Plant & Location |
Capacity |
Actual loading |
Treatment processes |
Ref. |
|
|
|
Industrial |
COD |
BOD |
HRT |
Daily flow |
|
|
|
(PE) |
(PE) |
( %) |
(mg/l) |
(mg/l) |
(h) |
(m3/d) |
|
|
Denmark in 1998-2001:
Jeksen (Hørning) |
140 |
103 |
0 |
440 |
177 |
|
23 |
Low tech.: Biological sand filter |
(Boutrup 2001) |
Lyngby (Århus) |
100 |
219 |
0 |
602 |
238 |
|
31.1 |
Low tech.: Biological bio-rotor plant |
Ormslev (Århus) |
350 |
30 |
0 |
39 |
10 |
|
83 |
Low tech.: (root zone plant) |
Tåstrup (Århus) |
11 |
11 |
0 |
347 |
141 |
|
2 |
Low tech.: Mechanical |
Tranbjerg |
10,000 |
8,726 |
0 |
~
350 |
|
21R |
2,207 |
M, AS, N, D, C, FR |
Mårslet |
3,550 |
4,166 |
5 |
~
300 |
|
12R |
1,067 |
M, AS, N, D, C, FR |
Trige |
5,000 |
2,979 |
5 |
~
350 |
|
|
619 |
|
Harlev |
6,000 |
1,908 |
10 |
~
50 |
|
|
1,315 |
|
Marselisborg |
220,000 |
271,676 |
64 |
~
800 |
|
|
|
M, AS, N, D, C |
Randers |
160,000 |
103,712 |
35 |
480 |
|
|
|
M, AS, N, D, C |
160,000 |
78,578 |
26 |
330R |
130R |
|
27,000R |
(Christiansen 2001) |
Egå |
|
88,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
M, AS, N, D, C, F |
(Boutrup 2001 ) |
|
78,959 |
74 |
|
|
|
21,427 |
(Christiansen 2001) |
Søholt |
105,000 |
74,273 |
45 |
600 |
|
|
|
M, AS, N, D, C, F |
(Boutrup 2001 ) |
Fornæs |
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
M, AS, N, D, C |
Viby |
100,000 |
45,869 |
30 |
600 |
|
|
|
M, AS, N, D, C, F |
100,000 |
126,000R |
24 |
571R |
|
|
28,557R |
(Christiansen 2001) |
Skanderborg |
|
33,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
M, AS, N, C |
(Boutrup 2001) |
Boeslum |
|
19,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
M, AS, N, D, C |
Beder |
6,000R |
4,700R |
25 |
354R |
|
16R |
1,773R |
M, AS, N, D, C, F |
(Christiansen 2001) |
Rønde |
|
3,345 |
10 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
M, AS, N, D, C |
Voel |
|
1,040 |
0R |
|
180R |
26R |
433R |
M, AS, N, C |
Balle |
|
636 |
0 |
|
|
|
285 |
M, AS, N, |
Ørum |
|
1,011 |
0 |
|
|
|
285 |
M, AS, N, |
Herning |
175,000 |
110,000 |
50 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
M, C, AS, N, D, P-rem FeCl3,
AD |
(Pedersen 2002) |
Hillerød |
60,000 |
48,700 |
5 |
|
|
|
20,400 |
M, C, AS, N, D, P-rem Al salts
Filtration, AD |
|
Sweden: |
|
3,500 |
0 |
|
|
|
Approx. 900 |
C, AEB |
(Larsson 1999) |
UK:
Southend STW |
|
197,749 |
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
45,000 |
PS (April-Oct.), 50 % receives Vitox
treatment |
(Desbrow 1998) |
Harpenden STW |
|
31,200 |
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
8,250 |
PF, SF |
(Desbrow 1998) |
Rye Meads STW |
|
357,000 |
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
88,500 |
AS, FS; TL |
(Desbrow 1998) |
Deephams STW |
|
796,000 |
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
160,000 |
AS |
(Desbrow 1998) |
Naburn STW |
|
388,000 |
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
20,000 |
SC, PS, BF, SHS |
(Desbrow 1998) |
Horsham STW |
|
107,250 |
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
18,000 |
BF, SL |
(Desbrow 1998) |
Billing STW |
|
285,959 |
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
60,000 |
EXA |
(Desbrow 1998) |
Chelmsford STW (1997-1998) |
|
138,000 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Rodgers-Gray 2000) |
Nederlands:
STP A, B & C |
300,000-560,000 |
75-95% of Cap. |
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
|
AS |
(Belfroid 1999) |
STP D & E |
< 100,000 |
75-95% of Cap. |
100 |
|
|
|
|
AS |
(Belfroid 1999) |
Eindh |
284,400 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
147,000 |
AS |
(Johnson 2000) |
Kral |
231,000 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
78,000 |
AS |
(Johnson 2000) |
West |
296,400 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
39,000 |
AS |
(Johnson 2000) |
Germany:
Frankfurt/Main (1997) |
|
312,000 |
|
|
|
|
41,200 |
PS, Aerator tank , P rem. by Fe(II)Cl2,
FS |
(Ternes 1999) |
Ulm & New Ulm
(1998) |
|
350.000 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
PS, AS, P rem. by FeCl3, FS |
(Kuck 2000) |
Langenau (2000) |
|
15,000 |
Mainly domistic |
|
|
|
|
PS, AS, FS |
(Kuck 2001) |
Blaubeuren (2000) |
|
15,000 |
Mainly domistic |
|
|
|
|
PS, AS, FS |
Ulm & New Ulm (2000) |
350,000 |
350,000 |
Domistic & industrial |
|
|
|
|
PS, AS, FS |
Ulm & New Ulm (1998) |
350,000 |
350.000 |
40 |
|
|
|
80,000-100,000 |
PS, AS, N, D, P (biological), FS |
(Körner 2000) |
Ditzingen (1998) |
120,000 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
(Spengler 2001) |
Ludwigsburg-Eglosheim (1998) |
18,400 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Ludwigsburg-Poppenweiler (1998) |
31,000 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
AS, P |
Stuttgart-Mühlhausen (1998) |
1,000,000 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Stuttgart-Möhringen (1998) |
149,500 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Stuttgart-Büsnau (1998) |
10,000 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P, Ms |
Hechingen (1998) |
57,000 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P, E (F)1 |
Albstadt-Ebingen (1998) |
150,000 |
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P, E, F |
Sindelfingen (1998) |
226,000 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
T, N, P |
Donaueschingen (1998) |
148,000 |
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Blaubeuren (1998) |
11,000 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Ulm (1998) |
350,000 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Pforzheim (1999) |
250,000 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Industrial STP 1 (1999) |
67,000 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Industrial STP 2 (1999) |
100,000 |
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
AS, T, N |
Lahr (1999) |
115,000 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
AS, T, N, P |
Waiblingen (1999) |
70,000 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, D, P |
Leutkirch (1999) |
85,000 |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
AS, N, P |
39 different STPs (1997) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Fromme 2002) |
Austria:
1 STP |
120,000 |
|
60 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
M, AS (2 tank in series), N, D, FS, AD
(sludge age: 8-9 days) |
(Fürhacker 2000) |
Switzerland: 1983-85
Nänikon |
|
4,000-240,000 |
Significant amount from a
chem. industry |
2405 |
1015 |
|
|
PS, AS, FS, AD |
(Ahel 1994) |
Fällanden |
|
|
2105 |
775 |
|
|
Bassersdorf |
|
|
2505 |
835 |
|
|
Dübendorf |
|
|
2505 |
965 |
|
|
Zürich-Glatt |
|
|
2305 |
735 |
|
|
Opfikon |
|
|
2805 |
1435 |
|
|
Niederglatt |
|
|
2505 |
1015 |
|
|
Bülach |
|
|
2405 |
1085 |
|
|
Stadel |
|
|
1805 |
645 |
|
|
Glattfelden |
|
|
2705 |
1225 |
|
|
Rheinsfelden |
|
|
2905 |
1015 |
|
|
Italy:
Ostia, Rome (1991-92) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Corcia 1994) |
Cobis , Rome (1997) |
|
|
Mainly domestic |
|
|
|
|
|
(Corcia 1998) |
Cobis (1999-2000) |
|
40,000 |
Mainly domestic |
540 |
270 |
12 |
10,000 |
AS |
(Baronti 2000) |
Ostia |
|
350,000 |
Mainly domestic |
350 |
220 |
14 |
112,000 |
AS |
Fregene |
|
120,000 |
Mainly domestic |
330 |
210 |
12 |
42,000 |
AS |
Roma Nord |
|
800,000 |
Mainly domestic |
220 |
120 |
14 |
354,000 |
AS |
Roma Sud |
|
1.2x106 |
Mainly domestic |
200 |
100 |
12 |
734,000 |
AS |
Roma Est |
|
800,000 |
Mainly domestic |
230 |
140 |
14 |
265,000 |
AS |
USA:
STP 1 California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,2003 |
PT, AS, MFO; HOCl |
(Huang 2001) |
STP 2 California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,7203 |
PT, AS,BNU, EF, HOCl |
STP 3 California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,0083 |
PT, ST, C2, MF, RO, O3/UV |
STP 4 California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,1843 |
PT, T, UV |
STPs in Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Rudel 1998) |
Septic tanks in Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 STPs at Green Bay (1995) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Field 1996) |
Japan:
27 STPs (1998-99) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PS, AS, FS, disinfection (N, D, P at some
plants) |
(Nasu 2001) |
40 STPs (1995-96) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main part: PS, AS, FS, disinfection |
(Fujita 2000) |
Canada:
Burlington, Ontario |
|
134,000 |
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
AS, AN |
(Bennie 1998) |
Burnaby, British Columbia |
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
|
82,000 |
PS, 2-stage sedimentation (sludge) |
Cambridge-Galt, Ontario |
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
AS, sand F, AN |
Charlottetown, Prince Edwards Island |
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
PS, 2-stage sedimentation (sludge) |
Cowansville, Quebec |
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
17,000 |
PS, sedimentation of sludge |
Edmonton, Alberta |
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
|
230,000 |
AS |
Granby, Quebec |
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
|
53,000 |
PS, sedimentation of sludge |
Guelph, Ontario |
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
42,000 |
Rotating bio-contacters, sand F, AN |
Hamilton, Ontario |
|
320,000 |
|
|
|
|
320,000 |
AS, AN |
Moncton, New Brunswick |
|
61,000 |
|
|
|
|
44,000 |
PS, sedimentation of sludge |
Montreal, Qebec |
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
890,000 |
PS, FeCl3 coagulation,
sedimentation of sludge |
Regina, Saskatchewan |
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
AS, BNU, AN |
Saint John, New Brunswick |
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
Rotating bio-contacters, AN |
Toronto, Ontario |
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
AS, AN |
Truro, Nova Scotia |
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
Not reported |
PS, sedimentation of sludge |
Winnipeg, Manitoba |
|
620,000 |
|
|
|
|
340,000 |
AS with pure O2, AN |
Ontario (1997-98) |
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
PS, AS, FS, Clorination in the summer |
(Lee 1998b) |
Burligton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Lee 1998a) (Lee 2000) |
Dundas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Lee 1998a) |
Edmonton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Lee 1998a) |
Calgary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Lee 2000) |
Galt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Lee 2000) |
Toronto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Lee 2000) |
Brazilian
Penha/rio de Janeiro |
|
624,000 |
|
|
|
|
120,096 |
PS, AS (71 %)4 & T (29 %)4,
|
(Ternes 1999) |
PS: Primary sedimentation; PF: Percolating filters; SF: Sand filters; AS: Activated
sludge; FS: Final sedimentation; TL: Tertiary lagoons; SC: Screening; BF: Biological
filtration; SHS: Secondary humus settlement; SL: Settlement lagoons; EXA: Extended
aeration; C: Chemical treatment, AEB: Aerobic biological treatment; HRT: Hydraulic
retention time; P: Phosphate elimination; N: Nitrification, D: Denitrification; E:
Decolorization; Ms: Micro sieve; T: Trickling filter; F: Filtration; MF: Micro filtration;
BNU: Biological nutrient removal; EF: Effluent filtration; ST: Secondary treatment but not
specified; UV: Ultra violet; AN: Anaerobic digester
R: Information received from the STP
1: At he second time of sampling, this STP was equipped with an additional activated
charcoal filtration.
2: Alum flocculation
3: Design flow
4: % of the flow rate
5: COD and BOD in the primary effluent
|