Decisive for the amount of time required is whether the calculation of indicators uses
data for the entire material consumption and waste treatment in society (Model A), or
whether only data for quantities actually recycled or incinerated is used (e.g.
calculation of realised savings Model B), supplemented by data for relevant potentials for
recycling.
Appendix B discusses assumptions, and below an overall assessment of amount of time
required for the three relevant alternatives is given:
- Status of the entire waste management field (Model A)
- First statement of indicator calculation for realised savings and potentials (Model B)
without previous status (I)
- Annual updating of Model B, whether on the basis of I or II.
Provision of data for calculation of life-cycle-based factors must primarily take place
the first time the calculation is carried out. In the current annual statements of
realised savings it would not be expedient to update factors, as this would only result in
indicators reflecting changes in factors rather than developments in waste management.
In the assessment of amount of time required to provide life-cycle data for materials
and treatment options to be included in the status, the point of departure is an
assessment of the number of materials and waste treatment options in question. In
principle, most materials can be included in waste. However, some materials will be
excluded, as they are only present in insignificant quantities.
If it is assumed that within each of the three fractions of metals, plastic, and oil
and chemical waste statements are made for seven materials, and within each of the other
12 fractions listed in Chapter 6.1 statements are made for two significant materials,
there will be around 45 materials that may be handled in two to four different ways each.
This gives a total of 90-180 life-cycle-based data sets. Of these, however, many will be
relatively similar, such as incineration of different types of plastic with the same
calorific value.
A very large part of this LCA data is already available, even if updates may be
necessary. Assuming that 10-20 data sets are non-existent and that 10-20 need updating
before being applicable, these will require the largest amount of work with calculation of
life-cycle-based indicators.
It should be noted in this context that for the proposed indicators it is merely a
matter of providing data for resource consumption from which energy consumption can be
derived, as well as data for assessment of landfill requirements in the entire life-cycle
of the material. This limits the task of providing relevant data considerably. It is
assessed that the work of providing LCA data can be done in around 2 man-months. The work
must be done whether it is chosen to make the comprehensive statement (Model A) or an
indicator calculation of realised savings (Model B). In the annual update of indicator
calculations it should be expected that around 0.5 man-months will be needed for updating
LCA data.
Time required to set up general principles for calculation of waste quantities of the
different material fractions, as well as possibilities of doing this, are explained in
Appendix B and discussed briefly below.
Mixed waste fractions such as "domestic waste" are made up of a number of
material fractions and will be represented in the calculation of these materials. This
means that for each material there will also be an assessment of how large a proportion,
for example, is incinerated with domestic waste or bulky waste.
It is estimated that a distinction should be made between the following material
fractions:
 | Paper and cardboard |
 | Glass divided into glass packaging and "other glass" |
 | Plastic divided into PE, PVC, PS, PP, PET and "other plastic" |
 | Metal divided into iron and steel, stainless steel, aluminium, copper, zinc and
lead |
 | Oil and chemical waste, if necessary divided into main fractions |
 | Automobile rubber |
 | Concrete |
 | Tiles |
 | Asphalt |
 | Wood clean and pressure impregnated |
 | Other building materials divided into, for example, insulation materials,
plasterboard and roofing (excl. tiles) |
 | Food waste/other organic |
 | Garden waste |
 | Soil, gravel and stone |
 | Other materials for example ceramics, rubber (excl. automobile rubber) and
textiles. |
Information on data sources for quantitative data is discussed in Appendix B,
including an outline in Table 2.1. The table has not been included in the main report, as
for some aspects it is incomplete. For each material fraction data sources are stated and
an assessment of uncertainty of data. Uncertainties are a rough estimate made by the
authors to the best of their ability. As the largest uncertainties are associated with
non-recycled waste quantities, it is further stated how large a proportion of total waste
is collected for recycling. As it is seen from the table, for some materials it will be
necessary to supplement information from the ISAG and material flow statistics on total
quantities disposed of. In addition, in particular for metals, new mass-flow statistics
are available that can also be applied. For a study to be applicable, it must have been
carried out within the last five years.
The preparation of statuses will probably account for the largest part of time required
to set up total calculation principles and provision of quantitative data to conduct the
first calculation of indicators. Total amount of time required to update statuses has been
assessed in Appendix B at 12-30 man-months. In the calculation some time can be saved if
existing mass-flow analyses are used for some of the metals from 1994, or from any similar
updated studies. With this assumption, the amount of time required to set up the total
calculation principle will be in the range of 10-20 man-months.
An alternative to an extensive status can be to calculate realised savings for the
entire waste management field, as well as calculation of realistic potentials for further
optimisation of waste management (Model B). Initially, setting up this model will in
particular require collection of data focusing on present incineration or recycling of
materials. To this should be added an assessment of realistic potential savings. This is
assessed to require 3-5 man-months depending on number of materials assessed to be
realistic for recycling.
Annual statements of realised savings (Model B) can be carried out with an input of
about one man-month for data collection and calculation. A significant proportion of this
time will be required to gather and check data on metals from Statistics Denmark.
In addition to updating the data basis, some man-days must be set aside for
presentation, assessment and reporting of developments, which is assessed to require 5-10
man-days, depending on requirements for presentations.
The discussion of the amount of time required to prepare a status and current updates
of realised savings is summarised in Table 6.1. It should be noted that in the annual
updates, time for reporting has been included.
Table 6.1
Total time required for statement and annual calculations of indicators