Denmark's Fourth National Communication on Climate Change

B1: DATA SHEETS FOR MEASURES THAT AFFECT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND REMOVALS

TD-1 Mineral-oil Tax Act
1 Sector: Energy, Transport, Business Sector, Domestic Sector, Agriculture etc. (Fuel Consumption)
2 Name*: Mineral-oil Tax Act
3 Origin:  
4 Legal basis: Act no. 701 of 28 September 1998 on energy taxes of mineral oil products etc., and amendments.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Tax on mineral oil products in Denmark. The tax is:
Gas oil and diesel oil used as motor fuel: DKK 2.787 per litre
Other gas oil and disel oil: DKK 1.857 per litre
Light diesel oil (sulphur content max. 0,05%): DKK 2.687 per litre
Diesel, low in sulphur (sulphur content max. 0,005%): DKK 2.507 per litre
Diesel, sulphur free (sulphur content max. 0,001%): DKK 2.487 per litre
Fuel oil: DKK 2.092 per kilogramme
Heating tar: DKK 1.888 per kilogramme
Petroleum used as fuel: DKK 2.787 per litre
Other petroleum: DKK 1.857 per litre
Petrol, with "lead": DKK 4.50 per litre
Petrol, lead-free: DKK 3.85 per litre
Petrol, "with Lead" and vap. recovery: DKK 4.47 per litre
Petrol, lead-free and vap. recovery: DKK 3.82 per litre
Auto gas (LPG): DKK 1.746 per litre
Other liquified gas (LPG), used as motor fuel: DKK 3.21 per kilogramme
Other liquified gas (LPG) (refinery gas): DKK 2.379 per kilogramme
Carburettor liquid: DKK 4.07 per litre
7 Objective: Restructuring of existing acts on oil and gas taxes and later also reduction of consumption of polluting fuels as part of the energy policy
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 1993
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: 1100 (325+775) DKK per tonnes CO2-equivalent (a)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: http://www.retsinfo.dk/index/SKA/AN000053.htm
(1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects and socio-economic costs related to tax raises since 1990 shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of tax raises since 1990 on all oil products. Reductions related to mineral oil tax on petrol and diesel have been estimated separately, but are now included in the estimate showing the total effect.
TD-2 Gas Tax Act
1 Sector: Business Sector and Domestic Sector (Consumption of Gas)
2 Name*: Gas Tax Act
3 Origin:  
4 Legal basis: Act no. 887 of 3 October 1998 on energy taxes of natural gas and town gas, and amendments.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Tax on consumption of natural gas and town gas in Denmark. The tax amount to: DKK 2 042 per Nm³
7 Objective: In order to have a tax level on this fuel which match the tax level on other fuels
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 1996
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: 1100 (325+775) DKK per tonnes CO2-equivalent (a)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: http://www.retsinfo.dk/index/SKA/CR041986.htm
(1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects and socio-economic costs related to tax raises since 1990 shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of tax raises since 1990 on all oil products. Reductions related to mineral oil tax on petrol and diesel have been estimated separately, but are now included in the estimate showing the total effect.
TD-3 Coal Tax Act
1 Sector: Energy and Business Sector (Consumption of coal)
2 Name*: Coal Tax Act
3 Origin:  
4 Legal basis: Act no. 702 of 28 September 1998 on energy taxes of coal, lignite and coke etc., and amendments.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Tax rated after the calorific value of coal, coke, furnace coke, coke gravel, crude coke, lignite briquettes and lignite, tall oil, wood tar, vegetable pitch etc. The tax amount to DKK 51,9 per GJ
7 Objective: At its introduction the objective was both fiscal and reductions in energy use. Later, CO2 reduction also became an objective.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 July 1982
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: 1100 (325+775) DKK per tonnes CO2-equivalent (a)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: http://www.retsinfo.dk/index/SKA/AN000050.htm
(1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects and socio-economic costs related to tax raises since 1990 shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of tax raises since 1990 on all oil products. Reductions related to mineral oil tax on petrol and diesel have been estimated separately, but are now included in the estimate showing the total effect.
TD-4 Electricity Tax
1 Sector: Business Sector and Domestic Sector (Consumption of electricity)
2 Name*: Electricity Tax
3 Origin:  
4 Legal basis: Act no. 689 of 17 September 1998 on electricity tax, and amendments.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Tax on consumption of elektricity. The tax amount to DKK 0.511 per kWh for electricity consumption over 4000 kWh in buildings heated by electric panels. Tax the on all other consumption of electricity amount to DKK 0,576 øre per kWh.
7 Objective: At its introduction in 1977, the objective was both fiscal and reductions in energy use. Since the beginning of the 1990s, amentments also have had CO2 reduction as an objective.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 April 1977
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: 1100 (325+775) DKK per tonnes CO2-equivalent (a)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: http://www.retsinfo.dk/index/SKA/AN000057.htm
(1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects and socio-economic costs related to tax raises since 1990 shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of tax raises since 1990 on all oil products. Reductions related to mineral oil tax on petrol and diesel have been estimated separately, but are now included in the estimate showing the total effect.
TD-5 Carbondioxide tax on energy products
1 Sector: Business Sector and Domestic Sector (CO2 emissions from energy consumption)
2 Name*: Carbondioxide tax on energy products
3 Origin:  
4 Legal basis: Act no. 643 of 27 August 1998 on carbondioxide taxes of certain energy products, and amendments.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Tax on energy products depending on their contribution to CO2 emissions based an average tax of DKK 90 per tonnes of CO2. The taxes are: Gas oil and diesel oil: DKK 0.243 per litre Fuel oil: DKK 0.288 per kilogramme Heating tar: DKK 0.252 per kilogramme Petroleum: DKK 0.243 per litre Coal, coke, furnace coke, coke gravel: DKK 217.8 per tonnes Crude coke: DKK 290.7 per tonnes Lignite briquettes and lignite: DKK 160.2 per tonnes Electricity: DKK 0.09 per kWh Auto gas (LPG): DKK 0.144 per kilogramme Other liquified gas: DKK 0.27 per kilogramme Gas (refinery gas): DKK 0.261 per kilogramme Natural gas and Town gas: DKK 0.198 per Nm³
7 Objective: Reductions in energy use and related CO2 emissions
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 March 1992
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -2,7 (-1,5 & -1,2) (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: 1100 (325+775) DKK per tonnes CO2-equivalent (a)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: http://www.retsinfo.dk/index/SKA/AN000065.htm
(1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects and socio-economic costs related to tax raises since 1990 shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of tax raises since 1990 on all oil products. Reductions related to mineral oil tax on petrol and diesel have been estimated separately, but are now included in the estimate showing the total effect.
TD-6 Green Owner Tax
1 Sector: Transport (Energy consumption)
2 Name*: Green Owner Tax
3 Origin: Related to Council Directive 80/1268/EC
4 Legal basis: Act no. 864 of 22 October 2002 on taxes on passenger cars depending on fuel efficiency, and amendments.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines
6 Description: Car owners have to pay annual taxes which are differentiated in accordance with the fuel efficiency of the cars expressed in kilometers per litre.
7 Objective: To strengthen the incentive to choose more fuel efficient /energy efficient cars in order to increase the contribution to achieve the environmental objectives concerning limitation and reduction of the environmental impacts from the transport sector's pollution.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 2 June 1997
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 July 1997
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0,2 (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,6 (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants: NMVOCs, NOx, CO, sulphur, benzene, particles
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: http://www.retsinfo.dk/index/SKA/AN003124.htm
(1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects related to improvement of energy efficiency of cars, both on individual cars and in total, and shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of EU measures (voluntary agreements with the automobile industry) and national measures (the green owner tax, information campaigns, energy labelling etc.)
TD-7 Registration Tax Act
1 Sector: Transport (Energy consumption)
2 Name*: Registration Tax Act
3 Origin: Related to Council Directive 80/1268/EC
4 Legal basis: Act no. 977 of 2 December 2002 on registration tax on motor vehicles (act no. 964 of 20 December 1999 on fuel efficient cars).
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: - The Registration Tax for diesel-driven cars driving more than 45 km/litre and for petrol-driven cars driving more than 40 km/litre will in the period 2000-2005 be 4/6 of the normal tax and in the period 2006-2010 be 3/5 of the normal registration tax. - The Registration Tax for diesel-driven cars driving 37.5-45 km/litre and for petrol-driven cars driving 33.3-40 km/litre will in the period 2000-2005 be 3/6 of the normal tax and in the period 2006-2010 be 2/5 of the normal registration tax. - The Registration Tax for diesel-driven cars driving 32.1-37.5 km/litre and for petrol-driven cars driving 28.6-33.3 km/litre will in the period 2000-2005 be 2/6 of the normal tax and in the period 2006-2010 be 1/5 of the normal registration tax. - The Registration Tax for diesel-driven cars driving 28.1-32.1 km/litre and for petrol-driven cars driving 25-28.6 km/litre will in the period 2000-2005 be 1/6 of the normal registration tax.
7 Objective: Restructuring of existing legislation and reduction in consumption of polluting fuels by introducing incentives to buy more fuel efficient cars.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 2000
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0,2 (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,6 (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: http://147.29.40.91/_SHOWF_B602867490/
1606&A20020097729REGL&0004&000001

(1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects related to improvement of energy efficiency of cars, both on individual cars and in total, and shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of EU measures (voluntary agreements with the automobile industry) and national measures (the green owner tax, information campaigns, energy labelling etc.)
EN-1 EU-CO2-allowances for electricity and district heat production and certain industrial processes (incl. Business)
1 Sector: Energy sector and the energy intensive part of the Business Sector incl. Off-shore
2 Name*: EU-CO2-allowances for electricity and district heat production and certain industrial processes (incl. Business)
3 Origin: DIRECTIVE 2003/87/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC
4 Legal basis: Act no. 493 of 9 June 2004 on CO2 allowances
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine as extra tax in the order of 40-100 Euro per tonnes of CO2
6 Description: EU-CO2-allowances for electricity and district heat production (including Business)
7 Objective: To regulate CO2 emissions
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Regulatory (allowances) and economic (financial)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 4 June 2004
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 2005
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority and Danish Environmental Protection Agency
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005: -6 mill. tonnes CO2 annually 2005-7
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects: Not higher than the quota price
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects: Not higher than the quota price
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures: Is an element in the governments Climate Strategy
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the estimate shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes, cf.. NAP1 in 2005-7; estimates of the effects after 2007 are only based on the expected effects of the EU allowance regulation on energy prices - and not any fixed amount of allowances in NAP2. This amount will not be fixed until the adoption of NAP2 in 2006
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/
l_275/l_27520031025en00320046.pdf

http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw11540.asp
http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw13515.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
42 Comments:  
EN-2 Biomass Agreement (Agreement on the use of biomass in electricity production)
1 Sector: Energy sector
2 Name*: Biomass Agreement (Agreement on the use of biomass in electricity production)
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Biomass Agreement of 14 July 1993, amendment og follow-up reforms on 1 July 1997 and 22 March 2000. Electricity Supply Act
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Precondition for permits. Fines.
6 Description: In 1993 it was agreed to increase the use of biomass in the energy supply. The agreement has been adjusted several times. Today, the target is to reach an amount of 1.4 mill. tonnes of biomass in energy supply by 2005. The incentive for producers of electricity is a garanteed minimum sales price for electricity at DKK 0.4 per kWh through a subsidy adjusted in accordance with the market price on electricity. In addition, certain plants for production of heat and power can obtain a subsidy per tonnes of biomass combusted - but for no longer than 10 years.
7 Objective: Increased use of biomass, R&D, demonstration, reduction of CO2
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial, subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented, with the exception of one straw fired CHP plant
11 Date for the political adoption: 14 July 1993
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 1 May 2001
13 Date of beginning: 1993
14 Date of end, if relevant: 10 years after production start at the latest
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: The electricity producers Elsam and E2
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes
41 References and links for further information: http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw13380.asp
http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw20499.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
EN-3 Price supplement for environmentally friendly electricity
1 Sector: Energy sector
2 Name*: Price supplement for environmentally friendly electricity
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: The political Agreement on Energy of 29 March 2004. The price supplement for production of environmentally friendly electricity is implemented via the Act on Electricity Supply and it is payed by the electricity consumers relative to consumption (Public Service Obligation).
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: Since 1 January 2005, all environmentally friendly electricity from wind turbines and other plants based on renewable energy and from decentralised CHP plants, has been sold on market terms. The previous subsidy for environmentally friendly electricity, where consumers were allowed only to buy electricity at a fixed price, has changed into a financial subsidy adjusted relatively to the market price and to a price supplement to the market price. The main principle is that existing plants can receive the susidy in 20 years, with 15 years as the minimum from 2004. New plants based on renewable energy kan receive the subsidy for 20 years.
7 Objective: Support for technology development and aiming for making electricity production with wind turbines competitive to conventionally produced electricity, Reduction of the impact on the environment, including CO2 emissions.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial, subsidies, price supplement)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 29 March 2004
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 9 June 2004
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 2005
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority and entities responsible for energy production
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information: http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw13754.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/graphics/Energiforsyning/Vedvarende_energi/
Vind/Afregning/Forenkletvindmolleafreg-u2.pdf
42 Comments:  
EN-4 Tenders for offshore wind turbines
1 Sector: Energy sector
2 Name*: Tenders for offshore wind turbines
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: The Act on Electricity Supply
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: In the agreements of 29 March 2004 it was agreed to establish 2 offshore wind turbine facilities, each wih a size of 200 MW. One of the facilities should be located at Horns Rev ("Horns Rev II") and the other at Rødsand ("Rødsand II"). Both should be build on the basis of tenders.
7 Objective: Promote technology development and aiming for making electricity production with wind turbines competitive to conventionally produced electricity. Reduction of the electricity production's impact on the environment, including CO2 emissions.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Regulatory (administrative, tender), Economic (financial, tender)
10 Status of implementation: In 2005, the winner of the tender on Horns Rev II has been found and production is expected to start in 2009. The deadline for the final bid on Rødsand II is 13 December 2005.
11 Date for the political adoption: 29 March 2004
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: Additional legal steps, if necessary, will be take by the end of 2005 or in 2006.
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources: The winners of the tenders will receive price supplement
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information: http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw13778.asp
http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw14306.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
42 Comments:  
EN-5 Scrapping scheme for old wind turbines
1 Sector: Energy sector
2 Name*: Scrapping scheme for old wind turbines
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 495 of 9 June 2004, Statutory order on Wind turbines (Statutory Order no. 1365 of 15 December 2004) and the guidelines on issuance and administration of scapping certificates etc. from the entities responsible for the energy system.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: The scrapping scheme will support taking down old and unfavourable placed wind turbines and will support expansion of wind power - aiming at 350 MW new capacity within 5 years. It will only be possible to issue scrapping certificates within a total of 175 MW
7 Objective: Promote technology development and aiming for making electricity production with wind turbines competitive to conventionally produced electricity. Reduction of the electricity production's impact on the environment, including CO2 emissions.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial, price supplement)
10 Status of implementation: The legal basis has been implemented. In 2005, the planning of where to relocate old and locate new wind turbines began.
11 Date for the political adoption: 29 March 2004
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 9 June 2004
13 Date of beginning: The price supplement is given to new (ab factory) wind turbines connected to the grid in the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2009.
14 Date of end, if relevant: For the price supplement: 31 December 2009
15 Allocated resources, if any: The price supplement is DKK 0.12 per kWh and is given to production of electricity from a wind turbine, but no more than what is equal to 12,000 full load hours for twice the installed effect of the scrapped wind turbine. If the sum of the electricity market price, the ordinary price supplement, and the scrapping price supplement exceed DKK 0.48 per kWh, the scrapping price supplement will be reduced accordingly.
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?): Wind turbines to be scrappede under this scheme shall be taken down in the period 15 December 2004 - 15 December 2009. The replacing wind turbines shall be connected to the grid in the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2009.
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information: http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw14138.asp
http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw15568.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
42 Comments:  
EN-6 Energy research
1 Sector: Energy sector
2 Name*: Energy research
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 1024 of 23 December 1998 on financial support for research and technology development within the energy area
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: The Energy Research Programme (EFP), under the responsability of the Danish Energy Authority, support energy research, development and pilot projects
7 Objective: The main objective of the EFP is to support the governments energy policy target, which is a cost effective, environmentally friendly and stable energy supply, and to support the competitiveness of Danish compagnies in the energy area
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Research
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1976-77
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any: Financial support for energy research, development and pilot projects can be obtained from different programmes with different sub-objectives (the budgets for 2005 are shown in the parentesis): -The Energy Research Programme (DKK 72 mil.), -The PSO-scheme on environmentally friendly electricity production technologies (DKK 130 mill.), -The PSO-scheme for efficient use of electricity (DKK 25 mill.) and -The Strategical Research Council's budget for energy and environment (65 mill.).
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: No, not direct, but indirect through the support of the technology development assumed in the energy projections - on which the GHG emission projection is based
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No
41 References and links for further information: http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw11580.asp
http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw12337.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
42 Comments:  
EN-7 National CO2 allowance scheme for electricity producers
1 Sector: Energy sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: National CO2 allowance scheme for electricity producers
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 376 of 2 June 1999.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Extra tax (on emissions exceeding the allocated amount of allowances), fines
6 Description: The national CO2 allowance scheme imposed CO2 emission ceilings on production of electricity, if CO2 emissions were above 100,000 tonnes of CO2. If the ceiling was exceeded the producer of electricity had to pay an extra tax. Allowances could be traded among producers of electricity under the scheme.
7 Objective: CO2 -reduction, forerunner for the EU allowance regulation
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented and in place in the period 2001-2004
11 Date for the political adoption: 3 March 1999
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 2 June 1999
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 2001
14 Date of end, if relevant: 31. december 2004
15 Allocated resources, if any: None
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State authorities (Danish Energy Authority), energy producers. EU CO2 allowance scheme also covers energy-intensive enterprises
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -3 mill. tonnes CO2 in total in the period from 2000 to 2004
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects: Not higher than the quota price
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the estimate shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place: Replaced by the EU CO2 allowance scheme (EU ETS) from 1 January 2005
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes, for the first year of the projection (2004)
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No
41 References and links for further information: http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw19297.asp
http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw17278.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
42 Comments:  
EN-8b Subsidies for electricity generation (wind turbines)
1 Sector: Energy sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Subsidies for electricity generation (wind turbines)
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: The agreement on an electricity reform, Act on electricity supply, Act on exploitation of renewable energy sources
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: Electricity from wind turbines bought before the end of 1999 is guaranteed a price of DKK 0.43 per kWh in 10 years and a price supplement of DKK 0.17 per kWh for a full load hour production graduated after turbine size. After this period, electricity have to be sold on market terms with a price supplement up to DKK 0.10 per kWh until the age of the turbine is 20 years. The price supplement is adjusted in such a way, that the sum of market price and price supplement will not exceed DKK 0.36 per kWh. Rules on price supplements have been changed over time. The latest change took place with Act no. 495 of 9 June 2004.
7 Objective: Reduce CO2 emissions, promote technology development and aiming for making electricity production with wind turbines competitive to conventionally produced electricity.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (price supplement and settling prices)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented. With the reorganisation of 1 January 2005 it was replaced by price supplement for the production of environmentally friendly electricity.
11 Date for the political adoption: The agreement on an electricity reform of 3 March 1999
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: Several times. The latest change took place with Act no. 495 of 9 June 2004.
13 Date of beginning: 1 April 2001
14 Date of end, if relevant: End of 2012
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority, Energy producers
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants: Decrease in emissions of SO2 and NOx from power plants due to decrease in production of electricity
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures: The effort on reduction of SO2 and NOx emissions from power plants
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place: Replaced by price supplement for the production of environmentally friendly electricity
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Regarding the measures effect on the etablishment of renewable energy based heat and power capacity, the effect in the future is assumed to be the same as in 2003. Since energy statistics for 2003 are the basis for the projections, no separate extra effects from this meaures is included in the projections.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/sw11368.asp
http://www.ens.dk/sw14294.asp
http://www.ens.dk/graphics/Energiforsyning/Vedvarende_energi/
Vind/ Afregning/Forenklet_vindmolleafreg-u2.pdf

(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) In the Effort Analysis the effect of subsidies for production of electricity from wind turbines is estimated together with the effect of subsidies for production of electricity from other renewable energy sources
EN-9 Priority for electricity from CHP plants
1 Sector: Energy sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Priority for electricity from CHP plants
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Agreement in 1990 between the government at that time (VKR) and the Socialdemocrates. The agreement was realised in a revision of the Act on heat supply. The subsidy was introduced as part of the CO2 tax package.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Memorandoms on terms
6 Description: 1. It was requried from the municipalities that they should see to that a shift from district heating (based om separated electricity and heat production) to decentralised combined heat and power based on natural gas. 2. In addition, from 1992 a subsidy for production of electricity in natural gas fired decentralised combined heat and power plants was given. The size of the subsidy has changed several times since then.
7 Objective: Combined production of electricity and heat in order to the gain fuel savings in comparison with separate production.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: 1. Regulatory (Requirement) 2. Economic (Subsidy)
10 Status of implementation: No longer in place. Replaced by price supplement for the production of environmentally friendly electricity.
11 Date for the political adoption: 1. 1990 2. 1992
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State authorities, Municipalities and Energy producers
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1) Only investments in the period 1992-2002 are included.
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities: The emission of methane is higher at combined heat and power production than at separate heat production.
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants: Reduction of SO2- and NOx emissions.
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place: Replaced by price supplement for the production of environmentally friendly electricity
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/sw14254.asp
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
EN-10 Requirement for offshore wind turbines
1 Sector: Energy sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Requirement for offshore wind turbines
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Recommandations from "The action plan on offshore windturbines in Danish waters (1997)"
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Requirement
6 Description: Requirement to the power plants to build: 1. 200 MW wind power on land before 2000 (according to agreement between the Ministry for the Envionment and Energy and producers of electricity). 2. 750 MW offshore wind power in the period 2002-2008 (an element in the energi savings action plan Energy 21). However, this order was withdrawn in 2002. 3. In addition, a state financed subsidy of DKK 10 per kWh was given to the production of electricity from 1992 until mid 1999.
7 Objective: Expansion of environmentally friendly technology in electricity production.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Regulatory (administrative), Economic (financial)
10 Status of implementation: 1. Implemented 2. Withdrawn and replaced by tenders 3. With the reorganisation of 1 January 2005 it was replaced by price supplement for the production of environmentally friendly electricity.
11 Date for the political adoption: 1996
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities:  
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants: Decrease in emissions of SO2 and NOx from power plants due to decrease in production of electricity. Therefore power plants can save some of the costs related to compliance with the SO2- og NOx quota regulation. With this, it is assumed that there are no extra environmental benefits from reduction of SO2- and NOx-emissions.
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place: Replaced by offshore wind turbine tenders and price supplement for the production of environmentally friendly electricity.
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw13787.asp
http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw14312.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
EN-11 Scrapping scheme for old, badly located wind turbines
1 Sector: Energy sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Scrapping scheme for old, badly located wind turbines
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 273 of 2 June 1999 and amendment by Act no. 1277 of 20 December 2000.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or pay back of unwarranted subsidy
6 Description: As an element in the electricity reform a replacement scheme was etablished. The scheme implied a scrapping certificate for scrapped wind turbines under 150 kW which entitled the owner(s) to a price supplement of DKK 0.17 per kWh in 12,000 full load hours in a new wind turbine. The scheme was in place until 1 January 2004.
7 Objective: Scrapping of old, badly located wind turbines
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial, price supplement)
10 Status of implementation: The scheme is no longer in place. From 2005, a new scrapping scheme has been established
11 Date for the political adoption: The agreement on a electricity reform of 3 March 1999
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 April 2001
14 Date of end, if relevant: End of 2003
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place: From 2005, a new scrapping scheme has been established
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: http://www.energistyrelsen.dk/sw14138.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
42 Comments:  
EN-12 Renewable energy island - Samsø
1 Sector: Energy sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Renewable energy island - Samsø
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Not implemented by an Act
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: The aim is to make the island of Samsø self-sufficient with local renwable energy sources within a period of 10 years.
7 Objective: To demonstrate the practical, technological, institutional and financial possibilities in switching a local community over to 100% renewable energy supply and create a global show-window for Danish Renewable Energy Technology.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic(financial), Research and Other(demonstration)
10 Status of implementation: The switching over process is ongoing – now primarily with focus on possible changes in the Transport sector. As show-room and a role model community, the concept continues.
11 Date for the political adoption: The initiative was included in ENERGY21 - the Action plan on Energy from 1996.
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1997
14 Date of end, if relevant: 2007
15 Allocated resources, if any: The project has been supported by the state within exising budgets on subsidies for development projects and plants based on renewable energy. The investment subsidy has been approx. DKK 20 mill. in total.
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources: Further earmaked funds are not planned.
18 Implementering entity or entities: The project has been rooted locally.
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs:  
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals:  
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place: Finished as state initiative. Continued locally.
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: No
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: www.veo.dk
42 Comments:  
EN-13 Construction subsidy for renewable energy
1 Sector: Energy sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Construction subsidy for renewable energy
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: The Development Programme for Renwable Energy (UVE)
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or pay back of unwarranted subsidy
6 Description: Arrangements according to which subsidies were given to system approved boilers based on solar heat, heating pumps, biogas and biomass and for test facilities, information activities and test and demonstration projects.
7 Objective: Incentive to use renewable energy.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial, subsidy)
10 Status of implementation: Development and Demonstration projects under UVE as well as the special programmes on hydrogen, solar energy, geothermi and wave energy - except in a few cases - have ended in 2004.
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: Beginning of 1970s
14 Date of end, if relevant: End of 2001
15 Allocated resources, if any: DKK 450 mill. in the period 1991-2001.
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities:  
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1) Only subsidies for solar heating, biomass fired plants and heating pumps have been included in the Effort Analysis. See Danish Energy Authority (2004)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place: The subsidies are no longer in place
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: No
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/sw16321.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
EN-14 Subsidy for investment in energy savings by industry
1 Sector: Energy sector, Business sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Subsidy for investment in energy savings by industry
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Lov nr. 2 af 3. januar 1992 Lov nr. 284 af 27. april 1994 Lov nr. 406 af 14. juni 1995
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or pay back of unwarranted subsidy
6 Description: Subsidy for investments in energy efficient technology, establishment of CHP in industry, projects with development, test or demonstration objectives, advisory and information activities etc. The subsidy typically amounted to 20-40% of the total budget. This arrangement was linked to so-called Agreement Scheme.
7 Objective: Energy Savings
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: No longer in place
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1993
14 Date of end, if relevant: 2001
15 Allocated resources, if any: DKK 1.8 bn.
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
  Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants: SO2 og NOx
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes. To the extent that the effect deviates from the effect in 2003 - the latest year with energy statistics on which the energy projection is based - it is included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/sw11574.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/sw12329.asp
http://www.ens.dk/sw17747.asp
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
EN-15 Subsidy for conversion of old housing to CHP
1 Sector: Energy sector, Domestic sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Subsidy for conversion of old housing to CHP
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 5 of 3 January 1992 on state subsidy for conversion of old housing to CHP.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or pay back of unwarranted subsidy
6 Description: Subsidy for connection to district heating for old housing (build before 1950) without central heating, but with heating based on paraffin, town gas, bottled gas, electric heating or wood etc. A precondition was that housing was situated in an area with CHP district heating supply.
7 Objective: To reduce CO2 emissions
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial, subsidy)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented, but no longer in place
11 Date for the political adoption: 3 January 1992
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: Latest statutory order: No. 534 of 8 July 1998
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 1993
14 Date of end, if relevant: 31 December 2001
15 Allocated resources, if any: In the period 1993-2003: DKK 1,080 mill. (Budget was: DKK 1,500 mill.)
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?): 1 January 1993
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority and Municipality Boards
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: It is estimated that the effect in the future will be the same as in 2003. Since 2003 is the latest year of energy statistics on which the projection of energy consumption is based, no additional effects have been included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
EN-16 Subsidy to promote connection to coal CHP
1 Sector: Energy sector, Domestic sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: Subsidy to promote connection to coal CHP
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 420 of 1 June 1994 on state subsidy to promote connection to coal CHP.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or pay back of unwarranted subsidy
6 Description: Subsidy as an incentive to house owners with oil burners or electric heating to shift to district heating.
7 Objective: Targetted compensation for the increase in coal tax in 1993.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidy).
10 Status of implementation: No longer in place
11 Date for the political adoption: 1 June 1994
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 1 June 1994
13 Date of beginning: 1994
14 Date of end, if relevant: 2003
15 Allocated resources, if any: At the adoption of the Act the budget for this subsidy was DKK 240 mill., but since then the budget has been reduced gradually. Until 2003 the total payment of this subsidy amounted to DKK 160 mill.
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: It is estimated that the effect in the future will be the same as in 2003. Since 2003 is the latest year of energy statistics on which the projection of energy consumption is based, no additional effects have been included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
EN-17 State subsidy for energy savings measures in housing for pensioners
1 Sector: Energy sector, Domestic sector, measures no longer in place or replaced
2 Name*: State subsidy for energy savings measures in housing for pensioners
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 1050 of 23 December 1992
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or pay back of unwarranted subsidy
6 Description: Subsidy for energy savings measures in housing for pensioners receiving grants for heating costs.
7 Objective: Permanent energy savings, increase employment, improve the pensioners comfort and reduce the need for heating cost grants.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial, subsidy)
10 Status of implementation: No longer in place
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 23 December 1992
13 Date of beginning: 1 April 1993
14 Date of end, if relevant: 31 December 2003
15 Allocated resources, if any: DKK 0.5 bn. In the period 1993-2004
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority and Municipality Boards
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: It is estimated that the effect in the future will be the same as in 2003. Since 2003 is the latest year of energy statistics on which the projection of energy consumption is based, no additional effects have been included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
TR-1 Information campaign on fuel consumption of new cars
1 Sector: Transport
2 Name*: Information campaign on fuel consumption of new cars
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Improve the efficiency of energy consumption, CO2-reduction
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Information
10 Status of implementation: Implemented (the actual campaign lasted for 2 years)
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Denmark`s Road Safety and Transport Agency
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0,2 (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,6 (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: (1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects related to improvement of energy efficiency of cars, both on individual cars and in total, and shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of EU measures (voluntary agreements with the automobile industry) and national measures (the green owner tax, information campaigns, energy labelling etc.)
TR-2 Energy-correct driving technique
1 Sector: Transport
2 Name*: Energy-correct driving technique
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Improve the efficiency of energy consumption, CO2-reduction
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Information
10 Status of implementation: Is included in the drivers education
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Justice
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0,2 (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,6 (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the estimates shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: (1) http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) The effects related to improvement of energy efficiency of cars, both on individual cars and in total, and shown here are from the Effort Analysis where the estimate includes the total effect of EU measures (voluntary agreements with the automobile industry) and national measures (the green owner tax, information campaigns, energy labelling etc.)
TR-3 Initiative on enforcing speed limits
1 Sector: Transport
2 Name*: Initiative on enforcing speed limits
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Improve the efficiency of energy consumption, CO2-reduction
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Information, economic
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Justice
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
TR-4 Establishment of intermodal installations
1 Sector: Transport
2 Name*: Establishment of intermodal installations
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Improve transport efficiency, CO2-reduction
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial)
10 Status of implementation: Ongoing implementation
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Transport and Energy, counties, municipalities, HUR, DSB
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
TR-5 Promotion of environmentally friendly goods transport
1 Sector: Transport
2 Name*: Promotion of environmentally friendly goods transport
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Improve transport efficiency, CO2-reduction
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (financial) and information
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Haulage contractors
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
TR-6 Reduced travel times for public transport
1 Sector: Transport
2 Name*: Reduced travel times for public transport
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Improve transport efficiency, CO2-reduction
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Regulatory (Administrative)
10 Status of implementation: Ongoing implementation
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Transport and Energy, Counties and Danish State Railways (DSB)
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
TR-7 Spatial planning
1 Sector: Transport
2 Name*: Spatial planning
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Reduce the need for transport, CO2-reduction
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Regulatory (Administrative)
10 Status of implementation: Ongoing implementation
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Counties, municipalities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
BU-1 Agreements on energy efficiency with business
1 Sector: Business (energy consumption)
2 Name*: Agreements on energy efficiency with business
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 1 of 3 Frebuary 1992 Act no. 850 of 13 November 1995 Statutory Order no. 863 of 17 November 1995
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Cancellation of the agreement and the CO2 tax discount. Fines in the case of incorrect or detained information.
6 Description: In connection with the implementation of the CO2 tax also a subsidy for CO2 tax descount for energy intensive industries was introduced. However, a condition for getting the CO2 tax discount is an agreement on improvements in energy efficiency. Industries under the CO2 allowance scheme are no longer covered by this arrangement. The aggrement scheme was significantly revised in 1996.
7 Objective: Energy efficiency at energy-intensive enterprises and to reduce the effect of the CO2 tax on energy intensive industries' competitiveness.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Voluntary agreements, economic (financial)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1993
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any: Subsidies (CO2 tax discount) approx. DKK 130 mill. annually (in 2004)
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes. To the extent that the effect deviates from the effect in 2003 - the latest year with energy statistics on which the energy projection is based - it is included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/sw11574.asp
http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/sw12329.asp
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm, where estimation of effects relate to the revised agreement scheme from 1996.
42 Comments: (EN-18)
BU-2 Savings activities by elec. grid, gas and district heating companies (incl. for the domestic and public sectors)
1 Sector: Energy, Business
2 Name*: Savings activities by elec. grid, gas and district heating companies (incl. for the domestic and public sectors)
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Electricity grid companies: The Electricity Supply Act District heating companies: The Heating Supply Act Gas distribution companies: The Natural Gas Supply Act
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines in the case of failures in fulfillment of the energy suppy companies' obligations
6 Description: The energy companies carry out campaigns and energy saving activities aimed at energy consumers. A special advisory service is offered to consumers with large consumptions. The effort is most significant with regard to electricity. The effort is financed by the consumers via the consumers' electricity price.
7 Objective: Energy savings, reduced energy costs
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Information (advice, education, campaigns), Regulation (administrative)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 1999 og 2000 (in its present form)
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 2000 og 2001
13 Date of beginning: 2001 in its present form (the electricity companies have worked with energy savings since 1992-93)
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any: The energy companies' information effort amount to approx. DKK 240 mill. annually
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005: Electricity companies: Annual electricity savings amount to approx. 150 TWh
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: The CO2 shadow price of the electricity companies' information effort amount to approx. DKK 40 per tonnes of CO2
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
BU-3 Tax on HFCs, PFCs and SF6
1 Sector: Business (the industrial gases)
2 Name*: Tax on HFCs, PFCs and SF6
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 208 of 22 March 2001 on tax on ozone depleting substances and greenhouse gases. Latest amendment is in Act no. 127 of 27 February 2004.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines. The Ministry of taxation and its institutions is responsible for the enforcement of domestic compliance.
6 Description: Tax on HFC, SF6 og PFC. The tax is differentiated in accordance with the global warming potential of the substance with DKK 0.1 per kilogramme of CO2 equivalents as the general principle and with DKK 400 per kilogramme of CO2 equivalents as a general upper limit.
7 Objective: Reduction of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 emissions
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: HFCs, PFCs and SF6
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implementedt
11 Date for the political adoption: 15 December 2000
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 March 2001
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0.05 mill. tonnes CO2-eq. (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,4 mill. tonnes CO2-eq. (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: In average DKK 200 per tonnes of CO2-eq. (a)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: Reduce consumption and emissions of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 - e.g. by providing incentives to focus on leakages of these substances from major plants or uses. See also Chapter 5, the effort analysis(1) and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: (1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) Reductions and costs have been estimated as the total effect of taxes on and regulation of HFC's, PFCs and SF6.
BU-4 Regulation of use of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 (phasing out most of the uses)
1 Sector: Business (the industrial gases)
2 Name*: Regulation of use of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 (phasing out most of the uses)
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 552 of 2 July 2002 on regulation of certain industrial greenhouse gases.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment.
6 Description: Import, sale and use of the substances or new products containing the substances is forbidden from 1 January 2006 with some exceptions.
7 Objective: Reduction of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 emissions
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: HFCs, PFCs and SF6
9 Type of measure: Regulation (administrative, ban)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented (full effect from 1 January 2006)
11 Date for the political adoption: 2 July 2002
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: In general 1 January 2006, but for some uses before
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Environmental Protection Agency
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0.05 mill. tonnes CO2-eq. (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,4 mill. tonnes CO2-eq. (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: In average DKK 200 per tonnes of CO2-eq. (a)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: Reduce consumption and emissions of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 - e.g. by making it necessary for users to focus on leakages of these substances from major plants or uses. See also Chapter 5, the effort analysis(1) and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: (1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (a) Reductions and costs have been estimated as the total effect of taxes on and regulation of HFC's, PFCs and SF6.
BU-5 The enterprise scheme on HFCs
1 Sector: Business (the industrial gases)
2 Name*: The enterprise scheme on HFCs
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Statutory order awaits the approval of the European Commission
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: A general enterprise scheme will be administeret by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. The total budget for the period 2004-2007 is DKK 144 mill. where the budget for 2005 amount to DKK 26.3 mill. The general objective of the enterprise scheme is to promote better conditions for environmental improvements in enterprises. In the general enterprise scheme is included a budget share of DKK 12 mill. 2005-2007 for projects with the development of alternatives to HFCs in the refrigerating business and the establishment of a knowledge center for HFC-free cooling as the objectives.
7 Objective: Reduction of HFCs use and emissions in the cooling business
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: HFCs
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidy)
10 Status of implementation: To be implemented in 2005
11 Date for the political adoption: January 2005
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: Statutory order awaits the approval of the European Commission
13 Date of beginning: 2005
14 Date of end, if relevant: 2007
15 Allocated resources, if any: DKK 12 mill. 2005-2007
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Environmental Protection Agency
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs:  
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures: Will act as support for the Statutory order on phase out (see BU-4)
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: Will act as support for the Statutory order on phase out (see BU-4)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: http://www.mst.dk/tvær/05020000.htm
42 Comments:  
BU-6 Circular on energy-efficiency in state institutions
1 Sector: Energy, public service
2 Name*: Circular on energy-efficiency in state institutions
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Circular no. 27 of 19 April 2005
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: This is based on the general principle of self-governance in state institutions. According to this each ministry and its minister is responsible for being in compliance with the circular.
6 Description: The circular require state institutions to:
• Focus on energy efficiency in their behaviour
• Buy energy efficient products
• Oprerate state buildings in an energy efficient manner
• Report on, and make public, figures on consumption of energy and water and energy labelling of buildings
7 Objective: To limit central authorities' consumption of energy and water through promotion of energy efficient purchase and energy efficient behaviour in state institutions and to operate and maintain buildings owned or rented by the state in an energy efficient manner.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Regulation (administrative)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 19 April 2005 (Signed by the Minister for Transport and Energy)
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 27 April 2005
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: The Minister for Transport and Energy / The Danish Energy Authority is responsible for the circular. The individual ministries and state institutions are responsible for the implementation of the circular.
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: It is estimated that the effect in the future will be the same as in 2003. Since 2003 is the latest year of energy statistics on which the projection of energy consumption is based, no additional effects have been included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/sw11614.asp
http://www.ens.dk/sw23194.asp
42 Comments: (EN-20)
BU-7 Electricity Saving Trust – campaigns and A club to promote energy efficient appliances
1 Sector: Energi, offentlig service
2 Name*: Electricity Saving Trust – campaigns and A club to promote energy efficient appliances
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 1209 of 27 December 1996 Act no. 819 of 3 November 1997
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fine and/or pay back of unwarranted subsidy
6 Description: The task of the Electricity Saving Trust includes th promotion of efficient electric appliances etc. and electric heating conversion in households and the public sector. The Trust are making use of measures such as national campaigns, efforts to influence the market, voluntary agreements and efforts to raise awareness on the consumption. The budget is approx. DKK 90-100 mill. annually.
7 Objective: Electricity savings, technology development and market promotion of energy efficient products and appliances.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Information (campaigns), agreements, economic (subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 1996
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 1 December 1996
13 Date of beginning: 1997
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any: DKK approx. 90-100 mill. annually. The Trust is financed by households and public institutions via a special energy saving contribution on the electricity bill.
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources: DKK approx. 90-100 mill. annually.
18 Implementering entity or entities: The Minister for Transport and Energy / The Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005: In the period 1997-2007 the annual electricity savings is expected to reach an average of approx. 100 GWh.
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: According to the Trust, the cost of the effort in the period 1997-2007 is expected to reach an average of approx. DKK 120 per tonnes of CO2.
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: It is estimated that the effect in the future will be the same as in 2003. Since 2003 is the latest year of energy statistics on which the projection of energy consumption is based, no additional effects have been included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/sw13892.asp
http://www.ens.dk/sw20018.asp
42 Comments: (EN-21)
AF-1 Action Plan for the Aquatic Environment I+II and Action Plan for Sustainable Agriculture
1 Sector: Agriculture (/Land-use)
2 Name*: Action Plan for the Aquatic Environment I+II and Action Plan for Sustainable Agriculture
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: The action plans contain several measures e.g. with the objective to increase the area with winter green fields and better utilisation of manure.
7 Objective: Reduction of nitrate pollution to the aquatic environment, i.e. reduction of N run-off from agriculture by 100,000 tonnes N per year.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: N2O
9 Type of measure: Regulation (order)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 1991 og 1998
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State and county authorities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -1.6 mill. tonnes CO2-eq. (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -1.9 mill. tonnes CO2-eq. (a) in (1), however this could be too low according to new estimates: -2,2 mio.t.CO2ækv.(2)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities: The action plans have especially reduced emissions of N2O, but it is likely that they have also reduced emissions of methane from storages of manure and emissions of CO2 through an increased storage of carbon in agricutural soils.
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the effort analysis(1) and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes (a)
41 References and links for further information: Olesen et al. (2004)
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
(2) Gyldenkærne et al. (2005) - in preparetion
42 Comments: (a) The total effect of the Action Plan for the Aquatic Environment I+II and Action Plan for Sustainable Agriculture and the NPO Action Plan
AF-2 Action Plan for the Aquatic Environment III
1 Sector: Agriculture
2 Name*: Action Plan for the Aquatic Environment III
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: The plan contain several measures, where the most import in relation to greenhouse gas emissions are:
• Establishment of 4000 ha wetlands in 2004 and 2005.
• Making the rules on catch crops more rigorous.
• Making the rules on exploitation of N in animal manure more rigorous.
• Additional environmentally friendly measures in crop farming.
7 Objective: Protection of the aquatic environment from nitrate and phosphorus pollution.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: N2O
9 Type of measure: Regulation (order), economic
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 2004
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State and county authorities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,15 without taking into account the effects of catch crops / with: -0,20
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information: Olesen (2004)
42 Comments:  
AF-3 Ban on burning straw on fields
1 Sector: Agriculture
2 Name*: Ban on burning straw on fields
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 68 of 24 January 1989 on environment protection as amended in Act. No. 753 of 25 August 2001
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: Ban on burning straw on fields
7 Objective: Less air pollution
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2, CH4, N2O
9 Type of measure: Regulation (order)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1989
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State and county authorities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities: CO2 emissions will be reduced both from increased return of straw in order to increase stored soil carbon and from incresed use of straw as substitute for fossil fuel in energy supply. Emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from burning of straw will be reduced. However, increased decomposition of straw residues will increase emissions of nitrous oxide to some extent.
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
AF-4a Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Optimisation of manure handling during housing.
1 Sector: Agriculture (/Land-use)
2 Name*: Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Optimisation of manure handling during housing.
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 753 of 25 August 2001 on fur animal farms Statutory order no. 604 of 15 July 2002 on professional animal farming, manure and slurry etc.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Optimisation of manure handling during housing for cattle, pigs, poultry and fur animals e.g. cleaning in fur animal houses at least once a week and a maximum time of 6 hours from field application of manure to incorporation and cover requirements etc..
7 Objective: Protection of the aquatic environment from nitrate pollution.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: N2O
9 Type of measure: Regulation (order)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: Cleaning: 1 August 2002 - 1 August 2007 Storage: See the data sheet on AF-4b Spreading: See the data sheet on AF-4c.
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State and county authorities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,03 (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures: An element in the Ammonia Action Plan.
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments: (a) The total effect of the Ammonia Action Plan (Ban on spreading, cover on manure, reduced storage time, ban on ammonia treatment of straw)
AF-4b Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Rules on covering storage facilities.
1 Sector: Agriculture (/Land-use)
2 Name*: Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Rules on covering storage facilities.
3 Origin: National measure and in part EU legislation
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 604 of 15 July 2002 on professional animal farming, manure and slurry etc., (Ammonia action plan, Council directive no. 91/767/EC of 12 December 1991 on the protection of waters against nitrate pollution from agriculture)
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Order with rules on covering storage facilities for solid manure (compost layer or another air tight material) and slurry tanks (floating layer, tent or similar).
7 Objective: Protection of the aquatic environment from nitrate pollution.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: N2O
9 Type of measure: Regulation (order)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: Spring 2001
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 15 July 2002
13 Date of beginning: Solid manure: 1 August 2004 Slurry: 1 March 2003
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State and county authorities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,03 (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures: An element in the Ammonia Action Plan.
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implementet after 2001
41 References and links for further information: Olesen et al. (2004): "Forberedelse af Vandmiljøplan III" (Preparations for the Action Plan on the Aquatic Environment III)
42 Comments: (a) The total effect of the Ammonia Action Plan (Ban on spreading, cover on manure, reduced storage time, ban on ammonia treatment of straw)
AF-4c Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Ban on surface spreading of manure
1 Sector: Agriculture
2 Name*: Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Ban on surface spreading of manure
3 Origin: National measure and in part EU legislation
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 604 of 15 July 2002 on professional animal farming, manure and slurry etc., (Ammonia action plan, Council directive no. 91/767/EC of 12 December 1991 on the protection of waters against nitrate pollution from agriculture)
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: With spreading of manure with towing tubes instead of ordinary broad surface spreading the evaporation of ammonia will be reduced. Also emissions of nitrous oxide will be reduced.
7 Objective: Protection of the aquatic environment from nitrate pollution.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: N2O
9 Type of measure: Regulation (order)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: Spring 2001
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 15 July 2002
13 Date of beginning: 1 August 2003
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State and county authorities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: 0
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5: 0
24 2020: 0
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities: There will be a risk of N2O formation due to anaerobic conditions. Spreading of manure with towing tubes will increase energy consumption and therefore also CO2 emissions. It is estimated that the measure - in total - has no effect on greenhouse gas emissions.
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other: N content in manure applied will increase due to reduced evaporation, and the need for commercial fertiliser will decrease.
35 Interaction with other policies and measures: An element in the Ammonia Action Plan.
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information: Olesen et al. (2001), Olesen et al. (2004)
42 Comments:  
AF-4d Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Reduction of the time on field surfaces.
1 Sector: Agriculture (/Land-use)
2 Name*: Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Reduction of the time on field surfaces.
3 Origin: National measure and in part EU legislation
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 604 of 15 July 2002 on professional animal farming, manure and slurry etc., (Ammonia action plan, Council directive no. 91/767/EC of 12 December 1991 on the protection of waters against nitrate pollution from agriculture)
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Manure applied to areas without crops shall be ploughed in within 6 hours.
7 Objective: Protection of the aquatic environment from nitrate pollution.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: N2O
9 Type of measure: Regulation (order)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: Spring 2001
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 15 July 2002
13 Date of beginning: 1 August 2002
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State and county authorities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005: -0,03 (a)
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other: N content in manure applied will increase due to reduced evaporation, and the need for commercial fertiliser will decrease.
35 Interaction with other policies and measures: An element in the Ammonia Action Plan.
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information: Olesen et al. (2004): Forberedelse af Vandmiljøplan III (Preparations for the Action Plan on the Aquatic Environment III)
42 Comments: (a) The total effect of the Ammonia Action Plan (Ban on spreading, cover on manure, reduced storage time, ban on ammonia treatment of straw)
AF-4e Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Ban on ammonia treatment of straw.
1 Sector: Agriculture (/Land-use)
2 Name*: Ammonia action plan and the new statutory order on manure: Ban on ammonia treatment of straw.
3 Origin: National measure and in part EU legislation
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 604 of 15 July 2002 on professional animal farming, manure and slurry etc., (Ammonia action plan, Council directive no. 91/767/EC of 12 December 1991 on the protection of waters against nitrate pollution from agriculture)
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment
6 Description: Ban on ammonia treatment of straw.
7 Objective: Protection of the aquatic environment from nitrate pollution.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: N2O
9 Type of measure: Regulation (order)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: Spring 2001
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different: 15 July 2002
13 Date of beginning: 1 August 2002
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State and county authorities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005: -0,03 (a)
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures: An element in the Ammonia Action Plan.
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No, implemented after 2001
41 References and links for further information: Olesen et al. (2004): Forberedelse af Vandmiljøplan III (Preparations for the Action Plan on the Aquatic Environment III)
42 Comments: (a) The total effect of the Ammonia Action Plan (Ban on spreading, cover on manure, reduced storage time, ban on ammonia treatment of straw)
AF-5 Planting of windbreaks
1 Sector: Agriculture
2 Name*: Planting of windbreaks
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Binding of CO2
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1960s
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: 0,14
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
AF-6 Biogas plants
1 Sector: Agriculture and Energy
2 Name*: Biogas plants
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Reduced CO2 and methane emissions and better exploitation of manure
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2, N2O og CH4
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1987
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: State
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0,2
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,5
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: No
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
AF-7 Subsidies scheme for private afforestation on agricultural land (increase the forest area in Denmark)
1 Sector: Forstry / Land-use
2 Name*: Subsidies scheme for private afforestation on agricultural land (increase the forest area in Denmark)
3 Origin: National measure and in part EU legislation
4 Legal basis: Act no. 959 of 2 November 1996 Statutory Order no. 80 of 30 January 1997 on subsidies for private afforestation Council resolution no. 1257/1999, Chapter 8.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Approved subsidies may be canceled in part or totally. Pay back of subsidies already payed can be required with interests. Fines is also possible in servere cases.
6 Description: Private owners of agricultural land can get grants for establishment of broadleaves or conifer forests, nursing of these in the first 5 years, establishment of fences, mapping and or accounting of the area as well as income compensation in the first 10 years - if the forest will be established in an area planned for afforestation.
7 Objective: Promote private afforestation in achieving the target of an increse in forest area by 450,000-500,000 ha in 100 years.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 30 January 1997
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 8 February 1997
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Forest and Nature Agency
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0.074 (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,262 (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments: (a) Total effect of private afforestation and the planned public afforestation.
AF-8 Public afforestation (state, counties and municipalities)
1 Sector: Forstry / Land-use
2 Name*: Public afforestation (state, counties and municipalities)
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis:  
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Public afforestation in achieving the target of an increse in forest area by 450,000500,000 ha in 100 years for purposes such as outdoor recreation, groundwater protection and CO2 sequestration.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: State: Regulation (adopted target, with financial support through the annual state budget) / Counties and Municipalities: Voluntary agreements
10 Status of implementation: Ongoring implementation through annual budgets
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Forest and Nature Agency, counties and municipalities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: -0,074 (a)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: -0,262 (a)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the effects shown above.
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments: (a) Total effect of private afforestation and the planned public afforestation.
DO-1 Energy labelling of small and large buildings (incl. public sector and business)
1 Sector: Energy, Domestic sector
2 Name*: Energy labelling of small and large buildings (incl. public sector and business)
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 485 of 12 June 1996 on promotion of energy and water savings in buildings
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines in the case of missing or inadequate labelling
6 Description: Sales of small buildnings (under 1500 m² ) shall be accompanied with energy labels recommending the buyer how to achieve cost effective energy saving measures. The requirement for larger buildings is the establishment of an energy management plan containing an annual review of the building and its energy consumption and potential energy savings.
7 Objective: Promotion of energy savings.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Information, Regulation (administrative, order)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented. The act is under revision in order to implement the EU building directive.
11 Date for the political adoption: 12 June 1996
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 1997
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any: Financed by the users
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: It is estimated that the effect in the future will be the same as in 2003. Since 2003 is the latest year of energy statistics on which the projection of energy consumption is based, no additional effects have been included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/sw13867.asp
http://www.ens.dk/sw13289.asp
(1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments: (EN-22)
DO-2 Energy labelling of electric appliances
1 Sector: Energy, Domestic sector
2 Name*: Energy labelling of electric appliances
3 Origin: EU legislation (Common and Co-ordinated Policies and Measures - CCPM)
4 Legal basis: -Act no. 450 of 31 May 2000 on promotion of energy savings and statutory orders cf. comments - Council directive 92/75/EC of 22 September 1992 - the framework directive on energy labelling and the Commissions directives cf. comments
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines in the case of missing or inadequate labelling
6 Description: The EU energy labelling directives on household appliances are mandatory and all products under these directives must be labelled. The energy consumption of the appliances have to be shown in a scale from A to G, where A represent the lowest energy consumption.
7 Objective: To promote development and use of energy efficient appliances with the purpose of reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CO2
9 Type of measure: Information
10 Status of implementation: Implemented. In the EU work on additional directives is on-going, aiming for the inclusion of other types of appliances under the labelling scheme.
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1992
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -                                 1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: It is estimated that the effect in the future will be the same as in 2003. Since 2003 is the latest year of energy statistics on which the projection of energy consumption is based, no additional effects have been included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: http://www.ens.dk/lovgivning
http://www.ens.dk/sw11747.asp
http://www.ens.dk/sw12327.asp
42 Comments:
Council directives:
2003/66/EC of 3 July 2003 (refrigerators – freezers)
2002/40/EC of 8 May 2002 (electric ovens)
2002/31/EC of 22 March 2002 (air-conditioners)
99/9/EC of 26 February 1999 amending
97/17/EC (dishwashers)
98/11/EC of 27 January 1998 (lamps)
96/89/EC of 17 December 1996 amending
95/12/EC (washing machines)
96/60/EC of 16 September 1996 (washer-driers)
95/13 EC of 23 May 1995 (tumble driers)
92/75/EC of 22 September 1992
(EN-23)
Statutory orders:
2003/66: Administrative order no. 693 of 17 June 2004 on energy labelling and required information concerning household electric refrigerators, freezers and their combinations.
2002/40: Administrative order no. 1096 of 9 December 2002 on energy labelling and required information concerning household electric ovens.
2002/31: Administrative order no. 1097 of 9 December 2002 on energy labelling and required information concerning household electric air conditioners.
99/9 & 97/17: Administrative order no. 59 of 29 January 1999 on energy labelling and required information concerning household electric dishwashers.
98/11: Administrative order no. 572 of 2 July 1999 on energy labelling and required information concerning household electric lamps.
96/89 & 95/12: Administrative order no. 318 of 7 May 2002 on energy labelling and required information concerning household electric washing machines.
96/60: Administrative order no. 320 of 20 May 2002 on energy labelling and required information concerning household electric washer-driers.
95/13: Administrative order no. 319 of 7 May 2002 on energy labelling and required information concerning household electric tumble driers.
92/75: Act no. 450 of 31 May 2000 on the promotion of savings in energy consumption
WA-1 Obligation to send combustible waste to incineration (in practice a ban on landfilling).
1 Sector: Waste
2 Name*: Obligation to send combustible waste to incineration (in practice a ban on landfilling).
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 581 of 24 june 1996 om waste as amended in statutory order no. 619 of 27 June 2000 on waste.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement: Fines and/or up to 2 years of imprisonment.
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Reduce landfilling, energy production, greater recycling, CH4 reduction
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CH4 (methane)
9 Type of measure: Regulation (administative)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: 1994
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 1997
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Municipalities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -1995:  
20 2001: 0,021
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: 0,333
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities: Reductions of CO2 emission in energy supply when biomass in waste for incineration substitutes fossil fuel combustion. All incineration plants in Denmark are connected to district heating grids. However, this effect has not been quantified separately.
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5, the Effort Analysis(1) and the effects shown above
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: Yes
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes
41 References and links for further information: (1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
WA-2 The waste tax
1 Sector: Waste
2 Name*: The waste tax
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no. 570 of 3 August 1998 on waste tax and tax on raw materials (amendments, originally introduced in 1986) Statutory order no. 638 of 3 July 1997 on waste tax as amended in statutory order no. 655 of 27 June 2000
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: A tax is imposed on waste for incineration or landfilling. The taxes are differentiated depending on which facility the waste is going to be treated.
7 Objective: Greater recycling and least possible landfilling.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CH4 (methane)
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1 January 1987
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry of Taxation
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: Danish Environmental Protection Agency (1997), Waste Center Denmark (www.mst.dk/udgiv/publikationer/2003/87-7972-958-4/html/ )
42 Comments:  
WA-3 Weight-and-volume-based packaging taxes
1 Sector: Waste
2 Name*: Weight-and-volume-based packaging taxes
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Act no 101 of 13 Frebuary 2001 on tax on packings, bags, service and PVC folios Statutory order no. 111 of 5 February 2000 on tires Statutory order of 22 March 2001 on CFCs Statutory order no. 1060 of 4 December 2000 on lead accumulators
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: Taxes or compensations on several products. E.g. taxes on packings, tires, lead accumulators, CFCs and bags.
7 Objective: The objectives of both weight and volume -based packaging taxes are to reduce the amount of packaging waste and its impacts on the environment. The taxes provide for economic incentives to behave in accordance with these objectives.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CH4 (methane) and CO2
9 Type of measure: Fiscal (tax)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities:  
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information: Waste Centre Denmark (www.affaldsinfo.dk/vidensbank) have an electronic industrial waste bank that collates and systematizes knowledge about industrial waste in 20 sectors.
42 Comments:  
WA-4 Subsidy programme – Enterprise Scheme (special scheme for businesses)
1 Sector: Waste
2 Name*: Subsidy programme – Enterprise Scheme (special scheme for businesses)
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Textual note no. 106 to paragraph 23 in the Act on the state budget for 2004, 2005….. A statutory order awaiting the approval of the EU Commission.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: Reduce environmental impacts from waste
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CH4 (methane)
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented
11 Date for the political adoption: December 2003
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 2004
14 Date of end, if relevant: 2007
15 Allocated resources, if any: Approx. DKK 33 mill. over 4 years (2004-2007)
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry for the Environment
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
WA-6 Implementation of the EU landfill directive
1 Sector: Waste
2 Name*: Implementation of the EU landfill directive
3 Origin: The EU landfill directive
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 650 of 29 June 2001 on landfills
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description:  
7 Objective: To introduce more rigorous demands for landfilling of waste and to lower the amount of waste going to landfills.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CH4 (methane)
9 Type of measure: Regulation (administrative)
10 Status of implementation: Under implementation, i.e. the statutory order on landfills is under revision.
11 Date for the political adoption: 29 June 2001
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning:  
14 Date of end, if relevant:  
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Environmental Protection Agency, counties and municipalities
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  
WA-7 Support for (construction of facilities for) gas recovery at landfill sites
1 Sector: Waste, measures no longer in place, but replaced with the general price supplement (See data sheet EN-3)
2 Name*: Support for (construction of facilities for) gas recovery at landfill sites
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: The development programme for renewable energy (UVE), The Plant Fond etc.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: Methane is recovered at landfills. The methane collected acts as fuel in CHP production.
7 Objective: Energy supply and reduction of methane emissions.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CH4 (methane) and CO2 from fossil fuel based energy supply
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: Until 1 January 2002 subsidies could be given to the establishment of plants for recovery and use of gas from landfills. Today, support for use of biogas from landfills is supported via the general support for using biogas, i.e. tax exception for heat production and price supplement in the case of electricity production. See data sheet EN-3.
11 Date for the political adoption:  
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: Mid 1980s
14 Date of end, if relevant: 31 December 2001
15 Allocated resources, if any:  
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Danish Energy Authority
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -1995:  
20 2001: See the Effort Analysis(1)
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5: See the Effort Analysis(1)
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects: See the Effort Analysis(1)
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants: Combustion of biogas from landfills will emit e.g. NOx.
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5 and the Effort Analysis(1)
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place: See under Implementation above
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?: It is estimated that the effect in the future will be the same as in 2003. Since 2003 is the latest year of energy statistics on which the projection of energy consumption is based, no additional effects have been included in the projection.
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?: Yes
41 References and links for further information: (1) See Annex B2 and http://www.mst.dk/transport/01041000.htm
42 Comments:  
WA-8 Subsidy programme for cleaner products
1 Sector: Waste, measures no longer in place
2 Name*: Subsidy programme for cleaner products
3 Origin: National measure
4 Legal basis: Statutory order no. 731 and 732 of 9 October 1998 on subsidy programme for cleaner products and on The Environment Council on Cleaner Products as amended in Statutory order no. 784 of 4 September 2003.
5 Domestic compliance and enforcement:  
6 Description: Under the subsidy programme for cleaner products it was possible to get grants for projects targetted at reducing the environmental impact from handling of waste generated throughout the life cycle of products as well as for projects with the objective to limit environmental problems in connection with the handling of waste.
7 Objective: Reduce the impact of waste on the environmental.
8 Greenhouse gas(es) affected: CH4 (methane)
9 Type of measure: Economic (subsidies)
10 Status of implementation: Implemented, but no longer in place.
11 Date for the political adoption: 9 October 1998
12 Date for adoption of legislation, if different:  
13 Date of beginning: 1999
14 Date of end, if relevant: 2003
15 Allocated resources, if any: Approx. DKK 100 mill. in total the period 1999-2003
16 For planned measures, planned date of start (& end?):  
17 For planned measures, planned allocation of resources:  
18 Implementering entity or entities: Ministry for the Environment
19 Estimated effect (mill. tonnes CO2-eq.) in -1995:  
20 2001:  
21 2005:  
22 2010 or (2008-2012)/5:  
23 2015 or (2013-2017)/5:  
24 2020:  
25 2025:  
26 2030:  
27 Reduction cost, short term - with side effects:  
28 Reduction cost, short term - without side effects:  
29 Reduction cost, long term - with side effects:  
30 Reduction cost, long term - without side effects:  
31 Methods and assumptions used for the estimation of reduction effects and socio-economic costs: See Chapter 5
32 Side effects – on other GHGs or GHG emitting activities:  
33 Side effects – on other air pollutants:  
34 Side effects – other:  
35 Interaction with other policies and measures:  
36 How will the policy or measure modify longer-term trends in anthropogenic GHG emissions and removals: See Chapter 5
37 Explanation, if the measure is no longer in place:  
38 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with measures” GHG projection) ?:  
39 *Is the effect of the measure included in the ”with additional measures” GHG projection) ?: N.a.
40 *Is effect estimated and subtracted in the ”without measures (since 1990)" -projection ?:  
41 References and links for further information:  
42 Comments:  

 



Version 1.0 December 2005, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency