Phytochemical responses to herbicide exposure and effects on herbivorous insects 6. The effect of herbivory on phytochemical profileThe present experiments were conducted to test if herbivores and herbicide together cause a (consequent) change in the content of selected phenolic compounds. It was observed in Chapter 4 that UV-B-radiation in general increases the amount of phenolic compounds in F. convolvulus. Rousseaux et al. (1998) observed that herbivorous insects eat more on plants that were not exposed to UV-B radiation. If this is the case for G. polygoni it may imply that an interaction between effects of UV-B and herbivory exists. It is therefore of interest to study if such interactions exist for compounds shown to increase due to UV-B and chlorsulfuron treatment. 6.1 Materials and methodsThe effect of herbivore load was assessed by means of artificial defoliation in order to reduce the variability of the data due to for example mortality of the larvae or abnormal feeding behaviour. However, first a trial was conducted to verify that comparable responses are found in plants exposed to artificial and natural defoliation, respectively. The combined effect of herbivory and UV-B radiation was assessed in a greenhouse experiment. 6.1.1 Comparison of phytochemical responses to natural and simulated herbivoryThirty F. convolvulus plants possessing approximately five leaves each were placed in a controlled-environment-chamber administered at 20°C, 16 h photoperiod, and a relative humidity of 70%. The following day, 10 larvae were placed on each of 10 plants. Ten other plants were exposed to simulated herbivory equal to the feeding activity by 10 G. polygoni-larvae (Table 1 presents the leaf area removed during the experiment based on a pilot experiment) and another 10 plants were left without leaf damage. Both natural and simulated herbivory were initiated on the third leaf counted from the bottom of the plant. After 6 days, the damaged leaves were harvested. Those exposed to natural herbivory were gently cleaned for faecal deposits with water before they were freeze-dried singly. The other leaves were freeze-dried without further handling. Early in development, larvae are more or less aggregated. As they grow, they become more dispersed on the leaves. Therefore, the artificial defoliation was conducted as follows (Table 6.1). On day 1, only one hole was made, and thereafter the number of holes created increased to 10 on day 3 (equal to the number of larvae). Hereafter, the size of the holes increased. If specimens died or disappeared (probably dead) they were replaced with specimens of the same size and age. Table 6.1
|
Compound |
DF |
F |
p |
1 |
2 |
0.47 |
0.6389 |
2 |
2 |
0.66 |
0.5329 |
3 |
2 |
3.30 |
0.0722 |
4 |
2 |
0.49 |
0.6235 |
5 |
2 |
3.22 |
0.0759 |
6 |
2 |
0.11 |
0.8963 |
The content of all analysed compounds changed significantly in response to herbicide treatment. Compounds 1, 4 and 6 decreased significantly (Tukey-t-test), and compounds 2 and 3 increased (Table 3 and 4). Only compound 2 showed significant changes in relation to herbivory. The concentration of compound 2 decreased with increased herbivory for both sprayed and unsprayed specimens (Fig 6.1A). Compound 3 was only found in detectable concentration in sprayed plants. For the sprayed plants, the concentration decreased with increasing herbivory (Fig 6.1B).
Table 3
Statistical analyses of the impact of herbicide treatment and artificial defoliation
on the concentration of phenolic compounds (Two-way ANOVA without interactions).
Compound |
Effect |
DF |
F |
p |
1 |
Herbicide |
1 |
27.98 |
<0.0001 |
Herbivory |
3 |
1.91 |
0.1310 |
|
2 |
Herbicide |
1 |
32.92 |
<0.0001 |
Herbivory |
3 |
4.78 |
0.0076 |
|
3 |
Herbicide |
1 |
70.86 |
<0.0001 |
Herbivory |
3 |
0.32 |
0.8098 |
|
4 |
Herbicide |
1 |
25.30 |
<0.0001 |
Herbivory |
3 |
2.63 |
0.0556 |
|
6 |
Herbicide |
1 |
4.84 |
0.0339 |
Herbivory |
3 |
0.13 |
0.9441 |
Figure 6.1
Relationship between the degree of artificial defoliation and the concentrations of
compound 2 (Fig. A) and compound 3 (Fig. B). The herbivore load is artificial defoliation
equally the feeding of a specified number of G. polygoni larvae. Circles represent data
from unsprayed plants and triangles represent plants treated with chlorsulfuron at a
dosage of 0.5 times the recommended field rate. The concentration of the compounds is
given in m moles g dry weight-1. Error bars
represent Standard Error of Mean
Table 4
The effect of chlorsulfuron treatment and simulated G. polygoni herbivory on the
content of selected phenolic compounds in black bindweed (F. convolvulus). The analyses
were made on the artificially damaged third leaf counted from the bottom of the plant.
Defoliation equal to feeding by a specified number of larvae |
||||||
Com- pound |
Dosage |
0 |
10 |
20 |
40 |
|
1
|
0 |
3.0 ± 0.38 |
3.1 ± 0.56 |
3.0 ± 0.61 |
2.1 ± 0.34 |
|
0.5 |
1.9 ± 0.21 |
1.5 ± 0.19 |
1.2 ± 0.07 |
1.1 ± 0.22 |
||
2
|
0 |
3.3 ± 0.31 |
2.6 ± 0.87 |
2.8 ± 0.74 |
1.5 ± 0.27 |
|
0.5 |
10.1± 1.61 |
6.3 ± 1.87 |
7.1 ± 0.79 |
3.9 ± 0.71 |
||
3
|
0 |
0.0 ± 0.00 |
0.0 ± 0.00 |
0.0 ± 0.03 |
0.1 ± 0.06 |
|
0.5 |
9.1 ± 1.69 |
8.2 ± 2.33 |
7.8 ± 1.83 |
6.4 ± 1.54 |
||
4
|
0 |
15.2 ± 2.50 |
14.3 ± 2.48 |
11.7 " 1.78 |
9.4 ± 1.73 |
|
0.5 |
8.6 ± 1.00 |
6.9 ± 0.60 |
5.7 ± 0.58 |
5.8 ± 0.91 |
||
6
|
0 |
2.1 ± 0.52 |
2.1 ± 0.26 |
1.7 ± 0.11 |
1.9 ± 0.30 |
|
0.5 |
1.3 ± 0.23 |
1.5 ± 0.22 |
1.7 ± 0.16 |
1.7 ± 0.05 |
Two-way ANOVAs were conducted for each compound and none showed significant interactions. Therefore, test were made with main effects only (i.e. herbicide treatment and UV-B radiation).
UV-B radiation and spraying with chlorsulfuron had a significant impact on the concentration of both compound 1 (p = 0.0063 and p < 0.0001 respectively in a two-way ANOVA) (Fig. 6.2) and compound 2 (p = 0.0091 and p = 0.0005; two-way ANOVA). Spraying caused a lower concentration of compound 1, but the two herbicide dosages were not different (p > 0.05; Tukey). However, the concentration was higher in plants exposed to UV-B radiation than in control plants. For compound 2, only the highest spray dosage caused a significant increase compared to the control (p < 0.05; Tukey t-test). The UV-B-radiation caused higher concentrations in exposed plants.
Compounds 3 and 4 were not affected by UV-B radiation (p = 0.0824 and p = 0.0890 respectively; two-way ANOVA). Herbicide treatment affected the concentration of compound 3 (p = 0.0074; two-way ANOVA). There was a tendency to reduced concentration of compound 4 with increasing herbicide treatment.
Exposure to UV-B radiation and herbicide spraying with chlorsulfuron had no effect on the concentration of compound 5 (p = 0.3901; p = 0.1016; two-way ANOVA).
UV-B-radiation had a significant effect on the concentration of compound 6 (p = 0.0012; two-way ANOVA). The concentration was higher in UV-B treated plants. Spraying with chlorsulfuron did not change the concentration of compound 6 (p = 0.1167; two-way ANOVA).
The phytochemical response of the plants exposed to herbicide and to UV-B radiation showed the same trends as described for in Chapter 4, except that the herbicide caused a decrease in compound 4. The difference may be due to differences in timing of harvesting.
The absolute concentration of compound 2 was high in the experiment with UV-B radiation compared to the previously presented data from controlled environmental chambers. The first experiment was conducted in the greenhouse, which both have higher temperature fluctuations and probably also experience higher light intensities. The content of the phenolic compounds in this study with UV-exposure and herbivory were comparable to the UV study without herbivory (Table 4.6). It was also found that the levels for the phenolic compounds in the experiment with artificial defoliation were comparable to the control plants with herbivores in the "UV-B experiment", except again for compound 4 (Table 6.3 and Figure 6.1).
Figure 6.2
Relationship between herbicide dosage, UV-B radiation and the content of selected
phenolic compounds. The open symbols represent plants were unexposed to UV-B radiation and
closed symbols represent UV-B exposed plants. Bars represent standard error of mean.
It was the aim of this study to find if any of the selected compounds increased with herbicide dosage and herbivore load. No such combination was found. However, if we should proceed along the working hypothesis that phenolic compounds elicit the observed effects only two compounds are likely candidates i.e. compounds 2 and 3, which increase with herbicide treatment.