| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next |
Muligheder for økologisk spildevandshåndtering på Christiansø
Christiansø is a group of small rocky islands situated to the Northeast of Bornholm in
the Baltic, Denmark. The islands have almost no wastewater handling at present, resulting
in hygienic problems due to emptying of latrines on the surface and discharge of untreated
wastewater from households and fishing industry into a harbour with visiting tourists and
further into the Baltic. A conventional treatment plant (mechanical/biological/chemical)
has been proposed, however at high costs. The purpose of the study reported here was to
come up with other suggestions, possible leading to reduced costs and increased
sustainability. The results are based on a larger research project on sustainable
wastewater handling financed by the Danish EPA and have relevance for other small and
remote islands with no or limited wastewater handling.
Christiansø is owned by the Ministry of Defence and is not under the jurisdiction of
any county or other environmental regulatory body. Thus, it has been difficult to
determine a "required" level of wastewater treatment; any decision concerning a
future solution must be made in collaboration between the administrator in place and the
Ministry of Defence in Denmark. If no action is taken by any of these parties, the
problems remain unsolved.
The islands have about 100 residents with a maximum capacity of 135. In the summertime
(about 2 months) many visitors (regular visitors, visitors in cabins, campers and sailors)
and tourists (visiting for about 3 hours) come to the islands. In total, about 635 Pe are
present each day during the summer period. The load of nutrients (as NH4+-N
and total P) and organic matter (BOD5) is illustrated in figure 1. It is noted
that the sum of all the population groups, is 100 % for each component.
According to figure 1, the major load of nutrients and organic matter comes from the
residents (about 100 Pe) and the tourists during the summer period. Any solution should
consider this load distribution. Subsequently it is recognised that more than 50 percent
of both N and P are found in the black wastewater from the residents.

Figure 1:
The contribution of nutrients and organic matter between population groups and
wastewater type (black and grey wastewater).
The geology of Christiansø is characterized by bedrock with a thin soil layer. The
islands are preserved by a provision that comprises all life and buildings; import of
foreign plants is not permitted and there is no agriculture. These preconditions have
major impact on the possibilities for implementing solutions such as constructed wetlands
and sandfilters because of high construction costs and space demand. Also, they do not
favour solutions based on local recycling of nutrients and excreta.
With reference to a gross list of alternative options for wastewater handling and a
thorough analysis of the location, the solutions in figure 2 have been proposed for
Christiansø.
|
N |
P |
BOD5 |
kg/ year |
Degree of reduction (%) |
kg/ year |
Degree of reduction (%) |
kg/
year |
Degree of reduction (%) |
Existing
conditions |
760 |
~0 |
198 |
1 |
4024 |
13 |
Long pipe |
760 |
~0 |
198 |
1 |
4024 |
13 |
Public vacuum toilets |
526 |
31 |
152 |
24 |
3489 |
25 |
Compact plant (Actiflo**) |
624 |
18 |
30 |
85 |
402 |
91 |
Vacuum toilet / Actiflo |
431 |
43 |
23 |
89 |
349 |
92 |
Conventional treatment
plant* |
114 |
85 |
20 |
89 |
201 |
96 |
Urine separation / Actiflo |
57 |
93 |
13 |
94 |
366 |
92 |
Expected demands |
686 |
10 % |
180 |
10 % |
3242 |
30 % |
* mechanical/biological/chemical treatment (only mechanical ~ expected
demands)
** physical/chemical treatment plant with a compact layout (no biological treatment step)
Figure 2:
The load of nutrients and organic matter into the Baltic when applying the
different solutions, compared to the existing conditions.
Subsequently, mass balances have been made in order to evaluate the load on the
environment (i.e. the Baltic) by implementing the different solutions. The expected
demands are based on the present regulation (only mechanical treatment for smaller
plants - a few 100 Pe) in the county of Bornholm (same recipient, similar geological
conditions etc.).
Figure 2 shows that the solution with urine separation, as expected, is the most
effective solution towards reducing the nutrient load on the Baltic. It also shows that
all the proposed solutions (except long pipes and public vacuum toilets
alone) can fulfil the expected demands. Reducing the discharge of nutrients and
organic matter to the Baltic is however not the only issue to consider. A number of
criteria were used in order to evaluate and assess the sustainability of the different
solutions and making a decision with regard to the wastewater problem at Christiansø:
Load on the environment (based on figure 2 and assessment of transportation need)
The hygienic aspects
Operational aspects (including maintenance)
User aspects
Economy (cost of construction and operation)
Local management/administration
Robustness (flexibility towards future changes in demands and wastewater load)
Value of demonstration
These criteria were set up in a matrix with the different solutions. Subsequently, an
assessment (mostly qualitative) was made to evaluate the performance of each solution
compared to the existing conditions. The solutions were rated by ---, --, -,0,+,++,+++,
where 0 means that the solution will not lead to any change of the existing conditions.
The multi criteria analysis made it possible to put forward a recommendation on the future
wastewater handling at Christiansø.
It has, controversially, been concluded that the most sustainable solution would be
improving the existing sewage collection system and extend it with a long pipe (about 300
m) into the Baltic. This would solve the hygienic problems (i.e. emptying of latrine into
the surroundings and discharge of wastewater directly into the harbour), and the choice of
no treatment is justified by the limited pollution load to the Baltic compared
with other land-based sources from the surrounding countries. Most of the other solutions
would involve higher costs or the need for transportation of human waste products, which
would involve potential hygienic problems and increased energy consumption.
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next | | Top
| |