| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next |
Survey and Health Assessment of Products for Interior Car Care
5 Screening of compounds
In connection with the 26 products selected for screening (section 2.5.1), it was initially investigated which compounds they contain in order to estimate if there is a possible content of health hazardous substances that should be investigated closer in exposure scenarios and a more precise quantitative analysis.
The results of the initial screening cannot be used directly as it only is a semi-quantitative analysis, but they can be used to give an impression of the magnitude of the content of the identified compounds and to compare the individual products.
5.1 Applied analysis methods for screening
The chemical screening that was carried out was based on GC/MS analyses. An extraction/dilution with dichloromethane for semi-quantitative GC/MS screening of the products was carried out to identify the product content of semi-volatile organic compounds. In order to identify very volatile compounds, e.g. propellants, a SPME-GC/MS screening was carried out of the headspace of all of the products.
The specific parameters of the applied methods are described in the following.
5.1.1 Semi-quantitative GC/MS screening
A sample amount (app. 2 g) was weighed and a known amount of dichloromethane (50 ml) was added containing internal standards. The extracts were subsequently analysed gas chromatographically (GC/MS). In connection with product 32 and 40, 1 complete tissue was used.
The results of this analysis cover the semi-volatile compounds but not propellants nor volatile solvents. In connection with the screening that was carried out the detected compounds were merely identified by comparing the mass spectra of each compound with a library (NIST MS library, NIST02 Version 2.0) containing more than 150.000 mass spectra of organic substances.
The detection limit of the analysis method is estimated to be 0.01 mg/g and the measuring uncertainty is estimated to be ± 20%, however, higher for some compounds as only semi-quantification was carried out against an internal standard, bromobenzene.
Table 5.1 GC/MS analysis parameters
GC/MS instrument |
Agilent HP 5973 ALS |
GC parameters |
Column: Zebron ZB-1, 20 m x 0.18 mm id., 0.18 μm film thickness
Carrier gas: Helium, constant flow at 0.8 ml/min.
Oven program: 40 ºC. for 2 min., 15 ºC. /min. at 300 ºC.
Injection: 275 ºC. , split 1:10. |
MS parameters |
Scan mode: 35-550 m/z
Solvent delay: 2 min. |
5.1.2 Qualitative SPME-GC/MS screening
A sample amount, app. 0.2 g, was weighed directly in a headspace glass. The gas phase was subsequently analysed gas chromatographically by SPME-GC/MS.
The results of this analysis mainly cover the content of propellants, solvents and the most volatile compounds. In connection with the screening that was carried out, detected compounds were merely identified by comparing with a NIST MS library (NIST02 Version 2.0). AMDIS was applied as deconvulation software by means of which compounds with identical retention times could be identified.
The detection limit of the analysis method is estimated to be 0.001 mg/g but will depend on the vapour pressure and affinity of the individual compound for the applied SPME fibre. The results are qualitative and therefore no analysis uncertainty is stated.
Table 5.2 SPME-GC/MS analysis parameters
GC/MS instrument |
Finnigan Focus GC-DSQ |
GC parameters |
Column: Zebron ZB-1, 30 m x 0.25 mm id., 1,0 μm film thickness
Carrier gas: Helium, constant flow at 0.8 ml/min.
Oven program: 40 ºC.for 1 min., 10 ºC/min. at 275 ºC, 275 ºC for 10 min.
Injection: 275 ºC, split 20 ml/min. |
SPME parameters |
Fibre: 85 μm Carboxen/PDMS
Absorption: 35 ºC, 15 min.
Desorption: 3 min. |
MS parameters |
Scan mode: 35-450 m/z
Ion source 225 ºC |
5.2 Results of screening
The substances identified in connection with the performed screenings are summarized in the following tables. The results have been organized according to product type and analysis method. All identified substances have a CAS no. In connection with some compounds, reasonable identification was not obtained with NIST MS library and it can be a similar compound – therefore, the stated CAS no. is only advisory (marked at the specific compound in the table with a note).
5.2.1 Results of the semi-quantitative screening
For each identified compound an estimated content has been stated and it was calculated against an internal standard, bromobenzene. The detection limit is estimated to be 0.01 mg/g sample.
Table 5.3 Results of vinyl make-up, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
1 |
2 |
15 |
25 |
29 |
Hydrocarbons * |
|
400 |
540 |
25 |
- |
480 |
1,3-dimethyl benzene |
108-38-3 |
0.08 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-Acetonaphthon |
941-98-0 |
- |
0.05 |
- |
- |
- |
Alkyl-benzenes eg xylenes** |
|
1.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-methyldodecyl-benzene |
4534-53-6 |
3.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-ethyldecyl-benzene |
2400-00-2 |
0.74 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-methyltridecyl-benzene |
4534-59-2 |
1.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-ethanol |
111-90-0 |
5.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
α-pinen |
80-56-8 |
1.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
β-pinen |
127-91-3 |
4.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
N,N-dimethyl-1-dodecanamin |
112-18-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.36 |
Diethyl phthalate |
84-66-2 |
- |
0.06 |
- |
- |
0.07 |
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate |
117-81-7 |
- |
- |
- |
0.25 |
- |
Phthalates |
|
0.27 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Diisooctyl 1,2-benzene dicarboxylacid |
27554-26-3 |
2.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Siloxanes – silicone oil*** |
|
- |
57 |
- |
2.4 |
56 |
Silicium or fluorine containing oil**** |
|
30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
’ - ’ Means that the compound was not detected in the product in question.
* This group covers several different aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons corresponding to the boiling point from heptane to dodecane.
** This group covers several different compounds where it has not been possible to obtain acceptable identification by means of the NIST library.
*** Product no. 2 and 29 are similar, while other types of siloxanes are present in product no. 25.
**** Requires other techniques to be identified.
Table 5.4 Results of glass cleaner, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
23 |
24 |
37 |
Hydrocarbons * |
|
- |
- |
280 |
Alkyl-benzenes** |
|
- |
- |
X |
1-methoxy-2-propanol*** |
107-98-2 |
X |
- |
- |
2-butoxy-ethanol |
111-76-2 |
- |
21 |
- |
1-butoxy-2-propanol |
5131-66-8 |
- |
14 |
- |
5-methyl-3-heptanone |
541-85-5 |
0.02 |
- |
- |
’ - ’ Means that the compound was not detected in the product in question.
* This group covers several different aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons corresponding to the boiling point from heptane to undecane.
** This group covers several different compounds where it has not been possible to obtain acceptable identification by means of the NIST library. The compounds are on top of the hydrocarbons and therefore it is not possible to state a possible result.
*** It has not been possible to state a possible result as the top is just at the beginning of the MS programme and therefore it is not included in its full size.
Table 5.5 Results of fabric waterproofing, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
5 |
12 |
41* |
Hydrocarbons ** |
|
400 |
- |
- |
Alkyl-benzenes*** |
|
0,10 |
17 |
- |
Butyl acetic acid ester |
123-86-4 |
45 |
- |
- |
α-pinen |
80-56-8 |
0.16 |
- |
- |
β-pinen |
127-91-3 |
0.89 |
- |
- |
Limonene |
5989-27-5 |
5.6 |
- |
- |
Terpene |
|
0.38 |
- |
- |
(Pentadecafluoroctanal )**** |
|
- |
0.01 |
- |
Fluorine compound**** |
|
- |
0.01 |
- |
Hexafluor propene**** |
116-15-4 |
0.16 |
- |
- |
’ - ’ Means that the compound was not detected in the product in question.
* Organic compounds were not detected in product no. 41.
** This group covers several different aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons corresponding to the boiling point from heptane to octane.
*** This group covers several different compounds where it has not been possible to obtain acceptable identification by means of the NIST library.
**** The identification of these compounds by means of the applied GC/MS technique is very poor. Another analysis method is required to determine whether a content of fluorinated compounds exists and to determine the quantitative content.
Table 5.6 Results of fabric cleaner, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
7 |
9 |
22 |
30 |
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-ethanol |
111-90-0 |
- |
42 |
55 |
- |
1-(2-methoxy-1-methylethoxy)-2-propanol, 2-(2-hydroxyproxy)-1-propanol or similar compounds** |
20324-32-7, 106-62-7, 13429-07-7 etc. |
4.6 |
- |
- |
- |
β-pinen |
127-91-3 |
- |
0.02 |
0.01 |
- |
Limonene |
5989-27-5 |
0.16 |
0.60 |
0.16 |
- |
Methyl paraben |
99-76-3 |
- |
X* |
26 |
- |
’ - ’ Means that the compound was not detected in the product in question.
* Methylparaben was detected in sample no. 9 but is below the estimated detection limit.
** This group covers several different compounds where it has not been possible to obtain acceptable identification by means of the NIST library.
Table 5.7 Results of odour remover, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
8 |
14 |
Hydrocarbons* |
|
- |
0.61 |
Benzyl chloride |
100-44-7 |
0.79 |
- |
Propylene glycol |
57-55-6 |
- |
3.5 |
Triethylen glycol |
112-27-6 |
0.20 |
- |
Eucalyptol |
470-82-6 |
- |
0.03 |
Fluorine compounds** |
|
0.01 |
- |
4-amino heptane |
16751-59-0 |
0.02 |
- |
N,N-dimethyl-1-dodecanamin |
112-18-5 |
0.85 |
- |
N,N-dimethyl-1-tetradecanamin |
129-24-3 |
0.21 |
- |
’ - ’ Means that the compound was not detected in the product in question.
* This covers one or several unidentified hydrocarbons (cyclic, alcohols) with a boiling point corresponding to decane.
** The identification of these compounds by means of the applied GC/MS technique is very poor. Another analysis method is required to determine whether a content of fluorinated compounds exists and to determine the quantitative content.
Table 5.8 Results of vinyl cleaner, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
10 |
27 |
1-(2-methoxy-1-methylethoxy)-2-propanol, 2-(2-hydroxyproxy)-1-propanol or similar compounds |
20324-32-7, 106-62-7, 13429-07-7 etc. |
- |
14 |
α-pinen |
80-56-8 |
0.01 |
- |
β-pinen |
127-91-3 |
X* |
- |
D-Limonene |
5989-27-5 |
0.24 |
- |
3-caren |
13466-78-9 |
0.04 |
- |
Diethyl phthalates |
84-66-2 |
0.05 |
- |
’ - ’ Means that the compound was not detected in the product in question.
* The content is below the estimated detection limit.
Table 5.9 Results of leather cleaner, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
13 |
35 |
Hydrocarbons * |
|
40 |
- |
Eicosane, heacosane, noncosane ** |
|
0.25 |
- |
Butylhydroxy toluene (BHT) |
128-37-0 |
0.32 |
- |
Dodecane acid |
143-07-7 |
- |
0.28 |
D-Limonene |
5989-27-5 |
- |
0.02 |
Diethyl phthalate |
84-66-2 |
- |
0.06 |
’ - ’ Means that the compound was not detected in the product in question.
* This group covers several different aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons corresponding to the boiling point from heptane to undecane.
** It has not been possible to identify these compounds with reasonable probability by means of the NIST library. The compound could be a similar compound.
Table 5.10 Results of cleaning tissues, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
32 |
40 |
Benzaldehyde * |
100-52-7 |
- |
0.02 |
Benzyl chloride |
100-44-7 |
- |
0.01 |
Ethyl paraben |
120-47-8 |
0.07 |
- |
Butyl paraben * |
94-26-8 |
0.03 |
- |
N,N-dimethyl-1-dodecanamin |
112-18-5 |
- |
0.18 |
N-methyl-N-benzyltetradecanamin* |
83690-72-6 |
- |
0.02 |
’ - ’ Means that the compound was not detected in the product in question.
* It has not been possible to identify these compounds with reasonable probability by means of the NIST library. The compound could be a similar compound.
Table 5.11 Results of anti-mist products, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
33 |
1,1'-oxybis-2-propanol * |
110-98-5 |
0.25 |
1-(2-methoxy-1-methylethoxy)-2-propanol, 2-(2-hydroxyproxy)-1-propanol * |
20324-32-7, 106-62-7, 13429-07-7 |
0.39 |
2-(phenylmethylene)-octanal |
101-86-0 |
0.14 |
Sum of esters * |
|
0.17 |
D-Limonene |
5989-27-5 |
0.18 |
* It has not been possible to identify these compounds with reasonable probability by means of the NIST library. The compound could be a similar compound.
Table 5.12 Results of detergent, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
34 |
No substances detected |
|
- |
Table 5.13 Results of synthetic materials sealant, semi-quantitative GC/MS, mg/g sample
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
38 |
Hydrocarbons * |
|
408 |
Ethyl butanacid ester |
105-54-4 |
0.08 |
* This group covers several different aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons and alcohols, corresponding to the boiling point from decane to hexadecane.
5.2.2 Results of qualitative screening of volatile organic compounds
In connection with the performed SPME GC/MS screening, no assessment of the amount of the identified substances in the product was carried out. The identified substances were marked with ”X”.
The substances are shown according to a rough volatility scale as they are shown according to retention time. Therefore, substances found at the beginning of the table must to a higher degree be expected to be emitted to the air with the risk of being absorbed via the respiratory passages.
Table 5.14 Results of vinyl make-up, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
1 |
2 |
15 |
25 |
29 |
Propane |
74-98-6 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Isobutane |
75-28-5 |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
Butane |
106-97-8 |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
Ethyl alcohol |
64-17-5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Isopropyl alcohol |
67-63-0 |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
Pentane |
109-66-0 |
X |
|
|
X |
|
Dimethoxy methane |
109-87-5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
2,2-dimethyl butane |
75-83-2 |
X |
|
|
X |
|
Cyclo pentane |
287-92-3 |
|
|
|
X |
|
2-methyl pentane, 3-methyl pentane |
107-83-5, 96-14-0 |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
Hexane |
110-54-3 |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
1-butanol |
71-36-3 |
|
|
|
|
X |
Cyclo hexane |
110-82-7 |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
2-methyl hexane, 3-methyl hexane |
591-76-4, 589-34-4 |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
2,3-dimethyl hexane |
584-94-1 |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Heptane |
142-82-5 |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
Methyl-cyclo hexane |
108-87-2 |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
Xylenes |
95-47-6, 108-38-3, 106-42-3 |
X |
|
|
|
|
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-ethanol |
111-90-0 |
X |
|
|
|
|
α-pinen |
80-56-8 |
X |
|
|
|
|
2,2,4,6,6-Pentamethyl heptanes |
13475-82-6 |
|
X |
|
|
X |
Table 5.15 Results of glass cleaner, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
23 |
24 |
37 |
Ethyl alcohol |
64-17-5 |
X |
|
|
Isopropyl alcohol |
67-63-0 |
X |
X |
|
Acetic formic anhydride |
2258-42-6 |
|
X |
|
2-butanone |
78-93-3 |
X |
|
|
2,3-butandiol |
513-85-9 |
|
X |
|
1-methoxy-2-propanol |
107-98-2 |
X |
|
|
Ethyl benzene |
100-41-4 |
|
|
X |
Xylene |
95-47-6, 108-38-3, 106-42-3 |
|
|
X |
2-methyl octane, 3-methyl octane |
3321-61-2, 2216-33-3 |
|
|
X |
Nonane |
111-84-2 |
|
|
X |
1-butoxy-2-propanol |
5131-66-8 |
|
X |
|
1-(1-methylpropoxy)-butane |
999-65-5 |
|
X |
|
Alkyl benzenes eg (1-methylethyl)-benzene, 1-ethyl-2-methyl-benzene * |
98-82-8, 611-14-3 |
|
|
X |
3-methylnonane, 2-methylnonane |
5911-04-6, 871-83-0 |
|
|
X |
2-ethyl-1-hexanol |
104-76-7 |
|
X |
|
5-ethyl-2-methyl-heptane |
13475-78-0 |
|
|
X |
* It has not been possible to identify these compounds with reasonable probability by means of the NIST library. The compound could be a similar compound.
Table 5.16 Results of fabric waterproofing, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
5 |
12 |
41* |
Butane |
106-97-8 |
X |
|
|
2-methyl pentane, 3-methyl pentane |
107-83-5, 96-14-0 |
X |
|
|
Ethyl acetate |
141-78-6 |
X |
|
|
2,4-dimethyl pentane |
108-08-7 |
X |
X |
|
1-butanol |
71-36-3 |
X |
|
|
3,3-dimethyl pentane |
562-49-2 |
X |
X |
|
Cyclo hexane |
110-82-7 |
X |
|
|
2-methyl hexane, 3-methyl hexane |
591-76-4, 589-34-4 |
X |
X |
|
2,3-dimethyl hexane |
584-94-1 |
|
X |
|
Dimethylcyclo pentane |
2452-99-5, 1759-58-6 |
X |
X |
|
Heptane |
142-82-5 |
X |
X |
|
Methyl-cyclo hexane |
108-87-2 |
X |
X |
|
Ethylcyclo pentane |
1678-91-7 |
|
X |
|
Butyl acetate |
123-86-4 |
X |
X |
|
D-limonene |
5989-27-5 |
X |
|
|
* No volatile organic compounds were detected in product no. 41.
Table 5.17 Results of fabric cleaner, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
7 |
9 |
22 |
30 |
Ethyl alcohol |
64-17-5 |
X |
|
|
|
1-(2-methoxypropoxy)- 2-Propanol |
13429-07-7 |
X |
|
|
|
Benzyl alcohol |
100-51-6 |
|
|
|
X |
2-ethyl-1-hexanol |
104-76-7 |
X |
|
|
|
D-limonene |
5989-27-5 |
X |
X |
X |
|
a-LinaloolLinalool |
78-70-6 |
X |
|
|
|
Acetic acid linalool ester |
115-95-7 |
X |
|
|
|
Nerol acetate or geraniol acetate* |
141-12-8, 16409-44-2 |
X |
|
|
|
1-hexadecanol or similar |
36653-82-4 |
|
|
|
X |
* It has not been possible to identify these compounds with reasonable probability by means of the NIST library. The compound could be a similar compound.
Table 5.18 Results of odour remover, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
8 |
14 |
Isopropyl alcohol |
67-63-0 |
X |
|
1,2-propandiol |
57-55-6 |
|
X |
D-limonene |
5989-27-5 |
X |
|
a-LinaloolLinalool |
78-70-6 |
X |
|
3,7-dimethyl-3-octanol (linalool tetrahydrid) |
78-69-3 |
|
X |
Acetic acid benzyl ester |
140-11-4 |
X |
|
p-menth-1-en-8-ol or other terpene* |
98-55-5 |
X |
|
2-phenylethyl acetic acid ester |
103-45-7 |
|
X |
2-tert-butyl cyclo hexanol |
13491-79-7 |
|
X |
a-Ionon |
14901-07-6 |
|
X |
* It has not been possible to identify these compounds with reasonable probability by means of the NIST library. The compound could be a similar compound.
Table 5.19 Results of vinyl cleaner, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
10 |
27 |
Isopropyl alcohol |
67-63-0 |
X |
|
1-methoxy-2-propanol |
107-98-2 |
|
X |
α-pinen |
80-56-8 |
X |
|
dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether* |
20324-32-7 |
|
X |
dipropylene glycol* |
110-98-5 |
|
X |
α-pinen |
80-56-8 |
X |
|
p-menthane, 1,4-epoxy |
470-67-7 |
X |
|
Cymen |
99-87-6 |
X |
|
D-limonene |
5989-27-5 |
X |
|
a-LinaloolLinalool |
78-70-6 |
X |
|
p-menth-1-en-8-ol or other terpene* |
98-55-5 |
X |
|
Citral |
5392-40-5 |
X |
|
1R-α-pinen |
7785-70-8 |
X |
|
α-citral |
106-26-3 |
X |
|
Isobornyl acetate |
125-12-2 |
X |
|
Diethyl phthalate |
84-66-2 |
X |
|
α-hexyl cinnemaldehyd |
101-86-0 |
X |
|
* It has not been possible to identify these compounds with reasonable probability by means of the NIST library. The compound could be a similar compound.
Table 5.20 Results of leather cleaner, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
13 |
35 |
Octane |
111-65-9 |
X |
|
2,6-dimethyl heptanes |
1072-05-5 |
X |
|
C10-C12 alkane |
- |
X |
|
2-methyloctan, 3-methyl octane |
3321-61-2, 2216-33-3 |
X |
|
1-ethyl-3-methyl cyclo hexane |
198489-10-2 |
X |
|
Nonane |
111-84-2 |
X |
|
Decane |
124-18-5 |
X |
|
D-limonene |
5989-27-5 |
|
X |
butylated hydro toluene |
128-37-0 |
X |
|
Diethyl |
84-66-2 |
|
X |
Table 5.21 Results of cleaning tissue, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
32 |
40 |
Ethyl alcohol |
64-17-5 |
|
X |
Table 5.22 Results of anti-mist product, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
33 |
Isopropyl alcohol |
67-63-0 |
X |
2-tert-butyl cyclohexanol |
13491-79-7 |
X |
Table 5.23 Results of detergent, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no. |
34 |
Xylene |
95-47-6, 108-38-3, 106-42-3 |
X |
Allyl heptanoat |
142-19-8 |
X |
Tetralin |
119-64-2 |
X |
2-tert-butyl cyclo hexanol |
13491-79-7 |
X |
4-tert-butyl cyclohexyl acetate |
32210-23-4 |
X |
Table 5.24 Results of synthetic materials sealant, SPME-GC/MS
Identification |
CAS no. |
Sample no.. |
38 |
Isopropyl alcohol |
67-63-0 |
X |
2,2,6-trimethyl octane |
62016-28-8 |
X |
2,2,7,7-tetramethyl octane |
1071-31-4 |
X |
2,2,4,6,6-Pentamethyl heptanes |
13475-82-6 |
X |
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl octane |
52670-34-5 |
X |
5-ethyl-2,2,3-trimethyl-heptane |
62199-06-8 |
X |
3-methylun decane |
1002-43-3 |
X |
2,6-dimethyl decane |
13150-81-7 |
X |
2,3-dimethyl decane |
1312-44-6 |
X |
Tetra decane |
629-59-4 |
X |
5.2.3 Conclusion of screening results
The content of many of the product compounds stated on labels or safety data sheets (see Table 2.1Table 2.1) were detected and so were other organic compounds. In the following, the substantial results of the initial screening of each product type are listed:
- Vinyl make-up (5): A high content of different hydrocarbons was found in several of the products and one product contains terpenes (fragrances).
- Glass cleaner (3): They are dominated by different types of alcohols and glycol ethers. One single product contained alkyl benzenes and hydrocarbons.
- Fabric waterproofing (3): A high content of different hydrocarbons and limonene (perfume) was found in one product.
- Fabric cleaner (4): The products are dominated by glycol ethers and several of the products contain limonene (perfume).
- Odour remover (2): The products consist of alcohols, glycols and perfume.
- Vinyl cleaner (2): In the one product there was a content of glycol ether while the other contained isopropyl alcohol and perfume.
- Leather cleaner (2): In the one product a number of hydrocarbons and BHT were detected and in the other limonene (perfume) and a phthalate were detected.
- Cleaning tissue (2): One product contained parabens and the other benzyl chloride – both are preservatives.
- Anti-mist product (1): The product contains glycol ether and limonene (perfume).
- Detergent (1): Fragrances were detected.
- Synthetic materials sealant (1): The product has a high content of different hydrocarbons.
By comparing the results, the following similarities between some of the products appear:
- Product no. 2 and 29 (vinyl make-up) contain many of the same substances. Almost identical products might be in question.
- Product no. 5 and 12 (fabric waterproofing) are very much alike. However, there is perfume and several volatile compounds in sample no. 5.
- Product no. 9 and 22 (fabric cleaner) are very much alike. It is possible that almost identical products are in question.
- Product no. 7 and 27 (fabric cleaner and vinyl cleaner, respectively) are very much alike. However, product no. 7 has a content of perfume.
- · Product 5, 12 and 8 (fabric cleaner and odour remover, respectively) might contain some fluorinated compounds. The identification of these compounds by means of the applied GC/MS technique is very poor.
5.3 Screening for the effects of compounds – related to health
Based on the identified compounds during the different screening analyses, screening for possible health hazardous substances was carried out. The screening took its starting point in the classification of the List of Dangerous Substances supplemented with the Danish Environmental Protection Agency’s advisory list for self classification (both available on www.mst.dk), and the list of limit values of the Danish Working Environment Authority, DWEA, (available on www.at.dk), (the Danish Working Environment Authority, 2007). A dash indicates that the substance has no classification or limit value. The table lists the classification of the substances according to the List of Dangerous Substances.
The identified compounds are summarised in Table 5.Table 5.25. In the light of the screening results, 15 products were selected for closer quantification of compounds and 4 products were selected for emission tests to measure the actual concentration under realistic application conditions.
Compounds marked with grey were only identified via the qualitative GC/MS screening and therefore there are no content levels but only an ascertainment of the presence of the compounds. The remaining products were identified via semi-quantitative GC/MS and for a few compounds the highest measured concentration has been stated.
Table 5.25 Complete list of the compounds in investigated car care products (identified by screening) and their classification.
Substance name |
CAS no. |
Classification according to the List of Dangerous Substances |
Advisory classification according to DEPA self classification |
Possible limit value (DWEA) |
Highest measured value |
Dimethoxy methane |
109-87-5 |
- |
- |
1000 ppm 3100 mg/m³ |
- |
Ethyl alcohol |
64-17-5 |
F;R11 |
- |
1000 ppm 1900 mg/m³ |
- |
Propane |
74-98-6 |
Fx;R12 |
- |
1000 ppm 1800 mg/m³ |
- |
Pentane |
109-66-0 |
Fx;R12 XN;R65 R66 R67 N;R51/53 |
- |
500 ppm 1500 mg/m³ |
- |
Nonane |
111-84-2 |
- |
N;R50 |
200 ppm 1050 mg/m³ |
- |
Heptane |
142-82-5 |
- |
- |
200 ppm 820 mg/m³ |
- |
Methyl-cyclohexane |
108-87-2 |
F;R11 XI;R38 XN;R65 R67 N;R51/53 |
- |
200 ppm 805 mg/m³ |
- |
Isopropyl alcohol |
67-63-0 |
F;R11 XI;R36 R67 |
- |
200 ppm 490 mg/m³ |
- |
Cyclo pentane |
287-92-3 |
F;R11 N;R52/53 |
- |
300 ppm
850 mg/m³ |
- |
Cyclo hexane |
110-82-7 |
F;R11 Xi;R38 Xn;R65 R67 N;R50/53 |
- |
50 ppm 172 mg/m³ |
- |
1-butanol |
71-36-3 |
R10 XN;R22 XI;R37/38-41 R67 |
- |
50 ppm (LH) 150 mg/m³ |
- |
Octane |
111-65-9 |
- |
- |
200 ppm
935 mg/m³ |
- |
Butyl acetic acid ester |
123-86-4 |
R10 R66 R67 |
- |
150 ppm
710 mg/m³ |
45 mg/g |
Butyl acetate |
123-86-4 |
R10 R66 R67 |
- |
150 ppm
710 mg/m³ |
- |
Ethyl acetate |
141-78-6 |
F;R11 XI;R36 R66 R67 |
- |
150 ppm
540 mg/3 |
- |
Xylene |
95-47-6, 108-38-3, 106-42-3 |
R10 XN;R20/21 XI;R38 |
- |
25 ppm (H) 109 mg/m³ |
- |
Alkyl-benzenes |
95-47-6, 108-38-3, 106-42-3 |
R10 XN;R20/21 XI;R38 |
- |
25 ppm (H) 109 mg/m³ |
1.1 mg/g |
1-butoxy-2-propanol |
5131-66-8 |
XI;R36/38 |
- |
Tentative GV on 100 ppm |
14 mg/g |
1-methoxy-2-propanol |
107-98-2 |
R10 |
- |
50 ppm
185 mg/m³ |
- |
Decane |
124-18-5 |
- |
N;R50/53 |
45 ppm
250 mg/m³ |
- |
Tetraline |
119-64-2 |
R19 XI;R36/38 N;R51/53 |
- |
Tentative GV: 25 ppm |
- |
1,3-dimethyl benzene |
108-38-3 |
R10 XN;R20/21 XI;R38 |
- |
25 ppm (H)
109 mg/m³ |
0.08 mg/g |
Hexane |
110-54-3 |
F;R11 XI;R38 XN;R48/20-65 REP3;R62 R67 N;R51/53 |
- |
25 ppm
90 mg/m³ |
- |
Cymene |
99-87-6 |
- |
N;R51/53 |
25 ppm
135 mg/m³ |
- |
2-butoxy-ethanol |
111-76-2 |
XN;R20/21/22 XI;R36/38 |
- |
20 ppm (H)
98 mg/m³ |
21 mg/g |
5-methyl-3-heptanon |
541-85-5 |
R10 XI;R36/37 |
- |
10 ppm
53 mg/m³ |
0.02 mg/g |
Acetic acid benzyl ester |
140-11-4 |
- |
- |
10 ppm
61 mg/m³ |
- |
Butylhydroxy toluene (BHT) |
128-37-0 |
- |
Xn;R22 N;R50/53 |
10 mg/m³ |
0.32 mg/g |
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) |
117-81-7 |
REP2;R60-61 |
- |
3 mg/m³ |
0.25 mg/g |
Diisooctyl 1,2-benzene dicarboxyl acid |
27554-26-3 |
- |
- |
3 mg/m³ |
2.7 mg/g |
Diethyl phthalate |
84-66-2 |
- |
- |
3 mg/m³ |
- |
Benzyl chloride |
100-44-7 |
CARC2;R45 XN;R22-48/22 T;R23 XI;R37/38-41 |
- |
1 ppm (LK)
5 mg/m³ |
0.79 mg/g |
Alkyl benzenes eg (1-methylethyl)-benzene, 1-ethyl-2-methyl-benzene |
98-82-8,
611-14-3 |
R10 XI;R37 XN;R65 N;R51/53
or no classification |
- |
20 ppm (H) 100 mg/m³ or - |
- |
Benzaldehyd |
100-52-7 |
XN;R22 |
- |
- |
0.02 mg/g |
Benzyl alcohol |
100-51-6 |
XN;R20/22 |
- |
- |
- |
Hexafluor propene |
116-15-4 |
XN;R20 XI;R37 |
- |
- |
0.16 mg/g |
Citral |
5392-40-5 |
XI;R38 R43 |
- |
- |
- |
D-Limonene |
5989-27-5 |
R10 XI;R38 R43 N;R50/53 |
- |
- |
5.6 mg/g |
Isobutane |
75-28-5 |
Fx;R12 |
- |
- |
- |
Butane |
106-97-8 |
Fx;R12 |
- |
- |
- |
Ethyl benzene |
100-41-4 |
F;R11 XN;R20 |
- |
- |
- |
2-butanon |
78-93-3 |
F;R11 XI;R36 R66 R67 |
|
- |
- |
Allyl heptanoat |
142-19-8 |
- |
Xn;R22 N;R50/53 |
- |
- |
Dimethylcyclo pentane |
2452-99-5, 1759-58-6 |
- |
Xn;R22 N;R51/53 |
- |
- |
N,N-dimethyl-1-dodecanamin |
112-18-5 |
- |
R43 N;R50/53 |
- |
0.85 mg/g |
3-caren |
13466-78-9 |
- |
N;R51/53 |
- |
0.04 mg/g |
a-Ionon |
14901-07-6 |
- |
N;R51/53 |
- |
- |
4-tert-butyl cyclohexyl acetate |
32210-23-4 |
- |
N;R51/53 |
- |
- |
1-hexadecanol or similar |
36653-82-4 |
- |
N;R51/53 |
- |
- |
Tetra decane |
629-59-4 |
- |
N;R51/53 |
- |
- |
Butyl paraben |
94-26-8 |
- |
N;R51/53 |
- |
0.03 mg/g |
β-pinene |
127-91-3 |
- |
N;R50/53 |
- |
4.0 mg/g |
Nerol acetate or geraniol acetate |
141-12-8, 16409-44-2 |
- |
N;R50/53 |
- |
- |
α-pinen |
80-56-8 |
- |
N;R50/53 |
- |
1.1 mg/g |
α-citral |
106-26-3 |
- |
R43 |
- |
- |
3-methylnonan, 2-methylnonan |
5911-04-6, 871-83-0 |
- |
N;R50/53 |
- |
- |
2-methyl octane, 3-methyl octane |
3321-61-2, 2216-33-3 |
- |
-
N;R50/53 |
- |
- |
2-(phenylmethylene)-octanal |
101-86-0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
cinnemaldehyd, α-hexyl |
101-86-0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ethyl butan acid ester |
105-54-4 |
- |
- |
- |
|
2,6-dimethyl heptane |
1072-05-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2-methyl pentane, 3-methyl pentane |
107-83-5, 96-14-0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,4-dimethyl pentane |
108-08-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,1'-oxybis-2-propanol |
110-98-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
dipropylene glycol or similar |
110-98-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-ethanol |
111-90-0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Triethylenglycol |
112-27-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Acetic acid linalool ester |
115-95-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ethyl paraben |
120-47-8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Isobornyl acetate |
125-12-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
N,N-dimethyl-1-tetradecanamin |
129-24-3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,3-dimethyl decane |
1312-44-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,6-dimethyl decane |
13150-81-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2-Propanol, 1-(2-methoxypropoxy)- |
13429-07-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5-ethyl-2-methyl-heptane |
13475-78-0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,2,4,6,6-Pentamethyl heptane |
13475-82-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2-tert-butyl cyclohexanol |
13491-79-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Dodecane acid |
143-07-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4-amino heptane |
16751-59-0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ethylcyclo pentane |
1678-91-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-ethyl-3-methyl cyclo hexane |
198489-10-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether or similar |
20324-32-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-(2-methoxy-1-methylethoxy)-2-propanol, 2-(2-hydroxyproxy)-1-propanol and similar compounds |
20324-32-7, 106-62-7, 13429-07-7 etc. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
acetic formic anhydride |
2258-42-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-ethyldecyl-benzene |
2400-00-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Diethyl phthalate |
84-66-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-methyltridecyl-benzene |
4534-59-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-methyldodecyl-benzene |
4534-53-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
p-menthan, 1,4-epoxy |
470-67-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Eucalyptol |
470-82-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,3-butandiol |
513-85-9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,3,6,7-tetramethyloctan |
52670-34-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3,3-dimethylpentan |
562-49-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Propylene glycol |
57-55-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,2-propandiol |
57-55-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,3-dimethyl hexane |
584-94-1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2-methyl hexane, 3-methyl hexane |
591-76-4, 589-34-4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,2,6-trimethyl octane |
62016-28-8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5-ethyl-2,2,3-trimethyl-heptane |
62199-06-8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,2-dimethyl butane |
75-83-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3,7-dimethyl-3-octanol linalool tetrahydrid |
78-69-3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a-LinaloolLinalool |
78-70-6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
N-methyl-N-benzyltetra-decanamin |
83690-72-6 |
- |
- |
- |
|
p-menth-1-en-8-ol |
98-55-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-(1-methylpropoxy)-butane |
999-65-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3-methylun decane |
1002-43-3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Acetic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester |
103-45-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2-ethyl-1-hexanol |
104-76-7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,2,7,7-tetramethyl octane |
1071-31-4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1-Acetonaphthon |
941-98-0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Methyl paraben |
99-76-3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
H Means that the compound is skin permeable.
L Means that the limit value is a threshold value that never must be exceeded.
Fx Extremely flammable.
F Highly flammable.
Xi Irritant.
Xn Harmful.
N Dangerous for the environment.
T Toxic.
CARC Carcinogenic (classified as carcinogenic group 1 (substances that are carcinogenic to humans), group 2 (substances that probably are carcinogenic to humans) or group 3 (substances that possibly are carcinogenic to humans).
REP Can cause heritable genetic damage (classified as reproductive toxin group 1, 2 or 3).
R10 Flammable.
R11 Highly flammable.
R12 Extremely flammable.
R19 May form explosive peroxides.
R20 Harmful by inhalation.
R20/21 Harmful by inhalation and in contact with skin.
R20/22 Harmful by inhalation and if swallowed...
R20/21/22 Harmful by inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed.
R22 Harmful if swallowed.
R23 Toxic by inhalation.
R36 Irritating to eyes .
R36/37 Irritating to eyes and respiratory system .
R36/38 Irritating to eyes and skin .
R37 Irritating to respiratory system .
R37/38 Irritating to respiratory system and skin .
R38 Irritating to skin .
R41 Risk of serious damage to eyes .
R43 May cause sensitisation by skin contact .
R45 May cause cancer .
R48/20 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation .
R48/22 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure if swallowed .
R50 Very toxic to aquatic organisms .
R50/53 Very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment .
R51/53 Toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment.
R52/53 Harmful to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment .
R60 May impair fertility .
R61 May cause harm to the unborn child .
R62 Possible risk of impaired fertility .
R65 Harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed .
R66 Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking .
R67 Vapours may cause drowsiness and dizziness .
As a starting point, products with danger classified compounds are relevant in relation to quantitative analysis of compounds in the products and in relation to the emission tests and the final health assessment. However, not all classifications are equally relevant. When selecting products for closer analysis, regard was only given to danger classifications of relevance in relation to inhalation and skin contact. Danger classifications in relation to e.g. danger of fire and environmental danger are irrelevant in relation to the investigations carried out in this project and such classifications have not been considered when selecting products for quantitative analysis.
5.4 Products and compounds selected for quantification and emission tests
As described in chapter 4 (Description of the exposure scenarios) the main ways of exposure to interior car care products are inhalation and skin contact. Product intake has not been considered. It is anticipated that consumers use gloves or wash hands immediately after application of the products, so the products are not consumed e.g. by sucking the fingers.
Even though gloves are not used when applying the products for interior car care, skin contact will presumably be minimal as the main part of the product will be on the cloth used for application. Therefore, it is expected that the most substantial way of exposure is via inhalation.
When selecting compounds for quantitative analysis, great importance was attached to products with a content of volatile substances, and compounds with a relevant health classification and/or a limit value[4].
15 products were selected for further quantitative analysis of compounds and 4 products were selected for analysis of the emission of volatile substances in the climate chamber.
The products selected for quantitative analysis are stated below. It has been taken into account that some of the products, as stated in the chapter ”Screening of compounds”, are very much alike and in some cases they might be identical.
If products are very much alike, the product was selected that contains perfume – if the product exists with as well as without perfume.
Products containing compounds with a relevant health classification and/or limit value are:
- Product 1 - Vinyl make-up
- Product 2 - Vinyl make-up
- Product 25 - Vinyl make-up
- Product 23 – Glass cleaner
- Product 24 – Glass cleaner
- Product 37 – Glass cleaner
- Product 5 – Fabric waterproofing
- Product 7 – Fabric cleaner
- Product 8 – Odour remover
- Product 10 – Vinyl cleaner
- Product 13 – Leather cleaner
- Product 40 – Cleaning tissue
- Product 33 – Anti-mist product
- Product 38 – Synthetic materials sealant
- Product 34 – Detergent.
The 4 below products were selected for the emission tests. The products were selected as there is a wide range of these products and they are believed to be the product types that are used most often. In addition, the products were selected to represent different product types and finally the below products are interesting in relation to the emission tests as they (according to screening and safety data sheets) contain large amounts of compounds with a health classification and/or a limit value.
- Product no. 1 - Vinyl make-up (many volatile substances)
- Product no. 5 – Fabric waterproofing (many volatile substances)
- Product no. 10 – Vinyl cleaner – (many volatile substances)
- Product no. 24 – Glass cleaner (several different solvents).
[4] The occupational threshold limit values have been determined either in the light of the irritative effects of the substances or in the light of the special harmful effects of the substances. The limit values have been determined to protect people who work with the substances everyday. A technical/economic assessment of the limit value level can also form part of the determination of the level (Danish Working Environment Authority, 2008) (DWEA, 2007).
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next | | Top |
Version 1.0 December 2010, © Danish Environmental Protection Agency
|