| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next |
Siloxanes - Consumption, Toxicity and Alternatives
4 Environmental fate and effects
It is beyond the scope of this project to prepare a comprehensive review of environmental effects of the siloxanes, but some data on persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity are summarised below.
4.1 Initial screening for decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5)
Information about environmental properties and toxicity of decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) was initially retrieved from the databases Aquire, CambridgeSoft Corporation database, HSDB database,
IUCLID-CD, PHYSPROP DEMO-database, SPIN database, DART Special (RTECS) and ToxLine. The screening result for decamethylcyclopentasiloxane is shown in Annex 6. No information on
environmental toxicity was found and it was decided not to go further on with similar database screenings for the other substances.
4.2 PBT profiler screening
In order to make a first comparison between the substances as to persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity, the substances were screened using the PBT profiler developed by U.S. EPA (U.S. EPA 2003).
The profiler uses a procedure to predict persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity of organic chemicals on the basis of the chemical structure and physical parameters of the substances combined with
experimental parameters for substance with a similar structure, using a QSAR approach. For more information see U.S. EPA (2003).
The results for six members of the siloxane family (Table 4.1) predict the highest bioconcentration factors for the two phenyl siloxanes, one order of magnitudes higher than the values for the cyclic siloxanes
and two orders of magnitudes higher than the values for the small linear methyl siloxanes. The predicted toxicity is as well significantly higher (lowest ChV values - see description in table notes) for the phenyl
siloxanes. The predicted half-life is nearly the same for all substances.
Using U.S. EPA's criteria, the screening indicates that all substances are of high concern as to environmental toxicity, and that the phenyl siloxanes are considered very bioaccumulative.
Table 4.1 PBT profiler results for selected siloxanes (based on U.S. EPA 2003)
Chemical name |
CAS no. |
Synonymous |
LOG Kow |
BCF
Bioconcen- tration- factor |
Fish ChV * (mg/l) |
Half-life water/
sediment (days) |
Octamethyl-
cyclotetra- siloxane |
556-67-2 |
Part of cyclomethicone
Cas. no 69430-24-6 |
5.1 |
1,700 |
0.058 |
38 / 340 |
Decamethyl-
cyclopenta- siloxane |
541-02-6 |
Part of cyclomethicone
Cas. no 69430-24-6 |
5.2 |
2,000 |
0.021 |
38 / 340 |
Hexadimethyl-
disiloxane |
107-46-0 |
|
4.2 |
340 |
0.062 |
15 / 140 |
Octamethyl-
trisiloxane |
107-51-7 |
|
4.8 |
990 |
0.028 |
38 / 340 |
1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-1,3-diphenyl disiloxane |
56-33-7 |
Phenyl dimethicone |
7.2 |
35,000 |
0.00082 |
38 / 340 |
1, 1, 5, 5, 5- hexamethyl- 3- phenyl- 3- [(trimethylsilyl)oxy] trisiloxane |
2116-84-9 |
Phenyl trimethicone |
7.2 |
40,000 |
0.0012 |
38 / 340 |
CvH: Chronic Value (ChV) is the same as the chronic NEC (No effect concentration). US EPA uses the following criteria for Fish ChV (mg/l):
> 10 mg/l: Low Concern
0.1 - 10 mg/l: Moderate Concern
< 0.1 mg/l: High Concern
4.3 Aquatic toxicity data for octamethylcyclosiloxane and PDMS
The environmental fate and effects of volatile methylsiloxanes (mainly cyclosiloxanes) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) have been reviewed by Hobson et al. (1997) and Fendinger et al. (1997),
respectively.
A summary of aquatic toxicity data for octamethylcyclosiloxane is shown in Table 4.2 whereas toxicity data for PDMS is shown in Table 4.3.
Table 4.2 Summary of octamethylcyclosiloxane aquatic toxicity data (Hobson et al. 1997)
Species |
Test type(time) |
NOEC (µg/L) |
L(E)C50 or LOEC (µg/L) |
Rainbow trout |
Acute (14 d) |
4.4 µg/L |
LC50 = 10 µg/L |
Sheepshead minnow |
Acute (14 d) |
6.3 µg/L * |
LC50 > 6.3 µg/L * |
Daphnia magma |
Acute (48 h) |
15 µg/L * |
EC 50 > 15 µg/L * |
Mysid shrimp |
Acute (96 h) |
9.1 µg/L * |
LC50 > 9.1 µg/L * |
Rainbow trout |
Chronic (90 d) |
4.4 µg/L * |
- |
Daphnia magma |
Chronic (21 d) |
7.9 µg/L * |
LOEC = 15 µg/L |
* This concentration is the mean value measured in the highest exposure level.
Table 4.3 Soil and sediment testing results used for PDMS risk screening (Fendinger et al. 1997)
Organism |
Test conditions |
NOEC (mg/kg) |
End points |
Terrestrial |
|
|
|
Eisenia foetida |
PDMS dosed in high organic soil |
1100 * |
Number and viability of cocoons, survival and growth of adult and
off-spring |
Folsomia candida |
PDMS dosed in OECD standard soil matrix |
250 ** |
Survival, reproduction |
Aquatic/Sediments |
|
|
|
Chironomus
tentans |
PDMS dosed into high, medium and low organic content
sediments |
350-560 *with no evidence of
bioaccumulation |
Survival, growth |
Daphnia magna |
Daphnia magma were cultured over sediment amended with
PDMS |
572* |
Growth, survival, number of offspring, mortality |
Hyalella azteca |
PDMS dosed in pond sediment |
2200 * |
Survival |
Ampelisca abdita |
PDMS dosed in marine sediment |
2300 *** |
Survival |
* Indicates highest dose tested with no effects observed in test.
** Indicates nominal concentration.
*** Indicates acute test.
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next | | Top |
Version 1.0 September 2005, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency
|