Potential measures for reduction of releases of heavy metals, POPs, HCFCs, BFRs and industrial greenhouse gases with particular reference to Russia, Ukraine and China

2 Methodology

In the following the applied methodology for the review is shortly described.

2.1 Release sources and reduction measures

The main global release sources and reduction measures have been shortly reviewed based on the literature; mainly authorised reports from international or governmental institutions. The use of the substances and releases in Russia, Ukraine and China has been reviewed on the basis of information in English obtained from the Internet and literature. Additionally the information concerning Russia has been supplemented by literature and Internet Search in Russian. For most of the substances only scattered and incomplete information on the use and releases in Russia, Ukraine and China has been available. By combining the scattered information with the information on Global trends it has been attempted to establish a first view of the situation in the countries.

A list of main technical measures for reduction of the use, formation and releases of the substances was developed on the basis of information from literature and the general knowledge of the authors. For the technical reduction measures being effective there is in general a need for development of adequate regulation, development of guidelines, enforcement of regulation and promotion of alternative solutions. These additional measures are considered implicit for all proposed technical measures.

2.2 International agreements

The international agreements addressing the substances have been assessed, and a summary table indicating how the major release source categories and use areas are addressed by the agreements has been prepared. The aim of the table is to demonstrate the source categories or use areas of international concern, the applied types of reduction measures and the time perspective.

2.3 Ongoing activities

Information on ongoing and tendered activities was searched via the Internet April/May 2005 from the web-sites of the organisations listed in table 2-1. It is in the table indicated to what extent the list of relevant projects identified can be considered comprehensive.

Besides projects specifically addressing the substances, projects addressing hazardous waste management and reduced use of fossil fuels have been identified. Energy-related projects, which indirectly may reduce the releases of a number of the substances have not been listed unless directly relevant to the proposed options for additional initiatives.

Table 2-1 Organisations scanned for ongoing projects in Russia, Ukraine and China

Organisation Full name Comprehen-
sive list
generated
Project
database
identified
Comments
GEF Global Environment Facility + +  
WB, IBRD World Bank, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development + +  
UNEP United Nations Environment Programme + no  
UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organisation + +  
UNDP United Nations Development Programme probably no  
FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations probably no  
EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development + +  
EIB European Investment Bank + +  
EU TACIS European Union Technical assistance to Commonwealth of Independent States + + Project for the period 2000 - 2005 searched by use of "Tenders Electronic Daily"
EU TACIS BISTRO Small-scale TACIS projects (with a duration of no more than six months and a budget of up to 100,000 EUR) no no Projects generally not listed in the project database. Projects known by the authors are included
ADB Asian Development Bank + +  
ACAP Arctic Council Action Plan to Eliminate Pollution of the Arctic + +  
NEFCO Nordic Environment Finance Corporation no no  
DANCEE/DANCEA Danish Co-operation for Environment in Eastern Europe; Danish Co-operation for Environment in the Arctic + no The dataset including the DANCEE projects at web-site of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is no longer available
DANIDA Danish International Development Assistance probably no No environmental projects in Russia, Ukraine and China
US AID United States Agency for International Development probably + Russia, Ukraine no (China) US AID has apparently no environmental project in China
US EPA - OIA United States Environmental Protection Agency - Office of International Affairs no no  
CIDA Canadian International Development Agency + +  
SIDA Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency Russia, Ukraine: probably China: no +
no (China)
Country programmes scanned. Probably energy programmes in China not identified
NORAD Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation no no Country fact sheets scanned. Probably energy programmes in China not identified
FINNIDA Finnish International Development Agency no no  
BMZ Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (Germany) no no  
GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit + +  
IMET Italian Ministry for the Environment and Territory. Sino-Italian cooperation Program for Environment Protection + +  
Japan's ODA Japans Official Development Assistance no no Energy projects in China
AusAID The Australian Agency for International Development Probably no  
DFID The Department for International Development (UK) Probably no  
DGIS The Netherlands Directorate-General for International Cooperation Probably no China is not partner country

2.4 Paradigm

As a first phase of the study, a paradigm for the assessment and reporting was developed using mercury as example. The paradigm was presented for the Steering Committee, revised in accordance with the comments obtained and applied on the remaining substances.

 



Version 1.0 May 2006, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency