphonamide from knee bandage and waders

5.2.3 Quantitative analyses of selected substances in the products

It was subsequently decided to analyse quantitatively for some of the substances in the products. Aniline was included to see to what extent the substance is present in relation to phenol.

Table 5.5 Analyses of components in products

Substance CAS no. No. 1
Knee bandage
No. 4
Dive hood
No. 6
Waders
No. 7
Dive gloves
No. 8
Dive suit,
semi-wet
Detection
limit
3,5,5-Trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one (isophorone) 78-59-1 - 1.6 1.0 8.9 2.4 1
Toluene 108-88-3 2.1 - 74 - 9.8 1
Phenol 108-95-2 - - 7.7 36 - 5
N,N-Dibutyl formamide 761-65-9 240 18 7.2 5.5 12 5
N,N-diethylthiourea 105-55-5 - - 160 - 110 20
Aniline 62-53-3 - - - 5.4 6.8 3

When comparing Table 5.4 with Table 5.5, the highest concentrations in the migration tests are consistent with those in the products. Thus, this applies to:

  • Toluene i waders
  • Phenol in gloves
  • N,N-dimethyl formamide in knee bandage
  • N,N diethylthiourea in waders

Footnotes

[10] "-" means below the detection limit, 0.1µg/g.

 



Version 1.0 September 2005, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency