Kortlægning af kemiske stoffer i forbrugerprodukter, Nr. 86 2007 – Kortlægning og sundhedsmæssig vurdering af kemiske stoffer i deodoranter

Kortlægning og sundhedsmæssig vurdering af kemiske stoffer i deodoranter

7 Referencer

1. Uter W et al. Patch testing with patients’ own cosmetics and toiletries- results of the IVDK 1998-2002. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53(4):226-33

2. Johansen JD. Contact allergy to fragrances: clinical and experimental investigations of the fragrance mix and its ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 2002: suppl 3:46:1-31

3. (http://www.miljoeogsundhed.dk/default.aspx?node=5233)

4. Miljøministeriets bekendtgørelse om kosmetiske produkter. Bekendtgørelse Nr. 74 af 14. januar 2005.

5. (http://www.spt.dk/media//dk/Statistik/
Branchestatistik%201%20halvår05.pdf)

6. Rastogi SC, et al. Deodorants on the European Market: quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 38: 29-35.

7. Haslund Jørgensen P, Devantier Jensen C, Rastogi S, Andersen K, Johansen JD. Experimental elicitaion with hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde-containing deodorants. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 146-150.

8. Svedman C, Bruze M, Johansen JD, Goossens A, Frosch P, Lepoittevin J-P, Rastogi, SC, White I, Menné T. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48:217-223.

9. Bruze M, Johansen JD, Andersen KE et al. Deodorants: An experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003:48:194-200

10. Bruze M, Johansen JD, Andersen KE et al. Deodorants: An experimental provocation study with isoeugenol 2005:52:260-267

11. Rastogi S.C. (1993) Sample preparation for gas chromatographic analysis of organic solvents in aerosol cans. Chromatographia 36: 201-203

12. Miljøstyrelsen, Kortlægning nr. 8 – 2002: Indholdet af udvalgte duftstoffer i rengøringsprodukter og andre forbrugerprodukter

13. Miljøstyrelsen, Kortlægning nr. 24 – 2003: Antibakterielle midler i beklædningsgenstande

14. Johansen JD, Andersen TF, Kjøller M, Veien N et al. Identification of risk

products for fragrance contact allergy: a case-referent study based on patients’ histories. Amercian Journal of Contact Dermatitis 1998:9:80-87.

15. Uter W, Balzer C, Geier J, Schnuch A, Frosch p. Ergebnisse der epikutantestung mit patienteneigenen Parfüms, Deos und Rasierwassern. Dermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt 2005:53:25-36.

16. Hotchkiss SAM. Absorption of fragrance ingredients using in vitro models. In Fragrances. Beneficial and adverse effects. Eds. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, White IR. Springerverlag 1998:125-135

17. Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI. Absorption of some organic compounds trough the skin in man. J Invest Derm 1969:54:339-404

18. Felter S, Ryan CA, Basketter DA, Gilmour NJ, Gerberick FG. Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2003:37:1-10.

19. Edman B. The influence of shaving method on perfume allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1994:31:291-292

20. Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Bruze M, Andersen KE, Frosch P et al. Deodorants: a clinical provocation study in fragrance-sensitive individuals. Contact Dermatitis 1998:39:161-165

21. von Peter C, Hoting E. Anwendungstest mit parfümierten Kosmetika bei Patienten mit positivem Epikutantest auf Duftstoff-Mischung. Dermatosen 1993:41:237-241.

22. Friedmann PS. The immunology of allergic contact dermatitis: the DNCB story. Adv Dermatol 1990:5:175-9

23. Robinson MK, Gerberick GF, Ryan C, McNamee P, White, Basketter DA. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 2000:42:251-259.

24. The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and non-Food Products Intended for Consumers. The SCCNFP’s notes of guidance for testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation. 5^th revision. Adopted by the SCCNFP during the 25^th plenary meeting of 20 October 2003.

25. Cadby PA, Troy WR, Vey MGH. Consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients: providing estimates for safety evaluation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2002:246-252

26. Loretz L, Api AM, Barraj L et al. Exposure data for personal care products: hairspray, spray perfume, liquid foundation, shampoo, body wash, and solid antiperspirant. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2006:44:2008-2018.

27. Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menné T. Allergic contact dermatitis in Humans - experimental and quantative aspects. In Contact Dermatitis eds. Frosch PJ, Menné T, Lepoittevin JP. Springer 4. ed 2006: kap 13: 189-200.

28. IFRA. IFRA code and standards. http://www.ifraorg.org/GuideLines.asp

29. White IR. Fragrances – future aspects. Beneficial and adverse effects. Eds.

Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, White IR. Springerverlag 1998:216-225

30. Menne T, Wahlberg JE; European
Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Risk assessment failures of chemicals commonly used in consumer products. Contact Dermatitis 2002:46(4):189-90

31. Gerberick FG, Robinson MK, Felter S, White IR, Basketter D. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis 2001:45:333-340

32. Kimber I, Basketter DA, Butler M, Gamer A, Garrigue JL, Gerberick GF,

Newsome C, Steiling W, Vohr HW. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. Food Chem Toxicol 2003:41:1799-809.

33. Basketter DA, Andersen KE, Liden
C, Van Loveren H, Boman A, Kimber I, Alanko K, Berggren E. Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation.
Contact Dermatitis  2005:52:39-43.

34.   Fischer LA, Menné T, Johansen JD. Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds – a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 57-64.

35.  Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, Menné T, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Goossens A, Lepoittevin JP, White IR (2002). Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. I. Reactivity to 14 frequently used chemicals. Contact Dermatitis 47:78-85

36. Frosch PJ, Rastogi SC, Pirker C, Brinkmeier T, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Svedman C, Goossens A, White IR, Uter W, Giménez Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Johansen JD, Menné T. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix – reactivity to the single constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52:216-25

37. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A et al (2002). LyralÒ has been included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 46:295-297

38. www.videncenterforallergi.Nationale allergital for 2005/2006

39. Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Svedman C, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Pirker C, Menné T. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde – known as Lyral. Quantitative aspects and risk assessment of an important fragrance allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2003:48:310-16.

40. Belsito DV, Fowler JF Jr, Sasseville D,
Marks JG Jr, De Leo VA, Storrs FJ. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to fragrance materials in a select North American population. Dermatitis 2006:17:23-8.

41.   SCCNFP. Opinion of The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for Consumers concerning hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. Adopted 9. December 2003

42. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, Frosch PJ, Uter W; IVDK. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK.Contact Dermatiti. 2004 Feb;50(2):65-76

43. Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Andersen KE, Burrows D,
Camarasa JG, Dooms-Goossens A, Ducombs G,
Fuchs T, Hannuksela M, Lachapelle JM, et al. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes.Contact Dermatitis 1995:33:333-342.

44. Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Menné T. Exposure to selected fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 1996:34:106-110.

45. Suskind RR. The hydroxycitronellal story: what can we learn from it? In Fragrances. Beneficial and adverse effects. Eds. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, White IR. Springerverlag 1998:159-165

46. EU-commission. Public consultation on perfumery materials in the framework of council directive 76/768/EEC relative to cosmetic products.

       http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/
committees/sccp/documents/out93_en.pdf

47. White JML, Fleming J, Buckley D, White IR, McFadden JP. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is not decreasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005. Contact Dermatitis 2006:55:27

48. Tanaka S, Royds C, Buckley D, Basketter DA,
Goossens A, Bruze M, Svedman C, Menne T,
Johansen JD, White IR, McFadden JP. Contact allergy to isoeugenol and its derivatives: problems with allergen substitution.
Contact Dermatitis. 2004:51:288-91

49. Cocchiara J, Letizia CS, Lalko J, Lapczynski A, Api AM. Fragrance material review on cinnamaldehyde. Food Chem Toxicol. 2005;43:867-923.

50. Buckley DA, Wakelin SH, Seed PT,
Holloway D, Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP. The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17-year period. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142(2):279-83.

51. Johansen JD, Menné T. The fragrance mix and its constituents- a 14 year material. Contact Dermatitis 1995:32:18-23.

52. Weibel H, Hansen J, Andersen KE. Cross-sensitization patterns in guinea pigs. Acta Derm Venereol 1989:69:302-7

53. Elahi EN, Wright Z, Hinselwood D et al. Protein binding and metabolism influence the relative skin sensitization potential of cinnamic compounds. Chem Res Toxicol 2004:17:301-10

54. Smith CK, Moore CA, Elahi EN, Smart AT, Hotchkiss SA. Human skin absorption and metabolism of the contact allergens, cinnamic aldehyde and cinnamic alcohol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2000:168:189-99

55. Letizia CS, Cocchiara J, Lalko J, Lapczynski A, Api AM. Fragrance material review on cinnamyl alcohol. Food Chem Toxicol 2005:43:837-66.

56. Buckley DA, Basketter DA, Smith Pease CK,
Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP. Simultaneous sensitivity to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 2006:154:885-8.

57. Bickers D, Calow P, Greim H, Hanifin JM, Rogers AE, Saurat JH, Sipes IG, Smith RL, Tagami H; The RIFM expert panel. A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid when used as fragrance ingredients. Food Chem Toxico. 2005:43:799-836

58. Vølund A. Potency evaluation of contact allergens. Statistical appendix. Nordiske Seminar og Arbejdsrapporter 1993:570:83-107

59. Basketter D, Clapp, C, Jefferies D. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds. Contact Dermatitis 2005:53:260-267

60. Felter S, Robinson, Basketter D, et al. A review of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment for the induction og allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2002:47:257-266

61. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Frosch P. Contact allergy to farnesol in 2021 consecutively patch tested patients. Results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 2004:50:117-121

62. Matura M, Skold M, Borje A, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Frosch P, Goossens A, Johansen JD, Svedman C, White IR, Karlberg AT. Not only oxidized R-(+)- but also S-(-)-limonene is a common cause of contact allergy in dermatitis patients in Europe. Contact Dermatitis 2006 55:274-279.

62. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ. Sensitization to 26 fragrances to be labelled according to current European regulation. Contact Dermatitis 2007:57:1-10

63. Matura M, Skold M, Borje A, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Frosch P, Goossens A, Johansen JD, Svedman C, White IR, Karlberg AT. Selected oxidized fragrance terpenes are common contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2005:52:320-328.

64. Bernard G, Gimenez-Arnau E, Rastogi SC, Heydorn S, Johansen JD, Menne T, Goossens A, Andersen K, Lepoittevin JP. Contact allergy to oak moss: search for sensitizing molecules using combined bioassay-guided chemical fractionation, GC-MS, and structure-activity relationship analysis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2003;295:229-235. Epub 2003 Sep 16.

65. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Svedman C, Bruze M, Bernard G, Gimenez-Arnau E, Rastogi SC, Lepoittevin JP, Menne T. Chloroatranol, an extremely potent allergen hidden in perfumes: a dose-response elicitation study. Contact Dermatitis 2003 49:180-184.

66. Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products (SCCP). Opinion on Atranol and Chloroatranol present in natural extracts (e.g. oak moss and tree moss extract). Adopted by the SCCP during the 2^nd plenary meeting of 7 december 2004.

67. de Groot AC, Frosch PJ. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review.
Contact Dermatitis 1997:36(2):57-86

68. Johansen JD, Skov L, Volund A, Andersen K, Menne T. Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: a study of fragrance-sensitized individuals. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139(2):264-270.

69. Roed-Petersen J, Auken G, Hjorth N. Contact sensitivity to Irgasan DP 300. Contact Dermatitis 1975:1:293-294

70. Geier J, Lessmann H, Becker D et al. Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids: results of a multicentre study with a second series. Contact Dermatitis 2006:55:322-329.

71. Perrenoud D, Bircher A, Hunziker T et al. Frequency of sensitization to 13 common preservatives in Switzerland. Swiss Contact Dermatitis Group. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:276-279

72. Wahlberg JE. Routine patch testing with Irgasan DP 300. Contact Dermatitis 1976:2:292

73. Hindson T. Irgasan DP 300 in a deodorant. Contact Dermatitis 1975:1:328

74. Steinkjer B, Braaten LR. Contact dermatitis from triclosan (Irgasan DP 300). Contact Dermatitis 1988:18:243-244

75. Veronesi S, Padova MP, Vanni D, Melino M. Contact Dermatitis to triclosan. Contact Dermatitis 1986:15:257-58

76. Wong CSM, Beck MH. Allergic contact dermatitis from triclosan in antibacterial handwashes. Contact Dermatitis 2001:45:307

77. Zaugg T, Hunziker T. Germall II and triclosan. Contact Dermatitis 1987:17:262

78. Hasan T, Rantanen T, Alanko K, Harvima RJ, Jolanki R, Kalimo K, et al. Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland – a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 2005:53:40-45.

79. Campell L, Zirwas MJ. Triclosan. Dermatitis 2006:17:204-7.

80. Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Camarasa JM, Diepgen TL, Ducombs G, Frosch PJ, Goossens A, Lachappelle JM, Lahti A, Menne T, Seidenari S, Tosti A, Wahlberg JE. Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991-2000). Contact Dermatitis 2002 :46:207-10.