Integration of Environmental Considerations at Different Levels of Decision Making 3. Stakeholder identification and analysis
3.1 IntroductionAgenda 21 aims to engage a wide group of actors in the integration of environment and development. Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, which provides the framework for the Agenda 21 action programme, emphasises this point: "Environmental issues are best handled with the participation of all concerned citizens, at the relevant level ..". Changing production and consumption behaviour to achieve more sustainable patterns will only be effective if policies and tools focus on the key actors at the different levels in each sector who can really change their behaviour and the decisions which underpin their choices. The methodology focuses on market based actors because ultimately they are the key test of the extent and effectiveness of integration, particularly when it is a top-down process. However, it is important to identify the key actors at all levels of decision making to ensure the involvement of all key stakeholders, particularly those at macro and meso level who can influence the decision making framework for market based actors. As a first step, stakeholder analysis identifies how different stakeholder groups influence the policy drivers and pressures within each sector. Section 3.2 describes the analysis of stakeholders in a generic sector. A more detailed example is presented in Box 3.2 3.2 AnalysisThe generic stakeholder analysis identified three broad groups of stakeholders, distinguished by their legal and economic power, influence on policy and the types of integration decisions they are involved in. The relationships between the stakeholder groups, and the drivers that affect them, are presented in Figure 3.1 and described in Section 3.2.1. A description of the three stakeholder levels is presented in Section 3.2.2. 3.2.1 Parameters for Market Based Decision Making Figure 3.1 summarises the relationships between the different levels of stakeholders, and highlights the drivers that affect stakeholder decision making. Figure 3.1 At a very basic level production of goods or provision of services by businesses is driven by:
Consumption of goods or use of services by households, other businesses and government or institutions is driven by:
Policy may also be a driving factor for institutional buyers where central or local government or institutions are required (either by external legislation or internal policies) to take environmental considerations into account in their purchasing decisions. 3.2.2 Three Level Model Actors in the decision making process can be ascribed to one of three levels of decision making based on their legal and economic power, influence on policy and the types of integration process they are involved in. These three levels are described below. The Macro Level Macro level actors include the European Commission, central government and its agencies. Dependant on the legal context, they are responsible for establishing both generic and sectoral policies including strategies, objectives, targets, regulations, guidance, and the fiscal framework - which may or not incorporate sustainability principles. Macro level policies set the framework for decision making about sustainable production and consumption at the meso and micro levels. Macro level actors are responsible for strategic decision making which helps create the context, send messages and provide incentives for decision makers at the meso and micro levels to consider integration. Without this macro level foundation, it is difficult for integration to become systematic at other levels. Both EC and national governments are recognising this responsibility and the necessity to involve meso level actors (particularly academics, agencies, NGOs and producer and consumer groups) and civil society in strategic decision making processes to achieve integration. To date, consultation by macro level actors has tended to favour groups over individuals, larger over smaller enterprises, and institutions already involved in the subject area. However, consultation does not necessarily guarantee that actors at meso and micro levels will be motivated to consider integration in their own decision making. The responsiveness of actors at different levels is often dependant on the historical context, tradition or corporate culture. This issue is discussed further in Section 4 (on framework conditions) and Section 6 (on integration tools). The Meso Level Meso level actors typically include trade associations, producers groups, NGOs with a particular sectoral or environmental focus, and municipalities (see Box 3.1) in both policy making and enforcement roles at a local level and as providers of information to businesses and consumers. In this context the meso level also includes regulators who set standards for commercial , social or environmental performance for deregulated service providers (eg energy companies). Box 3.1 Municipalities as Meso level actors
Meso level actors tend to make sustainability decisions in a consultative way because they are not able to directly affect the macro level framework for integration by introducing regulations or fiscal measures. They therefore tend to be key movers in raising government awareness of environmental issues and lobbying at both the international and national level for changing the framework conditions for integration. They can affect producer behaviour by setting good practice standards, entering negotiated agreements with government on the part of groups of producers and by providing enabling information to help businesses make more sustainable production and consumption decisions. Meso level actors - particularly NGOs - also have a role in influencing framework conditions for individuals and households to make more sustainable consumption decisions eg by providing independent and credible information on products, their contents and how to use them. They are also increasingly involved in disseminating information on the environmental and social performance of companies through financial rating and ranking schemes for the benefit of shareholders. NGOs and producer associations have also been directly involved in developing and independently verifying Ecolabels and may also be involved in voluntary product taxes and green tax break schemes. An example of how a non governmental meso level actor can work to influence both policy makers and market based actors is highlighted in Box 3.2. Box 3.2 Meso Level Actors in the Industry Sector - Chemicals
Meso level actors have been included in the study to the extent that they are involved in either changing framework conditions or directly implementing tools for integration aimed at micro level decision makers. The Micro Level Micro level decision makers comprise the market based actors in the supply chain for goods and services including producers, wholesalers, retailers and consumers (individuals, other businesses and institutions such as municipalities in their role as producers or consumers of goods and services). These actors make day to day production and consumption decisions within the wider framework set at the macro level, although their decision making tends to be driven by perceptions of risks, opportunities and the immediacy of pressures. These characteristics enable much more rapid and less constrained decisions to be made. The parameters which constrain and influence micro level decisions reflect the characteristics of the actors and the significance of individual decisions in environmental terms. The availability of information and knowledge, the importance of perceptions (quality and suitability), habit or established behaviour, and the importance of price (which may/not encompass wider economic considerations through the life-cycle) are often the determining parameters in decision making. Individual decisions at the micro level, about production/provision (eg. choice and source of raw materials, operation for energy efficiency, etc) or about consumption patterns (eg. choice of transport mode, choice of food retailer, etc) are generally only significant in environmental terms when considered in aggregate. As these decisions are constantly being made, it is important that integration is achieved to address potential environmental impacts. The challenge at this level is the very large number of individuals that are making decisions, generally on an ad hoc and inconsistent basis. The fact that they are not held accountable for their day to day decisions also results in the problem that surveys show little relation between reported decisions and actual purchasing decisions (the so called big mouth problem with the purchase of green products such as organic foods). Micro level decision makers are generally less accountable to other stakeholders compared with the meso and macro levels. However, businesses are becoming increasingly accountable: to their employees, shareholders and those above and below them in the supply chain (all micro level); and indirectly to meso level actors who may develop and influence investment and reporting policies (financial institutions and regulators, NGOs etc). There is also the increasing likelihood of civil society holding producers responsible for damage to the environment and human health (eg class actions on tobacco producers, proposed environmental liability legislation, etc). 3.3 Identifying Key ActorsTable 3.1 illustrates the different levels of actors within the four sectors. An example of a stakeholder analysis is presented in Box 3.2 and a full description of the actors and their roles within each sector is presented in Annexes A-D. Table 3.1
Box 3.2
|