| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next |
Sustainable Handling of Human Urine and Faeces in
Allotment Gardens
Summary
This project gathers user experience concerning the establishing and running of 89
diverting/no-mixing toilet systems without water flush for separate collection of human
urine and human faeces in allotment gardens.
Further, the measurements of chemical and microbiological parameters of the collected
urine are discussed.
It has not been possible to achieve a permit to use human urine as fertilizer in the
individual allotment gardens.
The introduction describes the background for the Danish Allotment Garden
Associationīs interest in testing diverting/no-mixing toilets without water flush, as an
alternative to both chemical abd water flushing toilets with sewer or collection tanks.
The Danish Allotment Garden Association wished to test the toilets as well as the handling
of human urine and human faeces in the individual gardens. The Association was inspired by
the positive experience gained during practical the use of diverting/no-mixing toilets
without water flush in Landskrona in Sweden. The Swedish rules permit use of human urine
as well as composted faeces as fertilizer in the individual garden.
The history of the Danish allotment gardens and their organization is presented. The
allotment garden movement has for a long time been an important part of the Danish
everyday life. Allotment gardeners are known far outside the Danish borders for their
pleasant lifestyle and for their great creativity by few means. This lifestyle is hampered
by the more and more regulated society.
Chapter 2 reports on ten participating local associations in the three municipalities
Ballerup, Herlev and Slagelse. The participating associations in Ballerup municipality
were Brøndgården, Hestholm, Højvænge, Kildegården, Rønhøjgård,
Stuvehøjgård and Tjørnebjerg. In the municipality of Herlev the following
local associations participated: Klausdalsbro and Nyvang, and finally Østervang
from the municipality of Slagelse.
In chapter 3 a short introduction to traditions related to the handling of human waste
products/residuals is given. The chapter continues with a short characterization of human
urine and faeces. Furthermore, the handling of urine and faeces in the project is
described. The planned usage of human urine as fertilizer was not possible, due to
existing regulation of the disposal of waste products. Existing rules on current burying
of urine and composting and burying or direct burying of faeces are mentioned. Swedish
recommendations regarding handling of human urine in e.g. allotment gardens are presented.
In chapter 4 earlier investigations on the subject are discussed. Some investigations
concerning source uniting composting toilet systems and source uniting dry closets have
been made, although only limited experience has been described regarding source diverting/
no-mixing dry closets.
Chapter 5 describes the eight different types of diverting dry closets and the two
urine containers among which the participants in the project could choose. A description
is then given of the sampling, the measuring program and parameters to be investigated.
The parameters included nutrients, heavy metals, organic compounds as well as
microbiological parameters.
The methods used to collect user experiences are described. The ten allotment garden
associations are classified by numbers and sizes of the gardens. Garden sizes were
generally 390 400 m2. The age and the sex of the users, and distribution among the
allotment gardens, are stated. 80 allotment garden houses have altogether 176 permanent
users, slightly more women than men. 27 permanent users were under 18 years of age, and 13
of those were under the age of six. Answering a questionnaire, 34 participating gardens
responded that they used the allotment garden 60 230 days a year. The gardens were
in average used 145 days a year. Further the chapter focuses on the toilets previously
used in the allotment garden houses. The most commonly used toilet was a chemical toilet.
55 out of 81 toilets had been chemical.
Finally, figures for water consumption are given. Very few allotment gardens have water
meters. The water consumption, including water for garden irrigation, was 4 20 m3
in five allotment gardens, with an average of 11 m3/garden.
The final choices of toilets by the participants are stated in chapter 6. Most
frequently a "Separett Weekend", 37 out of 89, was chosen.
Chapter 7 shows that 80 participants preferred 25-litre urine containers and only 9 the
big 220-litre containers.
In chapter 8 the 10 households delivering urine mixture for sampling and analysis are
described. The households are described with relation to numbers of permanent users, age,
sex, type of toilet, urine container, efficiency of the source diverting system and the
frequency of emptying the urine container. The results of the chemical and microbiological
analysis are presented.
The urine mixture was highly concentrated, with a concentrations of 5,400 mg N, 360 mg
P and 1,100 mg K per liter. The concentrations of heavy metals were very low, much below
the limit values given in the sludge directive, and also much lower than the contents
found in other organic fertilizers. The concentrations of the investigated organic
compounds were also low, much lower than the limit values.
There were no findings of bacterial infectious matters, such as Campylobacter or
Salmonella or parasitic infectious matters such as Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia
duodenalis or other intestinal parasites, in the urine mixture from any of the 10
households. Amounts of thermotolerant coliforms were already during the first sampling
below the detection level (10 cfu/100 ml) for 9 of the 10 urine mixtures. The sample in
which thermotolerant coliforms could be detected was below the detection level at the
second analysis approximately one month after sampling in the allotment garden. Amounts of
enterococcus were below detection level (10 cfu/100 ml) for five of the urine mixtures at
the second analysis approximately one month after sampling. At the third analysis
approximately two months after sampling additional four samples were below detection
levels. In the last urine mixture the amount of enterococcus was not detectible at the
fourth analysis after approximately three months. pH was from 8.8 9.2.
Results of the investigations of user experience gained with establishing and running
the toilet systems are presented in chapter 9. Experience from installation and running of
81 toilet systems are reported. Installation of toilets, ventilation systems, and urine
systems with 25-litre containers, was generally quite easy. To dig down 220-litre
containers required more work and efforts. Experience from the running of the faeces
system, the urine system and the ventilation system are reported. The experience gained
was been positive.
The comfort of sitting on the toilets was reported in only positive terms by 63 users
(nine users had provided foot stools on their own). All of the participants using toilet
models with sitting heights of 40, 42 and 46 cm were satisfied. More different opinions
were expressed regarding sitting heights of 49, 50 and 53 cm without stools, 18 of these
users would prefer a stool.
The function of diversion of the urine to the urine collecting system was only reported
inconvenient by two women. However, it is reported that 11 women had to get acquainted
with and adjusted to the system in order to achieve a god diverting functioning. Men and
children at the age of seven or older had no problems. Experience with children under the
age of seven was varied. 5 out of 24 children found it difficult to divert properly. The 5
children were: a 15-month-old boy, three girls of three and a half, four and five years
and a child at the age of six with unspecified sex. 7 children at the age of 5 or less
managed fine.
3 out of 77 users only reported cleaning of the toilets as slightly difficult or
difficult. The rest of the participants found cleaning to be trouble free. Regarding
problems with noise, only 1 participant could occasionally hear an irritating sound from a
19 W fan. Nobody with fans had problems with smell in the toilet room. Some users without
fans could experience some smell problems, but not enough to make them install a
ventilation system. 2 users had big problems with flies, but the problems were solved by
means of continuous running of the fan, as prescribed in the manual, and by use of a fly
net at the end of the ventilation system and on the inlet to the urine container.
Reported experience with the handling of urine and faeces showed no problems concerning
urine and 76 of 77 users characterized emptying of the faeces container as unproblematic.
One participant found the smell unpleasant but acceptable. The frequencies of emptying the
faeces container are reported for the different models. The frequencies were from every
three to six days, to once a season depending on toilet model, size of the household and
use of the toilet.
Generally the interviewed participants characterized their impression of the toilet
system as positive or very positive.
49 participants had positive or very positive reactions from guests, neighbours or
others. 3 participants had seen negative reactions. 26 participants proposed amendments, 9
participants with sitting heights of 50 cm or more would prefer lower sitting height.
Conclusions
Diverting/no-mixing toilets were installed in 89 allotment gardens in the
municipalities of Ballerup, Herlev and Slagelse. The purpose was to allow the users to
evaluate the system regarding installation, diverting, usage, cleaning, emptying, and
possible inconveniences. A broadrepresentative section of the inhabitants participated in
the tests. The users were very positive and only had very few problems; all of them were
solved during the project. Installation, cleaning and emptying of the toilets are
considered easy to manage. One user had problems with installation of a 220-litre
container due to high ground water level.
The daily use of the toilets is without problems, but some women find it difficult to
hit the urine bowl. After a period of training, only two women still had problems.
Inconveniences like flies, noise and smell were negligible and the users solved the few
problems themselves. There has been some smell problems at special wind directions, at
five of the users who had decided to take the ventilation out of the wall instead of up
through and over the roof. Only two users considered the problem big enough to make it
worth changing the ventilation system.
The collected urine was very concentrated due to limited use of water. At the same time
the concentrations of heavy metals and organic compounds were far under the limit values
given in the sludge directive. The collected urine is well suited as a fertilizer.
In the analysis of the collected urine mixture no bacterial or parasitic infectious
microorganisms were found. The following species were investigated: Campylobacter, Salmonella,
Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia duodenalis and other intestinal parasites.
Thermotolerant coliform bacteria were only present in one of the 10 samples from the 10
different urine containers and disappeared after one month. The amount of enterococcus is
below the detection level for this urine mixture after three months of storage.
Usage of stored human urine, as a fertilizer, seems to involve a very small risk for
bacterial-related stomach intestinal infections to animals and human beings by handling of
human urine and by consumption of crops fertilized with human urine (Dalsgaard &
Tarnow 2001).
The test of diverting/no-mixing toilets in the allotment gardens was a great success,
and the systems are excellent alternatives to traditional systems. The advantages by
establishing diverting toilets above solutions with sewers are among others water savings
and recycling of nutrients. Furthermore, considerable economical advantages are achieved
for the allotment gardens, compared to installation of much more expensive solutions with
sewers. The results from the microbiological analysis indicate that the urine can be used
as a fertilizer in the garden instead of being dug down.
| Front page | | Contents | | Previous | | Next | | Top
| |