Varedistribuering i Århus City Summary
The traffic related problems in Danish urban areas are increasing due to the growth in the motorised traffic. Freight transport in urban areas make up a significant share of the traffic and hence of the total environmental impact. Several analyses have shown that a large share of the urban freight transport is environmentally inefficient, indicating a large need for rationalisation. Data CollectionOn this background the Municipality of Aarhus has supported by the City Traffic Project of The Danish Environmental Protection Agency carried out a project with the purpose to map out in detail the freight distribution in specific streets and to establish suggestions for a rationalisation of the freight distribution. The survey comprised a registration of the physical conditions, a license plate based survey, interviews with drivers and a registration of deliveries to each shop. As a supplement to these street surveys, interviews with manufacturers, distributors and shopkeepers were also carried out. One of the most significant results of the surveys was a remarkable surplus of capacity in relation to the transported amounts of goods. In the area of the survey the daily amount of delivered goods was about 13.6 tons. For this purpose a number of 333 trucks was used with a total tonnage of 2000 tons. Theoretically, the goods could be delivered by only 16 small trucks. PartnersThe central area in a major city is characterised by a lot of people attracted by functions in a small geographical area. There are shops, restaurants and other functions, attracting many customers and demanding constant supplies of goods. At the same time, there is a wish of the society to carry out the necessary transport activities as efficient as possible, in order to minimise the environmental impacts of the transport. In the actual project four main parties have been identified as having essential interests in the freight distribution. These are the society (national authorities), the city, the distributors and the shopkeepers. Several other parties are influenced by the distribution but do not have the same opportunities to change it, e.g. suppliers, drivers, shop customers and residents in the area. The interested parties have different aims and interests; hence a rationalisation of the freight istribution requires co-operation and common understanding among the various groups of partners. ImpactsThe most dominant negative impacts of the freight distribution can be summarised under the headlines energy consumption, environmental impacts and economy. These are directly influencing the interested parties mentioned above. Further, a number of impacts are influencing working environment, safety and traffic relations. These impacts are mainly influencing the other parties, who are not active partners in the freight distribution. The main interest of the society is the global environment, i.e. a reduction of the CO2 emission. Therefore, on a national level the main focus is on the energy consumption. The municipality on the other hand emphasises the local environment, whilst the other partners are mainly focusing on economic aspects. The project has been aimed at the primary interested parties. Therefore the other interested parties and their impacts are only mentioned briefly. Main problemsThe surveys of the freight distribution revealed several conditions influencing the efficiency of the freight distribution. The major problems are:
On the other hand some prejudices have been broken down. Contrary to the expected results the trucks have shown to be rather new, the engine running at idle speed is limited and the trucks do not come from far away. Improvement measuresPrevious projects regarding urban freight transport have mainly been focusing on the distributors as they carry out the transport and thus have the best opportunities to change the conditions. The distributors, however, have often emphasised that the other parties involved should play a more active role to solve the problems related to the distribution. Each partner has a series of improvement measures as listed below: The society's measures
The city's measures
The distributors' measures
The shopkeepers' measures The shopkeepers' improvement measures are:
The main conclusion of the survey is that there are to many vans and trucks in the City area in relation to the amounts of goods. The solution is to reduce the number of trucks, while the amounts of goods remain the same, which implies a higher use of capacity for each truck. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency and the Municipality of Aarhus have selected the following possible concrete solutions for reaching this goal:
"Environmental zone" This solution requires a certain amount of control and administration, but experiences gained from a similar solution in Copenhagen might be useful. An "environmental zone" reduces the number of trucks in the zone and thus provides a little improvement with regard to air pollution. Transport coordination on a voluntary basis The company is established as a pure administration company without own trucks or terminals. These services are to be provided by existing companies. Results from a project in Aalborg, financed by the Danish Transport Council, indicate that significant reductions of emissions can be obtained through a coordination of transport on a voluntary basis. Tenders for freight distribution. As the third and last solution, it is suggested that the shopkeepers invite fortenders for all freight distribution in a limited area of the city. The distribution company, which wins the tender, is obligated to take care of distribution of all kinds of goods in the area, using environment friendly vehicles. This solution implies that the producers of goods accept their goods to be picked up and delivered by the distribution company. The shopkeepers must accept to have fewer deliveries with larger consignments. It must be possible for other distributors to obtain a permission under special circumstances, for example when delivering express goods. It is assumed that this solution will have the most significant environmental impacts. The three solutions are summarised as follows: Table 1. Look here! |